• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.49-73
• /
• 2004

본 연구는 과학영재학교 학생들의 지적, 정의적 특성을 분석하고, 다양한 특성에 따른 학생들의 교과 선택 경향, 학업성취도, 개별연구과제 선택 경향, 진로선택 및 학교 적응 정도를 파악하는데 그 목적이 있다. 본 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위해 영재아들의 지적 ${\cdot}$ 정의적 특성 및 학교적응을 살펴보았다. 이에 따른 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 영재학생의 경우 출신 지역에 따라 영재교육을 받았는지의 여부에 차이가 났다. 즉, 영재교육을 받은 학생 중 대다수가 수도권과 영남 지역의 학생들이었다. 둘째, 학생들이 지적인 학습 능력에는 만족도가 높으나 대인관계 능력과 관련하여서는 상대적으로 만족도가 낮았다. 그리고 영재학교의 학생들은 일반학교 학생들과 성격 유형상 차이점을 보이고 있다. 즉, 영재학교 학생들은 일반학교 학생들에 비해 상대적으로 내향적이고 미래 지향적 혹은 개념적이며, 감정보다는 논리적 과정을 우선시한다. 셋째, PT 과목 통과에 있어서 생물과 정보 영역을 제외하고는 영재교육원에서의 교육과 PT 통과와는 상관이 없는 것으로 보고되었다. 넷째, 과학영재학교 학생들은 R&E 주제를 선택하는데 있어서 물리 과목에 가장 높은 선호도를 보였다. 그리고 이러한 선호도에는 남녀 간의 차이가 있었다. 또한 영재교육의 여부와 큰 상관이 없었다.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.465-484
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to compare the school life satisfaction of the gifted students with general students. For this study, the questionnaire on school life satisfaction was conducted to 76 elementary gifted students and 125 general students. The results of the study were as follows: First, in the school life satisfaction at the general class, there were significant difference among groups. It was found that the gifted students showed a little higher school life satisfaction score than the general students' (p<.05). The score of gifted class students' school life satisfaction was the highest. Second, the score of gifted class students' school life satisfaction was significantly higher than gifted education institute students' (p<.05). Third, school life satisfaction score of gifted students in a gifted class was significantly higher than in a general class (p<.05). Forth, regarding the gifted students' gender, there was no significant difference between girls and boys. Regarding the grades of the gifted students, there was no significant difference between 5th and 6th grader (p>.05).

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.1-19
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this study is to investigate the self-efficacy of gifted students in the area of sciences. For this purpose, The Self-efficacy Beliefs Inventory was administered to 220 5th and 6th gifted students and high achievers. The research findings were as follows; First, there was no statistically significant difference in the general, academic, self regulated learning, and others’ expectation self-efficacy beliefs between gifted students and high achievers as well as among groups of gifted students. Second, the gifted students in mathematics were higher than other groups in the mathematics self-efficacy beliefs. Third, the high achievers were higher than other groups in the language art self-efficacy beliefs. Fourth, the gifted students in mathematics were higher than other groups in mathematics self-efficacy beliefs. Fifth, the gifted students in science were higher than other groups in science self-efficacy beliefs. Sixth, the gifted students in IT were higher than other groups in computer self-efficacy beliefs. Seventh, the gifted students in IT were lower than other groups in social self-efficacy beliefs.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.22 no.4
• /
• pp.917-928
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to survey and compare of the science gifted and the mathematics gifted students at elementary school's 171 students who live in the Seoul city, using Attitude Assessment Tool and Learning Motivation in Science. The analytical results of the collected data are presented as follow; Firstly, there was no difference between science gifted and mathematics gifted in the attitude, value, social meaning, and attitude toward science subject and learners mostly have a positive attitude toward science but, there was difference in the preference of the science gifted and mathematics gifted. Science gifted's preference toward science subject is higher than mathematics gifted students. Secondly, there was no difference in the attention, self-efficacy, and contentment in learning motivation in the science but, there was difference between science gifted and mathematics gifted in the relevance.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2012.07a
• /
• pp.183-185
• /
• 2012

본 연구의 목적은 지속적인 영재학생 관리를 위해 학생 관리 시스템의 구축 방향을 제시함으로써 영재교육 수혜 경험에 대한 정보들의 누적이 학생들의 진로 진학이나 자아실현을 하기까지 도움을 제공할 수 있도록 하는 것이다. 이를 위하여 학생 관리시스템 구축에 대한 선행 연구를 분석하였으며 분석 결과 효율적인 교육과정 운영을 중심으로 학생의 인적 사항을 관리하거나 그 기관 내에서 학생을 재 선발하고, 학부모와 상담, 영재교육에 대한 연구 자료로 활용하는 데 그치고 있었다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 학생 관리 시스템의 구축 방향으로 전국 영재교육기관에 공통적으로 적용 관리할 수 있는 중앙 센터의 마련, 영재교육기관 간의 시스템 연계, 학생 중심의 시스템 구축을 통한 자아실현 및 진로 진학에 도움 제공, 인성 측면을 반영할 수 있는 시스템 구축, 구체적인 진로 상담 작성이 가능한 항목 마련, 교육과정 반영, 영재교육 보조교사나 전담교사 파견을 통한 철저한 학생 관리를 제시하였다.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.22 no.3
• /
• pp.527-550
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study was to investigate the career awareness, the preference for science and stereotypic image of the scientist between the gifted students and non-gifted students in elementary school. For this study, 52 gifted students and 80 non-gifted students were participated. The results were as follows: First, the career awareness of gifted students was significantly higher than that of non-gifted students. Second, the preference for science of gifted students was significantly higher in all sub-domains than non-gifted students. There was a significant interaction effect between group and gender in the scientific interest and the intention of solving problems. Third, analyzing stereotypic image test for scientist between the gifted students and non-gifted students, it proved that non-gifted students had more stereotypic image comparing with the gifted students. Forth, carrying out the correlation analysis on the career awareness and the preference for science, the career awareness and the stereotypic image of the scientist, it proved that there were significant correlations with each other. It revealed that the career awareness affected the preference for science significantly through multiple regression analysis.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.21 no.3
• /
• pp.741-760
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to compare the 5 OEs of Korean gifted elementary and middle school students and non-gifted, and to find out the gender differences and level of school differences to clarify the possibility of identification instrument of giftedness based on the 5 OEs as the affective factor of giftedness. Total subjects were 270 in this study. Among them, gifted group were 74, and non-gifted group were 196. Boys were 202, and girls were 168. Elementary students were 34, middle school students were 40 within the gifted group. OEQII (Kim, 2008) were modified and used for elementary students. The result of this study were as follows. First, the level of 5 OEs of gifted students was significantly higher than non-gifted students. Second, gender differences were found. Total OEs and sensory OE and emotional OE of girls were significantly higher than boys'. Third, there were significant interaction effects among gifted and non-gifted and gender factor in total OEs and psychomotor OE and sensory OE. Fourth, there was no significantly differences of 5 OEs between elementary and middle school gifted students, which may be interpreted that OEs were consistent affective factors of giftedness. OEs were discussed as the possibility of identification instrument of giftedness.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.23 no.4
• /
• pp.593-614
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study was to analyze the research ethics elementary and secondary gifted students enrolled in science-gifted education center of university and to get the implications of research ethics education. 180 elementary and secondary gifted students and 180 general students were participated. The results obtained from this study were as follows: First, the item, such as 'The researchers must have self-esteem and responsibility in their study', both the gifted students and the general students showed the highest perception. On the contrary, the item 'I think that it is right to exclude the person who didn't participate in research' both the gifted students and the general students showed the lowest perception. And gifted students' perception on research ethics was higher than the general students' on the whole. There was a statistically significant difference between two groups(p<.05). Second, the scientifically gifted students' research ethics in 'basic attitude of the researchers' was significantly higher than mathematically gifted students' and IT gifted students' (p<.05). Third, there was a statistically significant difference between the elementary gifted students and secondary gifted students in 'ethics of thought and expression' (p<.05). Fourth, experience in research ethics education and the number of research experience was significantly effect on perception of research ethics. There was a statistically significant interaction effect between gifted students and general students in 'science, technology, biomedical research ethics' items(p<.05).

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.22 no.3
• /
• pp.503-525
• /
• 2012

This study compared levels of mathematically talented students' statistical thinking with those of non-talented students in statistical modeling and sampling distribution understanding. t tests were conducted to test for statistically significant differences between mathematically gifted students and non-gifted students. In case of statistical modeling, for both of elementary and middle school graders, the t tests show that there is a statistically significant difference between mathematically gifted students and non-gifted students. Table of frequencies of each level, however, shows that levels of mathematically gifted students' thinking were not distributed at the high levels but were overlapped with those of non-gifted students. A similar tendency is also present in sampling distribution understanding. These results are thought-provoking results in statistics instruction for mathematically talented students.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.23 no.3
• /
• pp.387-406
• /
• 2013

This study compared levels of mathematically talented students' statistical thinking with those of non-talented students in the noticing of statistical variability. t tests were conducted to test for statistically significant differences between mathematically gifted students and non-gifted students. Results for the t-test shows that there is no difference between the TE students' and NE students' noticing of variability in the measurement settings. Meanwhile, the t-test results also show that there is a difference between the TM students' and NM students' noticing of variability in the both measurement and chance settings. Table of frequencies of each level, however, shows that levels of mathematically gifted students' thinking were not distributed at the high levels but were overlapped with those of non-gifted students. These results are thought-provoking results in statistics instruction for mathematically talented students.