• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.45-58
• /
• 2001

This study sheds light on the importance of developing creativity in mathematics class by examining the theoretical base of creativity and its relationship to mathematics. The study also reviewed the realities of developing creativity in mathematics courses, and it observed and analyzed the processes in which students and teachers solve the mathematics problems. By doing so, the study examined creative abilities of both students and teachers and suggests what teachers can do to tap the potential of the student. The subjects of the study are two groups of students and one group of mathematics teachers. These groups were required to solve a particular problems. The grading was made based on the mathematical creativity factors. There were marked differences in the ways of the solutions between of the student groups and the teacher group. It was clear that the teachers\\` thinking was limited to routine approaches in solving the given problems. In particular, there was a serious gap in the area of originality. As can be seen from the problem analysis by groups, there was a meaningful difference between the creativity factors of students and those of teachers. This study presented research findings obtained from students who were guided to freely express their creativity under encouragement and concern of their teachers. Thus, teachers should make an effort to break from their routine thinking processes and fixed ideas. In addition, teaching methods and contents should emphasize on development of creativity. Such efforts will surely lead to an outcome that is beneficial to students.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제47권2호
• /
• pp.135-154
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study is to help to improve the method of math teaching by analysing how learner-centered teaching method offsets mathematical creativity and mathematical disposition. For this purpose, research questions are established as follows; (1) Mathematical creativity between open-ended learning activity approach(OLAA) and general classroom-based instruction(GCI) shows any difference? (2) Mathematical disposition between OLAA and GCI shows any difference? The results obtained through this study were as follows: (1) There was significant difference between OLAA group and CCI group in mathematical creativity. This means that open-ended learning activity approach was generally more effective in improving mathematical creativity than general classroom-based instruction. (2) There was no significant difference between OLAA group and GCI group in mathematical disposition. But the average scores of mathematical disposition except mathematical confidence improved a little. So we can say that open-ended learning activity approach brought an positive influence on students' mathematical disposition. The results obtained in this study suggest that the OLAA can be used to cultivate the children's mathematical creativity and disposition. Therefore, I suggest that teachers should use the OLAA to improve the children's mathematical creativity and disposition.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제24권6호
• /
• pp.1053-1071
• /
• 2014

이 연구는 영재를 위한 창의성 프로그램 개발과 적용 그리고 영재의 선발에 이용될 수 있는 문제설정에서의 수학적 창의성 평가에 대한 이론적 고찰과 관찰을 통해 개선된 창의성 평가 요인을 제안하기 위한 것이다. 이를 위해 대학부설과학영재교육원 소속의 초등수학영재 19명에게 주어진 문제를 풀어보고 그 문제와 관련된 우수한 문제를 만들도록 요구하였다. 영재학생뿐만 아니라 예비교사 및 전문가 집단이 각각 영재가 만든 문제를 평가하고 우수한 문제의 특징을 기술하도록 하였다. 이를 통해 문제설정에서의 수학 창의성 평가의 요인을 융통성, 독창성, 원 문제와의 유사성, 문제의 복잡성, 정교성으로 제안한다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제23권5호
• /
• pp.40-50
• /
• 2020

Recently, the acquisition of teamwork skills as well as creativity has been a special challenge to engineering students. Also it became crucial for engineering educators to help them enhance effectively these skills. Thus, there has been a good deal of domestic and overseas research on teamwork skills and creativity. However, to date, there is relatively few studies analyzing two variables' relationships. This research aims to explore relationships between engineering students' teamwork skills and everyday creativity, and to suggest educational implications for future research and educational programs. For this purpose, this study was conducted with 450 engineering students at two universities in Korea, and their teamwork skills and everyday creativity have been measured. Our findings show that firstly, there were significant differences in teamwork skills by grade. Secondly, there were significant correlations among subcategories' variables of teamwork skills and everyday creativity. Thirdly, 35% of teamwork skills were explained by everyday creativity. Based on these findings, the theoretical and practical implications are discussed with particular attention to education for promoting teamwork skills.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제46권4호
• /
• pp.445-464
• /
• 2007

On considering the mathematical creativity of the gifted in mathematics, some points should be reflected such as the characteristics of leaners, the gifted and of domain-special facts in mathematics. And the clear view of mathematical creativity of the gifted in mathematics makes a way to define the meanings of creative-productive ability and of creative products. Therefore to explicate the concept of mathematical creativity of the gifted in mathematics, researcher reviewed literacies of the concept of creativity in general fields, classical mathematicians, and school mathematics. In conclusion, first, mathematical creativity of the gifted in mathematics should be considered on the aspects of subject-mathematics, object-the gifted, and performing-gifted education. Second, it contains advanced problem solving matters on the school mathematics curriculum but reflect the process of recovery and reinvent and it is suggested in [fig.1] and [fig.2].

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.803-822
• /
• 2009

오늘날 창의성은 모든 분야에서 가장 중요한 요소로 부각이 되고 있다. 수학교육에서도 창의성을 강조하고 있으나 많은 수학교육자들에게 창의성 및 수학적 창의성의 개념에 대한 견해는 다양하다. 본 연구에서는 수학교육에서 수학적 창의성의 의미를 여러 선행 연구에서 에서는 어떻게 규정하고 있는지 알아보고, 학교 현장에서 수학시간에 교과서를 문제를 기반으로 이를 신장 시킬 수 있는 방안을 제안하였다. 이를 위하여 특정한 수학 문항에 대한 초등학생들의 반응을 분석하고 교과서의 예를 기반으로 한 창의적인 문제를 위한 확장 방안을 제시하였다. 연구의 결과에 의하면 학생들은 제한된 수학 전략을 사용하였으며, 수학교과서는 학생들의 창의성을 신장시키기 위한 과제로 개선할 필요가 있었다. 이의 개선을 위해서 수학교육에서 학생들의 창의성 신장을 위하여 과제 및 교재의 개발 및 교사교육 프로그램의 재조명이 필요함을 제안하였다.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제26권6호
• /
• pp.1306-1314
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study was to analyze qualitatively implementation in schools through perception on creativity and character education of teachers who participated in winter training and workshop which the Southeast Regional Center for Creativity and Character Education arranged. The results are as follows. Firstly, teachers responded that they used most often a variety of students' experiential and participant activities associated with the subject in practising creativity and character education. Secondary, they showed a wide variety of responses from 'not to able to measure' to 'to practice in every class' for how often to apply to and practise creativity and character education in class. Thirdly, for the question of 'How do you think environment for creativity and character education in your school', while parts of them responded 'sufficient educational environment', some of them did 'poor or not completely supported environment'. Lastly, most of them utilized teaching materials for creativity and character education periodically or in reconstructing according to instructional form in their class.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제57권4호
• /
• pp.371-391
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to analyze manifestation examples and effects of group creativity in mathematical modeling and to discuss teaching and learning methods for group creativity. The following two points were examined from the theoretical background. First, we examined the possibility of group activity in mathematical modeling. Second, we examined the meaning and characteristics of group creativity. Six students in the second grade of high school participated in this study in two groups of three each. Mathematical modeling task was "What are your own strategies to prevent or cope with blackouts?". Unit of analysis was the observed types of interaction at each stage of mathematical modeling. Especially, it was confirmed that group creativity can be developed through repetitive occurrences of mutually complementary, conflict-based, metacognitive interactions. The conclusion is as follows. First, examples of mutually complementary interaction, conflict-based interaction, and metacognitive interaction were observed in the real-world inquiry and the factor-finding stage, the simplification stage, and the mathematical model derivation stage, respectively. And the positive effect of group creativity on mathematical modeling were confirmed. Second, example of non interaction was observed, and it was confirmed that there were limitations on students' interaction object and interaction participation, and teacher's failure on appropriate intervention. Third, as teaching learning methods for group creativity, we proposed students' role play and teachers' questioning in the direction of promoting interaction.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.197-215
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 1997년부터 2011년까지 국내 등재(후보)학술지에 발표된 수학적 창의성과 관련한 국내 연구 동향을 분석함으로써 수학적 창의성 교육의 미래 과제와 발전 방향에 대한 시사점을 제공하는 것이다. 연구대상은 1997년부터 2011년까지 국내 등재(후보)학술지에 발표된 논문 114편을 선정하여 분류기준에 따라 연도별, 대상별, 연구주제별, 연구방법별 동향을 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 수학적 창의성 교육 연구는 2000년 이후부터 지속적으로 이루어졌고, 연구대상별 동향분석에서는 연구주제가 사람이 아닌 경우, 중등학생, 초등학생, 영재학생, 교사, 유치원생 순으로 많이 이루어졌다. 연구주제별 동향분석에서는 수학적 창의성 교육방법, 수학적 창의성의 일반연구, 수학적 창의성 측정과 평가 연구가 비교적 활발하게 이루어졌고, 교과서 및 교육과정과 관련한 연구가 미진하였다. 연구방법별 동향에서는 질적연구방법이 양적 연구방법에 비해 많았으며 혼합 연구방법은 저조하였다. 이와 같은 연구 결과를 통해 본 논문은 현재까지의 수학적 창의성이 어떻게 연구되었고 앞으로의 연구방향에 대한 시사점을 제공하였다.

• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.57-66
• /
• 2007

This study purposed to examine the effects of integrated activities based on wordless picture books on increase in children's creativity. As for the subject of this study, 20 five-year old children(9 boys and 11 girls), who go to D Kindergarten in Ulsan-si, were selected as a experimental group and 20 five-year old children(8 boys and 12 girls) as comparative group, who attend B Kindergarten in Ulsan-si. For this study, all children of the groups were taken pre-test. After this experiment, difference in creativity of two groups was examined through post-test. The total of 42 sessions were conducted for 14 weeks from the first week of April to the second week of July, 2005. The test tool for this study was Creativity Scale developed by Kim Sang-yun (2003). To verify study questions, the mean of the two groups and the standard deviation were calculated and independent-sample t-test was carried out using SPSS WIN 11.5. The results of this study were as the following: First, integrated activities based on wordless picture books showed statistically significant difference in children's creativity between the experimental group and the comparative one(p<.001), which suggested that the activities affected increase in children's creativity in general. Second, integrated activities centering around wordless picture books indicated statistically significant difference in fluency(p<.05), flexibility(p<.01) and originality(p<.001), sub-factors of children's creativity, between the experimental group and the comparative one. This result revealed that these activities were effective. Third, integrated activities based on wordless picture books did not show significant difference in elaboration, a sub-factor of children's creativity, between the two groups. As the result of this study, integrated activities based on wordless picture books had positive effects on increase in children's creativity.