Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.5.419

INFLUENCE OF ADHESIVE APPLICATION ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF THE RESIN CEMENT TO INDIRECT RESIN COMPOSITE  

Song, Mi-Hae (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University)
Park, Su-Jung (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University)
Cho, Hyun-Gu (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University)
Hwang, Yun-Chan (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University)
Oh, Won-Mann (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University)
Hwang, In-Nam (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University)
Publication Information
Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics / v.33, no.5, 2008 , pp. 419-427 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study analyzed the influence of dental adhesive/primer on the bond strength between indirect resin composite and the resin cement. Seventy disc specimens of indirect resin composite (Tescera Dentin, Bisco) were fabricated. And bonding area of all specimens were sandblasted and silane treated for one minute. The resin cements were used with or without application of adhesive/primer to bonding area of indirect resin restoration, Variolink-II (Ivoclar-Vivadent) : Exite DSC, Panavia-F (Kuraray) : ED-Primer, RelyX Unicorn (3M ESPE) Single- Bond, Duolink (Risco) : One-step, Mulitlink (Ivoclar-Vivadent) : Multilinh Primer. Shear bond strength was measured by Instron universal testing machine. Adhesive application improved shear bond strength (p<0.05) But Variolink II and Panavia-F showed no statistically significant difference according to the adhesive application. With the above results, when resin inlay is luted by resin cement it seems that application of dental adhesive/primer is necessary in order to improve the bond strength.
Keywords
Resin inlay; Resin cement; Shear bond strength; Surface treatment; Primer; Bonding agent;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Watanabe EK, Yamashita A, Yatani H, Ishikawa K, Suzuki K. Improvement in the tensile bond strength between resin cement and dentin surfaces after temporary cement application. Int J Prosthodont 11:203- 211, 1998   PUBMED
2 Davies B, Dunne SM, Mokhfari M, Nicholson J. A comparison of the shear bond strength of composite resin bonded by a fourth and fifth generation dentin adhesive to bovine teeth. Prim Dent Care 6:103-106, 1999   PUBMED
3 Mondragon E, Soderholm KJ. Shear strength of dentin and bonded composites. J Adhes Dent 3:227-236, 2001   PUBMED
4 Kamada K, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material. J Prosthet Dent 79:508- 513, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Craig RG. Overview of posterior composite resins for use in clinical practice, in Vanherle G Smith DC(eds): Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials. St. Paul, 3M Co, 1985, p199-211
6 Douglas WH, Fields RP. Fundingsland J. A comparison between the microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorative systems. J Dent 17:184-188, 1989   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Kance J. Composite resin luting materials: A rationale for the' 90s', Esthetic Dentistry, 1:105-109, 1989   DOI
8 Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 3:237- 245, 2001   PUBMED
9 Thurmond JW, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strength of composite resin bonded to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 72:355-359, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Effect of crosssectional surface area on bond strengths between resin and dentin. Dent Mater 14:120-128, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
11 강현숙, 최호영. 2급 와동 복합레진 인레이 충전 후 변연누출에 관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지 17:191-205, 1992
12 Christensen GJ. Acceptability of alternatives for conservative restoration of posterior teeth. J Esthet Dent 7:228-232, 1995   DOI
13 Yanagawa T, Finger WJ. Relationship between degree of polymerization of resin composite and bond strength to Gluma-treated dentin. Am J Dent 7:157-160, 1994   PUBMED
14 Irie M, Suzuki K. Current luting cements; marginal gap formation of composite inlay and their mechanical properties. Dent Mater 17:347-353, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Jacobsen PH, Rees JS. Luting agent for ceramic and polymeric inlays and onlays. Int Dent J 42:145-149, 1992   PUBMED
16 Sheth PJ. Comparative evaluation of three resin inlay techniques: microleakage studies. Quint Int 20:831- 836, 1989
17 Heymann HO. Indirect composite resin veneers: an alternative, Porcelain laminate veneers. Quintessence books, 1998, p126-133
18 Ozden AN, Akaltan F, Can G. Effect of surface treatments of porcelain on the shear bond strength of applied dual-cure cement. J Prosthet Dent 72:85-88, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Lopes LMP, Leitao JGM, Douglas WM. Effect of a new resin inlay/onlay restorative material on cuspal reinforcement. Quint Int 22:641-645, 1991
20 Burke FJ. The effect of variations in bonding procedure on fracture resistance of dentin-bonded all-ceramic crowns. Quint int 26:293-300, 1995
21 Madani M, Chu FC, McDonald AV, Smales RJ. Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strengths between a resin cement and an alumina core. J Prosthet Dent 83:644-647, 2000   DOI
22 Sanares AM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light cured adhesives and chemical cured composites. Dent Mater 17:542-556, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Braga RR, Ballester RY, Carrilho MR. Pilot study on the early shear strength of porcelain dentin bonding using dual cure cements. J Prosthet Dent 81:285-289, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Della Bona A, van Noort R. shear vs tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res 74:1591-1596, 1995   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Nikaido T, Nakajima M, Higashi T, Kanemura N, Pereira PN, Tagami J. Shear bond strengths of a single- step bonding system to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater J 16:40-47, 1997   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
26 Braga RR, Cesar PF, Gonzaga CC. Mechanical properties of resin cements with different activation mode. J Oral Rehabil 29:257-262, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
27 O'Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection. 3rd ed. Quintessence, Chicago, p377, 2002
28 Keley WP 3rd, Triolo PT, Blankenau RJ, Kelsey MN, Ortmeier C, Hauser D. Bond strengths to enamel and dentin with indirect and direct resin composites. Am J Dent 9:105-108, 1996   PUBMED
29 Suliman JF, Swift EJ Jr, Perdigao J. Effect of surface treatment and bonding agents on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 70:118- 120, 1993   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Kupiec KA, Wuertz KM, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite-to-porcelain repair. J Prosthet Dent 76:119-124, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Jensen ME, Sheth JJ, Tolliver D. Etched-porcelain resin-bonded full veneer crowns: in vitro fracture resistance. Compendium 10:336-338,1989   PUBMED
32 Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 13:60-76D, 2000   PUBMED
33 Jackson RD, Ferguson RW. An asthetic bonded inlay/onlay technique for posterior teeth. Quint Int 21:7-12, 1990
34 Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Katahira N, Tagami J. Shear bond strength of three resin cements to dentin over 3 years in vitro. J Dent 29:139-144, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Roulet JF, Soderholm KJ, Longmate J. Effect of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res 74:381-387, 1995   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Hahn P, Attin T, Grofke M, Hellwig E. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays. Dent Mater 17:191-196, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn