1 |
Maskiewicz, A. C., & Winters, V. A. (2012). Understanding the co-construction of inquiry practices: A case study of a responsive teaching environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 429-464.
DOI
|
2 |
Maskiewicz, A. C. (2015). Navigating the challenges of teaching responsively. In A. D. Robertson, R. E. Shcerr, & D. Hammer (Eds.), Responsive teaching in science and mathematics, (pp. 105-125). New York, NY: Routledge.
|
3 |
National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
|
4 |
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
DOI
|
5 |
Pierson, J. L. (2008). The relationship between patterns of classroom discourse and mathematics learning (Doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin. Austin, TX.
|
6 |
Richards, J. (2013). Exploring what stabilizes teachers' attention and responsiveness to the substance of students' scientific thinking in the classroom(Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland. Maryland, MD.
|
7 |
Richards, J., & Robertson, A. D. (2015). A review of the research on responsive teaching in science and mathematics. In A. D. Robertson, R. E. Scherr, & D. Hammer (Eds.), Responsive teaching in science and mathematics. New York, NY, Routledge.
|
8 |
Robertson, A. D., Scherr, R. E., & Hammer, D. (Eds.) (2015). Responsive teaching in science and mathematics. New York, NY, Routledge.
|
9 |
Rosenberg, S., Hammer, D., & Phelan, J. (2006). Multiple epistemological coherences in an eighth-grade discussion of the rock cycle. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 261-292.
DOI
|
10 |
Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Tucker-Raymond, E. (2015). Developing interpretive power in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(10) 1571-1600.
DOI
|
11 |
Sandoval, W. A., Daniszewski, K., Spillane, J. P., & Reiser, B. J. (1999). Teachers' discourse strategies for supporting learning through inquiry. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
|
12 |
Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498-504.
DOI
|
13 |
Stefanou, C. R., Perencevich, K. C., DiCintio, M., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 97-110.
DOI
|
14 |
Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science-as-practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487-516.
DOI
|
15 |
Tannen, D. (1993). Framing in discourse. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
|
16 |
Thompson, J., Hagenah, S., Kang, H., Stroupe, D., Windschitl, M., & Colley, C. (2015). Rigor and responsiveness in classroom activity. Teachers College Record, 118(5).
|
17 |
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
DOI
|
18 |
Colley, C., & Windschitl, M. (2016). Rigor in elementary science students’ discourse: The role of responsiveness and supportive conditions for talk. Science Education. 100(6), 1009-1038.
DOI
|
19 |
Cornelius, L. l., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2004). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students’ relationships with each other and with concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 467-498.
DOI
|
20 |
diSessa, A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2-3), 105-225.
DOI
|
21 |
Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. E. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
|
22 |
Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2010). Epistemological resources and framing: A cognitive framework for helping teachers interpret and respond to their students' epistemologies. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice, (pp. 409-434). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
23 |
Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1982). Understanding student learning. London: Routledge.
|
24 |
Hammer, D. (1997). Discovery learning and discovery teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 15(4), 485-529.
DOI
|
25 |
Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (Eds.) (2008). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. Dordrecht: Springer.
|
26 |
Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. R., & Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in mathematics Education, 27(4), 403-434.
DOI
|
27 |
Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 92(3), 404-423.
DOI
|
28 |
Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Re-thinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 529-552.
DOI
|
29 |
Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
|
30 |
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
|
31 |
Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing, (pp. 169-190). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
|
32 |
Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2003). Tapping epistemological resources for learning physics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 53-90.
DOI
|
33 |
Hammer, D. (2004). The variability of student reasoning, lecture 1: Case studies of children's inquiries. In E. Redish & M. Vicentini (Eds.), Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi Summer School, Course CLVI (pp. 279-299). Bologna: Italian Physical Society.
|
34 |
Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353-383.
DOI
|
35 |
Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E., & Redish, E. F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfre of learning: Research and perspectives. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
|
36 |
Hammer, D., Goldberg, F., & Fargason, S. (2012). Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics, and ICT Education, 6(1), 51-72.
|
37 |
Hodson, D. (1993). Philosophic stance of secondary-school science teachers, curriculum experiences, and children's understanding of science-some preliminary findings. Interchange, 24(1-2), 41-52.
DOI
|
38 |
Bateson, G. (1972). A theory of play and fantasy. Psychiatric Research Reports, 2, 39-51.
|
39 |
Alvarado, C., Daane, A. R., Scherr, R. E., & Zavala, G. (2013). Responsiveness among peers leads to productive disciplinary engagement. Paper presented at 2013 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, Portland, OR. doi: 10.1119/perc.2013.pr.002
DOI
|
40 |
Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373-397.
DOI
|
41 |
Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26-55.
DOI
|
42 |
Berland, L. K., & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 68-94.
DOI
|
43 |
Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109-1136.
DOI
|
44 |
Colestock, A. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2015). What teachers notice when they notice student thinking. In A. D. Robertson, R. E., Scherr, & D. Hammer (Eds.), Responsive teaching in science and mathematics, (pp. 126-144). New York, NY: Routledge.
|
45 |
Kolsto, S. D., & Ratcliffe, M. (2008). Social aspects of argumentation. In S. Erduran, M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from classroom-based research, (pp. 117-136). Dordrecht: Springer.
|
46 |
Hutchison, P., & Hammer, D. (2010). Attending to student epistemological framing in a science classroom. Science Education, 94(3), 506-524.
DOI
|
47 |
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., Rodriguez, A., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). "Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(3), 387-312.
|
48 |
Kang, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2015). Supporting preservice science teachers' ability to attend and respond to student thinking by design. Science Education, 99(5), 863-895.
DOI
|
49 |
Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319-337.
DOI
|
50 |
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331-359.
DOI
|
51 |
Lee, J. (2016). Understanding of small group students' productive practice in scientific argumentation focusing on the change of epistemological resources network(Master's thesis). Seoul National University, Seoul.
|
52 |
Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice teachers' attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142-154.
DOI
|
53 |
Levin, D., & Richards, J. (2011). Learning to attend to the substance of students' thinking in science. Science Educator, 20(2), 1-11.
DOI
|
54 |
Levin, D., Hammer, D., Elby, A., & Coffey, J. (2012). Becoming a responsive science teacher: Focusing on student thinking in secondary science. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
|
55 |
Louca, L., Elby, A., Hammer, D., & Kagey, T. (2004). Epistemological resources: Applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 3(1), 57-60.
|
56 |
Lidar, M., Lundqvist, E., & Ostman, L. (2006). Teaching and learning in the science classroom: The interplay between teachers' epistemological moves and students' practical epistemology. Science Education, 90(1), 148-163.
DOI
|
57 |
Lineback, J. E. (2015). The redirection: An indicator of how teachers respond to student thinking. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(3), 419-460.
DOI
|