• 국토계획
• /
• 제54권3호
• /
• pp.27-48
• /
• 2019

The government has implemented housing welfare policy to ease low-income households' housing-cost burden and improve their quality of life. However, public housing residents and housing choice voucher recipients still show a high level of housing-cost burden. In this regard, this study aims to provide policy implications for current housing welfare policy by analyzing and comparing the factors that determine both subsidized and unsubsidized households' housing-cost burden. For the empirical analysis, this study uses "2017 Korea Housing Survey" and divides groups into public housing residents, housing choice voucher recipients, and unsubsidized low-income renters. We compared the level of housing-cost burden by employing t-test and chi-squared analyses and the factors affecting the housing-cost burden by employing logistic regression analyses between the three groups. According to the empirical analysis, the housing cost is the most burdensome for the housing choice voucher recipients group, followed by the unsubsidized low-income renters and public housing residents. In addition, the factors affecting housing-cost burden are different between the three groups. In case of public housing residents, housing characteristics usually affect the housing-cost burden. For housing choice voucher recipients and unsubsidized low-income renters, both housing and household characteristics influence the housing-cost burden. Looking at the detailed factors, except for the housing tenure and regional average rents that are common factors for all groups, the amount of deposit is an important factor for public housing residents, and household employment status is an important factor for both housing choice voucher recipients and unsubsidized low-income renters. The policy implications of this study are as follows: First, it is necessary to review the blind spot of the current housing welfare policy. Second, a comprehensive review of the housing choice voucher program is required. Third, it is necessary to make policy efforts to ease the level of housing-cost burden for renters. Fourth, a program is needed for those public housing residents who need a deposit support. Fifth, there should be further assistance with public housing for the poorest people.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제16권7호
• /
• pp.207-220
• /
• 2016

서민층의 주거지원 정책이 기존의 사업자 중심의 대규모 공공임대주택 공급에서 수요자 중심의 주택바우처 제도로 전환되고 있다. 한국의 주택바우처는 2010년부터 서울에서 운영하고 있으며 2014년에는 전국적으로 확대 실시하였다. 이러한 관심에 따라 주택바우처에 대한 다양한 이론적 논의가 많으나 실증 자료를 기반으로 한 연구는 부족한 편이다. 따라서 이 연구는 서울시 주택바우처 수혜자의 주거지 선택요인을 찾아내고, 일반 회귀분석(OLS)과 지리적 가중회귀(GWR) 분석을 실시하여 의미 있는 결과를 도출하고자 하였다. 분석결과, 서울시 주택바우처 수혜자들이 우선적으로 고려하는 요인으로 단순노무직 일자리와 사회복지시설 접근성, 대중교통 접근성이 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 기존 연구와 다른 결과로써 다음과 같은 점이 고려되어야 할 것이다. 첫째, 한국형 주택바우처에 대한 목적의 재정립이 필요하다. 둘째, 단순한 주거지원 뿐만 아니라 재취업을 위한 교육과 가족들을 지원할 수 있는 사회복지 서비스와의 연계가 필요하다.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.21-33
• /
• 2011

This paper aims to explore the characteristics of Bogeumjari Housing Program and its significance to housing policy, and propose an appropriate direction of future housing policy for low-income households without home ownership based on actual data on housing careers and preferences of the policy target households. Supply of Bogeumjary Housing is characterized by consolidation of existing housing program, housing support by income level, differentiation of eligible households, and housing subscription on-line. Bogeumjari Housing Program is meaningful in that it is a policy that resumed the supply of permanent housing, provides multi-tier support system by income level, and adjusts the imbalances in housing demand and supply. Despite their strong preferences for Bogeumjari Housing, their affordability is very low due to their low income levels and gloomy outlook for household finances. In this light, the government should pursue housing policies that include not only new housing constructions, but also efficient use of housing stocks, expansion of loans for first-time home buyers, and introduction of home mortgage and housing voucher.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.33-46
• /
• 2016

In era of lowbirth, aging population, low growth and social polarization, the effective welfare delivery systems are taking on added significance than past years. Public housing welfare resources, such as public rental housing, housing voucher, affordable housing loan, are more diversified and expanded. These programs could work effectively by the comprehensive interlink and community based delivery system. From the standpoint of recipients, how effectively the substantial benefits of welfare resources being delivered to each individual is more important than how much welfare resources being produced totally. This study aimed to explore the reform of public housing welfare delivery system. For this purpose, diagnosed the current states and key issues related to public delivery system, and analyzed what kinds of housing welfare services should be strengthened, and finally suggested the collaboration among the public sectors (local government, LH, HUG, HF etc.) and the partnership with non-profit organizations. Main research implications are as follows. The main housing welfare services which could be categorized as the housing welfare center's role are advice & information offering, several public resources interlink and accessibility improvement, community based network construction, etc. And the most important key for successful delivery system reorganization is the collaborative operation of the public sectors and local government, non-profit organizations.

• Human Ecology Research
• /
• 제54권2호
• /
• pp.155-164
• /
• 2016

This study explored the characteristics, housing deficits and expectations for support programs of low-income renter households in housing poverty in order to provide housing policy development and improvement information. Microdata of the 2014 Korea Housing Survey was utilized as secondary data for this study. A total of 2,508,672 low-income renter households (weighted count) in the bottom 40% income ranks of entire general households living in private rental units were selected as study subjects. The major findings were as follows. (1) One point four percent of the subjects were living in non-house living quarters (e.g., shanties, vinyl greenhouses, container houses, and mud huts), 1.4% were in dosshouses, 9.9% were in basements, semi-basements or rooftop units, and 8.2% were in sub-standard units. (2) Among the households whose housing costs burdens were measurable, 75.7% were found to have housing cost burdens to pay 30% or more of their household income towards housing costs (rental costs and maintenance costs), but only 7.5% of the burdened households received a housing voucher. (3) Eighty-one percent were found to be in a housing poverty status as defined by the researcher; in addition, low-income renter households in housing poverty in Seoul tended to have a greater proportion of households headed by females, the elderly, and be persons with low-education or disabilities. (4) Households in housing poverty showed greater expectations for financial support and/or extended provisions of public rental housing than other low-income renter households.

• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제24권5호
• /
• pp.27-37
• /
• 2013

Because of rapid aging, housing stability of elderly household is becoming an important social problem. The population of the elderly people was 11.3% and that of the elderly household was 23.2%, about 407 million, in 2010. Yet, social policies for elderly people are focusing on the household who takes care of the elderly people, not on the elderly headed households. These policies fail to reflect the reality. Housing satisfaction of the elderly household is different based on the tenure type and the satisfaction can be further affected by the types of elderly household within the same tenure group. Thus, strengthening the policies for the elderly headed households as well as differentiating the policies based on the types of household is required in order to meet the needs of the elderly households. For the elderly household living in a rent house in a city, a housing voucher is needed and for the low income elders who own their houses, housing renovation is required. Public housing affects only the residential satisfaction of single elderly households, not for all elderly households probably because public housing does not meet the demand of the elderly households appropriately. Since the elderly households wanting to move is noticeably small, a policy that provides proper facilities within the elders' neighborhood is most necessary. Also, in order to lessen the burden of housing expenses of the elders with low income, a public housing policy, in which 2-3 people living together in one public housing, needs to be examined.

• 토지주택연구
• /
• 제5권3호
• /
• pp.137-149
• /
• 2014

The authors derived rental housing policy measures that are appropriate for the current conditions of Korean housing supply and demand based on the confirmation of the issues of Korean rental housing system and reviewing implications from review of cases of foreign countries and these measures can be categorized into linkage with the urban regeneration and multi-functional development, acquisition of financial resources, operational management, policy and institutional aspects. For the expansion of supply of rental housing, it is essential to link the rental housing policy with urban regeneration. To pursue regeneration of underdeveloped areas and expansion of supply of rental housing in line with urban regeneration, more development sites should be added. Further, the rental home policy must be integrated into a new paradigm that includes securing commercial viability and providing various residential conveniences through multi-functional development. In addition, diversification of developers of real estates turning away from the existing framework of policy that has been focused only on the state-led housing supply so that local governments and private sector players can take part in. Next, new options for funding the supply of rental housing must be sought. First, raising financial resources sequentially through cyclical development approach could be considered. Or, various funding schemes including utilizing Tax-increment financing (TIF) based on the local tax revenues that will be accrued after the development projects and supply of rental housing. Or there should be various schemes to raise funds including utilization of TIFs that are based on the revenues that will be realized after the development projects and supply of rental housing, or utilizing REITs where funds can be provided through private sector investments. Also, getting out from the planning practice that focused only on physical expansion of supply of rental housing, continual operational management must be performed even after the development. These activities must be supported through establishment of control tower at the national level and continuous attention must be paid even after the development by developing specialized operational management companies that are led by private sector players. Finally, in addition to the hardware support that is focused on the public rental housing only, software support such as conditional provision of housing voucher or tax exemption for low-income classes should be provided, too. In other words, a shift from policies that are supplier-centric to ones that are customer-centric must take place.

• 한국융합학회논문지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.89-99
• /
• 2022

코로나19로 인해 원격 수업, 원격 근무, 원격 의료 등 비대면 문화가 확산되고 있다. 이러한 비대면 사회로의 정착의 일등 공신은 SW중소기업과 SW인력이다. 그러나 최근 대형 플랫폼 업체 및 해외 빅테크 기업들이 수천명의 SW인력을 채용함으로 인해 SW중소기업들은 심각한 인력난을 겪고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 중소 SW기업들이 SW 인력을 안정적으로 확보하고 지속적인 사업 영위를 지원하기 위한 정책 대안을 제시하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이러한 목적 달성을 위해 본 연구는 SW산업 및 인력 현황을 살펴 본 후, 산업계 전문가 등을 대상으로 설문조사 및 FGI(전문가 집중 인터뷰) 등을 통해 SW기업기술인력을 안정적으로 확보 할 수 있는 방안을 도출하여 SW인력확보의 애로사항 및 개선방안을 제안하였다. 그 정책들은 내일채움공제제도, 청년주택조합 구성 등과 같은 인력 유지 지원 인센티브 강화, 병역특례제도, 채용조건형 계약학기제 등에 의한 인력 채용, SW인력 양성 바우처 제도 보완 등을 통한 맞춤형 교육 강화, SW 분야 Skill 표준화, SW 인력 양성 거버넌스 체계 구축, 대기업 등으로의 인력 유출에 대한 대응책 마련 및 대·중소 SW 인력 상생협력 프로그램 등이다.