• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제10권1호
• /
• pp.107-116
• /
• 2008

Nowadays, BSC presented by alpan is observed by many enterprises and is being operated gradually. BSC includes non-financial factor as well as financial factor in performance assessment and it is a tool that will be able to evaluate even strategy of long-term view. In point of performance management, BSC brings in relief importance on non-financial performance as well as financial performance and it shares with viewpoint of 4 things of financial viewpoint, customer viewpoint, internal process view point, learning and growth viewpoint. then these make an array with vision and strategy of organization by causal relationship, it presented necessity of performance control on organization as center on KPI of inner of each viewpoint. Thus, study on measures and control of management performance is progressed actively and is accomplishing much development. This study is aimed at calculation of weight that is able to reflect its importance about AHP on KPI of each viewpoint. The purpose of this study is to present desirable performance measurement model and to give a weight in consideration of working-level character.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.183-191
• /
• 2009

The purposes of this research are presenting a new business model by introducing USN/ZigBee and measuring productivity using BSC(Balanced scorecard), and becoming a cornerstone by presenting a prototype of ServiceScience which is getting more attention from Industrial Engineering and Management. The new business model consists of development of leak current monitoring sensor using USN/ZigBee and the adoption of RCM(Reliability-Centered Maintenance) using knowledge-based system at current distribution. Additionally, for the measurement of this new model's productivity, ESC is used, and the strategic map and measurement indices are produced. The main contributions of this paper are showing a concrete model of ServiceScience and demonstrating this model can be extended to similar areas like are gas, water etc.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.117-124
• /
• 2011

Supplier selection is one of the most important activities of a company. This importance is increased even more by new strategies in a supply chain, because of the key role suppliers perform in terms of quality, costs and services which affect the outcome in the buyer's company. In addition, green production has become an important issue for almost every manufacturer and will determine the sustainability of a manufacturer. Therefore a performance evaluation system for supplier and green suppliers is necessary to determine the suitability of suppliers to cooperate with the company. Supplier and green supplier selection is a multiple criteria decision making problem in which the objectives are not equally important. In practice, vagueness and imprecision of the goals, constraints and parameters in these problems make the decision making complicated. The objective of this study is to construct a decision-making process using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and balanced scorecard (BSC) for evaluating supplier and green suppliers in the manufacturing industry. The BSC concept is applied to define the hierarchy with four major perspectives and performance indicators are selected for each perspective. FAHP is then proposed in order to tolerate vagueness and ambiguity of information. Finally, FAHP is applied to facilitate the solving process. With the proposed approach, manufacturers can have a better understanding of the capabilities that supplier and green supplier must possess and can evaluate and select the most suitable supplier for cooperation.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.63-69
• /
• 2011

As environmental protection is becoming more and more important, green production has become a key issue for almost every manufacturer and will determine a manufacturer can be sustainable in the long term. Therefore a performance evaluation system for green suppliers is necessary to determine the suitability of suppliers to cooperate with the company. While the works on the evaluation and/or selection of suppliers are abundant, those that concern environmental issues are rather limited. The objective of this study is to construct a combined model based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and balanced scorecard (ESC) for evaluating green suppliers in the manufacturing industry. The ESC concept is applied to define the hierarchy with four major perspectives (i.e. financial, customer, internal business process, and learning and growth), and performance indicators are selected for each perspective. FAHP is then proposed in order to tolerate vagueness and ambiguity of information. Finally, FAHP is finally constructed to facilitate the solving process. With the proposed model, manufacturers can have a better understanding of the capabilities that a green supplier must possess and can evaluate and select the most suitable green supplier for cooperation.

• The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business
• /
• 제8권5호
• /
• pp.1039-1046
• /
• 2021

This study aims to determine the influence of the application of Total Quality Management (TQM) in coffee exporting companies in Bali. The research was conducted as there was not much research done to explore the application of TQM in coffee exporting companies in the city of Kintamani, Bali. Thus, this research plays an important role in examining the effect of the application of total quality management factors on company performance. In this research, the effect of TQM variables which are: customer focus factors, continuous improvement factors and employee empowerment factors on the company's performance was measured by using a balanced scorecard approach. The research result showed that the customer focus, the continuous improvement, and the employee empowerment factor has a positive impact on the performance of coffee exporting companies in the City of Kintamani. The result showed that continuous improvement factor has a more dominant influence compared to the customer focus factors and the employee empowerment factor. Thus, it is very important to consider the consistency when the companies implement TQM. In conclusion, TQM is important for coffee exporting companies in Indonesia to enter global competition, especially for world market-oriented companies and should be supported by the government and stakeholders.

• 한국식생활문화학회지
• /
• 제24권5호
• /
• pp.486-495
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this research was to investigate whether the perception of KPIs by restaurant managers from financial and non-financial perspectives was affected by BSC implementation. The perceptions that were examined were importance, adoption, performance, and utilization of KPIs. We surveyed managers from multinational restaurant chains that were adopting BSC and those that were not. From a non-financial perspective, the difference in perceived importance between BSC adopted firms and firms that did not adopt BSC was significant. The managers of BSC adopted firms perceived KPIs more seriously than the others. Secondly, according to the managers' working experiences, the difference of perceived utilization in the internal business process perspective was significant between BSC adopted firms and firms that did not adopt BSC. In addition, from the learning and growth perspective, the difference in perceived adoption and utilization between the two groups was significant. Finally, in the BSC adopted firms, the perceived importance of the managers affected the other perceptions like adoption and utilization from both the financial and non-financial perspectives.

• 경영정보학연구
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.291-308
• /
• 2008

국내외의 여러 조직에서 구축하고 있는 BSC(Balanced Scorecard)의 성공요인중의 하나는 BSC 성과 관리시스템을 구축할 때 발생하는 현실적인 문제를 해결하는 것이다. 기존의 분산되고 중복되는 성과 관리시스템을 BSC 시스템이라는 골격에 적용하여 어떻게 통합적으로 관리할 것인가와 조직의 미션과 비전을 달성 할 수 있는 전략 실행의 요체인 핵심성공요인(CSF: Critical Success Factor)과 KPI(Key Performance Indicator)을 어떻게 도출할 것인가에 대한 대안을 제시하는 것이 BSC 성공에 필수적이다. 그래서 본 연구에서는 이러한 문제들을 개선 할 수 있는 모범적인 공공기관의 BSC 구축 사례를 토대로 성과평가를 효과적으로 관리할 수 있는 방안들을 제시한다. 즉, 공공부문의 BSC는 4가지 관점 중 재무관점에 있어서 민간부문과 달리 예산을 통한 재무자원 조달 측면을 고려해야 하며, 각각의 관점들을 개별 공공기관의 성격에 맞게 변용시키는 방법이 필요함을 언급하였다. 공공 부문에서의 BSC에서는 공공기관의 존립 근거, 즉 미션이 대 국민 서비스 차원이라는 목적에 부합되도록 고객관점이 강화되어야 함을 제안한다. 또한, 기존 공공 부문의 분산되고 중복성이 존재하는 성과관리(심사분석, 정부업무 평가, 직무성과계약제, 고객만족도 평가)시스템들이 BSC 시스템에 어떻게 적용되었는가를 살펴봄으로써 성과관리 시스템을 통합적으로 관리 할 수 있는 방향을 제시하고 있다.

• 한국산업경영시스템학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국산업경영시스템학회 2002년도 춘계학술대회
• /
• pp.113-118
• /
• 2002

Research and Development(R&D) was once considered to be a unique, creative and unstructured process that was difficult, if not impossible, to manage and control. R&D decisions impact the entire enterprise. Therefore, decisions must not be based solely on R&D's perception of what is important or worthwhile. R&D contributions are difficult to measure separately from other functional organizations such as manufacturing and marketing. While some firms are attempting to overcome perceived limitations in traditional accounting-based performance measures using ROI, EVA, others are embracing the use of non-financial measures for decision making and performance evaluation. In particular, many firms are implementing 'Balanced Scorecard(BSC)' systems that supplement traditional accounting measures with non-financial measures focused on at least three other perspectives-customers, internal business processes, and learning and growth. AHP is a popular multi-attribute decision making model that allows for the development of importance rankings. The AHP has been applied in a wide variety of practical settings to model complex decision problems. The former, determine Perspectives and the Key Performance indicator(KPI) through the former research, the latter compose the questionnaire for determine the weight of perspectives and KPIs. And then, make a survey with researchers about 4 perspectives and 18 KPIs. The results will be simulate with Expert Choice 2000 for determine the weights. This results helps establish the firm's business strategy and technology strategy The firm should establish the business strategy to consider market position, business growth potential, and technological capabilities.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.50-74
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study was to identify a determent of mastery approach goal and performance approach goal using a basic concept of goal orientations and goal setting theory, and to evaluate a preference of goal achievement index as a balance score card (BSC). The study model proposed had a adoptable level of goodness of fit index(.94) and root mean square residual(.08). The meditating variable, goal contribution, totally mediated the impact of goal commitment, Y-theory human behavior, and self-efficacy but organizational resource contribution for pursuing goal orientation. Moreover, goal contribution significantly determined mastery approach goal(p<.01) and performance approach goal(.05). In standardized effects, the most powerful antecedent of mastery approach goal and performance approach goal were in order of organizational resource contribution(.27/.28), goal contribution(.21/.17), self-efficacy(.07/.06), and Y -theory human behavior and goal commitment(.05/.05), respectively. Moreover, goal contribution had a more powerful impact on mastery approach goal(.21) rather than performance approach goal(.17). In the preference of BSC, all job types preferred learning and growth index in first. In the second preference, medical doctors and pharmacists chose financial results, nurses customer service, and office managers internal processes. Each job type reflected its' own preferred BSC index to that of the other job types. In comparing a preference of four BSC index of each own job type, it was statistically different at p<.001. In conclusion, one who emphasize organizational goal contribution in pursuing goal orientation has a more strong orientation toward mastery approach goal rather than performance approach goal. A hospital should overcome and harmonize the different preferences of four BSC index since the differences might cause organizational conflicts among job types with having each unique professional norm.

• 산학경영연구
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.111-136
• /
• 2008

균형성과표(BSC) 모형은 기업의 경영성과를 비재무적 지표로서 학습 및 성장성과, 내부 경영프로세스 성과, 고객성과, 재무적 지표로서 재무적 성과를 중심으로 측정하고 평가하는 통합적 성과 측정 시스템이다. 이러한 균형성과표(BSC) 모형은 재무적 성과 지표를 중심으로 기업의 경영성과를 측정하고 평가하는데 있어서 나타나는 한계를 보완하고 종합적으로 측정하고 평가함으로써 합리적인 기업의 성과를 예측하고 측정하는 평가시스템이다. 본 연구에서는 기업이 균형성과표(BSC) 모형을 도입하여 활용하는 경우 도입전과 후의 성과에서 유의미한 차이가 있는지를 구명하고, 비재무적 성과 지표와 재무적 성과 지표, 그리고 전반적인 경영성과 간의 영향관계를 분석하였다. 분석결과 균형성과표(BSC) 모형을 도입하여 활용하는 경우 기업의 학습 및 성장성과에 유의미한 차이가 분석되었으며, 비재무적 성과 지표들은 재무적 성과를 개선하여 전반적인 기업의 경영성과를 향상시키는 것으로 분석되었다.