Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2018.34.2.89

Effect of delayed time, surface treatment, and repair material on shear bond strength of repaired bis-acryl composite resin  

Park, Ji-su (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
Lee, Jae-In (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.34, no.2, 2018 , pp. 89-96 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of delayed time, surface treatment, and repair materials on repair of bis-acryl composite resin through comparison of shear bond strength and to evaluate the utility of bis-acryl composite resin repair using polymethyl methacrylate resin. Materials and Methods: A total of 90 bis-acryl composite resin specimens were fabricated and classified into 9 test groups, each of 10 pieces according to delayed time, surface treatment and repair material. The shear bond strength of each specimen was measured using a universal testing machine immediately after fabrication and analyzed using a statistical analysis program (IBM SPSS statistics 20). After the shear bond strength measurement, the fracture surface of the specimen was observed. Results: The highest shear bond strength ($17.54{\pm}3.14MPa$) was observed in the experimental group bonded immediately with a light-curing flowable composite resin using a bonding agent. Conclusion: When repairing bis-acryl composite resin, it is necessary to consider whether to remake according to the delayed time. For effective repair, it is desirable to consider appropriate materials and surface treatment methods according to the site or purpose of use.
Keywords
bis-acryl composite resin; polymethylmethacrylate resin; bonding agent; silane; provisional restoration repair;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Patras M, Naka O, Doukoudakis S, Pissiotis A. Management of provisional restorations' defciencies: a literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012; 24:26-38.   DOI
2 Michalakis K, Pissiotis A, Hirayama H, Kang K, Kafantaris N. Comparison of temperature increase in the pulp chamber during the polymerization of materials used for the direct fabrication of provisional restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:418-23.   DOI
3 Young HM, Smith CT, Morton D. Comparative in vitro evaluation of two provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:129-32.   DOI
4 Schwantz JK, Oliveira-Ogliari A, Meereis CT, Leal FB, Ogliari FA, Moraes RR. Characterization of bisacryl composite resins for provisional restorations. Braz Dent J 2017;28:354-61.   DOI
5 Hammond BD, Cooper JR 3rd, Lazarchik DA. Predictable repair of provisional restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2009;21:19-24; discussion 25.   DOI
6 Donovan TE, Hurst RG, Campagni WV. Physical properties of acrylic resin polymerized by four different techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:522-4.   DOI
7 Chee WW, Donovan TE, Daftary F, Siu TM. Effect of chilled monomer on working time and transverse strength of three autopolymerizing acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:124-6.   DOI
8 Eliasson ST, Tibballs J, Dahl JE. Effect of dif- ferent surface treatments and adhesives on repair bond strength of resin composites after one and 12 months of storage using an improved microtensile test method. Oper Dent 2014;39:206-16.   DOI
9 Staxrud F, Dahl JE. Role of bonding agents in the repair of composite resin restorations. Eur J Oral Sci 2011;119:316-22.   DOI
10 Shim JS, Lee JY, Choi YJ, Shin SW, Ryu JJ. Effect of light-curing, pressure, oxygen inhibition, and heat on shear bond strength between bis-acryl provisional restoration and bis-acryl repair materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:47-50.   DOI
11 Balkenhol M, Meyer M, Michel K, Ferger P, Wostmann B. Effect of surface condition and storage time on the repairability of temporary crown and fxed partial denture materials. J Dent 2008;36:861- 72.   DOI
12 Ward JE, Moon PC, Levine RA, Behrendt CL. Effect of repair surface design, repair material, and processing method on the transverse strength of repaired acrylic denture resin. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:815-20.   DOI
13 Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27:17-28.   DOI
14 Cavalcanti AN, De Lima AF, Peris AR, Mitsui FH, Marchi GM. Effect of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19:90-8; discussion 99.   DOI
15 Appleby DC. Repair of fractured connectors in a provisional fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:449-50.   DOI
16 Hagge MS, Lindemuth JS, Jones AG. Shear bond strength of bis-acryl composite provisional material repaired with fowable composite. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002;14:47-52.   DOI
17 Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B. Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength. Clin Oral Investig 2009;13:317- 23.   DOI
18 Wendler M, Belli R, Panzer R, Skibbe D, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Repair Bond Strength of Aged Resin Composite after Different Surface and Bonding Treatments. Materials (Basel) 2016;9:E547.   DOI
19 Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Ozcan M, Yli-Urpo A, Vallittu PK. An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:155-64.
20 Staxrud F, Dahl JE. Silanising agents promote resin-composite repair. Int Dent J 2015;65:311-5.   DOI
21 Burns DR, Beck DA, Nelson SK; Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fxed prosthodontic treatment: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:474-97.   DOI
22 Chen HL, Lai YL, Chou IC, Hu CJ, Lee SY. Shear bond strength of provisional restoration materials repaired with light-cured resins. Oper Dent 2008; 33:508-15.   DOI