• 제목/요약/키워드: ji{\bar{a}}\

검색결과 233건 처리시간 0.028초

"Su$\acute{s}$ruta-samhit$\bar{a}$.S$\bar{u}$trasth$\bar{a}$na"의 제1장~제15장까지 어석(語釋)을 통한 '$\bar{A}$yurveda(아유르베다)'에 관한 연구(I)

  • 서지영;김기욱;박현국
    • 대한한의학원전학회지
    • /
    • 제22권4호
    • /
    • pp.67-100
    • /
    • 2009
  • "Su$\acute{s}$ruta-samhit$\bar{a}$(妙闻集)是印度传统医学最重要的经典著作之一, 与"Caraka-samhit$\bar{a}$(闺罗迦集)"以及成书于八世纪的"Astangahrdaya-samhita(八心集)"(内外科综合概要)并称'$\bar{A}$yurveda(阿输吠陀)'的"三位长老", 至今仍是当代印度'$\bar{A}$yurveda(阿输吠陀)' 正规教育所采用的主要教科书. Su$\acute{s}$ruta-samhit$\bar{a}$(妙闻集)"是卷一"总說"46章, 卷二"病因论"16章, 卷三"身体论"10章, 卷四"治疗论"40章, 卷五"毒物论"8章, 卷六"补遗"66章等总共186章构成的. 其作者为苏斯鲁塔($Su\'{s}ruta$), 故此书亦称" Su$\acute{s}$ruta-samhit$\bar{a}$(苏斯鲁塔本集)". "Su$\acute{s}$ruta-samhit$\bar{a}$" 的成书年代无法确定, 虽然不乏认为其成书年代可以上溯到纪元前若干世纪者, 但现今一般倾向于认为其传世本的形成是在公元3~4世纪. 如果与韩医学加以比较, 可以说在经典的形成与流传方面, '$\bar{A}$yurveda(阿输吠陀)'的"三位长老"与今本"黄帝内经", 无论是在历史地位, 流传与分合, 内容形式及重要性等许多方面, 均有极大的可比性. 然而不论是想真正了解'$\bar{A}$yurveda(阿输吠陀)', 还是想对不同医学体系做比较, 交流方面的研究, 或是全面考察医学与社会, 哲学等等的关系, 仅仅阅读综述性的研究文章与著作总是不够的. 细观而真正了解经典原貌时所能体会到的真实感. 因此, 试图了翻译"Su$\acute{s}$ruta-samhit$\bar{a}$". "Su$\acute{s}$ruta-samhit$\bar{a}$"是用梵语写的, 所以很难接近. 以下借助大地原诚玄的1943年日译本"スシュルタ本集"之第一卷"总說" 而廖育群的"阿輪吠陀-印度的传统医学""妙闻集 总论篇"的主要内容译出. 如今西医体系获得了普遍性, 其他文化圈的传统医学消灭了. 然而其中韩医学和印度传统医学'$\bar{A}$yurveda(阿输吠陀)'仍然保持了生命力. 从而,论者通过翻译'$\bar{A}$yurveda(阿输吠陀)'医学经典即"Su$\acute{s}$ruta-samhit$\bar{a}$(妙闻集)"的"总說", 而且要贡献扩大韩医学和东洋传统医学的范围.

  • PDF

두풍(頭風)과 편두통(Migraine)에 대(對)한 동서의학적(東西醫學的) 문헌고찰(文獻考察) (The biblographical study on $T{\acute{o}}u\;f{\bar{e}}ng$ and Migraine -(Comparative study between Oriental and Western Medicine)-)

  • 오소조;정지천;이원철
    • 대한한방내과학회지
    • /
    • 제14권1호
    • /
    • pp.129-138
    • /
    • 1993
  • This report on the $T{\acute{o}}u\;f{\bar{e}}ng$ and Migraine comes to conclude, through the study of the Oriental- Western medical references, as follow; 1. First, $T{\acute{o}}u\;f{\bar{e}}ng$ and Migraine had some concurrencies that both the two symptoms have appeared severe and recurrent headache and more often to the female. 2 Many of them e.g. Sensory disturbance, Vertigo, Nausea, Vomiting, Tinnitus etc. in the prodrome and main symptom of $T{\acute{o}}u\;f{\bar{e}}ng$ and Migraine were identical, especially the symptom of the $f{\bar{e}}ng\;t{\acute{a}}n\;t{\acute{o}}u\;t{\grave{o}}ng$ was similar to the prodrome of the Migraine. We could find out the semilarity of the symptoms through that Migraine is proximately set in unilateral, and $Pi{\bar{a}}nT{\acute{o}}u\;f{\bar{e}}ng$ is so called alias $B{\grave{a}}n\;bi{\bar{a}}n\;t{\acute{o}}u\;t{\grave{o}}ng$. 3. The pathogeny of $T{\acute{o}}u\;f{\bar{e}}ng$ include the case of ‘$f{\bar{e}}ng\;xi{\acute{e}}\;r{\grave{u}}\;n{\bar{a}}o$’, the patient feeling weak condition, $T{\acute{a}}n,\;T{\acute{a}}nshi,\;T{\acute{a}}nhu{\breve{o}},\;Y{\grave{u}}q{\grave{i}}$, etc. and, ‘$t{\acute{a}}n\;zhu{\grave{o}}\;sh{\grave{a}}ng\;y{\acute{a}}o$’, ‘$G{\bar{a}}n\;y{\acute{a}}ng\;hu{\grave{a}}\;f{\bar{e}}ng$’. There were variable that $F{\bar{e}}ng,\;Xu{\grave{e}},\;F{\bar{e}}ngr{\grave{a}},\;F{\bar{e}}ngx{\bar{u}},\;Xu{\grave{e}}x{\bar{u}},\;Hu{\check{o}}$ in the left, and $t{\acute{a}}n,\;R{\grave{e}},\;t{\acute{a}}nr{\grave{e}},\;Qir{\acute{a}}$ in the right partial pathogeny. It was referred $Sh{\grave{a}}o\;y{\acute{a}}ng\;j{\bar{i}}ng$, $Ju{\acute{e}}\;y{\bar{i}}n\;j{\bar{i}}ng$, $Y{\acute{a}}ng\;m{\acute{i}}ng\;j{\bar{i}}ng$, $T{\grave{a}}i\;y{\acute{a}}ng\;j{\bar{i}}ng$ in connection with the Meridian system. And otherwise the primary cause of Migraine is still unknown to us. Heredity is probably important, but the mode of transmission is uncertain. Recently, the important assumption is the vasomotor change caused by vasoconstrictors like that norepinephrine, epinephrine, and serotonin etc.

  • PDF

Comparative study of prosthetic complications associated with the bar-clip, milled bar, and Locator attachments for implant overdentures: a retrospective study

  • Yoon, Kye-Won;Heo, Ji-Ye;Hwang, Hee-Sung;Kim, Chul-Hoon;Kim, Bok-Joo;Kim, Jung-Han
    • 대한치과의사협회지
    • /
    • 제54권12호
    • /
    • pp.1024-1034
    • /
    • 2016
  • Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the type and frequency of prosthetic complications associated with attachment types for implant overdenture. Material and methods. In this retrospective study, 38 patients (mean age, 63.5 years) have been treated with implant overdentures from 2007 to 2014. Ten patients received a bar-clip attachment. Eleven patients had received a milled bar with Locator attachment. Seventeen patients had received a Locator attachment. The mean follow-up period was 36.9 months (range, 15-83 months). The type and frequency of prosthetic complications was recorded. The frequency was analyzed to determine the statistical difference among the 3 different attachments by using one-way ANOVA (${\alpha}=.05$) and Bonferroni post hoc method at a 5% level of significance. Results. The total number of prosthetic complications was higher in the bar-clip attachment (55 events) than in the milled bar with Locator attachment (39 events) and the Locator attachment (34 events). There were no statistically significant differences, and the most common prosthetic complication was the loss of retention. In the bar-clip attachment group, the average frequency of prosthetic complications was 3.0 events per prosthesis during the first year. In the milled bar with Locator attachment and Locator attachment groups, the average frequencies were 1.45 events and 2.35 events, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed in the frequency of the complication. (p = .043) Conclusions. Compared to the bar-clip attachment, implant overdentures that use milled bars with the Locator attachment have a significantly lower incidence of prosthetic complications in the first year of follow-up after placement.

  • PDF

'아유르베다'($\bar{A}yurveda$)의 의경(醫經)에 관한 연구 (A Study of The Medical Classics in the '$\bar{A}yurveda$')

  • 김기욱;박현국;서지영
    • 대한한의학원전학회지
    • /
    • 제20권4호
    • /
    • pp.91-117
    • /
    • 2007
  • Through a simple study of the medical classics in the '$\bar{A}yurveda$', we have summarized them as follows. 1) Traditional Indian medicine started in the Ganges river area at about 1500 B. C. E. and traces of medical science can be found in the "Rigveda" and "Atharvaveda". 2) The "Charaka" and "$Su\acute{s}hruta$(妙聞集)", ancient texts from India, are not the work of one person, but the result of the work and errors of different doctors and philosophers. Due to the lack of historical records, the time of Charaka or $Su\acute{s}hruta$(妙聞)s' lives are not exactly known. So the completion of the "Charaka" is estimated at 1st${\sim}$2nd century C. E. in northwestern India, and the "$Su\acute{s}hruta$" is estimated to have been completed in 3rd${\sim}$4th century C. E. in central India. Also, the "Charaka" contains details on internal medicine, while the "$Su\acute{s}hruta$" contains more details on surgery by comparison. 3) '$V\bar{a}gbhata$', one of the revered Vriddha Trayi(triad of the ancients, 三醫聖) of the '$\bar{A}yurveda$', lived and worked in about the 7th century and wrote the "$A\d{s}\d{t}\bar{a}nga$ $A\d{s}\d{t}\bar{a}nga$ $h\d{r}daya$ $sa\d{m}hit\bar{a}$ $samhit\bar{a}$(八支集)" and "$A\d{s}\d{t}\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$(八心集)", where he tried to compromise and unify the "Charaka" and "$Su\acute{s}hruta$". The "$A\d{s}\d{t}\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$" was translated into Tibetan and Arabic at about the 8th${\sim}$9th century, and if we generalize the medicinal plants recorded in each the "Charaka", "$Su\acute{s}hruta$" and the "$A\d{s}\d{t}\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$", there are 240, 370, 240 types each. 4) The 'Madhava' focused on one of the subjects of Indian medicine, '$Nid\bar{a}na$' ie meaning "the cause of diseases(病因論)", and in one of the copies found by Bower in 4th century C. E. we can see that it uses prescriptions from the "BuHaLaJi(布哈拉集)", "Charaka", "$Su\acute{s}hruta$". 5) According to the "Charaka", there were 8 branches of ancient medicine in India : treatment of the body(kayacikitsa), special surgery(salakya), removal of alien substances(salyapahartka), treatment of poison or mis-combined medicines(visagaravairodhikaprasamana), the study of ghosts(bhutavidya), pediatrics(kaumarabhrtya), perennial youth and long life(rasayana), and the strengthening of the essence of the body(vajikarana). 6) The '$\bar{A}yurveda$', which originated from ancient experience, was recorded in Sanskrit, which was a theorization of knowledge, and also was written in verses to make memorizing easy, and made medicine the exclusive possession of the Brahmin. The first annotations were 1060 for the "Charaka", 1200 for the "$Su\acute{s}hruta$", 1150 for the "$A\d{s}\d{t}\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$", and 1100 for the "$Nid\bar{a}na$", The use of various mineral medicines in the "Charaka" or the use of mercury as internal medicine in the "$A\d{s}\d{t}\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$", and the palpation of the pulse for diagnosing in the '$\bar{A}yurveda$' and 'XiZhang(西藏)' medicine are similar to TCM's pulse diagnostics. The coexistence with Arabian 'Unani' medicine, compromise with western medicine and the reactionism trend restored the '$\bar{A}yurveda$' today. 7) The "Charaka" is a book inclined to internal medicine that investigates the origin of human disease which used the dualism of the 'Samkhya', the natural philosophy of the 'Vaisesika' and the logic of the 'Nyaya' in medical theories, and its structure has 16 syllables per line, 2 lines per poem and is recorded in poetry and prose. Also, the "Charaka" can be summarized into the introduction, cause, judgement, body, sensory organs, treatment, pharmaceuticals, and end, and can be seen as a work that strongly reflects the moral code of Brahmin and Aryans. 8) In extracting bloody pus, the "Charaka" introduces a 'sharp tool' bloodletting treatment, while the "$Su\scute{s}hruta$" introduces many surgical methods such as the use of gourd dippers, horns, sucking the blood with leeches. Also the "$Su\acute{s}hruta$" has 19 chapters specializing in ophthalmology, and shows 76 types of eye diseases and their treatments. 9) Since anatomy did not develop in Indian medicine, the inner structure of the human body was not well known. The only exception is 'GuXiangXue(骨相學)' which developed from 'Atharvaveda' times and the "$A\d{s}\d{t}\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$". In the "$A\d{s}\d{t}\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$"'s 'ShenTiLun(身體論)' there is a thorough listing of the development of a child from pregnancy to birth. The '$\bar{A}yurveda$' is not just an ancient traditional medical system but is being called alternative medicine in the west because of its ability to supplement western medicine and, as its effects are being proved scientifically it is gaining attention worldwide. We would like to say that what we have researched is just a small fragment and a limited view, and would like to correct and supplement any insufficient parts through more research of new records.

  • PDF

형광 투시법을 이용한 구강저에서의 피어싱 바의 제거: 증례보고 (REMOVAL OF A PIERCING BAR IN THE MOUTH FLOOR BY FLUOROSCOPY: REPORT OF A CASE)

  • 김재원;장지영;장헌수;차두원;백상흠
    • Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
    • /
    • 제34권2호
    • /
    • pp.196-199
    • /
    • 2008
  • The piercing is increasing in western culture, and has also become gradually popular among Korean teenagers recently However, the accident hap-pens sometimes such as loss of a bar into the tongue or mouth floor during the procedure. Because of the rare cases, few treatment of choices can be made when a bar is lost inside the mouth floor. In this case, the bar was removed under fluoroscope, without giving significant damage to the adjacent structure. 18 years old female patient visited the emergency room in our hospital. She attempted to pierce her tongue herself and could not find the bar which was lost in the mouth floor. The radiographs revealed that the needle was somewhere inside the mouth floor, but if incision were to be made it would be too deep to find the bar. The bar was removed through fluoroscope easily. Primary closure was done by 5-0 Vicryl and stitch-off was done 1 week later. The patient didn't have any speech problems and complications.

무소오 소세키(夢窓疎石)의 작정기법 (A Study on the Architectural Method of Mus${\bar{o}}$ Soseki)

  • 최미영;홍광표
    • 한국전통조경학회지
    • /
    • 제31권3호
    • /
    • pp.45-53
    • /
    • 2013
  • 본 연구는 무소오 소세키의 작품을 통해서 그의 작정기법을 밝히고자 하는 목적을 가지고 진행되었다. 본 연구에서는 무소오 소세키의 삶과 종교관을 통해서 무소오 소세키를 인간적으로, 종교적으로 이해하고자 했으며, 그의 작품 가운데 가장 대표적이라고 생각하는 에이호지, 에린지, 사이호지, 텐류지 등 4사찰을 대상으로 무소오 소세키가 추구한 작정관과 작정기법을 찾아보았다. 연구결과, 무소오 소세키는 불교의 선사상을 기본으로, 본인이 터득한 다양한 사상과 철학을 공간구성으로 상징화하고, 석조와 지천이라는 두 가지 정원요소를 통해서 구체화하였음을 확인할 수 있었다. 부처의 세계를 형상화한 석조와 마음 심(心)모양의 지천 구성기법에서 작정자의 절대적인 종교미를 알 수 있었다. 이러한 그의 작정기법은 당시 중국을 모티브로 한 일본 정원에서 벗어나, 선 공부를 위한 전용공간, 즉 방장정원을 고안하였으며, 이는 대표적인 일본정원 형식이 되었다. 만약 무소오 소세키의 작정술이 일본정원에 도입되지 않았다면 일본정원은 지금과 같이 상징적 개념을 가진 사유정원이 될 수 없었을 것이다. 본 연구에서 아쉽게 생각하는 것은 또 다른 선승 셋슈와 무소오 소세키를 비교연구하지 못했다는 것이다. 이 연구에 대해서는 다음 과제로 남기고자 한다.

하서(河西) 김인후(金麟厚)의 독서관에 관한 연구 - "하서전집"의 인용문헌 분석을 중심으로 - (A Study on Kim Inhue's View of Reading: Through the Analysis of Reference Books in Haseo-Chunjib)

  • 안현주
    • 한국도서관정보학회지
    • /
    • 제39권3호
    • /
    • pp.479-500
    • /
    • 2008
  • 이 연구는 "하서전집"의 인용문헌 분석을 통해 김인후의 독서관을 고찰하였다. 그 결과 최소한 123종의 책을 독서했으며, "사서삼경", "사기", "한서", "장자", "고문진보", "초사", "문선"을 가장 많이 인용하였다. 김인후는 16세기 선비들이 보여주는 공통적인 독서범주를 뛰어넘은 다양한 독서, 시대상에 구애받지 않은 자유로운 독서를 했음을 알 수 있다. 그의 독서관은 성리학의 경서를 중요시 여겼으며 또한 다양한 독서를 통하여 실생활에 유익한 지식을 얻음과 동시에 방대한 저술의 바탕을 마련하였다.

  • PDF

데라야마 슈지(寺山修司)의 '셋교부시(說敎節)에 의한 미세모노(見せ物)오페라' <신토쿠마루(身毒丸)>의 서사 구조 (The Narrative Structure of Terayama Shūji's Sekkyōbushi Misemono Opera Shintokumaru)

  • 강춘애
    • 공연문화연구
    • /
    • 제32호
    • /
    • pp.489-524
    • /
    • 2016
  • 본고는 일본 현대연극이 가타리모노 셋교부시를 수용하여 어떻게 현대화했는가에 주목하여 작품을 분석하였다. 아울러 이를 통하여 '셋교부시에 의한 미세모노(見せ物)오페라' 장르로 탄생하는 과정을 밝히고자 하였다. 이와 관련해서는 중세의 스토리텔링 셋교부시를 현대적 '미세모노 오페라'로 재탄생시켰다는 점에서, 데라야마가 언그라 1세대들과 확연히 다른 점에 대해 논했던 종래의 평가들과는 또 다른 시각을 제시하고자 한다. 60년대 일본 언그라운동 1세대 데라야마 슈지(寺山修司)의 <신토쿠마루(身毒丸)>(1978년)는 서사적 이야기에 가락을 붙여 음송하는 가타리모노(語り物) 셋교부시(說經節) <신토쿠마루(俊德丸)>를 소재로 한 작품으로서, 동아시아 스토리텔링의 현대적 유산이라고 할 수 있다. 셋교 <신토쿠마루>는 계모의 저주로 나병에 걸린 신토쿠마루가 텐노지(天王寺)에서 약혼자 오토히메(乙姬)라는 여성의 헌신적인 사랑과 관음(?音)의 영력(?力)에 의해 구원되는 이야기이다. 데라야마 슈지는 셋교부시의 서사적 형식에 J.A.시저(シ?ザ?본명 寺原孝明)의 주술적인 락(rock)음악을 결합시키고 부제를 '셋교부시에 의한 미세모노 오페라(說敎節による見世物オペラ)'라고 하였다. 근원소재인 모자신 신앙(母子神信仰)의 원리로 보이는 '모도리(もどり; 회귀)' 본능의 중세적 종교 세계를 데라야마 슈지는 모자상간의 세계로 변화시킨다. 그리고 셋교부시에서 나타나는 보편적인 복수장면은 신토쿠마루가 계모인 나데시코(撫子)의 복장과 가면을 쓴 드래그 퀸(drag queen: 여장)의 모습으로 이복동생 센사쿠(せんさく)를 근친상간하는 것으로 복수한다. 이 작품은 셋교부시의 전형적인 인과 구조를 따르고 있고, 작품 전반에 개입하여 전체적 서사를 진행시키는 이야기꾼(語り手, 카타리테)과 야나기타 구니오(柳田國男)박사의 등장은 서사 장치인 자기소개 기법과 코러스의 현대적 활용을 보여준다. 특히 코러스 가사에서 데라야마 슈지의 불행한 어린 시절의 기억, 즉 아버지의 부재, 아오모리현(?森?)의 대공습 경험이 자동기술법처럼 묘사되어 내용을 심층화하고 있다. 이후 니나가와 유키오(?川幸雄)의 연출 버전은 초연 때부터의 공동 극작가였던 기시다 리오(岸田理生)가 데라야마의 사후 17년을 경과해 다시 쓴 개정판으로 데라야마 슈지의 원작 <신토쿠마루>를 널리 알렸다. 그러나 그의 연출 버전에서는 데라야마가 이 작품에 붙인 부제의 요소가 전부 삭제됨으로써 극단 연극실험실 '덴조사지키(天井?敷)'가 시도한 다양한 실험연극의 줄기와 본질로부터 벗어나 있다. <신토쿠 마루>는 현대연극의 서사구조를 갖고 있지만 각 단락이 독립적인 이야기를 구성하면서도 서로 유기적인 결합이 가능하도록 한 구조를 갖고 있다.

아유르베다'($\bar{A}yurveda$) 의경(醫經)에 관한 연구 (A Study of The Medical Classics in the '$\bar{A}yurveda$')

  • 김기욱;박현국;서지영
    • 동국한의학연구소논문집
    • /
    • 제10권
    • /
    • pp.119-145
    • /
    • 2008
  • Through a simple study of the medical classics in the '$\bar{A}yurveda$', we have summarized them as follows. 1) Traditional Indian medicine started in the Ganges river area at about 1500 B. C. E. and traces of medical science can be found in the "Rigveda" and "Atharvaveda". 2) The "Charaka(閣羅迦集)" and "$Su\acute{s}hruta$(妙聞集)", ancient texts from India, are not the work of one person, but the result of the work and errors of different doctors and philosophers. Due to the lack of historical records, the time of Charaka(閣羅迦) or $Su\acute{s}hruta$(妙聞)s' lives are not exactly known. So the completion of the "Charaka" is estimated at 1st$\sim$2nd century C. E. in northwestern India, and the "$Su\acute{s}hruta$" is estimated to have been completed in 3rd$\sim$4th century C. E. in central India. Also, the "Charaka" contains details on internal medicine, while the "$Su\acute{s}hruta$" contains more details on surgery by comparison. 3) '$V\bar{a}gbhata$', one of the revered Vriddha Trayi(triad of the ancients, 三醫聖) of the '$\bar{A}yurveda$', lived and worked in about the 7th century and wrote the "$Ast\bar{a}nga$ $Ast\bar{a}nga$ hrdaya $samhit\bar{a}$ $samhit\bar{a}$(八支集) and "$Ast\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$(八心集)", where he tried to compromise and unify the "Charaka" and "$Su\acute{s}hruta$". The "$Ast\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$" was translated into Tibetan and Arabic at about the 8th$\sim$9th century, and if we generalize the medicinal plants recorded in each the "Charaka", "$Su\acute{s}hruta$" and the "$Ast\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$", there are 240, 370, 240 types each. 4) The 'Madhava' focused on one of the subjects of Indian medicine, '$Nid\bar{a}na$' ie meaning "the cause of diseases(病因論)", and in one of the copies found by Bower in 4th century C. E. we can see that it uses prescriptions from the "BuHaLaJi(布唅拉集)", "Charaka", "$Su\acute{s}hruta$". 5) According to the "Charaka", there were 8 branches of ancient medicine in India : treatment of the body(kayacikitsa), special surgery(salakya), removal of alien substances(salyapahartka), treatment of poison or mis-combined medicines(visagaravairodhikaprasamana), the study of ghosts(bhutavidya), pediatrics(kaumarabhrtya), perennial youth and long life(rasayana), and the strengthening of the essence of the body(vajikarana). 6) The '$\bar{A}yurveda$', which originated from ancient experience, was recorded in Sanskrit, which was a theorization of knowledge, and also was written in verses to make memorizing easy, and made medicine the exclusive possession of the Brahmin. The first annotations were 1060 for the "Charaka", 1200 for the "$Su\acute{s}hruta$", 1150 for the "$Ast\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$", and 1100 for the "$Nid\bar{a}na$". The use of various mineral medicines in the "Charaka" or the use of mercury as internal medicine in the "$Ast\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$", and the palpation of the pulse for diagnosing in the '$\bar{A}yurveda$' and 'XiZhang(西藏)' medicine are similar to TCM's pulse diagnostics. The coexistence with Arabian 'Unani' medicine, compromise with western medicine and the reactionism trend restored the '$\bar{A}yurveda$' today. 7) The "Charaka" is a book inclined to internal medicine that investigates the origin of human disease which used the dualism of the 'Samkhya', the natural philosophy of the 'Vaisesika' and the logic of the 'Nyaya' in medical theories, and its structure has 16 syllables per line, 2 lines per poem and is recorded in poetry and prose. Also, the "Charaka" can be summarized into the introduction, cause, judgement, body, sensory organs, treatment, pharmaceuticals, and end, and can be seen as a work that strongly reflects the moral code of Brahmin and Aryans. 8) In extracting bloody pus, the "Charaka" introduces a 'sharp tool' bloodletting treatment, while the "$Su\acute{s}hruta$" introduces many surgical methods such as the use of gourd dippers, horns, sucking the blood with leeches. Also the "$Su\acute{s}hruta$" has 19 chapters specializing in ophthalmology, and shows 76 types of eye diseases and their treatments. 9) Since anatomy did not develop in Indian medicine, the inner structure of the human body was not well known. The only exception is 'GuXiangXue(骨相學)' which developed from 'Atharvaveda' times and the "$Ast\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$". In the "$Ast\bar{a}nga$ Sangraha $samhit\bar{a}$"'s 'ShenTiLun(身體論)' there is a thorough listing of the development of a child from pregnancy to birth. The '$\bar{A}yurveda$' is not just an ancient traditional medical system but is being called alternative medicine in the west because of its ability to supplement western medicine and, as its effects are being proved scientifically it is gaining attention worldwide. We would like to say that what we have researched is just a small fragment and a limited view, and would like to correct and supplement any insufficient parts through more research of new records.

  • PDF

열유동을 고려한 GIS 모선의 온도상승 예측 (Temperature Rise Prediction of GIS Bus Bar Considering Thermal Flow)

  • 김중경;오년호;이지연;한성진
    • 전기학회논문지
    • /
    • 제58권4호
    • /
    • pp.742-747
    • /
    • 2009
  • Many works on the temperature distribution of power apparatus have usually done by coupled magneto-thermal analysis. Such a method can not consider the internal gas or oil flow in the power apparatus such as gas insulated switchgear, GIS bus bar, and power transformer. Moreover it can not show the internal temperature distribution of the power apparatus exactly. This paper proposes a coupled magneto-thermal-flow analysis considering Navier-Stokes equations. The convection heat transfer coefficient is calculated analytically by applying Nusselt number for natural convection and is applied to the boundary condition of proposed method. Temperature distribution of the GIS bus bar model considering thermal flow is obtained by the proposed method and shows good agreement with the experimental data.