• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.362-372
• /
• 2014

Purpose: The purpose of this research was to develop and test the validity and reliability of the Service Orientation Scale for Health Care Organization. Methods: The Service Orientation Scale for Health Care Organization, $SERV^*OR$, was developed through forward-backward translation methods. Internal consistency and reliability, construct and criterion validity were calculated using SPSS Statistics WIN 17.0. Survey data were collected from 283 clinical nurses in a general hospital in J province. Results: The Service Orientation Scale for Health Care Organization showed reliable internal consistency with Cronbach's ${\alpha}$'s for the total scale ranging from .85~.91. Factor loading of the 30 items on four sub-scales ranged from .67~.83. The sub scales were named service leadership, service system, customer focus, and service control. Item convergent and discriminant validity were also established for the Service Orientation Scale for Health Care Organization. Criterion validity showed a significant correlation with customer orientation. Conclusion: The findings of the study demonstrate that the Service Orientation Scale for Health Care Organization has satisfactory construct and criterion validity, and reliability and can be used to measure service orientation.

• 한국조리학회지
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.279-292
• /
• 2007

This study was to examine ongoing conflicts between employees and determine the level of conflict management strategies to establish a more effective management in hotel restaurants. The results of this research show, first, conflicts exalted collective organization; the more comflicts, the lower absorption or validity of the organization. Second, the lower increase in personal conflicts, the better the validity of the organization. Therefore, hypotheses in this study can be seen as acceptable. In this study, based on the future management of hotel restaurants, there should be private groups to resolve conflicts through the organizations which can increase the validity of the organizations.

• 한국안전학회지
• /
• 제38권1호
• /
• pp.78-86
• /
• 2023

In this study, we explored the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Safety Organization Scale (K-SOS). The SOS is based on the principles of a high-reliability organization and is an effective measure of the self-reported behaviors underlying the safety culture of an organization. We conducted a methodological study to examine the validity and reliability of the 9-item SOS translated into Korean. The data of 108 nurses working in three general hospitals with more than 100 beds located in D City were included. Content validity, construct validity, criterion validity, and reliability were evaluated. The results confirmed that the K-SOS is a unidimensional structure scale. Higher K-SOS scores exhibited a significant correlation with Hospital Survey On Patient Safety Culture, thus indicating the validity of the criterion. The internal consistency of the K-SOS was acceptable. Thus, the K-SOS is a reliable self-report scale for directly measuring the safety behaviors of an organization. The K-SOS can be used to improve patient safety in Korean hospital settings.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.75-88
• /
• 2003

Purpose : The Purposes of this study was to develop a learning organization measurement for nurses, and to test the validity and reliability of the measurement. Method : This study was conducted through 3 phases -theoretical framework choice, measurement items selection, and the testing of validity and reliability. In order to test reliability and validity of the measurement, data were collected from the 261 nurses, working in the 1 hospital with more 800 beds. The data obtained were analyzed by SPSS for Window program using percentages, Factor Analysis, Cronbach's alpha coefficients. Result : As a result of the study, 2 scales -Learning Organization Building Scale, and Knowledge Management Process Scale- were developed. Learning Organization Building Scale was consisted of 23 items, 5 factors. 5 factors explained 60.26% of the total variance, and the Cronbach's alpha of this scale was .8807. Knowledge Management Process Scale was consisted of 17 items, 4 factors. 4 factors explained 66.14% of the total variance, and the Cronbach's alpha of this scale was .9147. Conclusion : The Study supports the validity and reliability of the scales. Therefore, these scales can be effectively utilized for many researches about Learning organization of Nurse, and Nursing organization in the Hospital Setting.

• 대한치과기공학회지
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.73-82
• /
• 2008

This study has been analyzed to write an ideal training evaluation table after analyzing validity of content organization and assigning score of evaluating elements of clinical practice of Dept. of dental technology. 220 junior students who are studying dental technology in D university in Daegu were questioned to analyze the relationship of content organization and score of clinical practice evaluation table. The corrected material has been inspected by SAS V8 for Windows. The results are as following. 1. The validity of content organization of clinical practice evaluation table has a result which can be reliable over than 70% but the validity of score shows low reliance. c 2. The validity of content organization of detail elements of clinical practice evaluation shows that overuse of material and attentiveness(3.78) and responsibility (3.60) are high response but in score organization, the validity shows that safety measure(2.36) when controling machines, arrangement(2.98) after use and ability (2.98) of solving problems are very low. 3. In the elements without interpersonal relation, it shows that those are related to each other. its grading is p < 0.01 so it appears to be meaningful. 4. In result of analyzing the effect to 'studying amount' mark in clinical practice evaluation mark, it appears the element of attitude for job to affect it. And in result of analyzing the effect to 'training attitude' mark, it appears the element of 'controling machines' to affect it. For these results, to be a better evaluation tool, it should be modified by continuous research with arranging evaluation elements to be marked differently in between elements.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.175-184
• /
• 2004

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a nursing organization culture measurement tool and to test the validity and reliability of the tool. Method: This study conducted in three phases. In phase 1, theoretical framework choice, Phase 2, measurement items selection, Phase 3, testing of validity and reliability. In order to test validity and reliability of the measurement, data were collected from 915 nurses, working in the 22 hospitals with more 500 beds. The data obtatined were analyzed by SPSS-Win 10.0 program using percentages, Factor Analysis, Cronbach's alpha Coefficients. Result: As a result of the study, nursing organization culture measurement scale was consisted of 20 items, 4 factors. 4 factor explained 60.54% of the total variance, and the Cronbach's alpha of this scale was .8829. Conclusions: The Study supports the validity and reliability of the scales. Therefore, this scale can be effectively utilized for the evaluation of nursing organization culture in hospital setting.

• Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
• /
• 제35권
• /
• pp.7.1-7.14
• /
• 2023

Background: At present, no short standard questionnaire exists for assessing and comparing major work organization hazards in the workplaces of the United States. Methods: We conducted a series of psychometric tests (content validity, factor analysis, differential-item functioning analysis, reliability, and concurrent validity) to validate and identify core items and scales for major work organization hazards using the data from the 2002-2014 General Social Surveys (GSSs), including the Quality of Worklife (QWL) questionnaire. In addition, an extensive literature review was undertaken to find other major work organization hazards which were not addressed in the GSS. Results: Although the overall validity of the GSS-QWL questionnaire was satisfactory in the psychometric tests, some GSS-QWL items of work-family conflict, psychological job demands, job insecurity, use of skills on the job, and safety climate scales appeared to be weak. In the end, 33 questions (31 GSS-QWL and 2 GSS) were chosen as the least, but best validated core questions and included in a new short standard questionnaire (called the Healthy Work Survey [HWS]). And their national norms were established for comparisons. Furthermore, based on the literature review, fifteen more questions for assessing other significant work organization hazards (e.g., lack of scheduling control, emotional demands, electronic surveillance, wage theft) were included in the new questionnaire. Thus, the HWS includes 48 questions in total for assessing traditional and emerging work organization hazards, which covers seven theoretical domains: work schedule/arrangement, control, support, reward, demands, safety, and justice. Conclusions: The HWS is a short standard questionnaire for assessing work organization hazards which can be used as a first step toward the risk management of major work organization hazards in the workplaces of the US.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.21-41
• /
• 2004

The technical proposal suggested and published by MIC(Ministry of Information and Communication, henceforth MIC) contains too general assessment elements, which causes qualitative and subjective assessment of technical proposals. Thus, in terms of the technical proposal assessment. It lacks In fairness, validity and accuracy. Furthermore, it has a great deal of difficulty in assessment caused by the inconsistency between proposal planning and assessment methods. Also, each company has different writing format, so it is impossible to make use of its maneuvering data for the assessment. To overcome these weaknesses, our research focused on a quantitative evaluation on development organization, which is a part of organizational and administrative part of the technical proposal suggested and published by MIC. In this research, we divided development organization for the technical proposal into organization, teams, and team members, and then studied addition, deletion and merging for the assessment criteria. For the related study, we chose especially CMM(Capability Maturity Model) from a lot of international and national references, which is a model measuring the maturity of organization, and then we focused on Small-CMM which is available in the small-sized organization. We also suggested input form, description method, assessment elements for the quantitative assessment in the chosen developmental organization, and finally we proposed standard referencing criteria for the assessment. Our study concludes that our assessment method are valid and available in comparison with the previous Delphi method through a validity evaluation test.

• 융합보안논문지
• /
• 제14권6_2호
• /
• pp.73-81
• /
• 2014

이 연구의 목적은 민간경비조직 구성원의 감정노동이 직무스트레스 및 조직유효성에 미치는 영향에 대한 인과관계를 분석하는데 있다. 연구의 분석을 위하여 서울소재 경비업체에 근무하고 있는 민간경비원을 모집단을 설정하였으며, 설문지는 무선집락표집법에 의하여 700명을 대상으로 배포하였다. 조사기간은 2014년 5월부터 2014년 9월까지 약 4개월간에 걸쳐서 실시하였으며, 설문지는 회수되지 않거나 극단치가 있는 24부를 제외한 총 676부를 최종 데이터로 활용하였다. 데이터 분석을 위하여 이 연구에서는 SPSSWIN 18.0과 AMOS 18.0 통계패키지를 활용하였으며, 인과관계는 공변량 구조방정식을 통하여 가설을 검증 하였다. 분석결과, 감정노동은 조직유효성에 통계적으로 p<.001 수준에서 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타나 가설이 채택되었다. 그리고 감정노동은 직무스트레스에 통계적으로 p<.001 수준에서 부(-)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타나 가설이 채택되었으며, 직무스트레스는 조직유효성에 통계적으로 p<.001 수준에서 부(-)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타나 가설이 채택되었다. 또한, 직무스트레스는 감정노동과 조직유효성 간의 관계에서 통계적으로 p<.01 수준에서 부(-)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타나 매개역할을 할 것이라는 가설은 부분적으로 채택되었다.

• 융합보안논문지
• /
• 제23권5호
• /
• pp.231-238
• /
• 2023

본 연구는 우리나라 산업기술 보호의 필요성과 기술보호를 위한 산업보안요원들의 직무만족이 조직몰입과 조직성과에 미치는 영향을 확인하고 이에 대한 개선점을 도출하기 위함이다. 이를 위해 실무에서 산업보안요원으로 근무하고 있는 150여 근무자들을 대상으로 2023년 8월 28부터 9월 22일까지 4주간 설문조사를 시도하였다. 설문내용을 보면 변수를 "첫째 직무만족, 둘째 조직몰입, 셋째 조직성과"로 구성하였으며 이를 바탕으로 연구가설을 3개 제안하였다. 각 측정항목들의 내적 일관성이 충족한 것을 확인하고 판별타당성과 개념 신뢰도를 산출하였으며 각 변수들의 판별타당성을 검증하였다. 분석결과, 연구모형을 검증하기 위하여 회귀분석을 시행한 이후 그 결과를 보면 연구가설 3개 중에서 "직무만족 ⇨ 조직몰입, 직무만족 ⇨ 조직성과"는 통계적으로 유의한 것으로 도출되어 채택하였으나, "조직몰입 ⇨ 조직성과"는 유의하지 않는 것으로 산출되어 기각되었다.