Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (수산해양교육연구)

The Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (한국수산해양교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Qualitative Analysis on Implementation of Creativity and Character Education in Schools

창의·인성교육의 현장 실천에 대한 질적 분석

  • Received : 2014.09.11
  • Accepted : 2014.10.06
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze qualitatively implementation in schools through perception on creativity and character education of teachers who participated in winter training and workshop which the Southeast Regional Center for Creativity and Character Education arranged. The results are as follows. Firstly, teachers responded that they used most often a variety of students' experiential and participant activities associated with the subject in practising creativity and character education. Secondary, they showed a wide variety of responses from 'not to able to measure' to 'to practice in every class' for how often to apply to and practise creativity and character education in class. Thirdly, for the question of 'How do you think environment for creativity and character education in your school', while parts of them responded 'sufficient educational environment', some of them did 'poor or not completely supported environment'. Lastly, most of them utilized teaching materials for creativity and character education periodically or in reconstructing according to instructional form in their class.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, Beodeul Park, Jong-un(2014). A Study on Student', Parents', and Teachers' Change of Perception on Creativity and Character Education through Operation of Creativity and Character Model School. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Science Education, vol.26, No.2, pp257-269. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2014.26.2.257
  2. Lave, W. & Wenger, E.(1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral articipation. New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  3. Locality-Based Science Education in Sociocultural Approach: 'Scientific Exploration in Culture' in the Context of Korea
  4. Ministry of Education and Science technology(2009). The Manual of 2009 Revised Curricula.
  5. Ministry of Education and Science Technology(2010). Basic plan for creativity character education(2010. 1).
  6. Ministry of Education and Science Technology (2010).100 Education Curriculum Excellent School Plan. Curriculum Department Policy Data.
  7. Ministry of Education and Science Technology and Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity (2013). Creativity and character model schools workshop for school administrators(2013. 10. 18).
  8. Moon, Yong-Lin(2010). Now is creativity character education Science & Creativity, 2010. February. 6-9.
  9. Park, Choon-Sung.(2010). The creative character education evolved in school, The Journal of Creativity Education, vol.10, No.2. 61-72.
  10. Park, Choon-Sung.(2011). The Relationship between School and Creativity Character Education, Education Culture Research, vol.17, No.1, 79-97.
  11. Report on Operation in Creativity and Character Education Southeast part Main Center (2013), Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity. pp. 122-132.
  12. Sungmin Im*, Sung-Jae Pak, Daegu University, South Korea. *ismphs@daegu.ac.kr
  13. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 21:1 (2012), 63-70
  14. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.