• Title/Summary/Keyword: web information evaluation

Search Result 890, Processing Time 0.029 seconds

A Model for Evaluating Confidence and Satisfaction of Health Information Web-Sites (건강정보 웹사이트의 신뢰성과 만족도 평가 모델)

  • Woo Young-Woon;Cho Kyoung-Won
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.6 no.9
    • /
    • pp.42-49
    • /
    • 2006
  • In this paper, we proposed a model to evaluate confidence and satisfaction of health information web-sites visited by general health consumers. In order to propose the evaluation model, lots of foreign and domestic researches are investigated and analyzed. Based on these analyses, confidence and satisfaction standards for the model are proposed. A process for evaluation and a method for calculation of evaluation value by the standards are proposed, too. The proposed model can be utilized as a tool for analyzing conventional health information web-sites and can be utilized as check lists for developments in case of health information web-sites under construction.

  • PDF

An Empirical Study on Web Sites Evaluation by Industry Type (WebMAC Business를 이용한 업종별 웹사이트 평가에 관한 실증 연구)

  • Chung, Kyung-Soo;Kim, Jung-Young;Noh, Mi-Jin
    • Information Systems Review
    • /
    • v.5 no.2
    • /
    • pp.91-108
    • /
    • 2003
  • The number of companies which use Internet and Web grow at an explosive rate and most of them made use of the Web sites for business activity such as publicity, advertising, customer support, and online retailing. However, there are very few empirical studies on web sites evaluation based on theoretical framework. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate motivational effectiveness of Web sites using the WebMAC Business instrument. In this paper, we introduced a lot of Web sites evaluation studies and several IS studies based on the motivation theory. Web sites evaluation was performed by four motivational factors which include stimulating, meaningful, organized, and easy-to-use. There are significant differences among the industry type about motivational factors. This study identifies areas for improvement of existing Web sites and suggests several guidelines for development of Web sites from the user's perspective.

The Evaluation of Web Contents by User 'Likes' Count: An Usefulness of hT-index for Topic Preference Measurement

  • Song, Yeseul;Park, Ji-Hong;Shim, Jiyoung
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
    • /
    • v.49 no.2
    • /
    • pp.27-49
    • /
    • 2015
  • The purpose of this study is to suggest an appropriate index for evaluating preferences of Web contents by examining the h-index and its variants. It focuses on how successfully each index represents relative user preference towards topical subjects. Based on data obtained from a popular IT blog (engadget.com), subject values of the h-index and its variants were calculated using 53 subject categories, article counts and the 'Likes' counts aggregated in each category. These values were compared through critical analysis of the indices and Spearman rank correlation analysis. A PFNet (Pathfinder Network) of subjects weighted by $h_T$ values was drawn and cluster analysis was conducted. Based on the four criteria suggested for the evaluation of Web contents, we concluded that the $h_T$-index is a relatively appropriate tool for the Web contents preference evaluation. The $h_T$-index was applied to visually represent the relative weight (topic preference by user 'Likes' count) for each subject category of the real online contents after suggesting the relative appropriateness of the $h_T$-index. Applying scientometric indicators to Web information could provide new insights into, and potential methods for, Web contents evaluation. In addition, information on the focus of users' attention would help online informants to plan more effective content strategies. The study tries to expand the application area of the h-type indices to non-academic online environments. The research procedure enables examination of the appropriateness of the index and highlights considerations for applying the indicators to Web contents.

Investigation for Evaluation factor of Internet GIS Sites in the Context of User considering Web 2.0 (웹 2.0을 고려한 유저 참여 관점에서의 인터넷 GIS 사이트 평가기준 설정을 위한 연구)

  • Lee, Ho-Jin;Park, Hee-Jun
    • Proceedings of the Korea Database Society Conference
    • /
    • 2008.05a
    • /
    • pp.379-388
    • /
    • 2008
  • The internet GIS site what offered information one-sidedly by early enterpriser was changed to formation as produced and evaluate by users with paradigm of Web 2.0. We look around the existing universal evaluation model of web site and evaluation model of GIS site and propose new evaluate model of GIS site considering web 2.0. A reference point of evaluation model proposed though this study can proposal evaluation model of GIS 2.0 after develop this as a reference point of a evaluation model considering user participate rate.

  • PDF

A Study on Recent Research Trend on Web Accessibility Evaluation in Korea (한국의 웹 접근성 평가 연구동향 분석)

  • Kim, MiJeong;Kim, JaMee
    • KIPS Transactions on Software and Data Engineering
    • /
    • v.7 no.1
    • /
    • pp.33-42
    • /
    • 2018
  • The purpose of this study is to suggest the shortcomings and the direction of the web accessibility evaluation studies by analyzing the research trends on web accessibility evaluation in Korea. For this aim, a total of 59 theses presented in the registered academic journal and the candidate of registration academic journals from January 2000 to March 2017 were selected. The selected dissertations have been analyzed based on the evaluators, the evaluation targets, the evaluation methods, and the evaluation results with regard to web accessibility. As a result of the analysis, the highest rate in the evaluator aspect was 'independent evaluation (66 percent)' and the highest percentage in the evaluation target aspect was 'web site (83 percent)'. When it came to the evaluation methods, automatic evaluation and the mixture of automatic evaluation and manual evaluation had a similar percentage. Lastly, only two papers showed that web accessibility did not have any problems. This study is meaningful in the sense that it suggested a desirable direction for the web accessibility studies in Korea and web accessibility evaluation studies in the situation when the meta studies which analyzed research trends are insufficient.

Usability Evaluation for Hospital Web sites in Korea (국내 의료기관 웹 사이트에 대한 사용성 평가)

  • Kim, Jong-Min;Ban, Chae-Hoon
    • Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering
    • /
    • v.15 no.11
    • /
    • pp.2426-2432
    • /
    • 2011
  • In this study, we evaluated web usability for hospital web sites in Korea and analyzed the evaluation results of web usability. Estimators investigated twelve hospital web sites and answered a questionnaire. They also performed predefined tasks which were frequently used services in hospital web sites. We had an interview with the estimator for finding what happened in process of evaluating usability. The evaluation results showed that university hospital provided comparatively better web usability for users. But ambiguous and complicated user interface caused confusion among users. The simplifications of service processes and interfaces were necessary to improve web usability. Some hospitals did not offer primary web services and their services related to the tasks were not systematic.

Development of Web Accessibility Evaluation Algorithm-Based upon Table Element (웹 접근성 평가 알고리즘 개발-Table 요소 중심으로)

  • Park, Seong-Je;Kim, Jong-Weon
    • Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems
    • /
    • v.18 no.4
    • /
    • pp.81-87
    • /
    • 2013
  • Due to the development of IT technologies and the Internet penetration, the importance of Web accessibility has greatly increased and accordingly been studied a lot. This study noticed that the current evaluation algorithm for "Table Elements," which are used for data and layout tables, has many problems. Based on the Web Accessibility Guidelines, this study presents an improved evaluation algorithm for "Table Elements" and verifies its validity.

The Study for Developing Evaluation Tool of Child-Care Websites on the Internet (인터넷상의 육아관련 사이트 평가 도구개발)

  • Han, Kyung-Ja;Kim, Jeong-Soo
    • Korean Parent-Child Health Journal
    • /
    • v.5 no.1
    • /
    • pp.90-100
    • /
    • 2002
  • Web sites on the internet are excellent information resources for the consumers to gain health care knowledge. Especially web sites related to child-care more increase recently. But a concern has emerged for the quality of contents contained on the child-care web sites. Lack of evaluation criteria have led to inaccurate and misleading child-care related publications on the Internet. For evaluating the quality and reliability of child-care related information on the Web, rating tool should be provided and developed. So, this article reviewed and investigated the elements to evaluate child-care sites on the internet. On the basis of the review of articles and the validity test about the contents, 16 preliminary items including purpose, contents, authority, feedback, design developed. Through the pilot study that apply the preliminary evaluating criteria to 20 evaluating criteria for child-care web sites developed. This evaluating criteria have 24 items and that were categorized to purpose(2 items), detail of contents(16 items), authority(2 items), feedback(2 items), design(4 items). The result of this study suggest that the evaluation criteria for child-care web sites may be useful for evaluating the quality of child-care web sites.

  • PDF

Evaluation for Food and Nutrition Information Sites on the Internet (식품영양정보 제공 인터넷 사이트 평가)

  • Bae, Hyeon-Ju;Park, Hae-Jeong;Chae, Mi-Jin;Yun, Eun-Yeong;Kim, Gyeong-Won;Seo, Jeong-Suk
    • Journal of the Korean Dietetic Association
    • /
    • v.12 no.4
    • /
    • pp.404-410
    • /
    • 2006
  • This study was done to analyze the contents of food and nutrition information sites on the internet. In analysis, 276 web sites were used. Web sites from 3 internet search engines(Yahoo, Empas, Naver) were selected on the date of July 15th, 2004. The trained panels evaluated web sites' contents by the assessment tools using 3-point scale(2:strongly agree, 1:agree, 0:disagree). The contents classified by topics were functional foods(46.4%), cuisine and cooking(38.4%), food sanitation and safety(30.4%) and so on. Operators of web sites were individual(35.9%), company(30.4%) and public institution(33.7%). About 89.5% of web sites were operated for unspecified people. Contents of the web sites were well established especially in consistency in title and contents(1.6), scientific basis of explanations(1.2) and benefit of information(1.2) and so on while not well established in providing relevant sites(0.7), providing contact address and feed back mechanism(0.7) and so on. Web sites operated by public institutions are rated significantly higher than web sites operated by individual or company. In conclusion, in order to qualitatively improve food and nutrition information on the internet, continuing monitoring and evaluation are highly required and web sites operated by public institutions shall be developed further.

  • PDF

A Study on Quality Evaluation of Medical Web DBs : PubMed and Embase (의학 분야 Web DB의 품질평가 -PubMed와 Embase를 대상으로-)

  • Kim, Sang-Jun
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
    • /
    • v.38 no.2
    • /
    • pp.161-187
    • /
    • 2004
  • This study concerns DB quality of the Web databases which has been produced in medical science. For the quality evaluation of Embase and PubMed, 10 evaluating criteria were developed on the basis of literature review. The evaluation result showed that PubMed has superiority to the currentness, accuracy, completness, consistency, ease of use, customer support, searchability, cost, and network & H/W on DB, but Embase has only superiority to the coverage. It is needed for purchasing, user training, and library service based on the above evaluation result.