1 |
Ausubel, D. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. NY: Holt Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
|
2 |
Bender, B. & Levin, J. (1978). Pictures, imagery, and retarded children's prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 583-588.
DOI
|
3 |
Cho, H., Lee, H. & Kim, E. (2011). The effect of scientific writing program using thinking maps on the scientific gifted children's scientific process skill and creativity. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 4(2), 166-176.
|
4 |
Choi, S. (2013). The effect of applying concept maps for 'oceans' unit in middle school science. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 6(2), 93-100.
|
5 |
Chun, H. (2004). The Singapore story. London: Cowin Press.
|
6 |
Edens, K. M. & Potter, E. (2003). Using descriptive drawings as a conceptual change strategy in elementary science. School Science and Mathematics, 103(3), 135-144.
DOI
|
7 |
Rha, I., Park, S., Choi, H. & Choi, S. (2009). Development and validation of a visualization tendency test. In T. Bastiaens et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on e-Learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education 2009 (pp. 3665-3670). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
|
8 |
Shin, M. & Lee, Y. (2012). The effects of the astronomical observation class using thinking maps on science process skills and metacognition in the elementary scientific gifted. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 24(1), 41-60.
|
9 |
Song, J., Lee, M. & Park, S. (2015). Effectiveness of STEAM program using thinking maps on elementary school students. The Journal of Elementary Education, 28(3), 145-171.
|
10 |
Tuan, H., Chin, C. & Shieh, S. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students' motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639-654.
DOI
|
11 |
Yoo, K. & Cheong, J. (1998). Demographic and sociopsychological variables to adults' self-direction in learning. Korean Journal of Adult & Continuing Education, 4(1), 119-149.
|
12 |
Hubble, G. (2004). Embracing change: The evolution of thinking in a K-12 school. London: Cowin Press.
|
13 |
Edwards, P. (2011). Utilizing thinking maps to promote reading comprehension and motivation to read in urban elementary school males. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oakland University.
|
14 |
Gobert, J. & Clement, J. (1999). Effects of student-generated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of causal and dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 39-54.
DOI
|
15 |
Guglielmino, L. (1977). Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale. Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia.
|
16 |
Hyerle, D. & Yeager, C. (2007). Thinking maps: A language for learning. Cary, NC: Thinking Maps, Inc.
|
17 |
Hyerle, D. (1993). Thinking maps as tools for multiple modes of understanding. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
|
18 |
Hyerle, D. (1996). Visual tools for constructing knowledge. Alexandra, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
|
19 |
Hyerle, D. (2000). Thinking maps training of trainers resource manual. Raleigh, NC: Innovative Sciences.
|
20 |
Kang, O. & Jeon, H. (2008). The effects of the selfdirected learning on the learning activities applying the graphic organizer. Journal of Education Research, 4(1), 1-18.
DOI
|
21 |
Kim, J. & Park, Y. (2003). Validation of self-directed learning ability diagnostic scale for elementary higher graders. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 16(1), 183-199.
|
22 |
Kim, W. (2013). Instruction method using thinking maps in creativity art education. Journal of Korea Child Art Association, 12(1), 79-97.
|
23 |
Moon, S. & Kim, M. (2014). Effects of thinking maps training on reading achievement and reading abilities in elementary school students. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 18(1), 85-111.
DOI
|
24 |
Knowles, M. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Chicago. IL: Follett Publishing Co.
|
25 |
Larkin, H. & Simon, A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65-100.
DOI
|
26 |
McNamara, D. (2007). Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions and technologies. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
27 |
Park, H. (2010). The effects of science academic achievement and science process skill by science instruction using thinking maps. Master's thesis, Busan National University of Education, Busan, South Korea.
|
28 |
Park, J. & Cho, Y. (2010). Development and application of teaching strategy structuring learner's motivation and participation activities in elementary science classes. Biology Education, 38(2), 285-297.
DOI
|
29 |
Park, M. & Lee, Y. (2010). Effective educational use of thinking maps in science instruction. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 3(1), 47-54.
|
30 |
Park, S. & Cho, H. (1994). Learning theory and science education [학습론과 과학교육]. Seoul: Kyoyukkwahaksa.
|
31 |
Piercy, T. & Hyerle, D. (2011). Maps for the road to reading comprehension: Bridging reading text structures to writing prompts. In D. Hyerle(Ed.), Student successes with thinking maps: School-based research, results, and models for achievement using visual tools (pp.62-71). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
|