• 가족자원경영과 정책
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.1-21
• /
• 2018

The aim of this study was to suggest an improvement plan for the post-certification family friendly consulting service based on consulting reports from 2015-2016 and focus group interviews analysis. Focus group interviews were conducted with consultants with the Family Friendly Support Center and managers with family friendly certification companies. The results of this study were as follows. First, objective outcome indicators for the measurement of consulting performance should be created. Second, a checklist managers can use to choose the consulting type based on self-assessments should be developed. Third, a follow-up consulting system should be in place to complement the ABC module. Fourth, a consulting case database should be built to facilitate customized consulting by industry and size.

• 재활간호학회지
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.95-102
• /
• 2011

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze intervention studies related to Snoezelen (multisensory environment). Methods: Studies related to Snoezelen (multisensory environment) published between 1995 and 2010 in both Korean and International journals were systematically reviewed, and analyzed following guidelines. Based on inclusion criteria, 23 studies including 5 Korean and 18 International articles were selected. Results: Most studies were conducted in various area of research such as medicine, nursing, and occupational therapy. There was no publication related to Snoezelen (multisensory environment) in Korean nursing journals. In terms of target population, more than 65 % of the study subjects were patients with dementia, mental retardation, and learning disability. Intervention was implemented mostly in less than 30 minutes, once a week for 2 to 4 weeks. The effects on behavior, physical, and psychological contexts were assessed as outcome indicators. There was more 'positive' than 'no effect' in self-stimulatory behaviors, problem behaviors, heart rate, pain, mood state, and anxiety, whereas more 'no effect' than 'positive' in blood pressure, respiration, enjoyment, and relaxation. Conclusion: Future studies are needed to develop the protocol and outcome indicators for effective use of this new intervention in Korea.

• 에너지공학
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.236-244
• /
• 2016

본고에서는 에너지절약 홍보활동 성과에 대한 평가지표 설정은 Lasswell(1948), 노영우(2012)의 사례를 토대로, 먼저 홍보기관의 지표는 평판도, 인지도, 호감도, 신뢰도, 소통여부 등으로 구성되었다. 홍보내용은 첫째, 홍보내용에 대한 인식 평가지표로 홍보활동 내용의 인지도, 접촉도, 필요성, 홍보내용의 공감도, 절약의 영향력 등 8개 문항이며, 둘째는 홍보내용에 대한 평가지표로 홍보활동 내용의 만족도와 기여도 문항으로 구성되어 있다. 홍보매체에 대한 평가지표는 접촉하는 주요 홍보매체에 대한 식별, 접촉 매체의 신뢰도와 효과성, 그리고 에너지소비자가 홍보를 직접적으로 할 경우 가장 선호하는 홍보매체에 대한 식별 등이 평가항목으로 구성되어 있다. 홍보효과에 대한 평가지표는 실천도, 실행 강도, 그리고 실천이유와 실천하지 않는 이유 등이 평가항목으로 포함되어 있다.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.315-324
• /
• 2016

Underserved area is a region that has a lack of healthcare resources. In the context of Korea, however, there are not enough detailed criteria for underserved areas. In this study, we aimed to develop indicators for underserved area through Delphi technique. We systematically reviewed the existing measure of underserved area. Sixty indicators were extracted as candidates across four domains in secondary medical care. Four domains are demand, medical resource, quality of care, and health outcome. To develop indicator, two round Delphi survey was conducted among 15 professional experts such as professionals and public administrators. In conclusion, 2 final indicators (accessibility, medical utilization) was determined as an appropriate measure in order to designate underserved area for secondary medical services. Using our criteria from Delphi technique, 36 areas were found as underserved areas for the secondary medical care.

• Journal of Forest and Environmental Science
• /
• 제27권3호
• /
• pp.205-210
• /
• 2011

This study aims to assess MEE(management effectiveness evaluations) on PAs(protected areas) for forest genetic resources which play an important role in biodiversity conservation, and then to suggest better ways to manage PAs for forest genetic resources. This study applies same indicators of the MEE on PAs as the ones described in the prior study(Ryu et al. 2011). The indicators applied are composed of five elements, thirty-two indicators which all would be grouped into one element by each traits. Overall indicators belonging to the element of output and outcome are comparatively low. Especially the ones related to the change of biodiversity, degree of ecosystem health, variation of civil complaint and visitor satisfaction are ranked mostly low. The element of input shows the low rank on the number of staff and budget. The score of indicators related to the identification of the threats of PAs and local communities' supports turn out to be low in the element of Context. The element of process, however, has scored low on Staff management, Education/Awareness programs and Governance, while the law enforcement, management regulation and capacity to prevent forest disasters have made relatively high score. Meanwhile, all indicators in the element of planning have scored relatively high as compared to the indicators belonged to other elements. This study suggests to strengthen a few constructive proposals, such as facilitating efficient management framework for PAs, developing local community cooperation program, establishing survey, research and monitoring system, and registering PAs to the WDPA(World Database on Protected Areas) according to the IUCN categories.

• 보건교육건강증진학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.147-160
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this study is to identify the nature of the patient service quality of health center, and based on that, to examine the relationship of health center visitor's perceived quality and overall satisfaction. Data were collected on the basis of 'the 3rd Regional Health Care Planning' operated by Rural Health Care Service Technology Aid Task-force Team(RHCSTAT), Ministry of Health and Welfare. Basically, the Manual of 3rd Regional Health Care Planning is composed of structure, process, and outcome measurement indicators. Of these indicators, 21 patient satisfaction questions as outcome indicators are used in this study. The samples are 3,530 patients who visited 80 health centers all of the nation. First, the reliability and validity of patient service quality items was evaluated. Second, the descriptive statistics of health service quality are calculated. Third, through the T-test and ANOVA, the differences of patient satisfaction by responder's general characteristics are compared. In final, to explore the relationship of service quality and overall satisfaction, multiple regression analysis was used. This study shows firstly, the dimension of patient service quality was categorized into 3 dimensions, that is, facilities and environment, staff kindness, and access convenience. Secondly, the reliability and validity of patient service quality items was satisfied. Thirdly, the mean score of staff kindness factors are high in contrast to the facilities and environment. And in regard to the overall satisfaction, the mean score is more higher in Daegu region, County type health center, male group, and upper 65 age group than comparison groups. Lastly, as a result of multiple regression analysis, the effect of patient's perceived service quality, especially, appropriateness of billing time(Beta=0.190) and of reservation time(Beta=0.132) are statistically significant(P<0.01). In conclusion, to satisfy the health need of community people and improve the service quality of the health center, the efforts for the access convenience might be needed. Additionally, the enlargement on health center space and supply of new medical equipment is urgent for the patient satisfaction.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.285-300
• /
• 2001

To meet standards for high quality of care and satisfied customers, an evaluation tool about nursing care is necessary. And, We need to evaluate our practice continuously for the improvement in quality and outcomes. This study was intended to develop an evaluation tool about nursing care in NSICU, and was progressed of 3 steps; development, content validity verification and reliability verification. Data were obtained and analysed from Feb. To April, 2000. Development process of the study was as follows A preliminary list was made item by item on the basis of clinical Experience, literature review and patients' record review. Then the standards, criteria and indicators of preliminary evaluation tool were set by 5 clinical nursing panel, and their content validity was reviewed by 27 ICU nurses. Finally, an evaluation tool was developed and verified the reliability at c-university hospital located in Kwang-Ju. The results of this was as follows 1) The evaluation tool of this study developed 8 standards, 39 criterias and 106 indicators. The standards were divided into two dimensions. One was process dimension which contained 4 standards(26 criteria), The other was outcome dimension which contained 4 standards(13 criteria). 2) the Average content validity of the tool was 3.39 at standards, 3.55 at criteria and 3.51 at indicators. 3) Interrater reliability of the tool is r=.7993(p<.001) & internal consistency reliability ${\alpha}$ is .6031 4) Scores of NSICU Patients who participated in this study were 57 at total mean score, 58 at process mean score and 56 at outcome mean score The evaluation tool developed in this study seems to be useful in evaluation nursing practice appropriately for the improvement of nursing care in NSICU. I hope that this evaluation tool can be used effectively in NSICU as an intervention for the improvement of quality control.

• Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.217-221
• /
• 2017

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of internal fixation with locking T-plates for osteoporotic fractures of the proximal humerus in patients aged 65 years and older. Methods: From January 2007 through to December 2015, we recruited 47 patients aged 65 years and older with osteoporotic fractures of the proximal humerus. All fractures had been treated using open reduction and internal fixation with a locking T-plate. We classified the fractures in accordance to the Neer classification system; At the final follow-up, the indicators of clinical outcome-the range of motion of the shoulder (flexion, internal rotation, and external rotation) and the presence of postoperative complications-and the indicators of radiographic outcome-the time-to-union and the neck-shaft angle of the proximal humerus-were evaluated. The Paavolainen method was used to grade the level of radiological outcome in the patients. Results: The mean flexion was $155.0^{\circ}$ (range, $90^{\circ}-180^{\circ}$), the mean internal rotation was T8 (range, T6-L2), and the mean external rotation was $66.8^{\circ}$ (range, $30^{\circ}-80^{\circ}$). Postoperative complications, such as plate impingement, screw loosening, and varus malunion were observed in five patient. We found that all patients achieved bone union, and the mean time-to-union was 13.5 weeks of the treatment. The mean neck-shaft angle was $131.4^{\circ}$ at the 6-month follow-up. According to the Paavolainen method, "good" and "fair" radiographic results each accounted for 38 and 9 of the total patients, respectively. Conclusions: We concluded that locking T-plate fixation leads to satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes in elderly patients with proximal humeral fractures by providing a larger surface area of contact with the fracture and a more rigid fixation.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.237-250
• /
• 2017

스포츠의 새로운 분야로 자리 잡고 있는 e-스포츠는 국내 뿐 아니라 해외에서도 많은 인기를 얻고 있다. 그 중 AOS (aeon of strife) 장르의 게임들은 대표적인 e-스포츠 대회 중 하나로 주목받으며, 방송 및 미디어 매체는 다양한 통계 지표를 활용한 게임 중계를 실시하고 있다. 본 논문에서는 AOS 장르의 게임인 리그오브레전드의 게임 데이터를 이용한 통계적 분석으로 게임 내 지표를 개선하고 승패예측을 위한 승패예측모형을 설계한다. 인자 분석을 통해 구한 인자로 기존의 지표를 개선하는 새로운 지표를 창출하고, 판별 분석, 인공신경망, SVM을 이용한 승패예측모형을 추정해 모형 간 비교를 실시하였다. 그 결과, 게임 내 포지션의 특성을 반영한 인자 점수로 새로운 지표를 제안하였으며, 세 가지 승패예측모형은 모두 평균 95% 의 높은 정분류율을 보였다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제42권4호
• /
• pp.113-139
• /
• 2008

오늘날과 같이 급변하는 환경에서 공공도서관은 다양한 변화에 대응하기 위해서 통합적 관점에서 성과를 측정할 필요가 있다. 그러나 대부분의 성과평가연구는 특정 영역과 특정 분석방법에 치중하고 있는 한계가 있다. 이에 도서관의 활동 영역(투입, 과정, 산출, 결과)을 평가할 수 있는 다면적인 성과지표의 개발이 필요하다. 현재 국제표준화기구와 IFLA는 BSC(균형성과지표)에 기초한 통합성과평가체제의 도입을 시도하고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 선행연구를 통해 도서관의 성과평가영역(투입, 과정, 산출, 결과)과 성과지표(투입지표, 산출지표, 결과지표)의 유형을 도출하고 국내 외 공공도서관 평가사례를 대상으로 평가영역과 성과지표의 유형을 비교 분석하였다. 비교 분석결과에 따라 국내 외 평가사례에 기초한 공공도서관의 통합적 성과지표를 제안하였다. 구체적으로 국제표준화기구 평가사례로부터 4개의 평가관점과 인력자원, 이용, 장서, 시설 등의 세부적 평가영역을 선정하였고 평가영역별 성과지표와 성과측정방법을 제안하였다. 마지막으로 제안된 평가영역과 성과지표에 대한 적합성 검증 방법을 제안하였다.