• 한국기계가공학회지
• /
• 제7권4호
• /
• pp.82-95
• /
• 2008

As society has changed to being more knowledge-based, it is necessary that change of paradigm is incorporated into engineering education and the education goals and the assessment method of educational outcomes is developed to promptly meet the needs of the times. A purpose of this study is to measure learning outcomes in coursework of engineering college every semester, which ultimately provides to validate program outcomes. We looked into teaching-learning style of course in the engineering college and analyzed its grade method and tool. By use of a survey, we derived a reasonable method to measure for the learning outcomes in course and presented tools for course-embedded assessment to measure that learning outcomes had been tied to their objectives. These tools are effective to determine that program outcomes and education goals have been achieved, ultimately. In addition, it will help that instruction builds a loop system for better.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.57-63
• /
• 2009

학습성과 평가체계 수립 과정은 일반적으로 다음과 같다. 먼저 각 학습성과의 수행수준에 따른 수행 준거를 설정하고, 교육과정을 통하여 달성되어야 하는 프로그램 학습성과의 달성목표를 수립한 이후에 적절한 평가 도구를 가지고 루브릭에 기초하여 측정 평가를 실행한다. 측정된 결과를 토대로 분석평가한 이후에 프로그램 학습성과 달성을 위해 교육과정 개선을 도모한다. 그리고 나서 적용된 프로그램 개선 사항은 다양한 경로를 통하여 공개된다. 특히 본 논문에서는 광운대학교 전기공학 프로그램의 평가체계 및 적용 사례를 통하여 공학교육인증 대상 학생과 그렇지 않은 학생의 학습성과를 비교 분석해 보았다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.410-418
• /
• 2021

공학교육인증제를 운용하는 공학교육 프로그램에서 프로그램 학습성과는 학생이 졸업하는 시점까지 갖추어야 할 지식, 기술 그리고 태도를 말한다. 일반적으로, 프로그램 학습성과 성취도를 측정하는 평가도구로 캡스톤디자인을 사용한다. 본 논문에서는 프로그램 학습성과 평가에 참여한 수요지향 평가자들의 평가 결과의 신뢰도를 측정하기 위해 급내 상관계수(ICC)를 계산한다. 즉, 같은 평가도구를 이용하여, 여러 명의 평가자가 학습성과를 평가하게 하고, 그 결과를 이용하여 평가자의 ICC를 구한다. ICC는 단체로 수집되거나 단체로 분류된 데이터에 대한 신뢰도의 등급을 측정하는 데 이용된다. ICC가 1에 가까우면 평가자 간 신뢰도가 높다고 판단할 수 있다. 이러한 방법을 지난 2년간의 4년제 대학 컴퓨터공학과 PO 평가 결과에 적용하여 평가도구의 신뢰성을 측정하고 분석하였다. 그리고 이 결과를 이용하여 평가자 간 ICC 측정값을 이용하면, 객관성이 부족한 평가도구를 찾아 보완할 수 있음을 알 수 있었다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로, PO 평가체계에 대한 개선방안과 PO 수행 지침을 도출한다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제22권6호
• /
• pp.74-88
• /
• 2019

In recent years, the design has formed and operated convergence education in conjunction with many other academic fields, and ABEEK also encourages the participation of convergence engineering programs. The purpose of this study is to require design and software convergence major to operate program that accord engineering education certification criteria to develop a program outcomes evaluation system and examine its validity. The program outcomes evaluation system was developed in accordance with development research methods and procedures. As a result, developed evaluation system program outcomes for convergence-based program outcomes: convergence ability, creative thinking ability, entrepreneur ability, and design ability. Finally, it revised and supplemented them through expert validity examine. Expert validity review included 9 experts in engineering, IT engineering, education technology, and design. The validity, usefulness, intelligibility, universality, and explanatory power of the evaluation system were reviewed. The results of this study are expected to provide practical tools for operating ABBEK of convergence programs between design and engineering.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제15권5호
• /
• pp.108-118
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study was to provide analytic rubrics for measuring teamwork(PO6), communication and presentation skills(PO7), and life-long learning(PO8) based on theoretical concepts of performance assessment and rubrics. Also, this study analyzed data about performance assessment and rubics from courses offered through college of engineering. Participants were 34 senior engineering students who took the course 'Technical writing and presentation'. In the second week of the course, students were given the pre-test instrument which was developed for measuring students' understanding of program outcomes for this study. After performing project activities using rubrics, students were encouraged to complete the post-test instrument and the reaction questionnaire during the ninth week. The data were analyzed by using SPSS 14.0 and Microsoft Excel. The research findings are as follows. First, to promote and evaluate program learning outcomes appropriately, performance assessment-based on rubircs should be implemented. Second, in the reaction questionnaire about the rubircs, students answered that using rubircs for performing the project was very useful for understanding the performance procedures and assessment criteria. Third, the mean of understanding of program outcomes of students in post-test was significantly increased than in the pre-test(p<.0001). From the findings, performance assessment and rubrics should be used as evaluation tools at course levels in terms of promoting program learning outcomes for engineering education.

• Industrial Engineering and Management Systems
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.60-68
• /
• 2010

In this paper, a systematic methodology is proposed for developing an outcome-based undergraduate Industrial and Systems Engineering Program at the Systems Engineering Department of King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM) in Saudi Arabia. This program is an upgrade of the Industrial Engineering and Operations Research (IE/OR) option, which has been in existence since 1984 and has been revised several times since then. The methodology and process used is motivated by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) 2000 criteria and has been employed to develop the program's objectives and outcomes. Subsequently, a curriculum is designed that is expected to deliver the objectives and outcomes. The paper presents the methodology, objectives, outcomes and the developed curriculum of the outcome-based program.

• 정보보호학회논문지
• /
• 제26권3호
• /
• pp.777-785
• /
• 2016

공학교육인증제는 공학 교육의 질적 향상을 통해 국제 경쟁력을 갖는 공학기술 인력의 양성을 목적으로, 공학교육인증 프로그램의 학생들이 졸업할 시점에 달성해야 하는 학습 성과를 프로그램의 교육목표에 맞게 설정하고 적합한 절차에 따라 성취도를 평가하도록 하고 있다. 본 논문에서는 호서대학교 정보보호학 프로그램에서 설정한 프로그램 학습성과를 달성하기 위해 수행 준거, 평가 체계, 문서 체계 및 순환형 자율개선 체계 등을 포함하는 성취도 평가 시스템과 이러한 평가체계에 따라 성취도를 측정한 사례에 대해 연구한다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.29-42
• /
• 2007

공학교육인증에 있어서 프로그램학습성과는 공학교육의 질적 향상 정도를 판가름하는 중요한 기준이며 가장 핵심이 되는 부분이다. 한국공학교육인증원은 프로그램학습성과를 공과대학 졸업생들이 졸업과 동시에 반드시 지녀야 하는 핵심 역량 12가지로 규정하고 있으며 인증을 받고자 하는 모든 공학교육프로그램은 전공 관련 지식을 포함하여 이를 달성하기 위한 교육과정을 구축하고 달성 및 지속적인 개선을 하고 있는지의 여부를 보이기를 요구하고 있다. 여기서 프로그램학습성과는 크게 두 가지를 만족시켜야만 하는데첫째, 공학프로그램은 졸업생이 12가지 능력과 자질에 대해 달성하고 졸업함을 보장할 것에 대한 요구와 둘째, 12가지 능력 및 자질을 교육시키는 프로그램의 교육 수준의 지속적인 개선이다. 따라서 본 연구의 목적은 이러한 한국공학교육인증원의 취지에 맞는 평가를 실시하기 위해 프로그램학습성과 평가의 CQI와 QC를 실현을 위해 갖추어야 할 체계인 구축 모형을 소개하고 한국공학교육인증원의 기준에 알맞은 실천전략을 제시하고자 한다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제24권6호
• /
• pp.30-39
• /
• 2021

The present study aims to demonstrate that it is possible to objectively evaluate the competency (referred to as graduate attributes or program outcomes) of graduates of engineering education programs. To strengthen the link between engineering education accreditation and the qualification/certification system of engineering professionals, referred to as K-Engineering Professional (K-EP), individually assuring the quality of accredited graduates using multiple-choice test as main assessment tool is proposed. Test questions related to the basic vocational skills of NCS are developed for seven of the 10 program outcomes of the ABEEK KEC2015. The three program outcomes, PO1, PO3, and PO5, which need to fully accommodate the characteristics of each disciplinary field, are excluded. A pilot test involving graduates of eight accredited programs is conducted. Applying on Rasch model based on Item Response Theory (IRT), the item difficulty, fit and discrimination of multiple choice test are demonstrated. The pilot study strongly suggests that individual competency evaluation is possible at a certain level for seven program outcomes tested. For PO1, PO3, and PO5, however, questions that address the characteristics of each disciplinary field need to be devised. If a suitable pool of questions is built, it can be used as a program outcomes assessment tool by the accredited programs.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.47-58
• /
• 2020

Kunsan National University obtained accreditation for its Architecture & Building Engineering Program from the Accreditation Board for Engineering Education in Korea (ABEEK) in 2004 and has offered an ABEEK-accredited degree pathway ever since. Then, in 2018, the university introduced the course-embedded outcomes assessment system as per ABEEK's KEC2015 accreditation criteria. One year into its implementation, the new system allows the measurement and assessment of 10 program outcomes covering 19 curricular modules and 1 non-curricular licensing examination. The system incorporates the four areas of specialization within architectural engineering as well as the three course categories of the math, science, and computer; liberal arts; and engineering core modules under the accreditation scheme. It also takes the students' academic years into account, especially for the mandatory modules offered to all students. Its rubric clarifies the performance criteria, performance level, assessment tools, objectives, and modules. The 2018 course-embedded outcomes assessment system is an ever-evolving structure with regular CQI: Continuous Quality Improvements along the circular process of system establishment → implementation → evaluation as per the virtuous cycle model required for an accredited engineering program.