• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제40권2호
• /
• pp.57-66
• /
• 2002

This study investigated institutionalized children's behavior problems depending on their cognitive abilities. Subjects were 185 institutionalized children in 15 child-welfare facilities in Seoul (132 preschooler and 153 primary schoolers; 106 boys and 79 girls). Institutionalized children's cognitive abilities were measured using the Comprehension and Picture Completion Assessment, two subsets of K-WPPSI (Park et al., 1996) Comprehension and Picture Completion Assessment belong to verbal and performance scale, respectively. Measures of behavior problems included anxiety, immaturity, social withdrawal, physical symptom, hyperactivity, and aggression. Data were analyzed with mean, standard deviation, and t-test. Results showed that institutionalized children had higher scores in Picture Completion Assessment than Comprehension Assessment. Furthermore, institutionalized children with low scores in Comprehension Assessment were higher in anxiety and social withdrawal than children with high scores in Comprehension Assessment.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.72-86
• /
• 1990

The purpose of this study was to investigate possible differences in the behavior problems of peer-rejected and peer-neglected children in relation to parent and teacher perspectives. The subjects in this study were 239 children and their parents(fathers:37, mothers: 155. father+mother pairs:47) and 10 teachers in the fifth grade of a public elementary school located in Seoul. The sociometric assessment mothods were positive and negative peer nominations. On the basis of this sociometric assessment. children were assigned to one of 4 categories in degree of popularity:65 popular, 53 average. 62 rejected. and 59 neglected children. Parents and teachers rated child behavior on the Achenbach and Edelbrock Child Behavior Checklist(CBCL) for parents and Teacher's Report Form(TRF) were used. The obtained data were analyzed by one-way MANOVA and Duncan Multiple Range Test. Rejected children were found to exhibit more behavior problems than neglected, popular, or average children. Neglected children, however, did not exhibit more behavior problems than chidren of average status.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제28권5호
• /
• pp.55-72
• /
• 2007

Replication of the factor structure of the TBAQ(Toddler Behavior Assessment Questionnaire Goldsmith, 1988) in Korean 2-year-old children was examined by Multitrait Multimethod matrix of observed and reported child behavior. Participants included 113 toddlers and their mothers. Three factors comprising 63 items were identified and labeled as easy, difficult and fearful. On the Child Behavior Checklist(Achenbach & Edelbrock, 1983) difficult temperament was positively related to externalizing while fearful temperament was positively related to internalizing problems. Observation of inhibited child behavior in both unfamiliar social and nonsocial situations demonstrated a positive relationship to observed inhibition of fearful temperament. Easy temperament correlated negatively with both social inhibition and internal behavior problems. Results supported construct validity of TBAQ factors for Korean 2-year-old children.

• Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.3-12
• /
• 1998

본 연구에서는 청소년 자신의 문제행동에 대한 평가와 부모의 평가가 서로 어떻게 다른지와 각자의 평가에 영향을 주는 변인들을 비교하였다. 일반청소년 3271명을 대상으로 청소년 자신이 평가한 YSR과 부모가 평가하는 K-CBCL을 동시에 실시 한 후 두 평가척도에 공통되는 문항들만으로 요인분석을 실시한 결과 K-CBCL에서는 제1요인으로 공격성/비행요인이 전체변량의 14.08%를 설명하였고 이와 함께 신체적 증상, 사회적 위축, 소란/방해, 우울/불안 등 5개의 요인이 추출되었으며, YSR에서는 제1요인으로 우울/불안/위축요인이 전체변량의 14.23%를 설명하였고 이와 함께 공격성, 신체적 증상, 소란/방해, 인정욕구 등 5개의 요인이 추출되었다. K-CBCL과 YSR의 총 문제행동 점수 평가에 영향을 주는 변인들을 살펴보기 위해 회귀분석을 실시한 결과 부모의 평가와 청소년 평가에서 공통적으로 부모, 친구 등 사회적 관계가 나쁠수록, 학업수행이 나쁠수록 총 문제행동 점수가 높았다. 반면에 청소년 자신의 평가에서는 성, 연령이 중요한 기준이 되며 특히 보고하는 문제유형이 성별에 따라 다른 양상을 나타내었다. 이와 같은 결과는 부모가 자녀의 문제행동을 평가하는 경우 공격성이나 비행 등과 같이 외현적으로 드러난 행동문제가 중요한 기준이 되는 반면, 청소년 자신이 평가하는 경우 우울/불안/위축 등 내재화된 문제 정도를 최우선적으로 자각하게 된다는 점을 시사하며 이에 따른 청소년 평가 및 진단에서의 시사점을 논의하였다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.459-471
• /
• 1999

This study is to develop a mathematics assessment framework based on the mathematics assessment framework and content strands suggested by KEDI, NCTM, NAEP, TIMSS, Oregon State, New Zealand. According to the literature review, there has been more emphasis that students themselves 'communicate' what they 'understood' and how they 'thought' during the situation of 'solving problems'. As a result, communication ability is considered one of the most important factors in assessment situation, which always accompany the abilities of understanding, thinking, problem-solving, etc. In conclusion, the framework related to mathematical knowledge consists of content and behavior domains. The content domain is categorized into 6 content areas of the 7th mathematics curriculum, and the behavior domain is divided into computation, understanding, inference, problem-solving, and communication.

• 재활치료과학
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.9-25
• /
• 2024

목적 : 자폐 스펙트럼 장애(Autistic Spectrum Disorders: ASD) 아동은 감각 처리, 제한된 흥미, 행동, 인지, 사회성, 구강 운동, 소화 등 복합적인 원인으로 인해 섭식장애가 흔하게 동반된다. 주요한 섭식장애 문제로는 식사 시간 행동 문제, 까다로운 먹기, 선택적 먹기, 새로운 음식 거부, 음식 다양성 저하 등이며 이로 인해 영양 섭취 및 건강 문제, 발달, 사회적 활동 참여 제한, 가족과 보호자 스트레스를 유발하기도 한다. 따라서 ASD 아동의 섭식장애를 조기에 확인하여 적절한 중재 제공과 적합한 평가도구 사용이 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 최신 문헌 고찰을 통해 ASD 아동의 섭식장애 평가도구에 대한 심도 있는 이해를 위한 고찰을 실시하였다. 연구방법 : 본 연구는 ASD, ASD의 섭식문제, ASD의 섭식평가 등의 키워드를 검색하여 최근 약 10년간의 선행연구를 바탕으로 ASD 섭식문제 평가도구를 분석하였다. 결과 : ASD 섭식장애 평가는 직접 평가와 간접 평가로 나뉘는데 그 중, 부모와 보호자가 아동의 전반적인 상황을 척도화 한 질문지나 평가도구로 측정하는 간접 평가가 주로 사용되고 있었다. 평가는 주로 식사 시간 중 아동이 보이는 섭식 행동, 구강 및 미각 관련 감각 처리, 음식 선택 및 선호도를 확인하였으며 보호자의 섭식 태도가 아동의 섭식 행동에 미치는 영향을 평가하기도 하였다. 결론 : ASD 아동의 섭식 장애 평가는 1) 식사 시간 섭식 행동, 2) 감각 처리, 3) 섭취 음식, 4) 기타로 구분되었다. ASD 아동의 주요한 섭식장애 특징은 매우 다양하기 때문에 종합적인 평가가 이루어져야 하지만 아직 제한적이다. 또한 구강 운동 기능, 소화 등 추가적인 영역의 평가도 고려되어야 할 것으로 보인다. 작업치료사 등 연하재활 전문가는 ASD 아동의 섭식 문제, 행동, 감각 등에 대한 기본적인 이해를 바탕으로 한 종합적인 평가도구를 적용해야 할 것이다.

• Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.37-44
• /
• 2010

Objectives ： The purpose of this study was to evaluate gender differences with respect to the internalization or externalization of symptoms according to the amount of time spent engaged in extracurricular education. Methods ： The study included a community sample of 755 boys and girls (mean age, 6.6 years), collected from five elementary schools in Gunpo, South Korea. Primary caregivers completed a questionnaire which included information on demographics, the amounts of time children spent in extracurricular education and with other activities, and an adapted form of the Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC-2). Gender differences regarding externalizing and internalizing behavior problems were examined according to extracurricular education. Results ： With respect to the boys, there was a difference in the frequency of those who had externalizing behavior problems according to their time spent in extracurricular education. In contrast, the girls exhibited no difference. With respect to those children who spent a lot of time engaged in extracurricular education, there was a gender-specific difference only with respect to externalizing behavior problems. Conclusion ： A gender-specific difference exists only in terms of externalizing behavior problems according to time spent engaged in extracurricular education.

• 한국직업건강간호학회지
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.71-83
• /
• 2009

Objective: This study was conducted to compare health conditions and problems, health promoting behavior, and risky environment of industrial workers. Methods: The subjects of this study were 1,075 workers in 40 factories, located in Daegu, Korea. Survey data were collected from April 17th, 2006 to April 28th, 2006. CMI (Cornell Medical Index) Health Checklist was used to assess the health problems, Health Rating Scale for health status, HPLP II for health promoting behavior, and environmental risk assessment tool for risky environment. The data were analyzed by One-way ANOVA and Pearson Correlation Coefficient using SPSS 12.0 for windows. Results: The results indicated a significant difference in health problems (F=4.70, p=.000), health conditions (F=2.47, p=.022), health promoting behavior (F=5.67, p=.000), and risky environment (F=14.75, p=.000) among these industrial workers. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that there is a need to develop customized health care programs for each company to provide differentiated health care to different types of work places. Further studies are required to assess differences in work environment among different types of work places for measures to reduce harmful factors to the environment.

• Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
• /
• 제25권3호
• /
• pp.142-155
• /
• 2014

Objectives : The aim of this study was to develop an assessment tool for measurement of children's functioning in the mental health service. We conducted a preliminary study to develop a sensitive and inclusive scale focused on the functional changes of children rather than just focusing on their symptoms or screening. Methods : The Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale and the Korean-Child Behavior Checklist (K-CBCL) were both administered to 134 parents of children with emotional or behavioral problems who participated in the Aizone program and also to 186 parents of elementary school children in the Seoul metropolitan area as a control group. SPSS version 12.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results : Most of the reliability coefficients were over 0.70 except those of the conduct behavior items, which showed relatively high internal consistency. The corrected item-total correlations ranged from .411 to 758, except those of conduct behavior items and special measure items. In a concurrent validity test with K-CBCL, the total behavior problem score of K-CBCL was highly correlated with the total score of the Child and Adolescent Functional Assesment Scale (r=.610). For the construct validity, confirmatory factor analysis was performed for each of four areas, including behavior (at home/school), achievement, peer relationship, and emotion. Conclusion : The results showed that the scale was statistically reliable and valid, except for conduct behavior items. This study was conducted only for parents with elementary children. An adolescents group should be included in future studies.

• The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.250-257
• /
• 2020

Purpose: This study examined the effects of training using the slime on the hand function and problem behavior in adults with intellectual disabilities. Methods: Five adults with intellectual disabilities who were judged as Level 1 or Level 2 were selected. The training consisted of one session (50 min)/day, one day/week for 10 weeks (preparatory activities: 5 min, slime activities: 40 min, finishing activities: 5 min) The functions of the hand (Purdue Pegboard Test [PPT], grip strength test [GST]) and problem behavior (Korean Behavior Problems Inventory [KBPI]) were assessed three times (first assessment; pre, second assessment; post-5 weeks, third assessment; post-10 weeks). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to analyze changes in the subjects' performance before and after the intervention. Results: In the PPT, the use of the non-dominant hand was increased significantly (p<0.05). No significant differences were observed in the remaining results, but the mean value increased. In addition, although the problem behavior was not statistically significant, an increase in the problem behavior score was noted. Conclusion: The training using the slime for adults with intellectual disabilities is effective in hand function improvement and reducing problem behavior.