• 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지
• /
• 제6권6호
• /
• pp.403-412
• /
• 2016

기술을 이용한 거래 및 투자가 활성화 되면서 기술에 대한 객관적인 평가의 필요성이 증대되고 있다. 그러나 현행 기술가치 평가방법은 신뢰성 및 객관성이 부족한 한계를 가지고 있다. 전통적인 평가방법론인 시장접근법, 수익접근법, 비용접근법 외에도 실물옵션법, 로열티산정법 등 다양한 평가방법론이 연구되고 있으나 시장에서 지배적인 평가방법론은 없는 실정이다. 기술의 가치는 대상에 따라 상대적으로 결정되기 때문에 유사한 기술이라도 동일한 가치 평가방법을 적용할 수 없다. 이에 대하여 소수의 전문가보다 다수 참여에 의한 판단이 객관적이고 나은 결과를 가져온다는 의미의 집단지성 및 크라우드 소싱을 통한 접근은 위와 같은 문제에 대한 대안을 제시해 준다. 본 논문에서는 크라우드 소싱 모델의 네가지 유형인 Wisdom, Voting, Funding, Creation을 접목하여 전문가 그룹을 활용한 직접적 평가 및 대중의 간접적 평가를 통해 기술가치 평가에 대한 객관성을 제고할 수 있는 방법에 대해 논의한다.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.281-307
• /
• 2020

A variety of approaches are being applied to improve the existing ex-ante evaluation by expert panels in publicly funded R&D. While the objective evaluation criteria are constantly being improved to screen and select the superior projects, alternative approaches such as random prioritization and logical modeling are also underway to overcome the conservative bias of reviewers and to secure disruptive innovation. This study intends to find critical implications for ex-ante evaluation of public R&D system from the comparison of Indonesia and Korea. For the comparative analysis, literature review and expert in-depth interviews are conducted on the national R&D system and the selection evaluation process. In Korea, the selection criteria of projects are legally promulgated for establishing an objective evaluation system, and at the program level, the major considerations in the planning process are specified by Presidential Decree. On the other hand, while Indonesia conducts R&D in 47 strategic fields largely by public research institutes (PRI) based on the non-competitive government contributions. This study draws out implications of institutionalizing the planning process at the level of program, and of increasing the ratio of contract-based competitive funding at the level of project in the national R&D portfolio.

• International journal of advanced smart convergence
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.51-60
• /
• 2023

This study focuses on the design of a GPT-based system for relatively rapid technology credit assessment of SMEs. This system addresses the limitations of traditional time-consuming evaluation methods and proposes a GPT-based model to comprehensively evaluate the technological capabilities of SMEs. This model fine-tunes the GPT model to perform fast technical credit assessment on SME-specific text data. Also, It presents a system that automates technical credit evaluation of SMEs using GPT and LLM-based chatbot technology. This system relatively shortens the time required for technology credit evaluation of small and medium-sized enterprises compared to existing methods. This model quickly assesses the reliability of the technology in terms of usability of the base model.

• 충청수학회지
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.89-99
• /
• 1996

We introduce and study certain subgroups of homotopy groups which contain evaluation subgroups and use these subgroups to obtain a sequence similar to homotopy sequence of fibration. We use the sequence to calculate evaluation subgroups or generalized evaluation subgroups of some topological pair.

• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.77-94
• /
• 2015

This research aims to develope a maturity evaluation model on the technology management competence (MEMTMC) and to investigate the relationship between technology management competencies and maturity evaluation level in Korean firms. After research framework building through literature review and field study focusing on interview process, a maturity evaluation model was suggested, including technology management competency factors such as vision and strategy, leadership, resources, projects, performance management, and systematic procedures. Through the empirical study on the 111 Korean firms, the MEMTMC model was tested and some hypotheses were examined. As a result of the research, we found that the MEMTMC is significant statistically to evaluate the technology management competencies of firms from a practical point of view. Additionally, these findings suggest that firms can build up their technology management competencies, including the vision and strategy, leadership, resources, projects, performance management, and systematic procedures in order to raise their maturity level of technology management competencies. But this research has some limitations such as this MEMTMC has not considered separately the variety of industry, not enough survey respondents and 5 level group firms etc.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제5권3호
• /
• pp.307-320
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this paper was to design evaluation process on technological information analysis done by re-tired scientists and engineers. Existing studies on evaluation system and methodology were analyzed and their implications are as follows. To provide useful feedback to the retired scientists, indicators of evaluation should be simplified and method of evaluation confined to the quantitative one. And the results of evaluation need to be utilized in direction to encourage the old scientists and engineers.

• 한국군사과학기술학회지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.441-457
• /
• 2011

In this study, the axiomatic design(AD) method is applied to construct the hierarchical structure of evaluation criteria and the AHP method is used to calculate the weights of criteria in order to develop the proposal evaluation index for the overseas weapon system purchasing projects. The common evaluation items as main categories are selected through the review of evaluation criteria from the previous works and projects, relevant regulations and defense policy, and the design matrix using fuzzy concept is established and evaluated by the expert group in each design phase to determine the independency, that is the satisfaction of decoupled or uncoupled design, for each criteria in the same hierarchy when they are derived from the main categories. The establishment of decoupled or uncoupled design matrix provides mutually exclusiveness of how small number of DPs can be accounted for FRs within the same hierarchy. The proposal evaluation index developed in this study will be used as a general proposal evaluation index for the overseas weapon system purchasing projects which there are no systematically established evaluation tools.

• 정보관리연구
• /
• 제33권1호
• /
• pp.61-80
• /
• 2002

본 연구는 과학기술분야 해외 온라인 데이터베이스의 현황을 평가하고 조사한 것이다. 데이터베이스에 대한 평가는 과학기술정보 이용자나 정보 제공자에게 매우 중요한 과제로 인식되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 우선적으로 데이터베이스 평가에 대한 선행 연구를 간략하게 요약하였다. 그리고 현재 이용 가능한 해외 온라인 데이터베이스 618종을 대상으로 주제분야별, 발행처별, 갱신주기별, 온라인 이용방법별로 분석하였다. 또한 과학기술분야별로 주요한 온라인 데이터베이스를 간략하게 소개하였다.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.122-133
• /
• 2005

This study could begin with the improvement of computer graphic technology The graphic technology is the standards of computer technology level and up-to-date technology intensive. Above all, the technology of virtual reality has developed rapidly and the development of the program has changed from professional one only for the experts to easy of access ones for the space designers. Moreover, the program which major internet user's can experience the virtual model has been made, as the development of virtual reality technology that is based on the web. These graphic technology and the development of the web helped to extract human experiences on the space design step. However, to find the meeting point with real recognition is not easy though the virtual reality technology develops. Because the real space is made up of various senses that people feel in their surroundings. But, this study was possible because most of the space recognition is based on the visual organ, even though it can't satisfy all sensible factors that we feel in reality. Therefore, the significant of this study is the standards and criteria of evaluation, the technological proposal, expecting to make more advanced alternative design than before.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제4권3호
• /
• pp.275-290
• /
• 2001

The frameworks for evaluation of national R&D programs reflect their various political and administrative cultures(Gibbons & Georghiou, 1987), and the structure of national R&D system. In this research the core research questions are : what is god evaluation\ulcorner What is being evaluated, by whom, by which criteria, for whom and what purpose\ulcorner In order to examine these general aims and answer these questions, in detail several objectives can be proposed on the process of this research. In this research, the national R&D programs will be considered in terms of the interface between evaluation and the wider policy-making process. The programs for case study are the Alvey program(UK), the Advanced Technology Program (US) and the Framework program(EU) . One of the characteristics of these programs is the well established evaluation systems they have. From the comparative analysis, we can withdraw some useful implication for Korean evaluation practice for national R&D programs. Evaluation system is social process and the way in which it is organized is critical to its outcome.