• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제33권5호
• /
• pp.419-427
• /
• 2008

본 연구는 레진시멘트의 레진인레이에 대한 접착 시 접착제 혹은 primer의 사용이 결합력에 영향을 미치는지 평가하기 위해 시행하였다. 직경 5mm,높이 4.5mm의 원기둥 형태로 제작한 레진인레이 (Tescera, Bisco, USA)의 표면을 1000번, 1500번 그리고 2000번 사포로 주수 하에서 연마하여 평편한 면을 형성한 후 레진인레이의 표면에 sandblasting을 시행한 후 표면에 1분 동안 silane을 도포하였다. 2군으로 나누어 한 군은 대조군으로, 다른 한 군은 표면에 동일한 제조사의 접착제나 프라이머를 도포한 후 중합하였다. 레진인레이 상에 3mm 직경의 구멍이 형성된 아크릴판을 고정하고, 구멍에 레진 시멘트를 주입하여 경화시켰다. 레진 시멘트는 Panavia-F (Kurary), Varolink-II(Ivoclar-Vivadent), RelyX Unicem(3M ESPE), Duolink(Bisco)와 자가중합형인 Multilink (Ivoclar-Vivadent)를 사용하였다. 제작된 시편을 만능물성시험기에 위치시고 전단결합강도를 측정하였다. 측정 결과 접착제나 프라이머를 도포한 군은 대조군에 비해 전단결합강도가 증가하였다 (p<0.05). 하지만 Variolink-II와 Panavia-F는 전단결합강도의 차이를 보이지 않았다. 대조군에서는 각 레진 시멘트간에 전단결합강도의 유의한 차이를 보였으며 (p<0.01) Variolink-II가 가장 높은 결합강도를 보인 반면, 자가중합형인 Multilink가 가장 낮은 결합강도를 보였다. 하지만, 접착제나 프라이머를 도포한 군에서는 각 제품간에 전단결합강토의 차이를 보이지 않았다. 이상의 결과 이원중합형이나 자가중합형 레진시멘을 이용하여 레진인레이 부착 시 silane 처리 후 접착제나 프라이머의 도포가 결합 강도의 증가를 위해 필요하리라 사료된다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제5권3호
• /
• pp.248-255
• /
• 2013

PURPOSE. This study compared the effect of three intraoral repair systems on the bond strength between composite resin and zirconia core. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty zirconia specimens were divided into three groups according to the repair method: Group I-CoJet$^{TM}$ Repair System (3M ESPE) [chairside silica coating with $30{\mu}m$ $SiO_2$ + silanization + adhesive]; Group II-Ceramic Repair System (Ivoclar Vivadent) [etching with 37% phosphoric acid + Zirconia primer + adhesive]; Group III-Signum Zirconia Bond (Heraus) [Signum Zirconia Bond I + Signum Zirconia Bond II]. Composite resin was polymerized on each conditioned specimen. The shear bond strength was tested using a universal testing machine, and fracture sites were examined with FE-SEM. Surface morphology and wettability after surface treatments were examined additionally. The data of bond strengths were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tamhane post hoc test (${\alpha}$=.05). RESULTS. Increased surface roughness and the highest wettability value were observed in the CoJet sand treated specimens. The specimens treated with 37% phosphoric acid and Signum Zirconia Bond I did not show any improvement of surface irregularity, and the lowest wettability value were found in 37% phosphoric acid treated specimens. There was no significant difference in the bond strengths between Group I ($7.80{\pm}0.76$ MPa) and III ($8.98{\pm}1.39$ MPa). Group II ($3.21{\pm}0.78$ MPa) showed a significant difference from other groups (P<.05). CONCLUSION. The use of Intraoral silica coating system and the application of Signum Zirconia Bond are effective for increasing the bond strength of composite resin to zirconia.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제57권3호
• /
• pp.162-168
• /
• 2019

Composite resin restorations in posterior teeth are increasing due to the aesthetic needs of patients and the development of materials. This trend will accelerate in line with domestic insurance policies. However, resin composites generate stresses due to their contraction during the polymerization process. To reduce the polymerization shrinkage stress of resin composites, incremental layering technique has been recommended for decades. This technique reduces stress at the cavity wall interface and allows a more efficient light curing of the material. Bulk-fill resin composites have been designed to simplify the restorative technique because they can be placed into cavities in a single increment of 4-5mm. The simplification of the operative procedures is desirable in clinical daily practice. In this context, bulk-fill resin composites are an attractive alternative for posterior restorations. However, a clearer understanding of the clinical performance of this relatively new class of materials in comparison to conventional resin composites is required. Based on previous studies, the aim of the current review was to present the clinical criteria for the use of bulk-fill composites in direct restorations of posterior teeth.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.89-96
• /
• 2018

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 비스 아크릴 복합 레진의 수리 시 지연시간, 표면처리, 수리재료가 미치는 영향을 전단 결합강도 비교를 통해 알아보고, 폴리메틸 메타크릴레이트 레진을 이용한 비스 아크릴 복합 레진 수리의 효용성을 평가하고자 하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 총 90개의 비스 아크릴 복합 레진 시편을 제작하였고, 지연시간, 표면처리, 수리재료에 따라 10개씩 9개의 실험군으로 분류하였다. 각각의 시편들은 제작 직후 만능시험기를 사용하여 전단 결합강도를 측정하였고, 통계분석 프로그램(IBM SPSS statistics 20)을 이용하여 분석하였다. 전단 결합강도 측정 후 시편의 파절 단면을 관찰하였다. 결과: 시편 제작 직후, 접착제(bonding agent)를 이용하여 광중합형 유동성 복합 레진을 접착한 실험군에서 가장 높은 전단 결합강도를 보였다($17.54{\pm}3.14MPa$). 결론: 비스 아크릴 복합 레진을 수리할 때 경과시간에 따라 재제작 여부를 고려해야 하며, 효과적인 수리를 위해 사용부위나 목적에 따라 알맞은 재료와 표면처리 방법을 고려하는 것이 바람직할 것이다.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제32권4호
• /
• pp.604-610
• /
• 2005

현재 광중합 복합레진은 치아의 수복을 위하여 많이 사용되며 복합레진이 많이 사용되는 만큼 광중합을 위한 광중합기도 다양하게 사용된다. 하지만 광중합기에 따른 복합레진의 미세누출은 아직 연구대상이다. 본 연구의 목적은 광중합기에 따라 발생하는 미세누출에 대한 평가를 하는 것으로 최근에 개발된 광중합기의 중합능력을 전통적 인 할로겐 광중합기와 비교하는 것이다. 전통적으로 사용되어지던 저출력 할로겐 광중합기(Optilux 360), 일반 플라즈마 아크 광중합기(Flipo). 저발열 플라즈마 아크 광중합기 (Aurys), 고출력 LED 광중합기 (Freelight 2)를 사용하였다. 건전한 유구치에 와동을 형성한 후 복합레진(Z100)을 동일한 레진 접착제 (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose)를 사용하여 충전한 후 각 광중합기를 이용하여 복합레진을 중합시켰다. 광중합기의 광조사 시간은 제조사에서 복합레진의 광중합을 위해 권장하는 시간으로 Optilux 360은 40초, Flipo는 5초, Aurys는 9초, Freelight 2는 20초간 조사하였다. Optilux 360만 광강도의 변화가 없는 광조사 방식이며 그 외 광중합기들은 광강도가 광조사 중에 증가되는 soft-start 광조사 방식이다. 각 시편을 증류수에 24시간 보관 후 열 순환을 1000회 시행한 후 2% methylene blue용액으로 색소침투를 시켰으며 각 시편을 절단하여 색소침투 정도를 점수화시켜 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 미세누출을 각 점수화하였을 때 Aurys가 평균 0.95로 가장 낮은 값을 보였고 Freelight 2(1.05), Flipo(1.25), Optilux 360(1.30)의 순이었다. 하지만 각 광중합기군 간의 값에서는 통계학적인 유의성은 관찰되지 않았다(P>0.05).

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제48권4호
• /
• pp.35.1-35.14
• /
• 2023

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of dentin roughening and the type of composite resin used (either bulk-fill flowable or nanohybrid) on the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) with an 18-month follow-up period. Materials and Methods: This prospective split-mouth study included 36 patients, each with a minimum of 4 NCCLs. For each patient, 4 types of restorations were performed: unroughened dentin with nanohybrid composite, unroughened dentin with bulk-fill flowable composite, roughened dentin with nanohybrid composite, and roughened dentin with bulk-fill flowable composite. A universal bonding agent (Tetric N Bond Universal) was applied in self-etch mode for all groups. The restorations were subsequently evaluated at 6, 12, and 18 months in accordance with the criteria set by the FDI World Dental Federation. Inferential statistics were computed using the Friedman test, with the level of statistical significance established at 0.05. Results: The 4 groups exhibited no significant differences in relation to fracture and retention, marginal staining, marginal adaptation, postoperative hypersensitivity, or the recurrence of caries at any follow-up point. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, over an 18-month follow-up period, no significant difference was present in the clinical performance of bulk-fill flowable and nanohybrid composite restorations of non-carious cervical lesions. This held true regardless of whether dentin roughening was performed.

• 대한치과기공학회지
• /
• 제39권1호
• /
• pp.25-33
• /
• 2017

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate accuracy of glass fiber mesh complete denture of before and after curing. Methods: Edentulous model was selected as the master model. Ten study models were made by Type IV stone. Wax complete dentures were produced by the denture base and artificial teeth. CD and GD groups were measured six measurement distance before curing. The wax complete denture was investment after measurement is completed. Using a heat polymerization resin was injected resin. After injecting the resin it was curing. A complete denture was re-measured after curing. The measured data was verified by paired t-test. Results: Overall CD group was larger the value of the measured length. In the CD group, A-D point was larger. The smallest point was the B-D point. However, there was no statistically significant difference only C-D point(p>0.05). In the GD group, A-B point was larger. but B-D point was the smallest. A-D and B-C statistically points showed significant differences(p<0.05). Conclusion: Glass fiber mesh resin complete denture can be clinically applied to the edentulous patient.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.234-248
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study was to compare the fracture and shear bonding strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cements with composite resin and conventional glass ionomer cement Three kinds of restorative materials including a composite resin (Z 100), a conventional glass ionomer cement(Fuji II), and resin- modified glass ionomer cements(Fuji II LC, Vitremer, Dyract and Compoglass) were investigated in this study. For measurement of fracture and shear bonding strength, disk samples of the materials were prepared and cylindrical samples of the materials were bonded the flat enamel and dentin surfaces according to manufactuer's instructions. All specimen were determinated by using an Instron testing machine with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Then, each treated enamel and dentin surface was observed by SEM. The following results were obtained. 1. The bi-axial flexural strength of Z 100 was highest, and Fuji n LC, Vitremer, Dyract and Compoglass were significantly higher than Fuji n (P<0.05). 2. The shear bonding strength of Z 100 on the enamel and dentin surface was higher than other experimental groups except Fuji II LC(P<0.05). Fuji II LC was significantly higher than Fuji II (P<0.05), but in the case of Vitremer, Dyract and Compoglass were similar to Fuji II (P>0.05). 3. The shear bonding strength of Z 100 and Fuji II LC on the enamel surface were highly increased as compared with dentin surface (P<0.05), but in the case of Fuji II, Vitremer, Dyract and Compoglass were not different between enamel and dentin(P>0.05). 4. In the Z 100 and Fuji II LC, obvious etched enamel surface and exposed dentinal tubules according to remove of smear layer and smear plug were observed.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제8권6호
• /
• pp.417-422
• /
• 2016

PURPOSE. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the staining resistance of CAD/CAM resin-ceramics polished with different techniques and to determine the effectiveness of the polishing techniques on resin-ceramics, comparing it with that of a glazed glass-ceramic. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four different CAD/CAM ceramics (feldspathic ceramic: C-CEREC Blocs, (SIRONA) and three resin-ceramics: L-Lava Ultimate, (3M ESPE), E-Enamic, (VITA) and CS-CeraSmart, (GC)) and one light cure composite resin: ME-Clearfil Majesty Esthetic (Kuraray) were used. Only C samples were glazed (gl). Other restorations were divided into four groups according to the polishing technique: nonpolished control group (c), a group polished with light cure liquid polish (Biscover LV BISCO) (bb), a group polished with ceramic polishing kit (Diapol, EVE) (cd), and a group polished with composite polishing kit (Clearfil Twist Dia, Kuraray) (kc). Glazed C samples and the polished samples were further divided into four subgroups and immersed into different solutions: distilled water, tea, coffee, and fermented black carrot juice. Eight samples ($8{\times}8{\times}1mm$) were prepared for each subgroup. According to CIELab system, four color measurements were made: before immersion, immersion after 1 day, after 1 week, and after 1 month. Data were analyzed with repeated measures of ANOVA (${\alpha}=.05$). RESULTS. The highest staining resistance was found in gl samples. There was no difference among gl, kc and cd (P>.05). Staining resistance of gl was significantly higher than that of bb (P<.05). Staining resistances of E and CS were significantly higher than those of L and ME (P<.05). CONCLUSION. Ceramic and composite polishing kits can be used for resin ceramics as a counterpart of glazing procedure used for full ceramic materials. Liquid polish has limited indications for resin ceramics.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제12권6호
• /
• pp.376-382
• /
• 2020

PURPOSE. To determine the shear bond strengths of different denture base resins to different types of prefabricated teeth (acrylic, nanohybrid composite, and cross-linked) and denture teeth produced by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Prefabricated teeth and CAD/CAM (milled) denture teeth were divided into 10 groups and bonded to different denture base materials. Groups 1-3 comprised of different types of prefabricated teeth and cold-polymerized denture base resin; groups 4-6 comprised of different types of prefabricated teeth and heat-polymerized denture base resin; groups 7-9 comprised of different types of prefabricated teeth and CAD/CAM (milled) denture base resin; and group 10 comprised of milled denture teeth produced by CAD/CAM technology and CAD/CAM (milled) denture base resin. A universal testing machine was used to evaluate the shear bond strength for all specimens. One-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test were used for analyzing the data (α=.05). RESULTS. The shear bond strengths of different groups ranged from 3.37 ± 2.14 MPa to 18.10 ± 2.68 MPa. Statistical analysis showed significant differences among the tested groups (P<.0001). Among different polymerization methods, the lowest values were determined in cold-polymerized resin.There was no significant difference between the shear bond strength values of heat-polymerized and CAD/CAM (milled) denture base resins. CONCLUSION. Different combinations of materials for removable denture base and denture teeth can affect their bond strength. Cold-polymerized resin should be avoided for attaching prefabricated teeth to a denture base. CAD/CAM (milled) and heat-polymerized denture base resins bonded to different types of prefabricated teeth show similar shear bond strength values.