• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.29-43
• /
• 2023

수학교과에서 단순히 수학적 개념을 습득하는 것보다 수학과 관련된 문제를 실생활에 적용하는 맥락적 문제해결의 중요성이 강조되고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 장애학생을 대상으로 실제적 상황을 나타내는 문장제 문제에 대한 연구 동향을 살펴보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 2000년에서 2022년까지 발행된 단일대상실험설계를 사용하여 중재의 효과를 탐구한 논문 최종 12편을 선정하여 참여학생 특성, 중재 환경, 중재 방법 및 교수전략 등에 대해 분석하였다. 그 결과, 초등학교 고학년을 대상으로 연구가 가장 많이 이루어졌고, 학습장애, 자폐성장애, 지적장애를 포함하는 다양한 장애 유형을 대상으로 연구가 진행된 것을 확인하였다. 중재는 대부분 연구자에 의해 이루어졌고, 1회기 당 30~40분 정도로 중재가 제공되었다. 장애학생을 위한 수학문장제 문제 중재 방법으로 도식 기반 교수, 인지-초인지 전략 교수, 테크놀로지 기반 교수를 적용한 것으로 나타났고, 대부분 명시적 교수를 함께 사용한 것으로 확인되었다. 또한 본 연구에 포함된 12편의 단일대상연구가 방법론적으로 타당하게 실행되었는지를 분석하고자 Council of Exceptional Children에서 제시한 질적지표를 사용하여 평가하였고, 이러한 결과를 종합하여 향후 장애학생을 위한 문장제 문제 연구 방향에 대해 논의하였다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.289-306
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 예비교사들이 수학적 의사소통을 지도할 수 있도록 하기 위해 대학 수학 강좌에서 학습 일지를 쓰게 하는 경험을 제공하고 그 결과를 분석하였다. 예비교사의 수학 학습에서 학습 일지는 반성적 사고, 개념적 탐구, 정의적 영역의 표출, 자기 주도적 학습 계획, 학습의 기록 등의 역할을 담당했다. 예비교사들은 학습 일지 쓰기를 통해 수학 교수 학습 상황에서 갖게 되는 여러 교육적 관점을 수업 방법, 수업의 조직 및 운영, 평가, 교사의 자세 측면에서 구체적으로 생각하게 되었으며, 학습 일지 쓰기가 왜 중요한지, 어떻게 지도하며 무엇을 유의해야 하는지도 생각하게 되었다. 학습 일지 쓰기는 예비교사에게 교육적 상황에서 마주치는 여러 사안을 고민하고 대처할 수 있게 하는 경험의 장으로서 의의를 가진다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.13-24
• /
• 2001

Using computer technology in teaching school mathematics creates new instructional environments. The emphases on the use of computer technology in the classrooms and in particular the use of computer-based exploration as a context of mathematics instruction have been reflected in the recommendation of the NCTM (Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, 1989). Although the power of using computer technology in the exploration of mathematical problems has been recognized and stressed by many educators, we do not have many research studies on mathematics in computer-based explorations. Especially research has failed to clarify how computer technology can contribute to the construction of procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Up to now most researches on procedural and conceptual knowledge in computer environments have only focused on classifying programming languages which program language has more random access and rich interrelationship characteristic in relation to conceptual knowledge in humans, and which computer language has more characteristic flavor of procedural knowledge. How computer-based explorations affect the knowledge construction of mathematics, therefore, emerges as an issue of research on teacher education program for theoretical framework. This situation leads to do research on the effectiveness of using computer explorations in pre-service teacher education in terms of procedural and conceptual knowledge construction.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.71-94
• /
• 2001

The purposes of this study were to design small group collaborative learning models for developing the creativity and to analyze the effects on applying the models in mathematics teaching and loaming. The meaning of open education in mathematics learning, the relation of creativity and inquiry learning, the relation of small group collaborative learning and creativity, and the relation of assessment and creativity were reviewed. And to investigate the relation small group collaborative learning and creativity, we developed three types of small group collaborative learning model- inquiry model, situation model, tradition model, and then conducted in elementary school and middle school. As a conclusion, this study suggested; (1) Small group collaborative learning can be conducted when the teacher understands the small group collaborative learning practice in the mathematics classroom and have desirable belief about mathematics instruction. (2) Students' mathematical anxiety can be reduced and students' involvement in mathematics learning can be facilitated, when mathematical tasks are provided through inquiry model and situation model. (3) Students' mathematical creativity can be enhanced when the teacher make classroom culture that students' thinking is valued and teacher's authority is reduced. (4) To develop students' mathematical creativity, the interaction between students in small group should be encouraged, and assessment of creativity development should be conduced systematically and continuously.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.203-241
• /
• 2000

This study aims to suggest a model of task development for mathematics performance assessment and to develop performance tasks for the fifth graders in the primary school on the basis of this model. In order to achieve these aims, the following inquiry questions were set up: (1) to develop open-ended tasks and projects for the fifth graders, (2) to develop checklists for measuring the abilities of mathematical reasoning, problem solving, connection, communication of the fifth graders more deeply when performance assessment tasks are implemented and (3) to examine the appropriateness of performance tasks and checklists and to modify them when is needed through applying these tasks to pupils. The consequences of applying some tasks and analysing some work samples of pupils are as follows. Firstly, pupils need more diverse thinking ability. Secondly, pupils want in the ability of analysing the meaning of mathematical concepts in relation to real world. Thirdly, pupils can calculate precisely but they want in the ability of explaining their ideas and strategies. Fourthly, pupils can find patterns in sequences of numbers or figures but they have difficulty in generalizing these patterns, predicting and demonstrating. Fifthly, pupils are familiar with procedural knowledge more than conceptual knowledge. From these analyses, it is concluded that performance tasks and checklists developed in this study are improved assessment tools for measuring mathematical abilities of pupils, and that we should improve mathematics instruction for pupils to understand mathematical concepts deeply, solve problems, reason mathematically, connect mathematics to real world and other disciplines, and communicate about mathematics.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제31권3호
• /
• pp.475-489
• /
• 2011

The purposes of this study were to inform the exemplary models of integrated science and mathematics and to analyze and discuss their similarities and differences of the models. There were two steps to select the exemplary models of integrated science and mathematics. First, the second volume (Berlin & Lee, 2003) of the bibliography of integrated science and mathematics was analyzed to identify the models. As a second step, we selected the models that are dealt with in the School Science Mathematics journal and were cited more than three times. The findings showed that the following four exemplary theoretical models were identified and published in the SSM journal: the Berlin-White Integrated Science and Mathematics (BWISM) Model, the Mathematics/Science Continuum Model, the Continuum Model of Integration, and the Five Types of Science and Mathematics Integration. The Berlin-White Integrated Science and Mathematics (BWISM) Model focused an interpretive or framework theory for integrated science and mathematics teaching and learning. BWISM focused on a conceptual base and a common language for integrated science and mathematics teaching and learning. The Mathematics/Science Continuum Model provided five categories and ways to clarify the extent of overlap or coordination between science and mathematics during instructional practice. The Continuum Model of Integration included five categories and clarified the nature of the relationship between the mathematics and science being taught and the curricular goals for the disciplines. These five types of science and mathematics integrations described the method, type, and instructional implications of five different approaches to integration. The five categories focused on clarifying various forms of integrated science and mathematics education. Several differences and similarities among the models were identified on the basis of the analysis of the content and characteristics of the models. Theoretically, there is strong support for the integration of science and mathematics education as a way to enhance science and mathematics learning experiences. It is expected that these instructional models for integration of science and mathematics could be used to develop and evaluate integration programs and to disseminate integration approaches to curriculum and instruction.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제32권3호
• /
• pp.363-383
• /
• 2018

2015 개정 교육과정에 새롭게 도입된 <수학과제 탐구> 과목은 고등학교 1학년에서 다뤄지는 <수학> 과목을 이수한 후 수학 과제 탐구의 목적과 절차 및 연구 윤리를 학습하고, 이를 토대로 이전에 학습한 수학 내용을 더 깊이 탐구하거나 다른 교과와 수학을 융합한 흥미로운 주제를 선택하여 탐구하는 과목이다. 하지만, 이 신설 과목은 이례적으로 다른 여타 교과목과는 달리, 교과용 도서가 개발되지 않기 때문에 이 과목의 수업 진행은 온전히 담당 교사의 몫이 된다. 따라서 교육과정 성취기준을 토대로 효율적인 수업 방법이 이뤄지도록 <수학과제 탐구> 과목 운영에 대한 관심과 노력이 필요할 때이다. 본 연구에서는 2015 개정에 따른 수학과 교육과정에 새롭게 도입된 <수학과제 탐구> 과목의 교육 목적인 주제 선정 및 과제 탐구를 달성하기 위하여 성취기준에 부합하는 과제 탐구 수업모형을 개발하고 이에 근거하여 구체적인 수학적 탐구 과제를 개발하여 제시하고자 한다. 이때, 학생들의 학업 및 인지 수준에 보다 적합하고 독창적인 과제 개발을 위하여 실험수업을 실시하여 학생들의 의견을 수렴하고자 한다. 이러한 실험적용은 G 지역에 위치한 J 고등학교 2학년에 진학 예정인 9명을 대상으로 3차시의 수업으로 진행하며, 3차시 수업 직후에는 학생들을 대상으로 반 구조화된 면담을 실시한다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.77-101
• /
• 2005

NCTM에서 9-12학년 교육과정의 규준으로 설정한 바 있는 이산수학은 우리나라 f17차 수학과 교육과정에서 과목 선택형 교육과정으로 운영되고 있는 교과이다. 본 논문에서는 이산수학의 교수-학습방법을 논의의 대상으로 하여 학교수학에서 이산수학 학습의 중요성에 관한 최근의 논의들을 종합, 정리하고 제7차 교육과정에서의 이산수학 지도내용과 교수-학습방법을 분석하였다. 또한 이산수학의 교수-학습에 관한 국내$\cdot$외 선행연구들의 수업 실행 사례들로부터의 시사점을 바탕으로 학교현장의 수학교사들이 이산수학의 지도를 위해 고려해야 할 교수학적 지침을 네 가지로 구분하여 제안하였다. 그리고 각각의 제안 사항을 수업구성의 아이디어를 담고 있는 교육적 자료와 함께 구체적으로 논의하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.111-125
• /
• 2000

This paper presents cross-national perspectives on challenges in implementing current mathematics education reform ideals. This paper includes detailed qualitative descriptions of mathematics instruction from unevenly successful second-grade classrooms both in Koran and in the U. S with regared to reform recommendations. Despits dramatic differences in mathematics achivement between Korean and the U.S student. problems in both countries with regard to mathematics education are perceived to be very similar. The shared problems have a common origin in teacher-centered instruction. Educational leaders in both countries have persistently attempted to change the teacher-centered pedagogy to a student-centered approach. Many teachers report familiarity with and adherence to reform ideas, but their actual classroom teaching practices do not reflect the full implications of the reform ideals. Given the challenges in implementing reform, this study explored the breakdown that may occur between teachers adoption of reform objectives and their successful incorporation of reform ideals by comparing and contrasting two reform-oriented classrooms in both countries. This comparison and contrast provided a unique opportunity to reflect on possible subtle but crucial issues with regard to reform implementation. Thus, this study departed from past international comparisons in which the common objective has been to compare general social norma of typical mathematics classes across countries. This study was and exploratory, qualitative, comparative case study using grounded theory methodology based on constant comparative analysis for which the primary data sources were classroom video recordings and transcripts. The Korean portion of this study was conducted by the team of four researchers, including the author. The U.S portion of this study and a brief joint analysis were conducted by the author. This study compared and contrasted the classroom general social norms and sociomathematical norms of two Korean and two U.S second-grade teachers who aspired to implement reform. The two classrooms in each country were chosen because of their unequal success in activating the reform recommendation. Four mathematics lessons were videotaped from Korean classes, whereas fourteen lessons were videotaped from the U.S. classes. Intensive interviews were conducted with each teacher. The two classes within each country established similar participation patterns but very different sociomathematical norms. In both classes open-ended questioning, collaborative group work, and students own problem solving constituted the primary modes of classroom participation. However in one class mathematical significance was constituted as using standard algorithm with accuracy, whereas the other established a focus on providing reasonable and convincing arguments. Given these different mathematical foci, the students in the latter class had more opportunities to develop conceptual understanding than their counterparts. The similarities and differences to between the two teaching practices within each country clearly show that students learning opportunities do not arise social norms of a classroom community. Instead, they are closely related to its sociomathematical norms. Thus this study suggests that reform efforts highlight the importance of sociomathematical norms that established in the classroom microculture. This study also provides a more caution for the Korean reform movement than for its U.S. counterpart.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.207-229
• /
• 2019

제 4차 산업혁명 시대를 맞이하여 수학과 교수 학습에 ICT기술을 접목한 수업의 시도가 다양하게 이루어지고 있으며, 거꾸로 수업과 증강현실을 활용한 수업의 필요성과 효율성이 주목받고 있다. 이는 교육현장에서 거꾸로 수업과 증강현실을 활용한 수업 콘텐츠와 그 활용방안에 대한 수요의 증가로 이어지고 있다. 따라서 실제로 현장에 적용할 수 있는 수업 콘텐츠의 개발과 수업 방안에 대한 연구의 필요성이 커지고 있다. 이와 같은 관점에서 본 연구에서는 교수 학습 유형을 분류하고, 구성주의 수학 교육 원리와 증강현실 기반 모바일 앱을 활용한 거꾸로 교실 수업 방안과 교수 학습 유형별 수학 교수 학습 콘텐츠를 개발하고 교수 학습 현장에 적용할 수 있는 방안 및 수업지도안을 제시한다.