• Title/Summary/Keyword: scoring system

Search Result 694, Processing Time 0.03 seconds

Diagnostic Potential of Strain Ratio Measurement and a 5 Point Scoring Method for Detection of Breast Cancer: Chinese Experience

  • Parajuly, Shyam Sundar;Lan, Peng Yu;Yun, Ma Bu;Gang, Yang Zhi;Hua, Zhuang
    • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
    • /
    • v.13 no.4
    • /
    • pp.1447-1452
    • /
    • 2012
  • Aim: To evaluate the differential diagnostic potential of lesion stiffness assessed by the sonoelastographic strain index ratio (SR) and elastographic color scoring system (UE) for breast lesions. Materials and Methods: Three hundred and forty two breast masses (158 benign and 184 malignant) from 325 consecutive patients (mean age 44.2 years; range 16-81)who had been scheduled for a sonographically guided core biopsy were examined proposed by Itoh et al, with scoring 1-3=benign and 4-5=malignant. Strain and area ratios of each lesion were calculated within the same machine. Histological diagnosis was used as the reference standard. The area under the curve (AUC) and cut-off point were obtained by receiver operating curve and the cross table Fischer Test was carried out for assessing diagnostic value. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy and false-discovery rates were compared. Results: The mean strain ratios for benign and malignant lesions were 1.87 and 7.9 respectively. (P<0.0001). When a cutoff point of 3.54 was used, SR had a sensitivity of 94.6%, a specificity 94.3%, a PPV of 95.1%, an NPV of 93.7% and an accuracy of 94.4%. The AUC values were 0.90 for the 5 point scoring system (UE) and 0.96 for the strain index ratio. The overall diagnostic performance was SR method was better (P<0.05). Conclusions: Strain ratio measurement could be another effective predictor in elastography imaging besides 5 the point scoring system for differential diagnosis of breast lesions.

A Study on the Scoring Method for the Insurance Underwriting Using Generalized Linear Model (보험사 언더라이팅 기준 설정을 위한 스코어링 기법에 관한 연구)

  • Lee, Chang-Soo;Kwon, Hyuk-Sung;Kim, Dong-Kwang
    • The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
    • /
    • v.22 no.3
    • /
    • pp.489-498
    • /
    • 2009
  • Underwriting is the first step for the administration of an insurance contract, which may result in stable profitability or unexpected loss for insurance company. Adequacy of underwriting criteria determines underwriting result. Generally, quantitative scoring system is used for underwriting. Method of evaluating risk for the scoring system is summing up scores for risk factors of a potential policyholder in consideration. Scores for each risk factor is predetermined. Current business environment for insurance companies makes underwriting profit more important, which means that insurance companies need more efficient underwriting method. This study suggests a reasonable approach to estimate risk relativities based on generalized linear model. Real data were used to quantify risk levels of groups of insureds for the design of underwriting model. Finally, effects in business volume and profitability of reflecting estimated underwriting scoring system are explained.

Development and Application of a Chemical Ranking and Scoring System for the Management of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (환경성 내분비계장애물질(EDCs)의 우선관리순위 결정법 개발 및 적용)

  • Lim, Miyoung;Park, Ji Young;Ji, Kyunghee;Lee, Kiyoung
    • Journal of Environmental Health Sciences
    • /
    • v.44 no.1
    • /
    • pp.76-89
    • /
    • 2018
  • Background: Exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) has been considered one of the main causes of a range of endocrine diseases in modern society. An EDC priority list considering exposure, toxicity, and societal concern should be established for EDC management. Methods: The chemical ranking and scoring (CRS) system for EDCs was based on exposure, toxicity,and societal concern. The exposure score system was based on usage, circulation volume, bioaccumulation, and detection in consumer products. The toxicity score system was based on carcinogenicity and reproductive and developmental toxicity. The societal concern score system was based on domestic or international regulations and mass media reports. Results: A total of 165 EDCs were considered in the CRS system. The top-five priority EDCs were Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), Benzene, Bisphenol A, Dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and Trichloroethylene. Phthalates, bisphenols and parabens were identified as priority chemical groups. Conclusion: We developed a CRS system for EDCs to identify priority EDCs for management. This will be a foundation to provide an EDC management plan based on scientific decision-making.

Measurement of Public Research Outcomes: A Technology Valuation Method

  • Park, Jung-Min;Lim, Seong-Il;Seol, Sung-Soo
    • Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
    • /
    • v.6 no.2
    • /
    • pp.206-224
    • /
    • 2017
  • This article proposes a logic model for assessing the performance of the outcome of public research as a technology valuation method. It consists of two parts and eight steps. The first part is a scoring system and the second part is a validation process of the performance index derived from scoring by valuation method. The scoring in the first part generally requires a focus group method to find out the value drivers and make an evaluation table. The reason why we call it the technology valuation method is that the first part is derived from the simple evaluation of technology value using checklists for value drive. The second part is the regular technology valuation process. The model is designed for the measurement of unquantifiable outcome. Is knowledge or scientific outcome comparable to the measured outcome? If possible, how big is the unquantifiable outcome? This model is based on financial valuation techniques with clear or acceptable market data. Therefore, it cannot work solely for unquantifiable outcomes without comparable measurable outcomes, unlike economic valuation.

Scoring Methods of Polysomnography for Diagnosis of Sleep Apnea in Adolescents (청소년에서 수면 무호흡 진단을 위한 수면 다원 검사의 판독 방법)

  • Lee, Keu Sung;Sheen, Seung Soo;Lee, Il Jae;Choi, Byung-Joo;Choi, Ji Ho;Park, Do-Yang;Kim, Han Tai;Kim, Hyun Jun
    • Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
    • /
    • v.61 no.11
    • /
    • pp.593-599
    • /
    • 2018
  • Background and Objectives Respiratory scoring guidelines for children and adults have been used for evaluating adolescents both in the 2007 and 2012 American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) scoring manuals. We compared the scoring methods of polysomnography used in these scoring manuals, where pediatric and adult scoring rules were adopted for the diagnosis of sleep apnea in adolescents. Subjects and Method 106 Korean subjects aged between 13 and 18 years were enrolled. All subjects underwent overnight polysomnography in a sleep laboratory. Data were scored according to both pediatric and adult guidelines in the 2007 and 2012 AASM scoring manuals. Results Both pediatric and adult apnea hypopnea index (AHI) using the 2012 method were significantly higher than those using the 2007 method. The difference in AHI compared between pediatric and adult scores with the 2012 AASM scoring system was markedly decreased from that with the 2007 method. There was a significant discordance in sleep apnea diagnosis between pediatric and adult scoring rules in the 2012 method. Conclusion Both pediatric and adult rules were used for the diagnosis of adolescent sleep apnea in the 2012 method. However, there was significant discordance in the diagnosis between pediatric and adult scoring guidelines in the 2012 AASM manual, probably due to different cut-off values of AHI for the diagnosis of sleep apnea in pediatric (${\geq}1$) and adult (${\geq}5$) patients. Further studies are needed to determine a more reasonable cut-off value for the diagnosis of sleep apnea in adolescents.

Seismic Performance Level Criteria and Evaluation Methods (기존시설물 내진성능평가를 위한 평가항목 분류체계와 평가방법)

  • 김남희
    • Proceedings of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea Conference
    • /
    • 2000.10a
    • /
    • pp.251-260
    • /
    • 2000
  • Seismic performance evaluation systems require rational classification of structure systems, proper evaluation criteria, and their scoring index for synthesis. Current seismic performance systems need expert judgments based on collection of available data, approximate analysis of important items, and various scoring system. This study presents a three-step seismic performance evaluation system for building structures in Korea. Each evaluation step determines the seismic performance and the method depends on the degree of refinement of analysis. The preliminary step evaluation involves the global attributes of structures such as vertical irregularity, asymmetric plan, redundancy, and age of structures. The second step requires an elastic analysis for estimation of forces acting on critical sections and checks the strength and ductility. The final step requires inelastic capacity of structures. Each stephas own evaluation scheme with proper weighing factor dependent on the importance and consequence. This study applies the fuzzy theory to a scoring method that synthesizes the individual quantity to a representative value.

  • PDF

Representative component scoring system and its validity and applicability (대표성분점수화법의 제안과 이의 타당성 및 활용성에 관한 연구)

  • 이광진
    • The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
    • /
    • v.10 no.2
    • /
    • pp.275-291
    • /
    • 1997
  • In the case that an abstract concept was measured indirectly by using its indicators, many researcher have obtained its score by using the simple mean, the first principal component, or the first factor, etc. In this paper, an scoring method named as the representative component scoring system was suggested as an alternative and its validity and applicability were studied.

  • PDF

Machine scoring method for speech recognizer detection mispronunciation of foreign language (외국어 발화오류 검출 음성인식기를 위한 스코어링 기법)

  • Kang, Hyo-Won;Bae, Min-Young;Lee, Jae-Kang;Kwon, Chul-Hong
    • Proceedings of the KSPS conference
    • /
    • 2004.05a
    • /
    • pp.239-242
    • /
    • 2004
  • An automatic pronunciation correction system provides users with correction guidelines for each pronunciation error. For this purpose, we propose a speech recognition system which automatically classifies pronunciation errors when Koreans speak a foreign language. In this paper, we also propose machine scoring methods for automatic assessment of pronunciation quality by the speech recognizer. Scores obtained from an expert human listener are used as the reference to evaluate the different machine scores and to provide targets when training some of algorithms. We use a log-likelihood score and a normalized log-likelihood score as machine scoring methods. Experimental results show that the normalized log-likelihood score had higher correlation with human scores than that obtained using the log-likelihood score.

  • PDF

A New Method of Plaque Scoring and Database Implementation (치아 플라그 인덱스 도출 및 데이터베이스 구성)

  • Shin, Seung-Won;Kim, Kyeong-Seop;Lee, Sun-Ju;Kim, Dong-In;Kim, Kee-Deog;Park, Won-Se
    • The Transactions of The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers
    • /
    • v.58 no.6
    • /
    • pp.1200-1206
    • /
    • 2009
  • In this study, a new method of dental plaque scoring is proposed by adopting new criteria to divide the tooth surface with utilizing the geometrical features of a tooth color image. For the possible clinical usage of our new plaque scoring system, GUI(Graphic User Interface) system is also implemented to estimate the numerical plaque index for a specific tooth by designing the supplementary database management module that handles dental plaque scores.

Development of a novel set of criteria to select methodology for designing product service systems

  • Tran, Tuananh;Park, Joon Young
    • Journal of Computational Design and Engineering
    • /
    • v.3 no.2
    • /
    • pp.112-120
    • /
    • 2016
  • This paper proposes eight groups of twenty nine scoring criteria that can help designers and practitioners to compare and select an appropriate methodology for a certain problem in designing product service system (PSS). PSS has been researched for more than a decade and is now becoming more and more popular in academia as well as industry. Despite that fact, the adoption of PSS is still limited for its potential. One of the main reasons is that designing PSS itself is a challenge. Designers and developers face difficulties in choosing appropriate PSS design methodologies for their projects so that they can design effective PSS offerings. By proposing eight groups of twenty nine scoring criteria, this paper enables a "step by step" process to identify the most appropriate design methodology for a company's PSS problem. An example is also introduced to illustrate the use of the proposed scoring criteria and provide a clear picture of how different design methodologies can be utilized at their best in terms of application.