• Educational Technology International
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.207-231
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of Critical Thinking Strategy supporting argumentation activities between learners. The research question is whether the form of Critical Thinking Strategy offered to support meaningful interaction of collaborative argumentation between learners influences the knowledge acquisition, learning outcome, and student satisfaction. For this, the collaboration outcome of the group, the level of individual knowledge acquisition, the level of students satisfaction were measured as outcome of argumentation activity and their differences analyzed. This study concludes the following: A comparison of the group that was provided with Critical Thinking Strategy (test group) and the group provided with general argumentation scaffolds (compared group) showed there wasn't statistically significant differences in the quality of the learning outcome of collaboration between the groups and in students satisfaction. But there was significant difference in the degree of individual acquisition depending on the offering of scaffolding for Critical Thinking. Therefore, as premised in this study, supporting meaningful mutual interaction between learners during collaborative argumentation using Critical Thinking Strategy has a positive influence on the individual acquisition of domain knowledge. The group provided with scaffolding for Critical Thinking gained higher effect in the degree of knowledge sharing and individual acquisition of domain knowledge compared to the group provided with general argumentation scaffolding.

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제21권6호
• /
• pp.657-664
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 소프트웨어 교육의 방법으로 놀이중심 SW교육 교수학습전략이 컴퓨팅 사고력 신장에 미치는 영향을 살펴보기 위한 것이다. 놀이중심 SW교육 교수학습전략은 주어진 컴퓨터 코드를 놀이 과정을 통하여 구체화하는 노력을 한 뒤 기능을 수정하고 새롭게 재구성하는 수업 전략이다. 우선 놀이중심 SW교육 교수학습전략을 적용한 교육 프로그램을 설계하여 초등학생들에게 투입하였다. 연구의 효과성을 검증하기 위하여 컴퓨팅 사고 개념과 컴퓨팅 사고 실습의 역량검사를 분석한 결과, 제안된 교수학습전략이 직접교수법보다 효과적이었으며 컴퓨팅 사고에 긍정적인 결과를 가져온 것으로 확인되었다.

• 한국시스템다이내믹스연구
• /
• 제13권4호
• /
• pp.81-99
• /
• 2012

The main purpose of this study is to explore the effects of the teaching and learning strategy for systems thinking education in elementary students. For this, we developed the teaching and learning material for the systems thinking education based on the book, namely "The tip of the iceberg," and applied to the control group(N=97) of the all students(N=201). The results were as follows. Firstly, the products of the control groups showed more cycle loops than non-control groups. Secondly, the prominent difference of the number of cycle loops was displayed by the 5th graders between control and non-control groups. Thirdly, in this study, applying the teaching and learning strategy for systems thinking education didn't increase the students' thinking ability in terms of quantity. Consequently, this study showed that improving systems thinking ability of higher elementary students is possible through the teleological education.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.137-154
• /
• 2012

Comparative studies on mathematical modeling cognition feature were carried out between 15 excellent high school third-grade science students (excellent students for short) and 15 normal ones (normal students for short) in China by utilizing protocol analysis and expert-novice comparison methods and our conclusions have been drawn as below. 1. In the style, span and method of mathematical modeling problem representation, both excellent and normal students adopted symbolic and methodological representation style. However, excellent students use mechanical representation style more often. Excellent students tend to utilize multiple-representation while normal students tend to utilize simplicity representation. Excellent students incline to make use of circular representation while normal students incline to make use of one-way representation. 2. In mathematical modeling strategy use, excellent students tend to tend to use equilibrium assumption strategy while normal students tend to use accurate assumption strategy. Excellent students tend to use sample analog construction strategy while normal students tend to use real-time generation construction strategy. Excellent students tend to use immediate self-monitoring strategy while normal students tend to use review-monitoring strategy. Excellent students tend to use theoretical deduction and intuitive judgment testing strategy while normal students tend to use data testing strategy. Excellent students tend to use assumption adjustment and modeling adjustment strategy while normal students tend to use model solving adjustment strategy. 3. In the thinking, result and efficiency of mathematical modeling, excellent students give brief oral presentations of mathematical modeling, express themselves more logically, analyze problems deeply and thoroughly, have multiple, quick and flexible thinking and the utilization of mathematical modeling method is shown by inspiring inquiry, more correct results and high thinking efficiency while normal students give complicated protocol material, express themselves illogically, analyze problems superficially and obscurely, have simple, slow and rigid thinking and the utilization of mathematical modeling method is shown by blind inquiry, more fixed and inaccurate thinking and low thinking efficiency.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.11-20
• /
• 2023

Purpose: 1) develop a learning model involving design thinking to develop creative economy innovation and the characteristics of digital entrepreneurs. 2) evaluate the impact of design thinking on creative economy innovation 3) evaluate the impact of design thinking on digital entrepreneurial ability. Research design, data and methodology: 1) develop a learning model involving design thinking in order to develop creative economy innovation and the characteristics of digital entrepreneurs. 2) Evaluating creative economy innovation involving design thinking. 3) Assessing the characteristics of digital entrepreneurs based on design concepts. Results: 1) the development of a learning model involving design thinking to develop creative economy innovation and digital entrepreneurial competency 2) The students who studied using the learning model involving a design thinking process had the highest overall scores in terms of creative economy innovation 3) The scores for the assessment of digital entrepreneurial activity for the students who studied by using the design thinking learning model were at a high level. Conclusions: The development of the design thinking learning model can encourage students to be able to develop creative economy innovations and to empower digital entrepreneurs' ability for distribution strategy. Educational institutions that would like to succeed in developing creative economy innovative and digital entrepreneurship characteristics with the support of design thinking.

• 대한지리학회지
• /
• 제40권1호
• /
• pp.96-108
• /
• 2005

그동안 꾸준히 강조되어 온 지리적 사고력은 오늘날 고차적 사고력의 함양으로 특히 강조되고 있다. 고차적 사고력으로서의 지리적 사고력의 함양은 교수-학습 과정이 사고기능을 포함한 지리적 기능 중심의 학습자 활동으로 구체화될 때 실현될 수 있지만, 우리나라 지리교육에서는 이에 대한 논의가 거의 이루어지지 못하고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 최근 영국의 국가교육과정에서 제시하는 사고기능과 그것을 지리교육과정으로 구체화한 '지리를 통한 사고 ' 전략에 대해서 살펴보았다. 하나의 사고력 교수 방법으로서 제시되는 TTG는, 무엇보다도 다양한 차이를 가지고 있는 학습자의 학습을 장려하기 위한 구체적이고도 실제적인 교수-학습 전략이다. 따라서 본 연구는 우리나라 지리교육에서 학습자의 사고력을 함양하기 위한 교수-학습 내용과 방법을 모색하는데 필요한 이론적, 실제적 통찰을 제공할 것이다.

• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제40권3호
• /
• pp.219-237
• /
• 2016

본 연구에서는 생각 지도를 이용한 반성적 사고 촉진 전략이 초등학생의 반성적 사고, 과학학업성취도 및 과학적 태도에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 6학년 2개 학급을 실험반과 비교반으로 나누어서 실험반에는 반성적 사고 촉진 전략을 활용한 수업을 처치하였고, 비교반에는 전통적인 지도서 위주의 수업을 실시하였다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같았다. 첫째, 생각 지도를 이용한 반성적 사고 전략은 초등학생의 반성적 사고력 향상에 긍정적인 영향을 끼쳤다. 둘째, 생각 지도를 이용한 반성적 사고 전략은 초등학생의 과학 학업성취도 향상에 유의미한 차이를 나타내지 못했다. 셋째, 생각 지도를 이용한 반성적 사고 전략은 초등학생의 과학적 태도 향상에 긍정적인 영향을 끼쳤다. 넷째, 생각 지도를 이용한 반성적 사고 전략을 활용한 수업에 대한 학생들의 만족도는 매우 높았고, 대부분의 학생들은 과학 수업에 대한 흥미가 높아졌다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제35권1호
• /
• pp.54-64
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this study is to develop instructional strategy which utilizes thinking maps focused on drawing as a measure to enhance science learning motivation, self-directed learning activity and science academic achievement of learners, and to examine the effects of its application. The target unit for this study is 'life cycle of plants' in the fourth grade of elementary school. Two classes of 4th grades of elementary school were selected and divided into two groups. The learners of experimental group have completed thinking map by drawing a picture to express the results to be observed and measured, and used it to arrange the learning contents. The result of this study is as follows. First, it is proven that using thinking maps focused on drawing actually helped improving the motivation of learners to study science. Second, it is proven that this strategy was effective to change their self-directed learning ability in positive ways. Third, it contributed to the improvement of learners' science academic achievement. We found out that the application of this strategy enabled them to enjoy the mapping using drawing, to be immersed in learning, to better recognize the scientific concepts and the structure of learning contents, and to have a positive awareness of the usefulness of thinking maps focused on drawing.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.118-123
• /
• 2010

This study is aiming to structure progressive instructional strategy for development of constructivist-thinking into the beginning stage, developmental stage, and advanced stage, then organize multiple choice, completion, descriptive, and essay problems to be suitable for each stage of the strategy, and finally, to evaluate what effects this instructional strategy has on the students' academic achievements and enhancement of their scientific essay writing skills. The results of the study are as follows. First, lessons applying the strategy for developing constructivist-thinking were more effective in enhancing student' academic achievement than the text book-oriented lecture type lessons. In changes in academic achievement, the test group, for both high and low levels, displayed a higher average than the control group, however, changes in the high level was not statistically significant and changes in the low level students were found to be statistically significant. Second, scientific essay writing skills were found to be effective in all levels of the test group and the averages in both high and low groups of the test group were higher than those of the control group and were also found to be statistically significant.

• 대한화학회지
• /
• 제59권1호
• /
• pp.54-68
• /
• 2015

이 연구의 목적은 탐구 과정을 수행하는 동안 발산적 사고와 수렴적 사고를 경험할 수 있는 수업 전략을 개발하고 이를 적용함으로써 그 효과를 검증하는 것이다. 이를 위하여 발산하기 모형, 수렴하기 모형을 탐구의 각 단계에 활용할 수 있는 수업 전략을 개발하였다. 그리고 중학교 1학년을 대상으로 5월부터 12월까지 개발한 수업 전략을 실시한 후 이 수업 전략이 창의적 사고력, 비판적 사고력에 미치는 효과를 알아보았다. 그 결과 창의적 사고의 하위 범주인 유창성과 융통성, 독창성이 모두 유의미하게 향상되었다. 또한 창의적 사고력과 그 하위 요소인 유창성, 융통성, 독창성에 대한 인지 수준, 성별, 학업 성취도는 교수 전략과의 상호 작용 효과는 없는 것으로 나타났다. 비판적 사고력에 대해서는 가설 설정, 변인 통제, 자료해석 및 자료변환에서 유의미한 신장을 나타냈다. 또한 비판적 사고력에 대한 인지 수준, 성별, 학업 성취도는 교수 전략과 상호 작용 효과가 없는 것으로 나타났다.