• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.27-38
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study was to develop a test of a creative problem solving (CPS) for the selection of gifted science students in elementary school. For this, the methods and procedures of the selection of gifted science students was investigated through the internet homepages 23 gifted science education centers of universities and 16 city. province offices of education. The results of this study were as follows: Most of the gifted science students were selected through a multi-step examination process. They were selected on the basis of their records by recommendation of a principal or a classroom teacher in their school, by operation of standardized tests (ex. intelligence quotient score, achievements in science and mathematics, interest and attitude/aptitude for science as well as through other means), as well as through intensive observation of those gifted science students who are selected by interview and oral tests. The selection of gifted students was not evaluated through creativity testing; giftedness in city. province office of education. Testing of CPS was found to be especially lacking in these organizations. For the development of the test items of CPS in science, the five elements were extracted through the framework for the content analysis of the CPS: problem exploration, problem statement, solution thinking, experiment design, and assesment. In addition, suggestions were made regarding an appropriate scoring system for the test of the CPS. As the result of the developed test was applied to the 4th grade of the gifted and general student, we found that gifted students were superior to general students. In conclusion, it was that the CPS test developed in this study should be used to evaluate the CPS for the selection of gifted students.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.117-139
• /
• 2012

이 연구의 목적은 Peer Instruction 수업을 통해 문항의 난이도에 따른 과학영재의 인지갈등의 특성을 알아보고, 일반 학생들의 인지갈등 정도와 비교 분석하였다. 서울시와 경기도 소재 교육청 부설 영재교육원 과학영재학생 49명, 일반 중학교 학생 71명을 대상으로 빛의 직진 및 합성에 관한 개념 검사에 대해 동료 토론 전 후의 인지갈등 검사를 실시하였다. 과학영재는 인지적 재평가 요인 측면에서는 문항의 난이도와 관계없이 동료와의 토론 후 유의미하게 인지갈등이 감소했다. 과학 영재는 동료에 대한 신뢰가 높은 편이었으며 동료와 토론하는 동안 자신의 개념을 동료에게 설명하면서 머릿속의 개념을 명료화할 수 있고 반성적 사고를 하게 되므로 갈등이 해소되어 인지갈등이 감소한 것으로 나타났다. 문항의 난이도가 높아질수록 과학영재는 일반학생과 같이 동료 토론 전에 불안 정도가 높았지만, 일반학생에 비해 그 불안 정도는 낮았고, 동료 토론 후에 불안 정도는 통계적으로 유의미하게 감소함을 알 수 있었다. 과학영재의 인지갈등변화를 분석한 결과를 바탕으로 과학영재의 학습자 특성을 고려한 다양한 인지갈등 전략의 개발과 적용이 필요하다는 것을 알 수 있다. 또한 과학영재를 위한 개념검사 문항을 개발할 때, 문항의 난이도에 대한 고려 사항에서 본 연구의 결과는 시사하는 바가 크다고 할 수 있다.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.294-305
• /
• 2011

본 연구에서는 과학영재학생들과 일반학생의 행동특성 차이를 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 과학영재 40명(남 27명, 여 13명)과 일반학생 38명(남 21명, 여 17명)을 연구의 대상으로 선정하고, 논리적 사고력, 과학탐구능력, 창의력, 지구과학창의력, 과학적 태도, 자기주도적 학습능력, 인지양식을 검사하였다. 그 결과 첫째, 과학영재들은 94.74%, 일반학생은 36.36%가 형식적 조작기에 도달해 있다. 둘째, 과학영재들은 일반학생보다 과학탐구능력 8.11점, 창의력 8.27점, 지구과학창의력 6.73점, 과학적 태도 10.79점, 자기주도적 학습능력 21.66점 높게 나타났다. 셋째, 과학영재의 약 70.0%와 일반학생의 약 60.53%가 장독립적인 사고를 하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 본 연구의 결과는 과학영재교육의 본질과 효율성 극대화를 위해 과학영재의 높은 행동 특성이 반영되어야 함을 의미한다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.51-60
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to investigate gifted students' verbal-nonverbal interactions in small grouped classes and to classify them into characteristics. For this study, an instrument to measure gifted student's verbal-nonverbal interactions was developed. The subjects were 16 students of 5th and 6th grades at H-area gifted center in rural area. Video recorded was classified each 5minutes by researchers. The results were as follows; First, verbal interactions were about 27% and non-verbal interactions were about 73%. Activities unrelated to learning were about 20%. Second, high achievement gifted students enjoyed verbal interactions including discussions. Third, gifted students can be classified 3 types(Spoken-centered, Written-centered and Played-centered) by interactions. The results revealed that gifted student's verbal-nonverbal interactions played an important role in communication between students and teacher as well as students. Small-grouped instructions according to characteristic and levels of gifted students are needed in gifted science education.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.110-118
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study was to compare the career awareness and social contribution consciousness between the elementary science gifted students and the general students. For this, survey was taken by 201 gifted students and 216 general students. Methods used are Cronbach alpha, frequency, percentage, independent t-test and Pearson's correlation coefficient. The results are as follows : 1. The gifted students have higher career awareness than the general students. The gifted students recognize their own interests, aptitudes and talents which they are concerned. 2. The gifted students have higher social contribution consciousness than the another. This shows that the gifted students have desire to be respected and positive view of social contribution. 3. There is a positive correlation between career awareness and the social contribution consciousness. According to the past studies, students' household economic status affect their view or grade which they get.. Based on these results, we suggest that a development of educational program for career awareness and social contribution consciousness which can improve gifted students' social responsibility consciousness is necessary.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2003

The present study examined gender differences between science-gifted students and general students in creative thinking, personality, environment and performance in science. Subjects were 171 eighth grade students, 66 gifted in science and 105 general students. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Stepwise Multiple Regression. Sex differences between the science-gifted and general students were found only in several subcategories of the dependent variables. The most critical predictors of creative performance in science were the title abstraction factor in gifted boys and general girls, and the resistance of enclosing factor in general boys.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.219-227
• /
• 2004

This study aims to investigate science teaching and learning for the gifted in comparison with regular classrooms in elementary schools. A questionnaire was developed to survey gifted and general students＇ perceptions to elementary science teaching and teaming with employing a teaching and learning model for the gifted by Maker and Neilson (1995, 1996). The 28 item questionnaire consisted of four categories of content, teaching and teaming process, student product, and learning environment, and each category included six to nine items. Randomly selected 114 students from gifted classes and 99 students for regular classes responded to the questionnaire through the use of five-point Likert scale. It was found that there are significant differences between gifted and regular classes of science at all four categories of the teaching and learning model for the gifted. Therefore, science teaching and teaming for the gifted seemed to be differentiated from regular classes and emphasized students＇ creativity. However, no differences were appeared in a few items: study of gifted people and research methods (gifted=3.0; regular=.21 F=2.54), students＇ freedom of choice for topics of lessons, tasks, etc., (gifted=3.1; regular=3.0, F=0.31), student product addressed to real audience (gifted=2.8, regular=2.6, F=0.96), and students＇ high mobility to seek for data in library, etc. during class periods (gifted=2.3, regular= 2.3, F=0.01). It was concluded that science education for the gifted in Korea calls for quality improvement in terms of teaching and teaming in various aspects.

• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제39권3호
• /
• pp.307-320
• /
• 2015

본 연구에서는 영재교육기관별 초등과학영재와 일반학생의 회복탄력성과 과제집착력을 비교하고 회복탄력성과 과제집착력은 어떤 상관이 있는지 탐색하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이 연구를 위하여 교육지원청부설영재교육원 초등학생 6학년 55명, 단위학교의 영재학급 초등학생 6학년 77명, 그리고 초등과학영재와 같은 지역의 초등학교 일반학생 5학년 147명을 연구대상으로 선정하였다. 회복탄력성 검사도구는 류형선(2013)의 검사도구를 일부 수정하여 사용하였고, 과제집착력은 신복진(2007)이 제안한 하위요인에 대한 검사도구를 각각 수집하여 구성하였다. 수집된 자료를 바탕으로 세 집단 간에 회복탄력성과 과제집착력의 차이가 있는지를 비교하기 위하여 일원분량분석과 $Scheff{\acute{e}}$ 사후검증을 실시하였다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 회복탄력성과 과제집착력에서 일반학생, 영재학급 초등과학영재, 영재교육원 초등과학영재의 순으로 회복탄력성이 통계적으로 유의하게 높게 나타났다. 그러나 회복탄력성의 하위요인에 대한 $Scheff{\acute{e}}$ 사후검증에서 영재학급 초등과학영재는 일반학생과 뚜렷하게 구별되지 않는 경우가 많았다. 둘째, 회복탄력성과 과제집착력 사이에 높은 상관이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과를 토대로 영재교육기관별 초등과학영재와 일반학생 간에 회복탄력성 및 과제집착력에 어떠한 차이가 있으며, 회복탄력성과 과제집착력의 상관관계 등에 대하여 논의하였다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.558-565
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study was to compare thinking styles between the gifted students in science and invention The subjects were 191 gifted elementary students in science and 182 gifted elementary students in invention, who enrolled in gifted education program. They were given the Thinking Style Inventory (TSI) that standardized Korea version by Yun (1997), which constructed 13 thinking styles of 5 dimensions (functions, forms, levels, scopes, and leanings of the mental self-government). The collected data were analyzed by independent sampling t-test and ANOVA with SPSS. The findings of this study were as follows: the gifted in science prefer executive, oligarchic, and global thinking styles rather than the gifted in invention. Meanwhile, the gifted in invention prefer legislative, judicial, local, and liberal thinking styles rather than the gifted in science. Both of the gifted in science and invention prefer legislative, executive, monarchic, anarchic, external, and liberal thinking styles. There was statistically significant differences between boys and girls in executive, oligarchic, local, and liberal thinking styles of the gifted in science.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.37-51
• /
• 2016

이 연구는 일반학급에서 과학영재와 일반학생이 지각하는 교우기대감과 영재학급 및 일반학급에서 초등과학영재가 지각하는 교우기대감을 조사한 것이다. 연구 대상은 지역교육청부설 영재교육원과 단위학교 영재학급의 5, 6학년 과학영재 233명과 과학영재와 같은 지역에 위치한 초등학교 5, 6학년 일반학생 329명이다. 검사도구로는 친밀성, 능력/유사성, 도덕성의 하위영역을 범주로 하는 교우기대감 척도 설문지를 사용하였다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 일반학급에서의 교우기대감에서 과학영재는 일반학생에 비하여 친밀성과 도덕성의 하위 영역에서 통계적으로 유의하게 교우기대감이 높았으나 능력/유사성에서는 두 집단 간에 차이를 보이지 않았다. 둘째, 영재학급과 일반학급에서 과학영재가 지각하는 교우기대감에서는 일반학급에 비하여 영재학급에서 친밀성의 하위 영역에서 통계적으로 유의하게 교우기대감이 높았고, 능력/유사성과 도덕성의 하위 영역에서는 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 연구 결과를 토대로 학습 환경에 따른 과학영재의 교우기대감이 주는 시사점에 대하여 논의하였다.