• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제24권
• /
• pp.25-49
• /
• 2004

English contract law has traditionally taken the view that it is not the duty of the parties to a contract to give information voluntarily to each other. In English law, one of the principal distinctions between insurance contract law and general contract law is the existence of the duty of disclosure in insurance law. This article is, therefore, designed to analyse the scope or extent of the duty of disclosure and the remedy for breach of the duty in English marine insurance law. The main purpose of this article is also to seek the alternative remedy for the breach. The results of analysis are as following : First, the scope of the duty of disclosure is closely related to the test of materiality and the concept of a hypothetical prudent insurer. The assured is required to disclose only material circumstances subject to MIA 1906, s. 18(1). The test of materiality, which had caused a great deal of debate in English courts over 30 years, was finally settled by the House of Lords in Pan Atlantic and the House of Lords rejected the 'decisive influence' test and the 'increased risk' test, and the decision of the House of Lords is thought to accept the 'mere influence' test in subsequent case by the Court of Appeal. Secondly, an actual insurer is, in order to avoid contract, required to provide proof that he is induced to enter into the contract by reason of the non-disclosure of the assured. But this subjective test of actual inducement is somewhat meaningless in sense that English court takes the test of materiality as a starting point and assumes the presumption of inducement even in case of no clear proof on the inducement. Finally, MIA 1906, s. 18 provides expressly for the remedy of avoidance of the contract for breach of the duty of disclosure. This means rescission or retrospective avoidance of the entire contract, and the remedy is based upon a fairly crude 'all-or-nothing' approach. The remedy of rescission is too draconian from the point of view of the assured, because he can be deprived of all cover despite he is innocent perfectly. An inadvertent breach from an innocent mistake is as fatal as wilful concealment. What is, therefore, needed in English marine insurance law with respect to remedy for the breach is to introduce a more sophisticated or proportionate remedy ascertaining degrees of fault.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.27-34
• /
• 1993

Quality Assurance Method of Defense Logistics Agency, U. S. A., was changed from Contract Quality Assurance Program to In-Plant Quality Evaluation in May, 1990. IQUE focuses on working with contractor in spirit of team work to measure and continuously improve processes and resulting product quality. The goals are to achieve customer satisfaction, improved product quality, and a reduction in the costs of items and ownership. It is suggested to adopt and apply the IQUE method to the effective accomplishment of Korean aircraft projects.

• 한국시뮬레이션학회논문지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.85-91
• /
• 2013

스마트폰은 우리의 생활에 필수적인 상품으로 자리잡았다. 기술이 개발되고 이동통신 시장이 포화상태로 접어듬에 따라, 고객이 스마트폰을 구매하는데 있어서 이동통신사 선정 요인을 이해하는 것은 중요해졌다. 이러한 선정요인을 파악하기 위하여 본 연구에서는 요인 분석과, 이항 로지스틱스 회귀분석을 사용하여 분석을 실시하였다. 본 연구에서는 우선 이동통신사 선정에 영향을 미치는 요인을 기존의 연구문헌을 참고하여 고객만족, 전환장벽, 전환유인의 3가지 범주로 구분하였다. 본 논문에서는 이 주제와 관련한 9가지의 가설을 제시하고 수집된 설문데이터에 대하여 요인 분석 및 이항 로지스틱스 회귀분석을 이용하여 가설을 검정하고자 하였다, 분석결과 데이터품질, 요금만족도, 기업이미지, 신규계약부담, 단말기 유인, 타사업자 매력의 6가지 요인이 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 확인되었다.

• Journal of Korea Trade
• /
• 제26권7호
• /
• pp.167-184
• /
• 2022

Purpose - This paper analyzes all possible issues that need to be considered in case disputes occur with regard to force majeure in international commercial contracts through the comparative study between English and Korean during COVID-19. Design/methodology - This paper belongs to the field of explanatory legal study, which aims to explain and test whether the choice of law is linked to the conditions that occur in the reality of judicial practice. The juridical approach involves studying and examining theories, concepts, legal doctrines, and legislation that are related to the problem. Findings - English law does not permit general economic impracticability to qualify as a valid force majeure event. If a party asserts that they were prevented from performing the contract, the courts will examine this strictly. Many commercial contracts in a broad range of sectors and industries are chosen by parties to be governed by English law. With COVID-19, there have been discussion of parties being released from performance as a result of force majeure. Meanwhile, under Korean law, a force majeure event should be unforeseeable and beyond a party's control. Since COVID-19 is a known event for future contracts, to avoid the risk that a similar situation in the future is deemed foreseeable and under a party's control, parties must ensure that such a risk is properly addressed in a contract. Therefore, it is necessary to have a new clause to cover a pandemic. Originality/value - In light of the ongoing unexpected and uncertain economic impacts COVID-19 is expected to bring to the world, it is anticipated that companies will experience an increased number of claims involving force majeure around the world, including English and Korea. As such, taking proactive steps to assess the applicable legal principles, including the concept of force majeure of contract, will help companies be prepared for the financial or legal implications of COVID-19. In this regard, it would be advisable for companies and businesses to take specific actions.

• 한국국방경영분석학회지
• /
• 제35권2호
• /
• pp.87-98
• /
• 2009

최근 군(軍) 물류 분야에서 3PL(3rd Party Logistics), 4PL과 같은 아웃소싱이 중요한 아젠다로 부각되고 있다. 하지만, 3PL을 성급하게 군 물류 분야에 적용시, 전시 전투력 저하, 정보 보안 취약성, 3PL 업체의 재하청(Sub-contract)에 따른 질적 저하, 규모의 경제에 미달하는 군내 소랑 조달에 따른 원가 상승 압력 등의 부작용 우려가 있다. 최근 미국, 영국과 같은 선진국에서는 이런 부작용을 보완하고자, 민간 부문과의 상호 보완적 협력 관계를 통한 민 관 경쟁 위탁(private-public competitive sourcing) 개념이 발전하고 있다. 이 개념이 우리 군(軍) 물류 분야에 적용되기 위해서는 군과 민간이 합리적으로 경쟁할 수 있는 군 수송 분야의 재정비와 효율화가 선제적으로 요구된다. 따라서 이 연구는 군 물류 표준화 5개 분야중 수송 분야에 중점을 두어 파렛트 규격 복수화 방안 (T11,T12) 시행에 따른 PLS(Palletized Load System) 트럭 적용 개선 방안 및 모형을 제시한 후, 사단급 부대 사례 분석을 통하여 계량화된 개선 효과를 분석하였다.

• 인터넷정보학회논문지
• /
• 제19권5호
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2018

블록체인은 네트워크 내의 모든 참여자들이 공동으로 소유하고 검증함으로서 데이터의 조작을 방지하고 무결성 및 신뢰성을 보장하는 기술이다. 블록체인은 보안성 및 확장성 투명성을 특징으로 하며 전 세계에서 이용가능하기 때문에 최근 송금을 포함하여 물류 유통, IoT 등 다양한 분야에서 활용되고 있다. 그 중에서도 최근에는 블록체인을 기반으로 하여 다양한 형태의 계약을 체결하고 이행을 자동화할 수 있는 스마트 컨트랙트에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있다. 스마트 컨트랙트를 활용하면 계약 사항을 미리 프로그래밍하여 작성하고, 조건이 충족되면 즉시 시행되기 때문에 디지털 데이터에 대한 신뢰도를 더욱 높일 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 스마트 컨트랙트 설계에 관한 연구를 진행하면서 최근 이슈가 되고 있는 가상화폐의 불법적 자금 악용 등의 문제를 해결하는 방안으로써, 스마트 컨트랙트 설계 방안에 대한 연구를 진행하였다. 이를 통해 고객확인(KYC:Know Your Customer)과 자금세탁방지 과정을 스마트 컨트랙트를 활용해 적용해 보았으며, 자금세탁방지의 가능성을 확인 및 ASM(AML SmartContract mechanism) 설계 방안을 제시해보고자 한다.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제36권2호
• /
• pp.19-36
• /
• 2020

물류아웃소싱 서비스 입찰단계는 화주기업과 물류기업 모두에게 매우 중요하다. 왜냐하면 물류 입찰단계를 통하여 화주기업은 불확실성 해소를 위하여 자사의 물류운영 정보를 물류기업들에게 제공해야 하고, 물류기업은 자사가 가지고 있는 화주기업 물류에 대한 경험 및 노하우를 피력하고 화주기업의 위험과 물류운영으로 인한 이익을 공유하겠다는 제안을 함으로써 입찰에 나온 계약물량을 수주할 수 있기 때문이다. 따라서 물류아웃소싱 입찰단계에서 확인할 수 있는 요인들과 그 요인들이 물류아웃소싱 서비스 만족도에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지에 대하여 살펴볼 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서는 물류 아웃소싱 파트너십 요인에 관한 선행연구와 물류아웃소싱 결정요인에 관한 선행연구에서 확인한 요인들을 토대로하여 물류아웃소싱 서비스의 입찰단계에 대한 측정요인들을 도출하여 각각의 측정요인에 대한 설문을 작성한 후, 국내 화주기업을 대상으로 물류를 수행하고 있는 물류기업에서 종사하는 전문가들에게 설문을 진행하였으며 Smart- PLS 방법론을 활용하여 연구모형을 검증하였다. 본 연구의 시사점은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 물류입찰단계에서 화주기업은 불확실성의 해소를 위하여 물류기업들에게 자사의 물류운영정보를 제공해야 한다. 입찰 설명회 통하여 운영 특이사항에 대하여 상세히 설명해야 하며, 필요하다면 제조공장 및 물류센터 현장 Tour도 진행해야 한다. 둘째, 물류기업은 입찰단계에서 화주기업의 물류에 대한 경험 및 지식 등 자사의 경쟁력을 제안을 통해 어필해야 하며, 자사의 부족한 물류서비스 보완을 위하여 타 물류회사와의 연합도 고려해야 한다. 셋째, 물류기업은 입찰단계에서 물류 아웃소싱을 통한 이익 및 위험을 공유하겠다는 제안을 해야 한다. 화주기업의 환경 불확실성으로 인한 위험을 자사의 역량으로 포용 가능한 범위 내에서 수용하겠다는 제안을 해야 하며, 화주기업 물류를 수행함으로써 발생되는 이익을 공유하겠다는 자세를 보여야 한다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제39권4호
• /
• pp.137-146
• /
• 2016

In recent years, business environment is faced with multi uncertainty that have not been suffered in the past. As supply chain is getting expanded and longer, the flow of information, material and production is also being complicated. It is well known that development service industry using application software has various uncertainty in random events such as supply and demand fluctuation of developer's capcity, project effective date after winning a contract, manpower cost (or revenue), subcontract cost (or purchase), and overrun due to developer's skill-level. This study intends to social contribution through attempts to optimize enterprise's goal by supply chain management platform to balance demand and supply and stochastic programming which is basically applied in order to solve uncertainty considering economical and operational risk at solution supplier. In Particular, this study emphasizes to determine allocation of internal and external manpower of developers using S&OP (Sales & Operations Planning) as monthly resource input has constraint on resource's capability that shared in industry or task. This study is to verify how Stochastic Programming such as Markowitz's MV (Mean Variance) model or 2-Stage Recourse Model is flexible and efficient than Deterministic Programming in software enterprise field by experiment with process and data from service industry which is manufacturing software and performing projects. In addition, this study is also to analysis how profit and labor input plan according to scope of uncertainty is changed based on Pareto Optimal, then lastly it is to enumerate limitation of the study extracted drawback which can be happened in real business environment and to contribute direction in future research considering another applicable methodology.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제46권
• /
• pp.181-210
• /
• 2010

The continuing advance of multimodal transport with the importance for efficient and effective logistics management emphasizes the need for uniform legal approach to international multimodal transport. However, the current fragmented instrument regulating such transport is being an obstacle to development of multimodal transport as it aggravates confusion and uncertainty. The Rotterdam rules, which was adopted in December 2008 by UNCITRAL, expands its scope of application to door-to-door transport. However, the new rules has some problems in its application to multimodal transport operation as it has been conceived not to regulate general multimodal carriage but to regulate contract of carriage by sea that extends its services to the transport by other modes. This article examines conflict of conventions in the Rotterdam Rules. The applicability of the Rotterdam Rules in international multimodal transport contract and possibility of potential conflict with other transport conventions are analyzed with some hypothetical cases. Furthermore, problems arising from application of the Rotterdam Rules under international multimodal transport Contracts are indicated in the chapter IV.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제44권6호
• /
• pp.1-21
• /
• 2019

In the case of a sea transport contract, the decision of the governing law, together with the choice of lex fori, shall be a legal issue in all legal disputes involving damage to the goods. In sea transport contracts, a paramount clause is often established in conjunction with the governing law clause, which can lead to conflict between these two clauses. Most B/L's back clauses contain a paramount clause that provides that the Hague Rules, Hague-Visby Rules, or foreign laws that prevail over other provisions of the terms. The Hague Rules and the Hague-Visby Rules, however, set different standards regarding the extent of the sea carrier's liability. Therefore, in the interpretation of ground conditions, it is an important question whether the Hague Rules or the Hague-Visby Rules are applied or whether each rule is applied as a law. For example, the paramount clause in the Superior Pescadores case was problematic in the interpretation of the term 'Hague Rules.' In this case, the English Court held that the expression 'Hague Rules' could be used to mean the Hague-Visby Rules, and not exclusively the Hague Rules. Therefore, the Hague-Visby Rules were applied in the judgment of this case, which suggests that this case can be a valuable precedent in future legal matters.