• Korean Journal of Logic
• /
• v.23 no.2
• /
• pp.71-115
• /
• 2020

It seems certain that even if the same evidence is in itself given for any hypotheses, the way how it is obtained makes some differences in its support degree of them. In this respect, it is worth paying our attention to Mayo's conception of "severe test" and her technical development of it, which are just concerned with the procedures of getting evidence. Nonetheless, there have been criticisms against her theory from various respects. Among them, here this paper focuses on those especially raised by Jung (2018) and Iseda (1999). And it attempts to defend Mayo's theory on behalf of her against their critiques. For this purpose, the paper also proposes particularly a new concept of what is called the "mechanism generating an evidence-hypothesis". On the way, Mayo's own faults are revealed as well.

• Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
• /
• v.61 no.6
• /
• pp.359-368
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study was to examine levels of claims and evidence produced by 53 secondary science teachers. Levels of claim and evidence produced by the teachers in this study are various depending on themes. For a problem integrated several science concepts, there were many teachers who produced claims and evidence in a level of 1 or 2. The participant teachers presented claims and evidence in a level of 3 or 4 for a problem related to chemistry concepts presented in chemistry textbooks. Professional development programs should be provided for science teachers to help them develop understanding of argument structure and construct high quality of claims and evidence.

• Convergence Security Journal
• /
• v.18 no.4
• /
• pp.35-43
• /
• 2018

Currently, digital evidence takes judicial discretion in adopting it, which does not clarify the criteria for adoption, and it can shorten the analysis time of digital evidence with distributed processing techniques. However, due to the development of cryptographic techniques, there is a problem in that it is not suitable for the 48 hour limit of the warrant request. In this paper, we analyze the precedents for admissibility of evidence and the probative power in the civil/criminal proceedings, and discuss the need for objective and detailed adoption criteria to replace judicial discretion. In addition, we'd like to propose a preliminary application form for analysis of digital evidence as a problem for limit time for warrant claims from the perspective of forensics and a solution to the problem.

• Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue
• /
• v.21 no.3
• /
• pp.497-510
• /
• 2015

The jury instruction consists of a set of legal rules and provides a guide for jurors to interpret evidence and the legal standard of a proof beyond reasonable doubt. Jury instructions are usually given after the closing arguments (at the end of the trial). But some research has shown that jury instruction provided before the evidence may have an impact on verdict. The present study was to determine the cognitive process caused by early instruction: (1) Early instruction may influence the verdict by upwardly adjusting the threshold for the decision to convict; (2) early instruction may influence the verdict through evaluations of the probative values of evidence; (3) Or both. 187 people older than 20 years of age participated in the on-line survey. With a trial scenario, one independent variable, Instruction Procedure, was manipulated in three levels: before-and-after the evidence procedure, after-only evidence procedure, and no-instruction procedure. The instruction procedure conditions did not show any difference in the evaluation of the probative values of evidence. On the other hand, before-and-after condition showed the lowest rate of guilty verdict and the highest probability of guilt for the defendant in the scenario. This latter result clearly suggested that the instruction procedure affects the decision threshold. Specifically, instruction provided twice, once before and again after the evidence, may upwardly shift the threshold for the decision to convict.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.16 no.8
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2018

With advances in digital technologies digital crimes also rapidly have been increased. For this reason, the digital forensics has an important role in investigating digital crimes. In particular digital evidence analysts have been responsible for more workloads as much increased as it reflects an importance of their task. However previous researches have more focused on technology, not much on their work circumstance and behaviors. This study is to draw out factors affecting job stress and its effects on their turnover rate as it considers Job satisfaction, organization commitment. In this study, survey have been conducted targeting 124 personnel in National Police Agency and then the collected data were analyzed by using Smart PLS 3.0. This study have proved that causal relationship between job stress, satisfaction, commitment and job turnover respectively which is borrowed from organizational concepts. There will be theoretical and practical contribution to improve work circumstance and secure digital forensic talents as well.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering
• /
• v.13 no.8
• /
• pp.1687-1692
• /
• 2009

Cyber forensics is used the process and technology of digital forensics as a criminal investigation in cyber space. Cyber crime is classified into cyber terror and general cyber crime, and those two classes are connected with each other. The investigation of cyber terror requires high technology, system environment and experts, and general cyber crime is connected with general crime by evidence from digital data in cyber space. Accordingly, it is difficult to determine relational crime types, collect evidence and the legal admissibility of evidence. Therefore, we considered the classifications of cyber crime, the collection of evidence in cyber space and the application of laws to cyber crime. In order to efficiently investigate cyber crime, it is necessary to integrate those concepts for each cyber crime-case. In this paper, we constructed a cyber forensics domain ontology for cyber criminal investigation using the concepts, relations and properties, according to categories of cyber crime, laws, evidence, and information of criminals and crime-cases. This ontology can be used in the process of investigating of cyber crime-cases, and for data mining of cyber crime; classification, clustering, association and detection of crime types, crime cases, evidences and criminals.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.23 no.6
• /
• pp.634-649
• /
• 2003

The aim of this paper was to diagnose Korean sixth graders' understanding for scientific evidence and explanation. The instrument constructed by Jeong, Songer, and Lee (2002) was used to assess students' understanding for priority of scientific evidence, objectivity of data, relevance of evidence, data interpretation, coordination of theory and evidence, and repeated observation. Results showed that although many students recognized certain features of scientific inquiry such as objectivity of data, few of them understood why such features are valued and how to collect and use such data. In particular, students experienced difficulty in formulating explanation from evidence, not knowing, for example, that repeated observations are needed before making a general statement. The results of this study suggest that efforts to foster students' inquiry abilities need to be based on careful analyses of students existing inquiry skills and understanding.

• Journal of Advanced Navigation Technology
• /
• v.18 no.1
• /
• pp.50-55
• /
• 2014

Recently, importance of digital forensics has increased and using analysis methods of digital evidence in the analysis of evidence of various types. However, analysis time and effort is steadily increasing because personal disk capacity is too big and it has many number of files. Most digital evidence has time property, such as access time, creation time, and modification time. These time information of digital evidence is one of most important factors in the digital forensic area. But if digital examiner simply analyze based on binary source only, it is possible to have wrong result because time has various types. In this paper, we classify various type of time in the digital evidence and describe advanced analysis method based on timeline chart for digital forensic investigation.

• KSCI Review
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.209-217
• /
• 2007

Korea's seas have the potentials of dispute against China or Japan due to the overlap of the territorial waters and EEZ. In case of marine accidents, the nature of the sea tends to eliminate much of the track, making it another hardship in evidence adoption in case of an international dispute along with the false entries of fishing vessels' journals. Marine Digital Forensics protects the functions of computers and IT appliance on vessels and extracts evidence of voyage and accidents to resolve international dispute. The digital evidence, if tampered with its integrity, may lead to the rejection to a critical claim or may even fail to make a case. As a solution, this thesis suggests Marine Digital Forensics as a way to extract evidence and prove a claim. This may be utilized as means of scientific investigation on sea as overseas exchange increases and the vessels digitalize, leading to a solution in international disputes that may occur in the future.

• Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
• /
• v.64 no.6
• /
• pp.389-400
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of Argument-based Inquiry activities on the claims and evidence in elementary students' science writing. Participants were thirty three fifth grade elementary school students and argument-based inquiry activities on five topics were implemented. We analyzed the Summary Writing samples written by students to investigate the effect of the Argument-based inquiry activities on elementary students' claims and evidence in their science writing, and also analyzed the writing samples of the experimental group to which the Argument-based inquiry activities were implemented, to examine the change of claims and evidence. The results of this study showed that the mean of experimental group was significantly higher than that of the comparison group. As a result of analyzing claims and evidence in Summary Writing of experimental group, the level of claim and evidence has tended to increase gradually as the number of classes progresses.