• 벤처창업연구
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.77-88
• /
• 2023

본 연구는 가젤기업의 특성 중 하나인 매출액 고성장 기업 판별을 목표변수로 설계된 현재의 투자용 기술평가 모형이 가젤기업의 또 다른 특성인 고용효과에 대해서도 확장 가능성이 있는지를 확인하는데 목적이 있다. 2016년~2018년 투자용 기술평가를 통해 기술투자 적합기업(TI1~TI6등급)으로 분류된 중소기업을 대상으로 공분산 분석과 다변량 회귀분석을 통해 절대적 고용효과와 상대적 고용효과를 구분하여 분석하였다. 공분산 분석 결과 기술투자등급(TI등급)이 우수할수록 절대적 고용효과와 상대적 고용효과가 우수한 것으로 확인되었다. 그러나 다변량 회귀분석 결과 절대적 고용효과에 대해서는 혁신 특성으로 정의한 투자용 기술평가 항목이 고용효과에 유의한 영향을 미치지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 반면, 상대적 고용효과와 관련해서는 혁신 특성 중 기술성이 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 확인되었으며, 이는 기술성이 평가 대상기업의 미래 성장성을 기준으로 평가하는 특성이 반영된 것에 기인한다고 판단된다. 특히, 상대적 고용효과의 경우 업력에 따른 체감효과로 인한 왜곡이 적은 실질적 고용효과라는 점에서 의미가 있으며, 현재의 투자용 기술평가 모형은 평가항목의 가중치 조정 등을 통해 향후 상대적 고용효과의 관점에서 확장 가능성이 있는 평가모형이라는 결론을 도출하였다.

• 산업공학
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.285-293
• /
• 1999

This paper analyzes the facility investment appraisal process of a real world shipyard and proposes several improving points. For this purpose the investment appraisal sheets are investigated in terms of the theory of the discounted cash flow (DCF) method. Through this investigation, the differences between the theory and its application are clarified and it is tried to resolve the gab by applying the DCF method appropriately including explicit use of actual cash flows in revenue and expense expressions. It is also proposed that some portion of the capital loss caused by defending facility sales may not be the sunk cost and that the portion can conceptually be calculated by the difference between economic value and sales price.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.267-273
• /
• 2011

Since 'The Act on Private Investment of The Infrastructure' was established in 1994, private investment as well as government's investment in transport infrastructure has been active. However investment in transport infrastructure has more risks than others' due to uncertainty both in traffic volume and in construction cost. In the current appraisal procedure of deciding transportation infrastructure investment, instead of risk management, the sensitivity analysis considering only the changes of benefit, cost and social discount rate which are main factor affecting economic feasibility is carried out. Therefore the uncertainty of various factors affecting demand, cost and benefit are not considered in feasibility study. In this study the problems in current investment appraisal system were reviewed. Using Delphi technique the major factors which have high uncertainty in feasibility study were surveyed and then improvement plan was suggested in the respective of classic 4 step demand forecasting method. The range estimation technique was also mentioned to deal with the uncertainty of the future.

• 대한교통학회지
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.336-346
• /
• 2014

최근 국가상위계획에 반영된 교통SOC 사업이 예비타당성조사단계에서 중단 지연됨에 따라 투자평가방법 및 제도의 실효성에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있다. 특히, 현재 시행되고 있는 투자평가제도간 중복 및 일관성 부족 등으로 인해 불필요한 예산 및 시간 그리고 인력낭비가 발생된다는 논란이 제기되고 있다. 일례로 국가재정의 효율적 운영을 목적으로 예비타당성조사가 도입되었으나 타당성 평가와 분석방법 및 평가내용이 유사하며, 효율적 교통체계구축을 촉진하기 위해 도입된 타당성 평가 또한 현재 타당성 조사가 그 기능을 대신하여 타당성 평가가 유명무실해 지는 등 주먹구구식 투자평가제도 도입으로 인해 효율적인 교통SOC투자가 이루어지지 못하고 있는 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 현재 수행되는 투자평가제도의 도입취지 및 운용현황을 살펴봄으로써 각 제도에 대한 이해도를 제고하고, 이를 토대로 현 투자평가체계의 효율화를 위해 각 투자평가제도간 연계성 강화방안을 제시하였다. 본 연구를 통해 현재 수행되는 투자평가제도를 체계적으로 정리할 수 있는 토대가 마련되어, 교통SOC투자제도의 합리성, 일관성 및 효율성 향상에 기여할 것으로 사료된다.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.45-60
• /
• 2015

Governments around the world invest in research and development (R&D) for different purposes : national economy, defence, environment, health, etc. as a means of national survival beyond the means of national competitiveness. These are usually programs with high social impact but low short-term economic impact or large scientific programs that are too expensive and risky for private sector investment alone. The Republic of Korea has also shown a very successful model of economic progress and social development through government R&D programs. However, there have been many corruption scandals behind it while selecting awardees for government R&D programs in Korea. So, the Republic of Korea focused on reforming appraisal system for government R&D and began preparation for "Clean Appraisal System" last year. In this study, first we analyzed the related appraisal tasks through the review of laws and administrative rules and typed appraisal tasks according to the flow of the actors and time. Thus securing the information infrastructure and finally we drew the conceptual model of the system according to an open appraisal tasks by introducing an element of the OECD on open government typed appraisal tasks.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.177-199
• /
• 2006

Recently, it has become important to establish a technology appraisal system because of increasing a service of technology credit guarantee. Also, there have been many efforts to evaluate a technology in the advanced countries. The technology/credit appraisal model which can measure firms' performance was suggested by Small and Medium Business Administration. In this paper, we analyze a structural validity of the model by confirmatory factor analysis and estimate the model which can distinguish whether an investment is possible or not by discriminant analysis.

• 농업과학연구
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.89-101
• /
• 2003

For the pre-feasibility study and project evaluation, the discount rate or cutoff rate should be given by the government authority. To get the Benefit/Cost Ratio, NPV(Net Present Value) and IRR(Internal Rate of Return) of the public investment projects, the pertinent and realistic discount rate should be determined to be suitable to the present time period. The cut-off rates in Korea were equivalent to 15% in 1970's, 10% in 1980's and 8% in 1990's. The prevailing rate of discount as 8% is considered not to be suitable for the 2000's public project appraisal considering the present interest rates on deposit and national bonds. To determine the socio-economic feasibility of the public projects, the IRR should be bigger than the present cutoff rate. When we still use the high old rate of discount, the analytical results of project appraisal will show always economically unfeasible. Therefore the new rate of discount suitable for present time should be determined by the government. The public projects to be implemented in 2000 year onward are recommended to be adapted 5% of cutoff rate for the project appraisal and evaluation according to the results of reviewing the tendency of discount rates and market rates of interest in Korea.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2003

Quality is a critical competitive factor in today's environment because of the impact of quality on costs and delivery. Many companies regard quality as a key concept of company strategy in order to achieve the competitive edge. Measuring and reporting quality cost is the first step in quality management program. The supposition of quality cost model is that investment in prevention activities will bring rewards from reduced failure costs, and that further investment in prevention activities will show profits from reduced appraisal costs. In this study, the degree of quality cost deviation is conceptualized. This means a deviation between the ideal and present ranking in the amounts of quality cost categories. This study analysed that the effect of its deviation on quality management activity and performance variables. However, there are no difference in these variables. The major reason is that most of companies are endeavoring for quality management but operating quality cost system unsystematically. The review against a prevention and appraisal activity is necessary.

• 아태비즈니스연구
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.11-20
• /
• 2013

This study extends the extant scope of understanding investment decision, beyond the dominant 'technical' emphasis on the application of discounted cash flow techniques. The research methodology draws the positivist and interpretive research paradigms. It uses a deductive approach, survey strategy and principal component analysis for the analysis. Three key sets of factors emerged as important in the investment decision process in the hydropower sector. They are: group consensus (framing), influences on own judgment (heuristics), and application of knowledge & experience (intuition). The use of purposive and convenient sampling might have some unintended impact on the findings. Consequently, any generalizations of the findings to a wider population of organizations and managers need to be made with care. It is hoped that this paper will encourage other researchers to go beyond the analytic techniques of investment appraisal that have dominated investment decision research and seek to balance the emphasis by focusing on human involvement and behavioral aspects of investment decision.

• 산학경영연구
• /
• 제5권
• /
• pp.1-29
• /
• 1992