• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.5
• /
• pp.89-114
• /
• 1997

• The Mathematical Education
• /
• v.35 no.2
• /
• pp.169-186
• /
• 1996

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.14
• /
• pp.395-403
• /
• 2001

컴퓨터를 이용한 수학교육의 개선을 위한 여러 가지 집중적인 노력에도 불구하고 아직까지 컴퓨터가 수학 교육과정에서 차지하는 위상에 대한 구체적이고 체계적인 연구가 이루어지지 못하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구를 통하여 최근의 관심이 되고 있는 교육 프로그램인 LOGO 프로그램을 수학 영재 교육에 어떻게 도입하여야 하는지 그 방법적인 측면의 구체적인 자료를 제공하고자 한다.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.105-120
• /
• 2011

This research intends to analyse how mathematically gifted 8th graders (age 14) discover and proof the properties on the sum of face angles of polyhedron. In this research, the problems on the sum of face angles of polyhedrons were given to 36 gifted students, and their discovery and proof processes were analysed on the basis of their the activity sheets and the researcher's observation. The discovery and proof processes the gifted students made were categorized, and levels revealed in their processes were analysed.

• Research in Mathematical Education
• /
• v.7 no.3
• /
• pp.139-150
• /
• 2003

The purpose of this paper is to review the gifted education from a reflective perspective. Especially, this research touches upon the issues of selection process from a critical point of view. Most of the problems presented in the mathematics competition or in the programs for preparing such competitions share the similar characteristic: the circumstances that are given for questions are too artificial and complicated; problem solving processes are superficially and fragmentally related to mathematical knowledge; and the previous experience with the problem very much decides whether a student can solve the problem and the speed of problem solving. In contrast, the problems for selecting students for Gifted Education Center clearly show what the related mathematical knowledge is and what kind of mathematical thinking ability these problems intend to assess. Accordingly, the process of solving these problems can be considered an important criterion of a student's mathematical ability. In addition, these kinds of problems can encourage students to keep further interest, and can be used as tasks for mathematical investigation later. We hope that this paper will initiate further discussions on issues derived from the mathematically gifted student selection process.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.9 no.1
• /
• pp.161-180
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study is to analyse how a mathematically gifted student constructs a nested signification model of three signs, while he abstracts the solution of a given NIM game. The findings of a qualitative case study have led to conclusions as follows. In general, we know that most of mathematically gifted students(within top 0.01%) in the elementary school might be excellent in constructing representamen and interpretant But it depends on the cases. While a student, one of best, is making the meaning of object in general level of abstraction, he also has a difficulty in rising from general level to formal level. When he made the interpretant in general level with researcher's advice, he was able to rise formal level and constructed a nested signification model of three signs. We suggested 3 considerations to teach the mathematically gifted students in elementary school level.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.437-461
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to examine the metacognition of mathematically gifted students in the problem-solving process of the given task in a bid to give some significant suggestions on the improvement of their problem-solving skills. The given task was to count the number of regular squares at the n${\times}$n geoboard. The subjects in this study were three mathematically gifted elementary students who were respectively selected from three leading gifted education institutions in our country: a community gifted class, a gifted education institution attached to the Office of Education and a university-affiliated science gifted education institution. The students who were selected from the first, second and third institutions were hereinafter called student C, student B and student A respectively. While they received three-hour instruction, a participant observation was made by this researcher, and the instruction was videotaped. The participant observation record, videotape and their worksheets were analyzed, and they were interviewed after the instruction to make a qualitative case study. The findings of the study were as follows: First, the students made use of different generalization strategies when they solved the given problem. Second, there were specific metacognitive elements in each stage of their problem-solving process. Third, there was a mutually influential interaction among every area of metacognition in the problem-solving process. Fourth, which metacognitive components impacted on their success or failure of problem solving was ascertained.

• Proceedings of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education Conference
• /
• 2006.04a
• /
• pp.195-202
• /
• 2006

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.19-38
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to analyze the responses and the behavioral characteristics between mathematically promising students and normal students in solving open-ended problems. For this study, 55 mathematically promising students were selected from the Science Education Institute for the Gifted at Seoul National University of Education as well as 100 normal students from three 6th grade classes of a regular elementary school. The students were given 50 minutes to complete a written test consisting of five open-ended problems. A post-test interview was also conducted and added to the results of the written test. The conclusions of this study were summarized as follows: First, analysis and grouping problems are the most suitable in an open-ended problem study to stimulate the creativity of mathematically promising students. Second, open-ended problems are helpful for mathematically promising students' generative learning. The mathematically promising students had a tendency to find a variety of creative methods when solving open-ended problems. Third, mathematically promising students need to improve their ability to make-up new conditions and change the conditions to solve the problems. Fourth, various topics and subjects can be integrated into the classes for mathematically promising students. Fifth, the quality of students' former education and its effect on their ability to solve open-ended problems must be taken into consideration. Finally, a creative thinking class can be introduce to the general class. A number of normal students had creativity score similar to those of the mathematically promising students, suggesting that the introduction of a more challenging mathematics curriculum similar to that of the mathematically promising students into the general curriculum may be needed and possible.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.25 no.1
• /
• pp.79-97
• /
• 2011

As the necessity of the special education for the gifted to develop their talents and national power is gradually recognized, many kinds of teaching-learning materials have been developed. However, the development tendency of the materials is not systematically studied because their database is not sufficiently constructed nor most of them are made public. In this research, we would like to provide the reference data to improve the quality of developed materials and reduce the deviation among the classified fields when we will develop the teaching-learning materials by collecting the already developed materials and analyse their development tendency by classifying them according to the contents.