• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제47권2호
• /
• pp.135-154
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study is to help to improve the method of math teaching by analysing how learner-centered teaching method offsets mathematical creativity and mathematical disposition. For this purpose, research questions are established as follows; (1) Mathematical creativity between open-ended learning activity approach(OLAA) and general classroom-based instruction(GCI) shows any difference? (2) Mathematical disposition between OLAA and GCI shows any difference? The results obtained through this study were as follows: (1) There was significant difference between OLAA group and CCI group in mathematical creativity. This means that open-ended learning activity approach was generally more effective in improving mathematical creativity than general classroom-based instruction. (2) There was no significant difference between OLAA group and GCI group in mathematical disposition. But the average scores of mathematical disposition except mathematical confidence improved a little. So we can say that open-ended learning activity approach brought an positive influence on students' mathematical disposition. The results obtained in this study suggest that the OLAA can be used to cultivate the children's mathematical creativity and disposition. Therefore, I suggest that teachers should use the OLAA to improve the children's mathematical creativity and disposition.

• 수산해양교육연구
• /
• 제26권5호
• /
• pp.1119-1128
• /
• 2014

This study was aimed at analyzing the correlation among each factor after finding out the difference between the gifted elementary students of science and general students with their parents' learning involvement, the children's intellectual curiosity and scientific creativity. The results of the study were as in the followings. Firstly, there was a significant difference in the intellectual curiosity between the gifted students and general students. Secondly, there was a significant difference in the parents' learning involvement perceived by the gifted students and general students. Thirdly, there was a significant difference in scientific curiosity of the gifted students and the general students. Forth, as the results of the correlation analysis among the talented child's father's learning involvement, the child's intellectual curiosity and scientific creativity, there was a positive correlation between the father's pursuit for appropriateness and the talented child's special curiosity, and another positive correlation between the father's encouragement for academic improvement and the child's flexibility and originality.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.3-10
• /
• 2011

본 연구의 목적은 공학교육에서의 창의성 증진을 위한 학습환경 설계모형을 탐색하는 것이다. 특히 창의적 문제해결 과정을 지원할 수 있는 웹 기반 학습환경에 주목하여, 공학교육에서의 창의성 증진을 위한 정보통신기술 기반의 이러닝 요소를 포함하는 종합적인 학습환경 설계모형을 개발하였다. 이를 위하여 공학교육과 창의성 관련 논문을 분석하여 공학교육에서의 창의성 증진을 위한 일반적인 설계 원리 일곱 가지를 도출하였다. 다음으로 도출된 일반적인 설계 원리들을 구조화할 수 있는 세 가지 이론적 구성 요소를 확인하여 모형화하였다. 마지막으로 일반적인 설계 원리의 구현 과정을 안내할 수 있는 상세 설계 지침을 제시하였다. 이러한 연구결과는 향후 실제적으로 학습환경을 구현하게 될 때 활용될 수 있는 기초적인 연구로서 의의가 있다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제46권3호
• /
• pp.293-302
• /
• 2007

In this paper, we review definition and concept of mathematical creativity. A couple of criteria have established for perspectives in mathematical creativity, The first is specific domain(mathematics) vs general domain(creativity) and the second is process(thinking process) vs outcome(divergent production). By these criteria, four perspectives have constructed : mathematics-thinking process approach(McTd), mathematics-divergent production approach(MctD), creativity-thinking process approach(mCTd), creativity-divergent production approach(mCtD). When mathematical creativity is researched by the specific reason and particular focus, an appropriate approach can be chosen in four perspectives.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.411-428
• /
• 2012

미래 사회에 대비하고 적응하기 위하여 창의성에 대한 요구가 한층 높아지고 있다. 이에 학교 수학에서 학생들의 창의성을 길러줄 수 있는 다양한 노력이 계속되고 있다. 특히 문제 만들기는 수학적 창의성을 길러줄 수 있는 좋은 방법이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 수학문제 만들기 활동의 결과물을 이용하여 학생들의 수학적 창의성을 분석하였다. 이를 위해 초등학교 3학년 상 수준 5명, 중 수준 7명, 하 수준 4명을 포함한 16명 학생을 연구 대상으로 문제 만들기 활동을 하고, 학생들이 만든 문제를 이용하여 학생들의 수학적 창의성을 분석하였다. 이를 통해 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다, 첫째, 창의성 점수의 평균에서는 상, 중, 하의 성취 수준에 비례하여 나타났다. 둘째, 학생들이 만든 문제의 수에서는 상, 중, 하 수준의 학생들 간에 큰 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 셋째, 학생들은 세 수준 모두에서 조건을 변경하여 문제를 만드는 비율이 높았고, 이런 현상은 상, 중, 하 순으로 갈수록 더 높게 나타났다.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.277-290
• /
• 2001

In this investigation of the effect of art appreciation on children's creativity, art appreciation activities were provided for 20 five-year-old kindergarten children over an 8-week period. Data collected with the use of the General Creativity Test for Children(Chon, 1995) were analyzed by t-test, ANCOVA and regression. Analyses revealed that the experimental group with the art appreciation activities developed a higher level of creativity on all scales of creativity, including originality, fluency, flexibility, and imagination and in all areas of physical, linguistic, and diagrammatic creativity. Boys were more creative than girls in imagination, originality and physical creativity.

• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.679-690
• /
• 1998

I wish to search for educational alternatives which improve students' mathematical creativity. As the first attempt for this, theories of general creativity and characters of mathematical creativity are discussed. And four factors( teacher variables. student variables, teaching and learning variables. environment variables) affecting mathematical creativity are analyzed. It is a educational well-known fact that students should think creatively and solve the problems for themselves. We postulate the fact that students' mathematical creativity can be developed. I think it is a mission and a duty for mathematics educators to develop the students' mathematical creativity fully. Mathematics educators should search for the methods which encourage the students to have mathematical creativity and should develop them.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제51권4호
• /
• pp.337-349
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to survey and analyze conception on creativity carried out from elementary school teachers in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do area. As results, first, most of teachers replied divergent thinking, creative problem solving, and new creation as general creativity and mathematical creativity. Secondly, they showed that thinking process would be related to transfer and cognition in terms of mathematical creativity factors. Lastly, there are significant differences among groups according to gender, teaching career, and age, even though most teachers expressed sympathy for need of creativity education in mathematics education.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제36권4호
• /
• pp.379-393
• /
• 2017

This study analyzed the relationship between self-directedness of science-gifted elementary students and their expression of scientific creativity in science-gifted class. A science-gifted program on the topic of Hydraulic Machine was implemented to 34 fifth-graders in the Science-Gifted Education Center of an education office in Seoul, Korea for four weeks. The self-directedness of the gifted students was divided into three types of 'General, Scientific, and Topic-Related Self-Directedness'. The products of the students' activities were assessed by using a scientific creativity assessment formula. Qualitative research, such as analysis of observations and interviews, was also conducted in order to identify characteristics that were not apparently revealed by quantitative data. The main results of this study are as follows: First, science-gifted elementary students' general self-directedness and their scientific creativity were significantly correlated (r=.373). Second, the students' scientific self-directedness and scientific creativity did not have a significant correlation (r=.294). Third, there was a positive correlation between the students' topic-related self-directedness and their expression of scientific creativity. Their self-rated scores (r=.420) for the topic-related self-directedness and the number of activity types associated with the topic had a positive correlation (r=.350). Fourth, the students were categorized into four groups according to the levels of their self-directedness and scientific creativity, and the result showed that Type HH (high self-directedness and high scientific creativity) was the most common type (15 students, 38.5%), followed by Type LL (low self-directedness and low scientific creativity) (11 students, 28.2%). Eight (20.5%) and five students (12.8 %) belonged to Type LH (low self-directedness and high scientific creativity) and Type HL (high self-directedness and low scientific creativity) respectively. Fifth, the classroom observation of the students in groups revealed that groups with more number of Type HH demonstrated better cooperation and performance. Sixth, the analysis results of the observation were almost matched to the results of the self-directedness and scientific creativity tests. The students with higher self-directedness demonstrated active class participation and good cooperative skills. The students with higher scientific creativity had a tendency to generate creative ideas more frequently in given situations. Seventh, dynamic activities were perceived as enjoyable and exciting by 76.9% of the students, but static activities that require creativity were regarded as interesting only by 23.1% of the students. Among the students who were satisfied with both the creative and static activities, Type HH accounted for the largest proportion (55.6%). In conclusion, factors such as students' interests, initiatives, and attitudes displayed through voluntary participations originated from their own daily life can predict the degree of scientific creativity associated with the topic. Also, when students were categorized into four types according to the level of self-directedness and scientific creativity, there was a tendency of active behavior in class, cooperative skill, and activity satisfaction. This suggested that we should consider self-directedness and scientific creativity in selecting the gifted, grouping them in class, and designing and executing programs for science-gifted elementary students.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제26권6호
• /
• pp.385-392
• /
• 2005

The current study assumes that the net effect of rewards on creativity is determined by interactions of motivational and cognitive properties conveyed by rewards when rewards are actually delivered. To test this hypothesis, experimental research was manipulated with 81 fourth-grade elementary students in Seoul, Korea, consisted of two sessions separated by a one-week interval. Data analyses pointed out that the changes of the creativity performance cannot be explained by the motivational changes and, in general, supported the hypothesis proposed in this study.