• Title/Summary/Keyword: 녹색건축물인증제도

Search Result 14, Processing Time 0.019 seconds

Comparison of DGNB and G-SEED in terms of the assessment items - Focusing on case studies of office buildings (독일의 지속가능한 건축물 인증제도(DGNB)와 국내 녹색건축물인증제도 (G-SEED)의 평가항목 비교연구 - 업무시설을 중심으로)

  • Won, Kyoung-Sop
    • Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
    • /
    • v.15 no.10
    • /
    • pp.6354-6365
    • /
    • 2014
  • This study aims to suggest a direction to develop Korea's certification system by comparing the evaluation items between Korea's G-SEED (Green Standard for Energy & Environmental Design) and Germany's sustainable building certification. A number of eco-friendly building certification systems are being implemented globally. On the other hand, mutually comparable evaluation items have not been suggested up until now. Therefore, international standards have been trying to establish evaluation criteria for eco-friendly buildings, and Germany's sustainable building certification is the first certification standard that has accepted those evaluation criteria. According to the result of comparing Korea's green building certification with Germany's sustainable certification, the green building certification has evaluation items not only on environmentality (62.6%), but also on social aspects (25.4%) and economic aspects (3.0%). This suggests a crucial direction to the development of evaluation items regarding the social and economic aspects of green building certification.

법령과 고시 - 제로에너지 건축물 인증제도 1월부터 본격 시행

  • 대한기계설비건설협회
    • 월간 기계설비
    • /
    • s.318
    • /
    • pp.56-58
    • /
    • 2017
  • 국토교통부는 녹색건축물 조성지원법 시행령 시행규칙을 개정하고 1월 20일부터 제로에너지건축물 인증제 시행에 들어간다. 제로에너지건축물은 고단열 건축자재와 신재생에너지를 결합하여 외부 에너지 유입을 최소화 한 건축물로 건축주는 인증을 원할 경우 인증기관에 신청하여 제로에너지건축물 인증을 받을 수 있으며, 인증받은 건축물에 대해서는 용적률 완화, 신재생에너지 설치보조금, 기부채납 부담률 완화 등의 인센티브가 제공된다.

  • PDF

제도 & 시행 (3) - 친환경 인증 "모든 신축건축물로 확대"

  • 대한설비건설협회
    • 월간 기계설비
    • /
    • s.239
    • /
    • pp.28-30
    • /
    • 2010
  • 국토해양부(장관 정종환)와 환경부(장관 이만의)는 6개 용도의 신축건축물에만 가능했던 친환경건축물 인증을 모든 용도의 신축건축물에 가능토록 하는 "친환경건축물의 인증에 관한 규칙" 개정안을 지난 5월17일 개정 공포('10.7.1 시행)했다. 이번 개정안은 저탄소 녹색건축물의 공급을 활성화하기 위해 모든 용도의 신축건축물에 대한 친환경인증[공공건축물(1만$m^2$ 이상)은 의무화, 민간건축물은 자발적 참여로 운영] 평가기준 마련과 인증기관의 전문성 강화 등을 주요내용으로 하고 있으며, 취 등록세 감면 등 인센티브 제도가 원활히 시행될 수 있도록 인증시기 및 절차를 개선하고, 인증등급을 세분화(2 $\rightarrow$ 4등급)하는 내용도 포함됐다. 국토해양부와 환경부는 이번 조치로 민간분야의 경우 본인들이 인센티브를 받기를 원하는 경우에는 친환경건축물 인증을 받을 수 있도록 하는 등 민간분야의 친환경설계를 적극 유도할 수 있는 기반을 마련했으며, "친환경건축물의 인증에 관한 규칙"의 차질 없는 시행을 위해 7월 1일까지 "친환경건축물 인증기준" (국토해양부, 환경부 공동 고시)을 개정할 계획이다. 한편, 내년부터는 기존 건축물도 친환경건축물 인증을 받을 수 있도록 그 대상범위를 확대해 나갈 예정이다.

  • PDF

An Analysis of the Self-reliance Rate by Element according to the Implementation of Zero Energy Certification System in School Facilities (학교시설 제로에너지인증제 시행에 따른 요소별 자립률 분석)

  • Meang, Joon-Ho;Kim, Sung-Joon;Lee, Seung-Min;Ko, Hyun-Su
    • The Journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research
    • /
    • v.20 no.1
    • /
    • pp.19-28
    • /
    • 2021
  • The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (MOLIT) is implementing a zero-energy building (ZEB) certification to save energy for the building section and to accelerate the achievement of national greenhouse gases reduction goals in accordance with a new climate regime. In 2014, the MOLIT announced a plan for early activation of the ZEB, and in January 2016, the "Green Buildings Construction Support Act" was revised and established. In addition, the plan was established to gradually spread zero-energy buildings from the public sector in 2020 to the private sector by 2025. Therefore, this study analyzed the self-sufficiency rate of each energy factor according to the implementation of the zero energy building certification of school facilities that belong to the public sector and are included in the mandatory zero energy buildings from 2020.

Building Commissioning Management Framework from the Case Study of Green Building (녹색건축물인증(LEED) 사례연구를 통한 커미셔닝 관리 프레임워크 도출)

  • Jeong, Jin-Hak;Park, So-Yeon;Song, Dong-Hun;Ahn, Yong-Han
    • Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design
    • /
    • v.34 no.8
    • /
    • pp.23-30
    • /
    • 2018
  • A necessity of increasing the energy efficiency of the buildings is rising due to global warming and high energy demands prices. Commissioning is an effective way to increase the energy efficiency of the building and reduce maintenance costs. In this study, a case study was conducted to derive the commissioning process of green building and propose management factors that can be used in domestic commissioning projects. The case was a university renovation project that received a LEED Glod certification and conducted the enhanced commissioning. The commissioning is divided into planning, design, construction, and post-construction phases. In the planning stage, commissioning company selection, commissioning goal setting, tasks and responsibilities for each subject are set. In the design phase, preparations are made for inspection and construction steps to prevent design errors. In the construction phase, problems are solved through periodic on-site inspections. In the post-construction phase, a final report with all the details of the commissioning will be created and future maintenance strategies will be proposed. Based on the findings of this study, it will be a basis for the management factors that can be used in the implementation of domestic commissioning projects.

A Study on the Right Direction of Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design(G-SEED) from the Perspective of Landscape Architecture (조경관점의 녹색건축 인증기준에 대한 방향 정립)

  • Cha, Uk Jin;Nam, Jung Chil;Yang, Geon Seok
    • Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
    • /
    • v.44 no.4
    • /
    • pp.45-56
    • /
    • 2016
  • In this study, an analysis has been conducted on the evaluation criteria of current G-SEED(Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design) and on the 78 buildings, certified by G-SEED, for 3 years from November, 2012 to November, 2015. Based on the results of this analysis, four issues are driven and proposed hereinafter. Issue 1 : Nowadays, the psychological proportion of landscape architecture in building is getting greater than ever so that it shows reliable reduction of carbon dioxide. Therefore, so far as the eight kinds of buildings are concerned, the evaluation items of G-SEED must include those of landscape architecture mandatorily through its enlargement. Issue 2 : It is undesirable factor that inhibits precise evaluation on landscaping area to let other areas appraise landscape architecture because it requires outstanding professionalism. So, G-SEED should not only ensure landscaping professionalism for the correct evaluation but also let landscape area participate in assessing other areas. Issue 3 : Many previous researches turned out that landscape planting technique has excellent effect on saving energy and reducing temperature of buildings. Thus, landscape planting technique of landscape area is required to be one of the evaluation items of energy sector. Issue 4 : Tree management also has to be newly included as one of the evaluation factor for the maintenance relating to the landscape architecture. G-SEED, enacted and enforced by the Green Building Creation Support Act in 2013, surely is effective system to reduce carbon dioxide in buildings. This is a special Act in its nature that is superior to Construction Law and must be observed by all means to construct buildings. Under the umbrella of this legal system, various of researches and products are contributing to creating new jobs in construction area. However, it is a well-known fact that landscape architecture area has shown less interest on this Act than that of construction area. In conclusion, it is necessary that landscape industry should conduct continuous researches on G-SEED and pay more attention to the Act enough to harvest related products and enlarge its work area.

A Study on Environment-friendliness in the Chungnam Regional Public Hospitals - Focused on the Sustainable Site and Transportation (충남지역 지방공공의료원의 친환경성 분석 연구 - 토지이용 및 교통부분을 중심으로)

  • Lim, Yeonghwan
    • Journal of The Korea Institute of Healthcare Architecture
    • /
    • v.20 no.2
    • /
    • pp.37-45
    • /
    • 2014
  • Purpose: Numerous researches about healthcare buildings have been performed however, they were mainly focused on convenience or healing condition for medical treatments. The hospitals consume energy and generate $CO_2$ as twice as the residential or commercial buildings do(Lim, et al., 2010a:154). The public regional hospitals are especially in serious conditions. They are more than 20 years old in average. Energy efficiency and environmental friendliness in the public regional hospitals are far behind ones in private sectors. Even though the ministry of health & welfare is supporting renovation of the builidngs and enhancement of the facilities every year, it is not integrated including sustainibility. In this study, we investigates current conditions of the regional public hospital in envrionment-friendly standpoint, especially focused on Chungcheong Province area Hospitals. Methods: we investigates current conditions of the regional public hospital in envrionment-friendly standpoint, especially focused on Chungcheong Province area Hospitals. The study was executed by qualitative and quantitative evaluations with site inspection, drawing analysis and interviews. Results: Through this study, we found that the Chungnam regional public hospitals can be environmentally improved by management plans and programs. Implications: Based on this analysis, Korean Green Building Certification for healthcare facilities will be developed in near future.

A basic study on the Eco-friendly elements evaluation of Hanok according to G-SEED -Focus on the Unjoru and Jinwondang- (녹색건축인증제(G-SEED)에 따른 한옥의 친환경 요소 평가에 관한 기초연구 -구례 운조루와 진원당을 중심으로-)

  • Choi, Hyung-Seok;Kim, Hark-Rae
    • Journal of the Korean Institute of Rural Architecture
    • /
    • v.17 no.1
    • /
    • pp.9-18
    • /
    • 2015
  • The purpose of this study is to analyze the usage of eco-friendly elements in Korean traditional architecture to evaluate Hanok(Unjoru and Jinwondang) according to Green Building Certification Criteria(G-SEED). The results of this study were as follows; Unjoru and Jinwondang was not enough to obtain certification points. From Site usage and Traffic category, Jinwondang gets more points than Unjoru. It's because Jinwondang is located in downtown Seoul, so it gets more points of traffic and neighborhood facility. From Energy and Environmental Pollution category, Jinwondang gets more points of energy performance than Unjoru, too. It's because Jinwondang secured insulation performance of wall and windows using insulator and glass. From Resources category, Unjoru gets more points than Jinwondang. It shows that modern Hanok was limited using natural resources. From Ecological Environments category, Jinwondang is located urban area, it's difficult to secure the open space, so Unjoru gets more points than Jinwondang. If Modern Honok installs a system that can getting point and secure insulation performance, it will be certificated according to G-SEED.

A study on the Improvement Plans for Green Building Certification System -focused on the school use classification- (녹색건축물인증제도 개선방향에 관한 연구 -학교시설 용도구분 개선을 중심으로-)

  • Lee, Jae Ok;Meang, Joon Ho;Lee, Sang Min;Lee, Seung Min
    • The Journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research
    • /
    • v.11 no.2
    • /
    • pp.28-37
    • /
    • 2012
  • The purpose of this study is to suggest improvement plans of School Green Building Certification System by comparing items of domestic system with those of foreign system. Especially, we focused on school use classification. Use classification of Green Building Certification System must be based on Building Codes and reflect the nature of building use and size. Schools are divided into three groups ; preschool, school(elementary, junior high school, high school), university and ect. Also they must be set up assessment method reflecting the nature of school use and size.

Comparison of the Building Envelope Design Elements between Green Building Design Guidelines and Green Building Certification Criteria - Focus on public institution relocation projects - (녹색건축물 디자인가이드라인과 녹색건축 인증 비교를 통한 외피계획요소에 관한 연구 - 공공기관 지방이전 건축물을 중심으로 -)

  • Kim, So-Young;Hwang, Sung-Pil;Oh, Joon-Gul
    • KIEAE Journal
    • /
    • v.14 no.4
    • /
    • pp.61-68
    • /
    • 2014
  • Due to rapid climate changing and the need for energy conservation, environment friendly initiatives have emerged, and regulations to support establishment of green structures in construction have been legislated and enacted. In this study, the supporting of green build method act for rapid climate change and energy conservation. Using green build method, protecting surrounding ecosystem and developing green building continuously, I suggest alternative for protection of the environment. Identifies Envelope Design Elements among various construction Green Building Design Guidelines. Green buildings that we extract the Green Building envelope design from Design Guideline, select the object building through the green buildings examples of public institution relocation projects. Since then analyzes the planned schematic design and Green Envelope Design Elements and Green Building Certification(G-SEED). So, that future directions for planning correlation of Green Building and Design Guidelines about Green Design Elements Can be presented.