• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 2004.10d
• /
• pp.303-307
• /
• 2004

본 논문에서는 서술형 정답을 요구하는 질의에 대해 올바른 서술형 정답을 추출하는 서술형질의응답시스템에 대해 기술한다. 질의응답시스템에서 요구되는 다양한 서술형 정답을 추출하기 위해 정답 유형을 10가지로 정의하였다. 말뭉치로부터 각 서술형 정답 유형에 대한 정답 패턴을 정의하고, 패턴별 제약 규칙 및 각 유형별 패턴적용 순위화 등을 사용하여 정확한 서술형 정답이 추출되도록 하였다. 정답 패턴은 서술형 정답의 구문 구조 및 각 패턴 또는 정답 유형별 실마리 어휘 등으로 구성된다. 현재 학습되지 않은 일반 문서에 대해 59.2%의 서술형 정답 추출 정확도를 보이며, 시스템 성능 향상을 위해 연구가 진행중이다.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.275-290
• /
• 2014

This study aims to examine how secondary mathematics teachers perceive and how they use constructed-response assessment in their mathematics classrooms. For this purpose, we conducted a survey in Seoul, Inchun, and Gyeonggi-do; 189 teachers participated in the survey. Results from the data analysis suggest as follows: a) the secondary mathematics teachers participated in the survey seem to consider the primary goals of assessment through constructed-response items as evaluating student achievement and the development of students' thinking and creativity; b) the teachers perceive that constructed-response assessment would promote students' mathematical thinking and problem solving skills; c) in general, constructed-response items were included in both performance assessment(less than 20 percent) and paper-and-pencil test(20 to 40 percent); and d) constructed-response items were primarily used as a part of regular examination, rather than as an independent assessment.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.26 no.3
• /
• pp.273-299
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to investigate how constructed-response assessments are currently defined and used to find an alternative way of developing well-defined constructed-response questions and an assessment system. Based on our review of the literature, we analyze constructed-response assessments developed and used in Gyeonggi-do, South Korea and Ohio, U.S.A. in terms of their definitions, types of questions, information and guidelines given by the government agencies in each place, and scoring rubrics and their use. The results provide meaningful implications for the development of constructed-response assessments in the future.

• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 2012.10a
• /
• pp.121-122
• /
• 2012

컴퓨터를 사용한 서술형 답안의 자동채점은 채점의 편의성과 객관성을 제고하기 위하여 많은 연구자들이 연구해 왔으며 자동채점의 성능을 향상시키기 위해 여러 가지 방법들이 제안되었다. 본 논문은 서술어 정규화를 통하여 서술형 답안의 자동채점 정확도를 높이고자 하였다. 기존의 다른 채점 방법들과 비교했을때 서술어 정규화 기법을 적용한 채점 방식은 기존의 방법들보다 유사도 계산 정확도가 향상되어 정답 판별 정확도가 향상되는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 서술어 정규화는 기존의 모든 서술형 답안 채점 방법에 추가적으로 적용할 수 있는 범용성을 가지고 있다. 따라서 서술어 정규화는 기존 방법들의 자동채점 정확도를 향상시켜 보다 정확하게 서술형 답안을 채점할 수 있다.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.16 no.1
• /
• pp.63-95
• /
• 2012

Since performance assessment was implemented for 10 years, a survey has been carried out from 212 elementary school teachers in Seoul area in terms of their perception and status about descriptive assessment. As results, most of teachers agreed strongly that using constructed-response items is necessary for assessment, and they showed that purpose of using constructed-response items in their mathematics classrooms was to evaluate accurately student achievement in accordance with learning objectives in mathematics and they referred mainly to items which they modified from problems or items in the textbook when they generate constructed-response items. In addition, they considered level of difficulty in creating constructed-response items mostly. Moreover, they indicated that the effects of assessment through constructed-response items would be improvement of students' problem solving and reasoning skills.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.195-219
• /
• 2006

This study was proposed to analyze mathematical communication activity and mathematical attitudes while students were solving project problem and to consider how the conclusions effects mathematics education. This study analyzed through qualitative research method. The questions for this study are following, First, how does the process of the mathematical communication activity proceed during solving project problem in a small group? Second, what reactions can be shown on mathematical attitudes during solving project problem in a small group? Four project problems sampled from pilot study in order to examine these questions were applied on two small groups consisting of four 5th grade students. It was recorded while each group was finding out the solution of the given problems. Afterward, consequences were analyzed according to each question after all contents were noted. Consequently, conclusions can be derived as follows. First, it was shown that each student used different elements of contents in mathematical communication activity. Second, during mathematical communication activity, most students preferred common languages to mathematical ones. Third, it was found that each student has their own mathematical attitude. Fourth, Students were more interested in the game project problem and the practical using project problem than others.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.18 no.2
• /
• pp.297-318
• /
• 2014

This study is designed for helping elementary school teachers have an insight into making or choosing questions of descriptive assessment in mathematics. For this, it is analyzed 30 descriptive mathematical questions produced by Gyeonggi Provincial Office of Education in 2011 and 2012 and 3rd to 6th grade students' papers marked by their teachers in charge from 2 elementary schools located in Gyeonggi Province. The main focus of analysis is the errors of students' answers and teachers' marking not from their own mistakes but from the defects of questions themselves. As a result of analysis, 7 cases of problematic situations are induced and they are reorganized into 3 categories as follow: i) case of not performing unique purpose of descriptive assessment, ii) case of inducing the problem of fairness of grading, iii) case of leading students erroneous direction.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.11 no.3
• /
• pp.377-397
• /
• 2008

In today's secondary school mathematics curriculum, assessment is to be focused on evaluating the student's mathematical thinking rather than finding the correct solution to the problem. A descriptive evaluation method is therefore introduced to the school districts and suggested as an alternative assessment method in K-12 school mathematics. Descriptive evaluation method is widely available for use in schools, but there are barriers to using it since the teachers are forced to use the method by the school districts. In this research, we surveyed 120 secondary school mathematics teachers in Seoul and the surrounding metropolitan area to understand the status and the perception about using descriptive evaluation. The goal of the study was to find and understand the direct implications of using the new assessment method in secondary mathematics classes. The study showed that most of the mathematics teachers used the descriptive assessment method during their regular exam periods which is given twice per semester. Most of the open-ended problems used for descriptive evaluation were medium or high level math questions which were graded by the teachers at least 3 times to ensure objective evaluation. The teachers stated that objectivity in grading, administrative situation, and development of descriptive problems were the difficult barriers in descriptive evaluation. The teachers in the survey also commented that teachers' administrative responsibility should be reduced and that school environment in general should be improved for the new assessment method to become successful. Finally, the study showed that development of more descriptive problems with specific grading guidelines need to be developed for each grade level.

• Journal of Science Education
• /
• v.42 no.2
• /
• pp.198-213
• /
• 2018

In recent years, descriptive evaluation has been gaining importance at school. The purpose of this study is to analyse descriptive evaluation items which have been made by school teachers. 300 items for regular examinations are collected from 7 middle schools (grades 1 through 3) in Gyeongnam Province. Distribution and types of items are examined to compare educational objectives of standard achievements and those of evaluation according to Bloom's revised taxonomy of educational objectives. The result shows that there exist a majority of shared subject units for descriptive evaluation. Huge difference of frequency is also found among subject units and standard achievements. Less than 65% of evaluation items are descriptive and the rest is simple completion or short answers. In addition, it reveals only 40.3% of agreement between educational objectives of standard achievements and those of evaluation items. The interviews with 27 teachers indicate that lack of ability to develop proper items and grading are the major obstacles. In conclusion, systematic training courses are to be provided in order to resolve issues over descriptive evaluation.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.28 no.1
• /
• pp.131-154
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of essay writing-centered mathematics instruction on problem solving and mathematical deposition in the elementary school. For the present study, two 6th grade classes with equivalent achievement in terms of problem solving and mathematical disposition based on the pretest. A total of 15 mathematics lessons focused on writing activities were administered to the experiment group for two months, while the textbook-based traditional lessons were given to the comparison group. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were adopted to analyze the data. The results of the present study showed that essay writing-centered mathematics teaching is statistically superior that the textbook-based mathematics teaching with respect to students' problem solving and mathematical disposition. In addition, it was evidenced that essay writing-centered mathematics instruction makes an influence on students' perceptions toward essay-based assessment in a positive way.