DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Building Commissioning Management Framework from the Case Study of Green Building

녹색건축물인증(LEED) 사례연구를 통한 커미셔닝 관리 프레임워크 도출

  • Received : 2018.04.18
  • Accepted : 2018.08.20
  • Published : 2018.08.30

Abstract

A necessity of increasing the energy efficiency of the buildings is rising due to global warming and high energy demands prices. Commissioning is an effective way to increase the energy efficiency of the building and reduce maintenance costs. In this study, a case study was conducted to derive the commissioning process of green building and propose management factors that can be used in domestic commissioning projects. The case was a university renovation project that received a LEED Glod certification and conducted the enhanced commissioning. The commissioning is divided into planning, design, construction, and post-construction phases. In the planning stage, commissioning company selection, commissioning goal setting, tasks and responsibilities for each subject are set. In the design phase, preparations are made for inspection and construction steps to prevent design errors. In the construction phase, problems are solved through periodic on-site inspections. In the post-construction phase, a final report with all the details of the commissioning will be created and future maintenance strategies will be proposed. Based on the findings of this study, it will be a basis for the management factors that can be used in the implementation of domestic commissioning projects.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. Cho, S. & Tae, C. (2001). Research and development trends of commissioning technology, Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration, 30(8), 34-38
  2. Cho, Y. (2010). Continuous commissioning process and application, Journal of the Korean Solar Energy Society, 30(5), 77-84
  3. Cho, Y. & Ahn, D. (2011). A study on the improving energy efficiency through retro-commissioning, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning and Design Section, 27(9), 301-308
  4. Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Research Center. (2017). National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report of Korea, 3-7
  5. Jung, C. & Jeong, D. (2017). A comparative study on domestic and international evaluation criteria of commissioning for sustainable building certification, Korea Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 18(1), 27-36 https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2017.18.1.027
  6. Kim, K. (2001). An effective application of building commissioning for remodeling project, Thesis, Chung-Ang University, 5-11
  7. Kim, D. (2004). A case study of G-building commissioning by dynamic simulation, Thesis, Daejon University, 13-16
  8. Kim, D. (2016). A study of effect of ongoing HVAC control commissioning through long-term energy measurement on a new building, Thesis, Yonsei University, 7-15
  9. Ministry of Science, The Office for Government Policy Coordination, Ministry of Strategy and Finance, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Ministry of Environment, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport & Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries. (2014). Roadmap for Achieving National GHG Reduction Targets, Report of State Council, 46-50
  10. Park, S. (2014). Study on the plan to promote TAB and commissioning, Thesism Busan University, 14-21
  11. Pearce, A. & Ahn, Y. (2018). Sustainable Buildings and Infrastructure. 2nd ed, Routledge, 195.
  12. Robson, C. (2002). Real world research, Blackwell, 223