Journal of Computational Design and Engineering

Society for Computational Design and Engineering (한국CDE학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of a novel set of criteria to select methodology for designing product service systems

  • Tran, Tuananh (Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Dongguk University) ;
  • Park, Joon Young (Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Dongguk University)
  • Received : 2015.10.08
  • Accepted : 2015.10.12
  • Published : 2016.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper proposes eight groups of twenty nine scoring criteria that can help designers and practitioners to compare and select an appropriate methodology for a certain problem in designing product service system (PSS). PSS has been researched for more than a decade and is now becoming more and more popular in academia as well as industry. Despite that fact, the adoption of PSS is still limited for its potential. One of the main reasons is that designing PSS itself is a challenge. Designers and developers face difficulties in choosing appropriate PSS design methodologies for their projects so that they can design effective PSS offerings. By proposing eight groups of twenty nine scoring criteria, this paper enables a "step by step" process to identify the most appropriate design methodology for a company's PSS problem. An example is also introduced to illustrate the use of the proposed scoring criteria and provide a clear picture of how different design methodologies can be utilized at their best in terms of application.

Keywords

References

  1. Alonso-Rasgado T, Thompson G, Elfstrom B. The design of functional (total care) products. J. Eng. Des. 2004;15(6)515-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820412331271176
  2. Alonso-Rasgado T, Thompson G. A rapid design process for Total Care Product creation. J. Eng. Des. 2006;17(6)509-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820600750579
  3. Aurich JC, Fuchs C, Wagenknecht C. Life cycle oriented design of technical Product-Service Systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2006;14(17)1480-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.019
  4. Aurich JC, Fuchs C, Wagenknecht C. Modular design of technical product-service systems. In: Brissaud, D, editor. Innovation in Life Cycle Engineering and Sustainable Development. Springer; 2006. p. 303-20.
  5. Aurich JC, Mannweiler C, Schweitzer E. How to design and offer service successfully. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2010;2:136-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2010.03.002
  6. Baines TS, Lightfoot H, Steve E, Neely A, Greenough R, Peppard J, Roy R, Shehab E, Braganza A, Tiwari A, Alcock J, Angus J, Bastlm M, Cousens A, Irving P, Johnson M, Kingston J, Lockett H, Martinez V, Michele P, Tranfield D, Walton I, Wilson H. State -of -the -art in product service systems. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 2007:1543-52.
  7. Bettencourt LA, Ulwick AW. The customer-centered innovation map. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2008;5:109-14.
  8. Beuren FH, Ferreira MGG, Miguel PAC. Product-service systems: a literature review on integrated products and services. J. Clean. Prod. 2013;47:222-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.028
  9. Cavalieri S, Pezzotta G. Product-service systems engineering: state of the art and research challenges. Comput. Ind. 2012;63:278-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2012.02.006
  10. Goedkoop, M.J., van Halen, C.J.G., te Riele, H.R.M., Rommens, P.J.M., 1999. Product service systems, ecological and economic basis. Report to Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment Commu-nications Directorate, The Hague, NL.
  11. Hara T, Arai T, Shimomura Y, Sakao T. Service CAD system to integrate product and human activity for total value. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2009;1(4)262-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2009.06.002
  12. Hussain R, Lockett H, Vasantha GAV. A framework to inform PSS conceptual design by using system-in-use data. Comput. Ind. 2012;63: 319-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2012.02.013
  13. Kimita K, Shimomura Y, Arai T. A customer value model for sustainable service design. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2009;1(4)254-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2009.06.003
  14. Komoto H, Tomiyama T. Integration of a service CAD and a life cycle simulator. CIRP Ann. -Manuf. Technol. 2008;57:9-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.001
  15. Komoto H, Tomiyama T. Design of competitive maintenance service for durable and capital goods using life cycle simulation. Int. J. Autom. Technol. 2009;3(1)63-70. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2009.p0063
  16. Komoto H. Computer Aided Product Service Systems Design (Service CAD and its integration with Life Cycle Simulation) (Ph.D. thesis). Delft, the Netherlands: Delft University of Technology; 2009.
  17. Lim CH, Kim KJ, Hong YS, Park KT. PSS Board: a structured tool for product-service system process visualization. J. Clean. Prod. 2012;37: 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.06.006
  18. Luiten, H. Knot, M., van der Host, T., 2001. Sustainable product service systems: the kathalys method. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manu-facturing. Tokyo, December 11-15, pp. 190-197.
  19. Manzini E, Vezolli C. A strategic design approach to develop sustainable product service systems: examples taken from the "environmental friendly innovation" Italian prize. J. Clean. Prod. 2003;11:851-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00153-1
  20. Maussang N, Zwolinski P, Brissaud D. Product-service system design methodology: from the PSS architecture design to the products specifica-tions. J. Eng. Des. 2009;20(4)349-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820903149313
  21. Meier H, Massberg W. Life cycle-based service design for innovative business models. CIRP Ann. -Manuf. Technol. 2004;53(1)393-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60724-0
  22. Mont OK. Clarifying the concept of product-service system. J. Clean. Prod. 2002;10:237-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00039-7
  23. Morelli N. The Design of Product/Service Systems from a Designer's Perspective. Common Ground (London): Staffordshire University Press; 2002.
  24. Morelli N. Developing new product service systems (PSS): methodolo-gies and operational tools. J. Clean. Prod. 2006;14:1495-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.023
  25. Sadek, T. Theiss, R., 1664. Knowledge based assistance for conceptual development of industrial product-service systems. In: Proceedings of the 6th CIRP-Sponsored International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology, Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol. 66, pp. 1647-1664.
  26. Sakao T, Shimomura Y. Service engineering: a novel engineering discipline for producers to increase value combining service and product. J. Clean. Prod. 2007;15:590-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.015
  27. Sakao T, Shimomura Y, Sundin E, Comstock M. Modeling design objects in CAD system for service/product engineering. Comput.-Aided Des. 2009;41:197-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2008.06.006
  28. Sakao T, Birkhofer H, Panshef V, Dorsam E. An effective and efficient method to design services: empirical study for services by an investment machine manufacturer. Int. J. Internet Manuf. Serv. 2009;2:95-110.
  29. Shimomura Y, Hara T, Arai T. A service evaluation method using mathematical methodologies. CIRP Ann. -Manuf. Technol. 2008;57: 437-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.012
  30. Shimomura Y, Hara T, Arai T. A unified representation scheme for effective PSS development. CIRP Ann. -Manuf. Technol. 2009;58: 379-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.025
  31. Tan AR, McAloone TC, Hagelskjaer LE. Reflections on product/service- system (PSS) conceptualisation in a course setting. Int. J. Des. Eng. 2009.
  32. Tan AR, Matzen D, McAloone T, Evans S. Strategies for designing and developing services for manufacturing firms. CIRP -J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2010;3(2)90-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2010.01.001
  33. Tomiyama, T., 2001. Service engineering to intensify service contents in product life cycles. In: Proceedings of the Second International Sympo-sium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 613-618.
  34. Tukker A. Eight types of product-service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2004;13:246-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.414
  35. Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD. Product Design and Development, 5th edition, Irwin: McGraw-Hill; 2012.
  36. Vasantha GVA, Roy R, Lelah A, Brissaud D. A review of product- service systems design methodologies. J. Eng. Des. 2012;23(9)635-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2011.639712
  37. Weber, C., Steinbach, M., Botta, C., Deubel, T., 2004. Modeling of product-service systems (PSS) based on the PDD approach. In: Proceed-ings of the International Design Conference. Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 18-21, pp. 547-554.
  38. Welp, E.G., Meier, H., Sadek, T., Sadek, K., 2008. Modelling approach for the integrated development of industrial product-service systems. In: Proceedings of the 41st CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems.

Cited by

  1. Overview about Service Labs worldwide: Approaches, Methods and Use Cases to test Service across Lifecycle vol.47, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.076
  2. A QFD-based approach to support sustainable product-service systems conceptual design vol.88, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8809-8
  3. Approach to Test a Product-Service System During Service Engineering vol.64, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.059
  4. A collaborative machine tool maintenance planning system based on content management technologies vol.94, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9829-0
  5. Servitization: A Model for the Transformation of Products into Services through a Utility-Driven Approach vol.4, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc4040060
  6. Prioritizing customer requirements in a product-service system (PSS) context vol.31, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1108/tqm-08-2018-0113
  7. Selection method of sustainable product-service system scenarios to support decision-making during early design stages vol.13, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2019.1660432
  8. A house of sustainability-based approach for green product design : Setting future research agenda vol.31, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1108/meq-03-2019-0057
  9. An efficient controlled elitism non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective supplier selection under fuzziness vol.7, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/qwaa039