• Title/Summary/Keyword: reinforced earth walls

Search Result 98, Processing Time 0.03 seconds

Analysis of the Behavior of Reinforced Earth Retaining Walls Constructed on Soft Ground Using the Replacement Method (치환공법을 적용한 연약지반에 시공된 보강토옹벽의 거동해석)

  • Ki, Wan-Seo;Joo, Seung-Wan;Kim, Sun-Hak
    • The Journal of Engineering Geology
    • /
    • v.17 no.4
    • /
    • pp.601-613
    • /
    • 2007
  • It is reported that factors affecting the behavior of reinforced earth retaining walls built on soft ground are not only basic physical properties but also the increase of load by the reinforced earth retaining walls, consolidation period, pore water pressure, etc. This study analyzed the behavior of reinforced earth retaining walls and soft ground using SAGE CRISP, a ground analysis program. First, we examined the effect of the replacement method, which was to prevent the excessive displacement of reinforced earth retaining walls, in improving the behavior of the walls. Second, we compared and analyzed how the behavior of ground is affected by the vertical interval of stiffeners on the back of reinforced earth retaining walls after the application of the replacement method. Lastly, we proposed the optimal replacement width and depth in the application of the replacement method. The results of this study proved that the replacement method is considerably effective in improving the behavior of reinforced earth retaining walls. In addition, the vertical interval of stiffeners on the back of reinforced earth retaining walls appeared effective in improving the horizontal displacement of the top of retaining walls but not much effective in improving the vertical displacement of the back of retaining walls. In addition, improvement in horizontal-vertical displacement resulting from the increase in replacement width was not significant and this suggests that the increase of replacement width is not necessary. With regard to an adequate replacement depth, we proposed the ratio of replacement depth to the height of retaining walls(D/H) according to the ratio of the thickness of the soft layer to the height of retaining walls(H/T).

Effect of preloading on residual deformation of Back-To-Back reinfored wall (선행하중작용시 Back-To-Back(BTB) 보강토 옹벽의 거동 특성)

  • Kim, Sun-Bin;Yoo, Chung-Sik;Kim, Jae-Wang;Joo, Sung-Yong
    • Proceedings of the Korean Geotechical Society Conference
    • /
    • 2008.03a
    • /
    • pp.251-258
    • /
    • 2008
  • The use of reinforced earth walls in permanent structures is getting it's popularity. Despite a number of advantages of reinforced earth walls over conventional concrete retaining walls, there exit concerns over long-term residual deformation when subjected to repeated and/or cyclic loads, during their service period. In this investigation, the effect of preloading in reducing long term residiual deformation of back-to-back reinforced soil wall under sustained and/or repeated loading enviormentment using a series of reduced-scale model tests. It is found that the preloading technique can be an effective means of controlling residual deformations of reinforced soils under varisous loading conditions.

  • PDF

Field Monitoring of Panel-type Reinforced Earth Walls Using Geosynthetic Strip Reinforcement with Folding Grooves (접힘홈이 형성된 띠형 섬유보강재를 사용한 패널식 보강토옹벽의 현장계측 연구)

  • Lee, Kwang-Wu;Cho, Sam-Deok
    • Journal of the Korean Geosynthetics Society
    • /
    • v.17 no.4
    • /
    • pp.179-188
    • /
    • 2018
  • A new style of panel-type reinforced earth wall is a more integrated structure by connecting the geosynthetic strip reinforcement with a folding groove directly to the front panel through C-shaped insertion hole embedded in the panel. In this study, field measurements were conducted on two reinforced earth walls constructed at different sites to assess the field applicability and structural stability of the new style of panel-type reinforced earth wall. The horizontal displacement of the front panel, tensile deformation of the geosynthetic strip reinforcement, and horizontal earth pressure acting on the panel were measured and analyzed through the field measurements. According to the field measurements, after completion of the reinforced earth wall construction, the maximum horizontal earth pressure applied to the front panel was less than two-thirds of the Rankine earth pressure, and the maximum horizontal displacement of the front panel was less than 0.5% of the wall height, and the maximum tensile strain generated on the reinforcement was less than 1.0%. Therefore, it was found that two reinforced earth walls constructed at different sites remained stable.

Development Study on the Behavior Characteristics and the Application of Reinforced Earth (보강토의 거동특성과 그 이용에 관한 개발연구)

  • 태병익;류연길
    • Geotechnical Engineering
    • /
    • v.3 no.4
    • /
    • pp.55-70
    • /
    • 1987
  • The use of reinforced earth is not new. But available information on basic proper.ties like strength and deformation behavior of reinforced earth materials is not adequate. Therefore, tile purpose of this present investigation is first to research the frictional characteristics of the reinforcement and standard rand using a shear testing appratus. The second purpose of this articles are to report the results of comparison test on the strength and stress-strain behavior of a dry sand einforced with aluminium fcils and geotextiles under different confining pressures. Finally, the paper explores the possibility of geotextile reinforced earth masonry walls. It was observed that the stress-strain response of sand ai.e considerably improved by the introduction of geotextiles. The results of tests are used in developing the geotextile reinforced earth masonry walls. It is hoped that this paper will be helpful in providing the basic data for the rational design and construction methods of reinforced earth structures.

  • PDF

Reinforced Earth Structures (보강토 공법)

  • 이은수
    • Proceedings of the Korean Geotechical Society Conference
    • /
    • 2001.10a
    • /
    • pp.301-313
    • /
    • 2001
  • Reinforced earth is a composite construction material in which the strength of engineering fill is enhanced by the addition of strong tensile reinforcement in variable types. The basic mechanism of reinforced earth involves the generation of frictional forces and bearing resistances between the soil and the reinforcement. The primitive structure of reinforced earth in Korean peninsula were found as the earth wall built around the old fort In about 3rd century Modern reinforced earth was introduced to Korea early 1980, and spreaded tremendously through the nation. Among them, not a few reinforced earth walls which were built ignored over all stabilities have been collapsed. In this paper basic concepts, economic benefits, design considerations and future applicable trends of reinforced earth are reviewed in simple manners.

  • PDF

Long Term Behaviors of Geosynthetics Reinforced Soil Walls (보강토옹벽의 장기거동분석에 관한 연구)

  • Won, Myoung-Soo;Lee, Yong-An;Kim, You-Seong
    • Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
    • /
    • v.22 no.8
    • /
    • pp.33-42
    • /
    • 2006
  • Geosynthetics reinforced soil (GRS) walls with a flexible wall face allow deformation. GRS walls constructed on the weak ground change in both horizontal earth pressures on wall faces and the tensile stress of geosynthetics, affecting the backfill in time until the deformation of the backfill and the foundation is completed. However, there are few studies that were done to measure and analyze the horizontal earth pressures and geosynthetics deformation on GRS walls constructed on the soft ground for a long period of time. Two field GRS walls in this study are constructed on a shallow layer of a weak foundation to measure and analyze geostynthetics deformation, horizontal earth pressures, and pore water pressures for the duration of approximately 16 months. Strain gauges are used to measure geosynthetics deformation; this study specifically suggests a new method of measuring nonwoven geotextile using strain gauges. Most geosynthetics deformation occurred within a month after the construction of GRS walls. The maximum deformation measured for approximately 16 months appeared as follows: nowoven geotextile: 6.05%, woven geotextile: 2.92%, and geogrid: 2.33%. Pore water pressures on the GRS wall can be ignored; however, horizontal earth pressures on the bottom and the upper part of the wall face appear larger than earth pressures at rest.

Weighting Value Evaluation of Condition Assessment Item in Reinforced Earth Retaining Walls by Applying Hybrid Weighting Technique (혼합 가중치를 적용한 보강토 옹벽의 상태평가항목 가중치 평가)

  • Lee, Hyung Do;Won, Jeong-Hun;Seong, Joohyun
    • Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection
    • /
    • v.21 no.5
    • /
    • pp.83-93
    • /
    • 2017
  • This study proposed the new weighting values and fault points of condition assessment items for reinforced earth retaining walls based on the combination the inspection data and hybrid weighting technique. Utilizing the inspection data of 161 reinforced earth retaining walls, multi regression analysis and entropy technique were applied to gain the weighting values of condition assessment items. In addition, the weighting values by AHP technique was analyzed based on the opinion of experts. By appling hybrid weighting technique to the calculated weighting values obtained by the individual technique, the new weighting values of condition assessment items were proposed, and the fault points and fault indices of reinforced earth retaining walls were proposed. Results showed that the rank of the weighting value of the condition evaluation items was fluctuated according to the multiple regression analysis, AHP technique, and entropy technique. There was no duplication of the rank of the weighting value while the current weighting value was overlapped. Specially, in the rsults of multi regression analysis, two condition assessment items were occupied 70% of the total weights. When the proposed weighting values were applied to existing reinforced earth retaining wall of 161, 16 reinforced earth retaining walls showed the increased risk rank and 31 represented the decreased risk rank.

Model Tests on Behavior of Geogrid Reinforced Soil Walls with Vertical Spacing of Reinforcement Layers (보강재 설치 간격에 따른 지오그리드 보강토옹벽의 변형거동에 관한 모형실험)

  • Cho, Sam-Deok;Lee, Kwang-Wu;Oh, Se-Yong
    • Proceedings of the Korean Geotechical Society Conference
    • /
    • 2004.03b
    • /
    • pp.372-379
    • /
    • 2004
  • The model tests were conducted to assess the behavior characteristics of geogrid reinforced earth walls according to various surcharge loads and reinforcement spacing. The models were built in the box having dimension, 100cm tall, 140cm long, and 100cm wide. The reinforcement used was geogrid(tensile strength 2.26t/m). Decomposed granite soil(ML) was used as a backfill material. The LVDTs were installed on the model retaining walls to obtain the displacements of the facing. In the results, the maximum displacement of facing and tensile strain of geogrid was measured at 0.7H(H is wall height) from the bottom of reinforced wall.

  • PDF

Behavior of Reinforced Earth Retaining Wall for Connector System Driving the Settlement of Reinforcement (보강재 침하를 허용하는 연결시스템을 적용한 보강토옹벽의 거동)

  • Jong-Keun Oh;Jeong, Jong-Gi;Lee, Song
    • 기술발표회
    • /
    • s.2006
    • /
    • pp.156-161
    • /
    • 2006
  • Recently, construction of soil-reinforced segmental retaining walls which used geosynthetics are being increased day by day due to its construction efficiency, economic efficiency, and its aesthetic view. The conventional reinforced earth retaining wall has the connector system to fix the reinforcement and block However, this system may cause the crack of block and the rupture of reinforcement due to the stress concentration near the face of reinforced earth retaining wall In this study, the new connector system, which is able to allow the settlement of reinforcement, was applied to analyze the effect of connector system of reinforced earth retaining wall The connection strength tests and centrifugal tests for both the conventional reinforced earth retaining wall and the settlement reinforced earth retaining wall were performed to compare the results

  • PDF