• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• no.126
• /
• pp.141-165
• /
• 2019

The ability hypothesis about black-and-white Mary once enjoyed the status of the "received view." But its popularity has declined since then. There seem to be two reasons for this. One is Martine Nida-Rümeline criticism against the ability hypothesis, where he tries to show that what Mary learns upon release is more than a bunch of abilities. The other is Jason Stanley and Timothy Williamson's criticism. They argue that the abilities Mary acquires amount to "knowledge-how", which in turn is reduced to "knowledge-that." This essay aims to defend the ability hypothesis against these criticisms, and thereby restore the status of the ability hypothesis. As for the first criticism, it is argued that the kind of knowledge Mary acquires other than the abilities is "demonstrative knowledge," which not only poses no threat to physicalism, but also is orthogonal to phenomenal knowledge. As for the second criticism, it is argued that by ruling out "the ability to imagine experiences," the ability hypothesis can survive Stanley and Williamson's criticism.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.30 no.3
• /
• pp.393-418
• /
• 2016

Theory and fundamentals of mathematics consist mostly of proposition form. Activities by research of the proposition which leads to determine the true or false, justify the true propositions and refute with counterexample improve logical reasoning skills of students in emphases on mathematics education. Also, utilizing of counterexamples in school mathematics combines mathematical knowledge through the process of finding a counterexample, help the concept study and increase the critical thinking. These effects have been found through previous research. But many studies say that the learners have difficulty in generating counterexamples for false propositions and materials have not been developed a lot for the counterexample utilizing that can be applied in schools. So, this study analyzed the current textbook and examined the use of counterexamples and developed educational materials for counterexamples that can be applied at schools. That materials consisted of making true & false propositions and students was divided into three groups of academic achievement level. And then this study looked at the change of the students' thinking after counterexample classes. As a study result, in all three groups was showed a positive change in the cognitive domain and affective domain. Especially, in top-level group was mainly showed a positive change in the cognitive domain, in upper-middle group was mainly showed in the cognitive and the affective domain, in the sub-group was mainly found a positive change in the affective domain. Also in this study shows that the class that makes true or false propositions in education of utilizing counterexample, made students understand a given proposition, pay attention to easily overlooked condition, carefully observe symbol sign and change thinking of cognitive domain helping concept learning regardless of academic achievement levels of learners. Also, that class gave positive affect to affective domain that increase interest in the proposition and gain confidence about proposition.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.37 no.1
• /
• pp.63-75
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to explore the effect of responsive teaching on students' productive argumentation practice. The participating students predicted the results of an activity to measure in which location on the body (the head, spine, or back of the hand) they would feel a cellphone's vibrations faster. They then engaged in the activity and built an argument to justify it. We interviewed the teacher to understand her thoughts regarding what was expected in the class. We also recorded and transcribed the class and the interview, for use in the analysis of the students' epistemological framing and the teacher's responsive practice in small group argumentation. We discovered that the teacher intervened in the groups with questions that elicited students' thoughts as starting points for her responsive practice. Her eliciting questions led the students to talk about their ideas, supporting their engagement in the argumentation. The teacher's understanding of the argumentation lesson and her behavior to understand the students' ideas reflected her productive framing, which led her to elicit students' ideas and to support their active interaction during the small-group argumentation. She presented rebuttals against students' ideas, engaging in the argumentation as another participant, not as an evaluator. This supported the equality of intellectual authority in the group and showed students how to engage in the argumentation, supporting students' productive framing. As a result of these responsive teaching practices, the students shifted their epistemological framing, resulting in productive argumentation practice. The results of this study will contribute to developing teachers' responsive teaching strategies to support students' productive framing in science classrooms.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.31 no.5
• /
• pp.694-708
• /
• 2011

In this study, we developed tasks including cognitive scaffolding for students to explain scientific phenomena using valid evidences in science classroom and sought to investigate how tasks influence the development of small group scientific argumentation. Heterogeneous small groups in gender and achievement were organized in one classroom and the tasks were applied to the class. Students were asked to write down their own ideas, share individual ideas, and then choose the most plausible opinion in a group. One group was chosen for investigating the effect of tasks on the development of small group argumentation through the analysis of discourse transcripts of the group in 10 lessons, students' semi-structured interview, field note, and students' pre- and post argument tests. The discrepant argument examples were included in the tasks for students to refute an argument presenting evidences. Moreover, comparing opinion within the group and persuading others were included in the tasks to prompt small group argumentation. As a result, students' post-argument test grades were increased than pre-test grades, and they argued involving evidences and reasoning. The high level of arguments has appeared with high ratio of advanced utterances and lengthening of reasoning chain as lessons went on. Students had elaborate claims involving valid evidences and reasoning by reflective and critical thinking while discussing about the tasks. In addition, tasks which could have various warrants based on the data led to students' spontaneous participation. Therefore, this study has significance in understanding the context of developing small group argumentation, providing information about teaching and learning context prompting students to construct arguments in science inquiry lessons in middle school.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.34 no.5
• /
• pp.479-490
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is to develop an argument-based modeling strategy, utilizing writing and argumentation for communication in science education. We need to support students and teachers who have difficulty in modeling in science education, this strategy focuses on development of four kinds of factors as follows: First, awareness of problems, recognizing in association with problems by observing several problematic situations. Second is science concept structuralization suggesting enough science concepts by organization for scientific explanation. The third is claim-evidence appropriateness that suggests appropriate representation as evidence for assertions. Last, the use of various representations and multimodal representations that converts and integrates these representations in evidence suggestion. For the development of these four factors, this study organized three stages. 'Recognition process' for understanding of multimodal representations, and 'Interpretation process' for understanding of activity according to multimodal representations, 'Application process' for understanding of modeling through argumentation. This application process has been done with eight stages of 'Asking questions or problems - Planning experiment - Investigation through observation on experiment - Analyzing and interpreting data - Constructing pre-model - Presenting model - Expressing model using multimodal representations - Evaluating model - Revising model'. After this application process, students could have opportunity to form scientific knowledge by making their own model as scientific explanation system for the phenomenon of the natural world they observed during a series of courses of modeling.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.19-41
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this article was to a) identify how preservice teachers conceive feedbacks and subsequent classroom discourses, and b) compare them with those in reform-oriented mathematics classroom video for mathematics teachers' professional development about classroom discourse. This article analyzes feedback patterns and subsequent classroom discourses in preservice teachers' imaginary classroom scripts (lesson plays) and compares them with those in the reform-oriented classroom video dealing with the same teaching situation. Most of the preservice teachers' feedbacks focused the evaluation of students' responses and transmission of meaning (univocal function), whereas the teacher's feedback in the reform-oriented classroom allowed the whole class to validate or challenge the answers, thereby facilitating students' generation of meaning (dialogic function). The comparison analysis between the univocal discourse in a preservice teacher's lesson play and the dialogical discourse in the reform-oriented classroom video shows that teacher feedback serves as an important indicator for the main function of classroom discourse and the levels of students' cognitive participation, and also as a variable that determines and changes them. This case study suggests that to improve the quality of classroom discourse, preservice and in-service teachers need experience of perceiving the variety of feedback patterns available in specific teaching contexts and exploring ways to balance the univocal and dialogical functioning in their feedback move during the teacher training courses.

• Journal of Korean Medical classics
• /
• v.13 no.2 s.17
• /
• pp.44-56
• /
• 2000

장개빈(張介賓)(1563-1640, 호시경악(號是景岳))시명말의학가이계승김원대의학전통적인물(是明末醫學家而繼承金元代醫學傳統的人物). 타재(他在) 류경도익(類經圖翼), 의역의(醫易義) 주장'의역동원'이논증의학여역학지회통성(主張'醫易同源'而論證醫學與易學之會通性). 타이성리학이론내연구의학(他以性理學理論來硏究醫學). 인이피칭위'유의'(因而被稱爲'儒醫'). 타광범지연구유가급제자백가지후(他廣範地硏究儒家及諸子百家之後), 이(以) 황제내경(黃帝內經) 여(與) 난경 위주(難經 爲主). 종합의가학설(綜合醫家學說). 타이(他以) '양상부족음본무여'지관념내설명인체내음양상태('陽常不足陰本無餘'之觀念來說明人體內陰陽狀態) 이반박주진형지자음론(而反駁朱震亨之滋陰論). 인이주장'부양억음'급'태극시명문'적학설(因而主張'扶陽抑陰'及'太極是命門'的學說). 타재(他在) 의역의(醫易義) 이부양억음내해설병리(以扶陽抑陰來解說病理). 관어태극-명문적론의야수성리학태극개념적영향(關於太極-命門的論議也受性理學太極槪念的影響). 단시(但是), 소위(所謂) '조원찬화'('調元贊化') '기사회생'적의학목적시속어도교양생론('起死回生'的醫學目的是屬於道敎養生論). 관어차점(關於此點), 연피칭위유의적성리학의가야병부예외(連被稱爲儒醫的性理學醫家也竝不例外). 일반인위 황제내경 시재전국 한대초기형성적(一般認爲 黃帝內經 是在戰國 漢代初期形成的). 야인위기의학체계반영저황로사상여음양오행론(也認爲其醫學體系反映著黃老思想與陰陽五行論). 장개빈수재성리학적립장내주장자기적이론(張介賓雖在性理學的立場來主張自己的理論). 단시대폭지접수도가급도교립장(但是大幅地接受道家及道敎立場). 타재(他在) 류경도익(類經圖翼), 태극도론(太極圖論), 이태극성위만물생명적근원(以太極成爲萬物生命的根源). 동시언급도도가여역위(同時言及到道家與易緯). 재장개빈(在張介賓), 태극시상통어도가발생론적개념(太極是相通於道家發生論的槪念). 야상통어태극적개념(也相通於太極的槪念). 재(在) 유경(類經), 섭생(攝生) 내간(來看). 타제요로장이외(他除了老莊以外). 우인용송대이후내단사상가강백단 이도순등적주장(又引用宋代以後內丹思想家强伯端 李道純等的主張), 인이전개자기적이론(因而展開自己的理論). 필자시위(筆者視爲), 장개빈재의학적양생방면상접수료이'성명쌍수'위기적송대이후내단사상(張介賓在醫學的養生方面上接受了以'性命雙修'爲基的宋代以後內丹思想). 병차타이연단적관점내이해부양억음(竝且他以煉丹的觀點來理解扶陽抑陰). 신위유의적장개빈능구장유도량자회통위일조의학체계적의거재어역학.(身爲儒醫的張介賓能구將儒道兩者會通爲一條醫學體系的依據在於易學). 장개빈재천인상응관념지하(張介賓在天人相應觀念之下), 용이음양변화지기구내변증천인관계(用以陰陽變化之機構來辨證天人關係). 재타적이론(在他的理論), 천지시속어 역(天地是屬於 易), 인시속어 의(人是屬於 醫), 단시양자귀위동일양적일리(但是兩者歸爲同一樣的一理). 재'원취제물(在'遠取諸物), 근취제신'적관점내강(近取諸身'的觀點來講), 타장'근취제신'적도리취어의학(他將'近取諸身'的道理取於醫學). 환유'원취제물'적도리취어역학(還有'遠取諸物'的道理取於易學), 인이모구귀납성일개원리(因而謀求歸納成一個原理). 타장자연현상적원리내재어인지생명(他將自然現象的原理內在於人之生命), 종여차정체적각도내간(從如此整體的角度來看). 가이설의학시상통어역학적(可以說醫學是相通於易學的). 역학대인여자연간적탐구(易學對人與自然間的探求), 비교측중어이론성(比較側重於理論性). 반이의학이역학이론위자(反而醫學以易學理論爲資). 관어자연여인지생명진일보지진행교구체성적연구(關於自然與人之生命進一步地進行較具體性的硏究). 총지(總之), 장개빈통과태극음양론(張介賓通過太極陰陽論), 부분유 도이참재'생명'적립장(不分儒 道而站在'生命'的立場), 광범지접납유도양가(廣範地接納儒道兩家). 유차(由此) 아문가이여도장개빈의서적가치병부한어의학가치(我們可以如道張介賓醫書的價値竝不限於醫學價値). 장개빈의서제시유 도량가가이회통어"생명사상"적철학상가능성(張介賓醫書提示儒 道兩家可以會通於"生命思想"的哲學上可能性).

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.32 no.5
• /
• pp.1007-1026
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study was to develop analytic framework for dialogic argumentation to show the context and flow visualizing interactions of argumentation, to be able to present quality of argumentation specifically. For this, we formulated a method of the argumentation diagram using feature of diagram simple and structurally visualizing interrelation between argument components, and then quantified quality of argumentation to argument level score on this basis. We have developed the learning material for argumentation about a vertical circular motion and used the obtained translations from applying it in developing the framework. We chose argument statements among full transcript and then coded as Toulmin's argument components, and these codes was effectively arranged and linked to show argumentation diagram. Results by argumentation diagram could be useful understanding of interactive argumentation context and the flow and present frequency, the combination of argument elements, rough qualitative level of argumentation. To quantify argumentation quality, we gave different scores to different link lines reflecting indication of argumentation quality like that diversity of argument component, justification, presence or absence of rebuttals. The process of identification of argument level is very simple, qualitative level of argumentation represented as concrete score could present various and concrete argument level. Developed analytic framework might contribute to argumentation research field, because it can present effectively dialogic argumentation result. Also, various analysis cases might guide designing an effective argumentation practice and circular motion learning.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.36 no.6
• /
• pp.895-910
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study is to explore secondary students' progression in group norms and argumentation competency through collaborative reflection about small group argumentation. The progression is identified as the development of group norms and an epistemic understanding of argumentation with the enhancement of group argumentation competency during collaborative reflection and argumentation lessons. Participants were four first grade middle school students who have different academic achievements and learning approaches. They participated in ten argumentation lessons related to photosynthesis and in seven collaborative reflections. As a result, the students' group norms related to participation were developed, and the students' epistemic understanding of argumentation was enhanced. Furthermore, the students' group argumentation competencies, identified as argumentation product and argumentation process, were advanced. As the collaborative reflection and argumentation lessons progressed, statements related to rebuttal increased and different students suggested a range of evidence with which to justify their claims or to rebut others' arguments. These findings will give a better idea of how to present an apt application of argumentation to science teachers and science education researchers.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.38 no.1
• /
• pp.69-85
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to explore teachers' responsive moves that affect students' argumentation practices, and to propose responsive teaching strategies in argumentation-based science classroom. Two teachers, who have not implemented argumentation in their classes, and 57 students, participated in this study. We recorded and transcribed their classes and interviews for the analysis. According to grounded theory approach, we categorized the teachers' responsive moves as focused on either structural or dialogical aspects of argumentation, and qualitatively analyzed their responsive teaching practices in classes. We discovered that the teachers mostly responded to structural rather than dialogical aspects of argumentation, particularly during the students' small-group discussions. This was mainly due to their instructional goals, which focused on the structural aspect of argumentation, and the limited time available for supporting small-groups. Regarding the structural aspects, those responsive moves that explored the students' thinking or facilitated their reasoning helped them to share their thinking and justify their arguments further with recognition of learning goals in the argumentation activities. Regarding the dialogical aspects, which were seen mostly in whole-class discussions, the moves that underlined similarities and differences between arguments, facilitated the sharing of a small-group's arguments with the entire class, or asked a specific student to evaluate the arguments were notable. These moves supported clarification of various small-groups' arguments, which led to reconstruction of coherent argument through evaluation and rebuttal of these arguments, consequentially facilitating dialogical interactions. Based on these results, we proposed responsive teaching strategies in an argumentation-based science classroom.