Browse > Article

An Analysis of Preservice Teachers' Lesson Plays: How Do Preservice Teachers Give Feedbacks to Students in an Imaginary Classroom Discourse?  

Lee, Jihyu (Incheon National University)
Publication Information
School Mathematics / v.19, no.1, 2017 , pp. 19-41 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this article was to a) identify how preservice teachers conceive feedbacks and subsequent classroom discourses, and b) compare them with those in reform-oriented mathematics classroom video for mathematics teachers' professional development about classroom discourse. This article analyzes feedback patterns and subsequent classroom discourses in preservice teachers' imaginary classroom scripts (lesson plays) and compares them with those in the reform-oriented classroom video dealing with the same teaching situation. Most of the preservice teachers' feedbacks focused the evaluation of students' responses and transmission of meaning (univocal function), whereas the teacher's feedback in the reform-oriented classroom allowed the whole class to validate or challenge the answers, thereby facilitating students' generation of meaning (dialogic function). The comparison analysis between the univocal discourse in a preservice teacher's lesson play and the dialogical discourse in the reform-oriented classroom video shows that teacher feedback serves as an important indicator for the main function of classroom discourse and the levels of students' cognitive participation, and also as a variable that determines and changes them. This case study suggests that to improve the quality of classroom discourse, preservice and in-service teachers need experience of perceiving the variety of feedback patterns available in specific teaching contexts and exploring ways to balance the univocal and dialogical functioning in their feedback move during the teacher training courses.
Keywords
Feedback; Classroom Discourse; Discourse Analysis; Univocal-Dialogical Discourse; Preservice teacher education;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 교육부(2015). 수학과 교육과정 (교육부 고시 제2015-74호 [별책 8])
2 김상화, &방정숙. (2010). 담화 중심 수학적 의사 소통 수업의 분석. 한국초등수학교육학회지, 14(3), 523-545.
3 방정숙, 정희진. (2006). 학습자 중심 교수법에 대한 초등 교사의 이해와 실행형태: 수학적 의사소통을 중심으로. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 6(1), 297-321.
4 윤민지. (2012). 중학교 2학년의 사각형 지도에 대한 실행연구. 교원대학교 석사학위 논문.
5 임태민, 백석윤. (2009). 초등수학 수업에서의 피드백 유형 및 학생의 반응. 한국초등교육, 20(1), 37-54.
6 Alro, H., & Skovsmose, O. (1996). On the right track. For the Learning of Mathematics, 16(1), 2-22.
7 Ball, D. L. (1991). What's all this talk about "discourse"? Arithmetic Teacher, 39(3), 44-48.
8 Borasi, R. (1994). Capitalizing on errors as "springboards for inquiry": A teaching experiment. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2), 166-208.   DOI
9 Blanton, M. L., Berenson, S. B., & Norwood, K. S. (2001). Using classroom discourse to understand a prospective mathematics teacher's developing practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 227-242.   DOI
10 Bray, W. S. (2011). A collective case study of the influence of teachers' beliefs and knowledge on error-handling practices during class discussion of mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(1), 2-38.   DOI
11 Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press.
12 Carpenter, T. P., Hiebert, J., Fennema, E., Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., & Murray, H. (2004). 어떻게 이해하지?.(김수환, 박영희, 이경화, 한대희 역). 서울: 경문사.(영어 원작은 1997년 출판)
13 Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning.
14 Chin, C. (2007). Teacher Questioning in Science Classrooms: Approaches that Stimulate Productive Thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815-843.   DOI
15 Drageset, O. G. (2013). Redirecting, progressing, and focusing actions-a framework for describing how teachers use students' comments to work with mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(2), 281-304. doi:10.1007/s10649-013-9515-1   DOI
16 Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., & Battey, D. (2007). Mathematics teaching and classroom practice. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 1). Reston, VA: NCTM.
17 Gallimore, R., & Tharp, R. (1992). Teaching mind in society: Teaching, schooling, and literate discourse. In L. C. Moll(Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 175-205).
18 Ingram, J., Pitt, A., & Baldry, F. (2015). Handling errors as they arise in whole-class interactions. Research in Mathematics Education, 17(3), 183-197. doi:10.1080/14794802.2015.1098562   DOI
19 Gibbons, P. (2006). Bridging Discourses in the ESL Classroom: Students, Teachers and Researchers. London: Continuum.
20 Imm, K., & Stylianou, D. A. (2012). Talking mathematically: An analysis of discourse communities. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 130-148.   DOI
21 Knuth, E., & Peressini, D. (2001). Unpacking the nature of discourse in mathematics classrooms. Mathematics teaching in the middle school, 6(5), 320-325.
22 Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
23 Lortie, D. C.(1996). 교직사회 : 교직과 교사의 삶. (진동섭 역). 서울 : 良書院. (원저는 1975년 출판)
24 Lotman, Y. M. (1988). Text within a text. Soviet psychology, 26(3), 32-51.
25 Lotman, Y. (2000). Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture (A. Shukman, Trans.): IB Tauris & Co Ltd.
26 Nassaji, H., & Wells, G. (2000). What's the use of ‘triadic dialogue'?: An investigation of teacher student interaction. Applied linguistics, 21(3), 376-406.   DOI
27 Otten, S., Engledowl, C., & Spain, V. (2015). Univocal and dialogic discourse in secondary mathematics classrooms: the case of attending to precision. ZDM, 47(7), 1285-1298. doi:10.1007/s11858-015-0725-0   DOI
28 Pierson, J. L. (2008). The relationship between patterns of classroom discourse and mathematics learning. Ph.D thesis. The University of Texas at Austin
29 Santagata, R. (2005). Practices and beliefs in mistake-handling activities: A video study of Italian and US mathematics lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 491-508. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.004   DOI
30 Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In M. Reddy & A. Ortony (Eds.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284-324).
31 Scott, P. (1998). Teacher Talk and Meaning Making in Science Classrooms: a Vygotskian Analysis and Review. Studies in Science Education, 32(1), 45-80. doi:10.1080/03057269808560127   DOI
32 Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605-631.   DOI
33 Smith III, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The journal of the learning sciences, 3(2), 115-163.   DOI
34 Spangler, D. A., & Hallman-Thrasher, A. (2014). Using Task Dialogues to Enhance Preservice Teachers' Abilities to Orchestrate Discourse. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 3(1), 58-75.   DOI
35 Truxaw, M. P. (2004). Mediating Mathematical Meaning Through Discourse: An investigation of discursive practices of middle grades mathematics teachers. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Connecticut.
36 Truxaw, M. P., & DeFranco, T. C. (2008). Mapping mathematical classroom discourse and its implication for model of teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(5), 489-525.
37 Tulis, M. (2013). Error management behavior in classrooms: Teachers' responses to student mistakes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 56-68. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.003   DOI
38 Wertsch, J. V., & Toma, C. (1995). Discourse and learning in the classroom: A sociocultural approach. In L. P. Steffe, & Gale, J. E. (Ed.), Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39 Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge University Press.
40 Rymes, B. (2011). 말이 열리는 교실: 교실 수업 개선을 위한 담화 분석.(김종현 역). 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스
41 Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as an action. New York: Oxford University Press.
42 Zazkis, R., Liljedahl, P., & Sinclair, N.(2009). Lesson Plays: Planning teaching vs. teaching planning. For the Learning of Mathematics, 29(1), pp. 40-47.
43 Wood, T. (1998). Alternative patterns of communication in mathematics classes: Funneling or focusing. In H. Steinbring, M. G. B. Bussi, & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Language and communication in the mathematics classroom (pp. 167-178). Reston, VA National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
44 Wood, T., Williams, G., & McNeal, B. (2006). Children's mathematical thinking in different classroom cultures. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(3), 222-253.