• 대한화학회지
• /
• 제57권1호
• /
• pp.127-137
• /
• 2013

우리나라 중학교 3학년 학생들을 대상으로 실시한 2009, 2010년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 결과를 이용하여 학생들의 성취수준별 특징을 조사하였다. 성취수준별 대표 문항 분석을 통하여 다음과 같은 내용을 알았다. 우수학력 학생들은 현상의 변화를 물질의 특징과 모형을 함께 이용하여 설명할 수 있고, 보통학력 학생들은 단순한 상황에 한정하여 모형을 활용하여 현상을 설명할 수 있으며, 기초학력 학생들은 모형의 의미를 이해하지 못하여 물질 현상을 모형을 이용하여 설명하지 못했다.

• 한국교육논총
• /
• 제37권1호
• /
• pp.103-116
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 혼합물의 분리 개념과 관련하여 중학교 학생들의 과학 개념을 조사한 것이다. 학생들이 이해하고 있는 수준은 성취수준별로 달랐으며, 성취수준이 높을수록 더 정확하고 복잡한 수준으로 이해하고 있었다. 모든 성취수준에서 오개념이 나타났으며, 성취수준이 높을 수록 개념 정의와 관련된 오개념이 많았고, 성취수준이 낮을수록 현상과 관련한 오개념이 많았다.

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.169-186
• /
• 2023

The research aimed to identify the effectiveness of an educational program using 3D glasses as a technological innovation on academic achievement and attitude towards elearning in science in the preparatory stage. The research relied on the analytical descriptive approach and the semi-experimental approach. The research tools were the achievement test and the scale of attitude towards e-learning. An educational program was designed and produced using 3D glasses. The study sample consisted of 60 students from the second grade in the preparatory stage at the Rural Jeddah School. The research concluded to the following results: There was a satistically sigificant difference at the level of sig. (0.05) among the -mean scores of the experiemtal and control group students in the post assessment atthe level of achievement in favor of the experiemental group and therewas a satistically sigificant difference at the level of sig. (0.05) among mean scores of the experiemtal and control group students in the post assessment at the level of attitude towards e-learning in favor of the experiemental group. And it was found that the positive effect of the 3D educational program for improving the level of achievement and the attitude towards e-learning for the students. The program allowed the experimental group students to practice self-learning, interaction, and achievement according to the individual differences among them.

• 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
• /
• 제10권2호
• /
• pp.161-182
• /
• 2000

This study is to develop assessment framework, test items and questionnaire for the National Assessment of Educational Achievement(NAEA), which administered in the elementary and secondary schools across the country in this year(2000). According to the first year study result of the NAEA, the test was administered in two core subjects, Mathematics and Social Studies. In this study, test items and sets of questionnaire and administered pretest were developed in the last year. In this year, the NAEA was administered with the adjusted test items and questionnaires and the results was analyzed and would be reported to the public. NAEA was developed on the basis of national curriculum, especially of the nature and objectives of subject curriculum in Mathematics (and also Social Studies). In the framework of assessment, we set up four differentiated levels of student achievement: 'under basic', 'basic', 'intermediary', and 'advanced'. Here 'the intermediary level' means the level of educational achievement in which students can understand average content of subject curriculum. 'Advanced level' indicates the level of educational achievement in which students master all the content of subject curriculum and apply basic concepts and principles to a variety of situations. 'The basic level' means the level of educational achievement in which students do not achieve the intermediary level. Students who do not understand average content of subject curriculum are classified as belonging to the basic level. Finally, this study would explain how to administer and analyze the test in the future. The test result was analyzed to report students' educational achievement according to regions, content areas, behavioral characteristics, and etc. This study would show how to report test result\ulcorner and how to set up students' academic achievement.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.21-39
• /
• 2001

This study is to develop assessment framework, test items and questionnaire for the National Assessment of Educational Achievement(NAEA), which administered in the elementary and secondary schools across the country in this year(2000). According to the first year study result of the NAEA, the test was administered in two core subjects, Mathematics and Social Studies. In this study, test items and sets of questionnaire and administered pretest were developed in the last year. In this year, the NAEA was administered with the adjusted test items and questionnaires and the results was analyzed and would be reported to the public. NAEA was developed on the basis of national curriculum, especially of the nature and objectives of subject curriculum in Mathematics (and also Social Studies). In the framework of assessment, we set up four differentiated levels of student achievement:‘under basic’,‘basic’,‘intermediary’, and ‘advanced’. Here ‘the intermediary level’means the level of educational achievement in which students can understand average content of subject curriculum. ‘Advanced level ’indicates the level of educational achievement in which students master all the content of subject curriculum and apply basic concepts and principles to a variety of situations. ‘The basic level’means the level of educational achievement in which students do not achieve the intermediary level. Students who do not understand average content of subject curriculum are classified as belonging to the basic level. Finally, this study would explain how to administer and analyze the test int he future. The test result was analyzed to report students’s educational achievement according to regions, content area, behavioral characteristics, and etc. This study would show how to report test results and how to set up student’s academic achievement.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제26권5호
• /
• pp.59-72
• /
• 2005

This study used secondary data of the Illinois Subsidized Guardianship Waiver Demonstration, Chicago Public Schools and administrative data of the Illinois Department of Child and Family Services. Multiple regression analysis was the main statistical method. Results revealed a positive effect of foster parents' expectations on educational achievement of foster children without disabilities. Among types of educational involvement, 'direct educational activities' showed a positive effect on math and 'supervision reported by children' showed a positive effect on reading achievement. Among indices of the quality of relationship: the presence of kinship ties, permanence achievement, and level of affection between foster parents and children, only level of affection had a significant positive association with both math and reading achievement.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제28권5호
• /
• pp.438-452
• /
• 2008

우리나라 학생들의 학력 수준을 파악하고 연도별로 학력이 어떻게 변화하는지를 파악하여, 이를 토대로 교육과정, 교수 학습, 교육 정책에 유의미한 시사점을 제공하기 위하여 한국교육과정평가원에서는 국가수준 학업성취도 평가를 시행하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 2003년부터 2006년까지 초등학교 6학년, 중학교 3학년, 고등학교 1학년 학생들을 대상으로 시행된 국가수준 학업성취도 평가에서 과학과 학업성취도 평균 점수와 성취수준별 비율의 변화 추이를 분석하였다. $2003{\sim}2006$년 연도별 과학과 성취도 점수를 비교한 결과, 학교급에 상관없이 학생들의 성취도는 증가 또는 감소의 특별한 경향이 보이지 않았다. 연도별 과학과 성취도 점수의 평균과 우수학력에 속하는 성취수준 비율을 성별로 비교한 결과, 초등학교에서는 여학생이 남학생에 비해 더 높았지만 학교급이 높아질수록 남학생이 여학생에 비해 더 높아졌다. 한편 기초학력미달에 속하는 학생의 비율은 모든 학교급에서 남학생이 여학생보다 더 높았다. 그리고 연도별 과학과 성취도 점수의 평균을 지역별로 비교한 결과, 초 중 고등학교 모두 읍 면지역 학생들의 성취수준이 상대적으로 낮게 나타났다. 이러한 결과를 고려할 때 성별, 지역별 점수 차를 줄이기 위하여 교육적 환경을 개선할 필요가 있으며, 학업성취도 평가 연구 결과가 교육과정 및 교육 정책 입안 등 다양한 분야에 활용되도록 추가적인 연구를 진행할 필요가 있다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제33권6호
• /
• pp.1186-1201
• /
• 2013

우리나라 초등학교 6학년 학생들을 대상으로 실시한 2009, 2010, 2011년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 결과를 이용하여 학생들의 성취수준별 특징을 조사하였고, 초 중학교 학생들의 특징을 비교하였다. 초 중학생의 성취수준별 대표 문항 분석을 통하여 다음과 같은 내용을 알았다. 초 중학교 공통적으로 우수학력 학생들은 모두 교육과정의 성취기준을 정확히 이해하고 있었지만 보통학력 학생들은 용어를 단순히 기억하는 수준과 같이 교육과정의 성취기준을 피상적으로 이해하고 있었다. 그래서 보통학력 학생들은 교육과정 목표 달성을 위해 수업 및 평가에서 내용을 정확히 이해하도록 돕는 방안을 늘릴 필요가 있다. 예를들어 선다형 평가 대신 서술형 평가를 요구하는 교육환경은 개념을 정확히 이해하는 습관을 길러줄 수 있을 것이다. 기초학력 학생들은 교육과정의 성취기준을 거의 이해하지 못하고 있었기 때문에 단순한 상황에서 성취기준을 다루는 보정 교육을 실시할 필요가 있다. 교육과정에서 다루는 과학 개념은 학교급별로 위계적으로 구성되어 있기 때문에 기초학력 미달 수준을 위한 보정 교육만으로는 과학교육에서 학습 결손 문제를 해결할 수 없다. 이를 위해서는 과학에서 수준별 수업을 대폭 확대할 필요가 있다.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.253-273
• /
• 2007

This study explores issues on how students' variables are related to their educational achievement in English subject. The National Assessment of Educational Achievement (NAEA) is conduced every year to measure educational progress and achievement, and to monitor the quality of education at the national level and appropriateness of the national curriculum. It also serves the purpose to collect background information affecting educational achievement. The background information is gathered by using questionnaires for students, teachers and school administrators. Among the student variables in the national level educational achievement assessment is self-regulated learning, which is composed of self-efficacy, self-control and learning strategy. In the NAEA in 2005 it was found that the features of self-regulated learning were significantly correlated to test scores in English. The findings from the analysis of the trends of the relationships between test scores in English and information on students' self-regulated learning provide implications for the national curriculum as well as for learning and teaching.

• International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.79-83
• /
• 2015

The Response to Intervention(RTI) approaches is the method to help students who are at risk for learning difficulties in advance and provide an appropriate level of intervention. In this article, the characteristics of model RTI were reviewed for students with achievement of below basic proficiency level. We considered RTI as supporting system to document students' progress and its applicability for the general educational setting in Korean school. The tier of RTI make it possible the evidence based individual instruction and counseling, differentiated step-by step approach for students with achievement of below basic proficiency level. In conclusion, RTI can be used as educational tools for dealing with improvement of academic subjects learning, behavioral and emotional problem for students with achievement of below basic proficiency level. For building high quality implementing for RTI it is needed the collaboration of teachers, counselors and learning consultants and related educators.