Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology (한국군사과학기술학회지)

The Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology (한국군사과학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Development of Proposal Evaluation Index for the Overseas Weapon System Purchasing Projects using Axiomatic Design/AHP

공리적설계/AHP를 이용한 해외무기체계 구매사업 제안서 평가지표 개발에 관한 연구

  • Cho, Hyun-Ki (Seoul National Unversity of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Woo-Je (Seoul National Unversity of Science and Technology)
  • 조현기 (서울과학기술대학교 산업정보시스탬공학과) ;
  • 김우제 (서울과학기술대학교 산업정보시스탬공학과)
  • Received : 2011.03.02
  • Accepted : 2011.05.13
  • Published : 2011.06.05
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, the axiomatic design(AD) method is applied to construct the hierarchical structure of evaluation criteria and the AHP method is used to calculate the weights of criteria in order to develop the proposal evaluation index for the overseas weapon system purchasing projects. The common evaluation items as main categories are selected through the review of evaluation criteria from the previous works and projects, relevant regulations and defense policy, and the design matrix using fuzzy concept is established and evaluated by the expert group in each design phase to determine the independency, that is the satisfaction of decoupled or uncoupled design, for each criteria in the same hierarchy when they are derived from the main categories. The establishment of decoupled or uncoupled design matrix provides mutually exclusiveness of how small number of DPs can be accounted for FRs within the same hierarchy. The proposal evaluation index developed in this study will be used as a general proposal evaluation index for the overseas weapon system purchasing projects which there are no systematically established evaluation tools.

Keywords

References

  1. 방위사업관리규정, 방위사업청, p. 102, 2010.
  2. 경태원, 김상국, "AHP 기법을 이용한 IT 프로젝트 관리 우선순위 수립에 대한 연구", Information Systems Review, Vol. 9(3), pp. 157-181, 2007.
  3. 김찬수, 조규갑, "국방핵심기술 연구개발의 제안서 평가를 위한 평가지표 개발에 관한 연구", IE Interfaces, Vol. 21(1), pp. 96-108, 2003.
  4. 이형준, 김우제, 김찬수, "국방연구개발 시험개발사업 성과평가지표 개발에 관한 연구", IE Interfaces, Vol. 23(1), pp. 78-88, 2010.
  5. 차성운, 박경진 역, Axiomatic Design, 동명사, 서울, pp. 142-146, 2009.
  6. Cebi, S. and Kahraman, C., "Developing a Group Decision Support System Based on Fuzzy Information Axiom", Knowledge-Based Systems Vol. 23, pp. 3-16, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2009.07.005
  7. Cebi, S. and Kahraman, C., "Extension of axiomatic Design Principles under Fuzzy Environment", Expert Systems with Applications Vol. 37, pp. 2682-2689, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.08.010
  8. Cebi, S. and Kahraman, C., "Indicator Design for Passenger Car using Fuzzy Axiomatic Design Principles", Expert Systems with Applications Vol. 37, pp. 6470-6481, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.138
  9. Ho, W., Xu, X. and Dey, P., "Multi-criteria Decision Making Approaches for Supplier Evaluation and Selection : A Literature Review", European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 202, pp. 16-24, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009
  10. Kulak, O. and Kahraman, C., "Multi-attribute Comparison of Advanced Manufacturing Systems using Fuzzy vs. Crisp Axiomatic Design Approach", International Journal of Production Economic, Vol. 95, pp. 415-424, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.02.009
  11. Suh, N. P., "Axiomatic Design Theory for Systems, Research in Engineering Design", Vol. 10, pp. 189-209, 1998.
  12. Saaty, T. L., "How to Make a Decision : The Analytic Hierarchy Process", European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 48, pp. 9-26, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I