• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.465-475
• /
• 2005

In this study, to explore the ways of the development of the effective and desirable teaching and learning materials for the elementary science gifted, relevant previous research results were critically examined and integrated. Then a theoretical background was established and specific materials in Life Areas of elementary science was developed based on the science knowledge construction types of 'What', 'How', and 'Why'. The results could be summarized as follows: (1) The types of educational programs for the science gifted were categorized and defined as 'General-Level','Early-Growing, Fast-Growing General Level', and 'Slow-Growing Enrichment, Excellence 'Types. (2) For 5th graders, in the unit of 'Environment and living Organisms', some activities of Enrichment Type for subject on 'Changes of Living Organism with Temperature' were developed following the processes of RDPE (Research-Development-Practice-Evaluation) and their ways of using and assessment were presented. On the basis of these results, several educational implications were discussed for further research and ways of applying to the science gifted education.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.37-57
• /
• 2017

스핑크스 퍼즐은 기존 칠교판에 비하여 수학적 도형을 다양하게 만들 수 있다는 점에서 영재교육의 소재로 활용되어 왔다. 본 연구에서는 스핑크스 퍼즐의 모든 조각을 사용하여 만들 수 있는 볼록다각형의 개수를 프로그램 탐구 과제로 삼는다. 이는 이전 연구에서 여러 차례 탐구 주제로 다루어져 왔으나, 현재 그 명확한 이유를 설명하지 못하고 있다. 이 논문에서는 초등영재 수준에서 증명이 가능한 최소넓이를 이용한 방법과 단위넓이를 이용한 방법을 새롭게 제안한다. 그리고 초등수학영재가 새로운 증명 방법으로 탐구 주제를 실제 정당화할 수 있는지 확인한다. 따라서 총 4차시 수업 프로그램을 구성하고 적용하였다. G교육지원청 영재교육원 6학년반 소속 학생 3명을 대상으로 수업 프로그램을 적용한 결과, 스핑크스 퍼즐로 만들 수 있는 볼록다각형이 27개임을 정당화하는 것은 가능함을 보였다.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.125-149
• /
• 2004

이 연구의 목적은 초등학교 교사들의 영재교육에 대한 현황과 인식을 알아보기 위한 것으로, 이를 위해 영재교육에 대한 일반적 인식, 영재의 특성, 영재의 판별, 영재교육 프로그램, 그리고 영재 담당교사에 대한 인식을 설문을 통하여 분석하였다. 설문 분석 결과 초등학교 교사들의 영재 교육에 대한 인식은 대체로 긍정적이었으나, 세부적인 내용에 대한 인식은 낮은 편이었으며, 영재의 지적 특성에 대한 인식은 높았으나, 영재의 정서적 특성에 대한 인식은 낮았다. 그리고 영재의 조기판별에 대한 인식은 높았으나, 영재의 판별 기준에 대한 인식이나 판별 능력은 낮은 편이었다. 또한 영재 프로그램에 대한 인식은 접해본 경험 부족으로 인해 매우 낮았으며, 영재 담당 교사 연수에 대한 인식은 높았으나, 영재 담당 교사에 대한 의향은 매우 낮았다. 이로써 영재교육에 대한 이론적 인식은 보통이나 긍정적인 수준이었지만 실천적 인식은 영재교육에 대한 열악한 재정적, 행정적 환경으로 인해 낮은 수준에 있었음을 알 수 있었다. 본 연구는 영재교육에 대한 초등의 현실을 파악하고, 이를 기초로 교사들의 영재교육에 대한 올바른 인식을 형성하기 위한 방향을 모색하는 데 그 의의 가 있다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.513-531
• /
• 2012

This study was to analyze the characteristic of scientific argumentation in the classes for the gifted of elementary school. The participants of this study were 5 fifth graders and 9 sixth graders, 14 in total, from the basic unit schools for gifted students of J elementary school in Incheon city. And it constituted small scale groups made up of 2~3 students with similar or identical ability in scientific reasoning. It had set up hypothesis for each group before the experiment, and students had a group discussion as a whole after the experiment. Classes were conducted 4 times, all courses were recorded as a sound/video. The ability in scientific reasoning of the students was inspected, making use of SRT II by means of pre-survey, and their argumentation levels were analyzed, utilizing 'Rubric for scientific argumentation course assessment.' As a result, argumentations did not incurred in every class. Analysis in argumentations of the students resulted in low level argumentation. This means argumentation cannot incur based on that with the limit in understanding the principle of experiments over the threshold of textbook no matter that he is an gifted student or not. The student both in formal operational period and transition period (2B/3A), the ability of scientific thinking in upper level, was improved of his argumentative ability in an overall aspect. However, a student of concrete operational period, the ability of scientific thinking in lower level, had argumentation with still lower level even after the experiment at the moment of discussing with the students on the upper level of scientific thinking ability.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.219-227
• /
• 2004

This study aims to investigate science teaching and learning for the gifted in comparison with regular classrooms in elementary schools. A questionnaire was developed to survey gifted and general students＇ perceptions to elementary science teaching and teaming with employing a teaching and learning model for the gifted by Maker and Neilson (1995, 1996). The 28 item questionnaire consisted of four categories of content, teaching and teaming process, student product, and learning environment, and each category included six to nine items. Randomly selected 114 students from gifted classes and 99 students for regular classes responded to the questionnaire through the use of five-point Likert scale. It was found that there are significant differences between gifted and regular classes of science at all four categories of the teaching and learning model for the gifted. Therefore, science teaching and teaming for the gifted seemed to be differentiated from regular classes and emphasized students＇ creativity. However, no differences were appeared in a few items: study of gifted people and research methods (gifted=3.0; regular=.21 F=2.54), students＇ freedom of choice for topics of lessons, tasks, etc., (gifted=3.1; regular=3.0, F=0.31), student product addressed to real audience (gifted=2.8, regular=2.6, F=0.96), and students＇ high mobility to seek for data in library, etc. during class periods (gifted=2.3, regular= 2.3, F=0.01). It was concluded that science education for the gifted in Korea calls for quality improvement in terms of teaching and teaming in various aspects.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.81-100
• /
• 2006

본 논문에서는 초등정보과학영재의 선발을 위한 평가문항을 개발하고 학교 현장에 적용한 결과를 분석하여 개발 문항의 타당도를 검증하였다. 이를 위하여 다음과 같은 단계를 통하여 연구를 진행하였다. 첫째, 다양한 측면에서 정보과학영재에 대한 특성을 분석한 후 정보과학영재를 정의하였다. 둘째, 제7차 초등수학교육과정 속의 이산수학적 요소를 분석하여 초등정보과학영재의 선발을 위한 평가문항을 개발하였다. 셋째, 개발한 평가문항을 학교현장에 투입하여 다양한 관점의 결과를 분석하였다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.415-422
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of scientific program for gifted elementary students using metacognition on learning-flow and lingual interaction. For the purpose, the two classes for elementary science of P Institute for Gifted Education located in Pusan were assigned to experimental and control groups, respectively. The experimental and controls groups received eight sessions applying a program for scientifically gifted students using metacognition and same program without using it, respectively. The learning-flow test and the lingual interaction observed among students and between teacher and students pre and post program were compared and analyzed. The results shows that there was no significant difference between pretest and posttest in experimental group, indicating that learning-flow is not a construct obtained by short-term using of metacognition. For the lingual interactions, however, the amounts of conversation and the ratio of high level conversation in experimental group were 1.6 and 1.5 times higher than those in control group. This suggests that the lingual interaction may be varied among classes even with same experiments, by instruction method. The lingual interaction is not active in control group where the experimental results may be obtained easily only with sincere attitude while, in experimental group, questions using metacognition and providing intellectual stimulation is continuously presented, leading to high level of lingual interaction, therefore it is considered that the development of scientific program for gifted elementary students using these advantages is needed.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.91-98
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is to compare scientific attitude and degree of satisfaction for school science lessons between science-gifted and general elementary school students. The results of analysis are as follows : 1. Scientific attitude of both groups appeared to be above average and especially science-gifted students demonstrated higher level of scientific attitude in all area. The characteristics of science-gifted tenacity, high motivation, and creativity are demonstrated in their scientific attitudes. 2. Degree of satisfaction about school science lesson for both groups was above average while science-gifted students showed higher degree of satisfaction than general students. 3. Correlation of scientific attitude and science lessons between science-gifted and general students were relatively low. Scientific attitude of science-gifted students are more dependent on other variables than those of science lessons.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.337-358
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 영재 행동을 도와주는 근원으로 개인의 정의적이고 성격적인 특성인 인지적 조합요인과 리더십과의 관계를 밝히는 것으로서 연구대상은 초등수학영재 77명과 초등일반학생 110명이다. 연구 결과, 초등수학영재가 인지적 조합요인의 모든 하위 영역에서 일반학생보다 수준이 높았으며, 통계적으로 유의미한 차이를 보였다. 또한, 초등수학영재와 일반학생은 리더십 수준에서 차이를 보이며, 모든 하위 영역에서 영재의 리더십 수준이 높았다. 인지적 조합요인과 리더십의 관계에 있어서는 영재 및 일반학생 두 집단 모두에게 있어 인지적 조합요인의 하위 영역과 리더십 하위 영역은 모두 유의미한 정적 상관이 있었다. 이 결과를 통해 인지적 조합요인은 리더십에 긍정적인 영향을 미치므로, 인지적 조합요인을 계발하면 리더십 또한 계발될 것이다. 따라서 리더십 계발을 위한 프로그램을 개발할 때 인지적 조합요인을 고려할 필요가 있다.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.55-61
• /
• 2009

This study was designed to explore problem solving process to earth science area by elementary science gifted children, which compared and analyzed the questionnaires and problem solving to earth science area by gifted Science education center, Seoul National University Of Education, The analyzed results showed difference by gender that in the science study level at the time of entrance to the gifted Science education center, male students was the highest in the middle school as 37.5%, and female students in the elementary 6th grade as 61.5%. And male students were investigated to do more precedent study than female students. Secondly, in the problem solving process of earth science related problems, males made most use of problem solving process area(30.3%), and females symbolizing (27.5%) area. Thirdly, comparison of reasoning technology in problem solving process by gender indicated that both sexes made the most use of analytical reasoning (male 62.0%, female 53.6%) to solve problems.