DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Program Outcomes Evaluation System for Multidisciplinary Major in Design and Software

디자인과 소프트웨어 융합전공의 프로그램 학습성과 평가체계 개발

  • Choi, Ji-Eun (Department of Digital Arts and Technology, Inha University) ;
  • Kim, Hakil (Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Jin, Sung-Hee (Division of Humanites and Liberal Art, Hanbat National University)
  • 최지은 (인하대학교 디지털예술공학) ;
  • 김학일 (인하대학교 정보통신공학) ;
  • 진성희 (한밭대학교 인문교양학부)
  • Received : 2019.09.25
  • Accepted : 2019.11.05
  • Published : 2019.11.30

Abstract

In recent years, the design has formed and operated convergence education in conjunction with many other academic fields, and ABEEK also encourages the participation of convergence engineering programs. The purpose of this study is to require design and software convergence major to operate program that accord engineering education certification criteria to develop a program outcomes evaluation system and examine its validity. The program outcomes evaluation system was developed in accordance with development research methods and procedures. As a result, developed evaluation system program outcomes for convergence-based program outcomes: convergence ability, creative thinking ability, entrepreneur ability, and design ability. Finally, it revised and supplemented them through expert validity examine. Expert validity review included 9 experts in engineering, IT engineering, education technology, and design. The validity, usefulness, intelligibility, universality, and explanatory power of the evaluation system were reviewed. The results of this study are expected to provide practical tools for operating ABBEK of convergence programs between design and engineering.

Keywords

References

  1. 김규태(2012). 새로운 융합인재 양성의 흐름 : 융합의 전제조건 협업. 한국과학창의재단. 월간 과학창의(10월호). 9-10.
  2. Chung, K. W.(2006). Design Management. Seoul: ahngraphics publishers.
  3. 교육과학기술부(2010). 창의 인재와 선진과학기술로 여는 미래 대한민국. 2011년 업무보고.
  4. 김혜영(2013). 융합교육의 체계화를 위한 융합교육의 방향과 기초융합교과 설계에 대한 제언. 교양교육, 7(2), 11-38.
  5. 정상훈(2017). ICT+디자인 융합 교육과정 개발연구. 감성과학, 20(1), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.14695/kjsos.2017.20.1.105
  6. 최지은.진성희(2019). 공학교육인증을 위한 디자인과 소프트웨어 융합전공의 학습성과. 디지털융합복합연구, 17(5), 51-63.
  7. 서강대학교, 아트 & 테크놀로지 http://creative.sogang.ac.kr
  8. 스웨덴 말뫼대학교, 인터렉션 디자인 http://edu.mah.se/en/Program/TGIDE
  9. 김복기.박진영(2008). 프로그램 학습성과 평가방법 연구. 공학교육연구, 11(4), 46-57.
  10. Computer Engineering(2018). Self Study Report. Saint Louis University.
  11. Computer Engineering(2013). Self Study Report. Lamar University.
  12. Computer Engineering(2013). Self Study Report. University of Washington.
  13. Computer Engineering(2012). Self Study Report. University of Florida.
  14. Seels, B. B., & Richey, R.(1994). Instructional Tehcnology: The Definition and Domains of the Field. Washington, DC: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
  15. Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Nelson, W. A.(2004). Developmental research: Studies of instructional design and development. Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, 2, 1099-1130.
  16. 성은모(2009). 이러닝 학습환경에서 디지털 텍스트 구조의 시각 표상 설계원리 개발연구. 교육공학연구, 25(3), 105-133.
  17. Tracey, K. J.(2002). The inflammatory reflex. Nature, 420(6917), 853. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01321
  18. Tracey, M. W., & Richey, R. C.(2007). ID model construction and validation: A multiple intelligences case. Educational Tehcnology Research and Development, 55(4), 369-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9015-4
  19. 류대성(2018). 창의적 융합역량 진단 도구 개발 및 타당화 연구. 박사학위논문. 한국교원대학교 대학원.
  20. Yeh, Y. C(2004). The interactive influence of three ecological systems on R & D employees' technological creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 11-25. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1601_2
  21. 국재경(2018). 창업자의 역량이 창업성과에 미치는 영향 - 역량 요인 고찰을 중심으로 -. 석사학위논문. 조선대학교 산업기술융합대학원.
  22. 김원경(2010). 디자인능력 평가모형과 재능 확신성에 관한 상관성 연구. 한국디자인인문화학회지, 16(4), 129-142.

Cited by

  1. 학부-대학원 연계 지역문제해결형 수업설계 경험에 관한 연구 vol.23, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2020.23.5.16