• Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.13-24
• /
• 2012

Usability and knowledge drawn from utilizing various ways of representing accounting data were examined. Classroom experiments were conducted to compare students' assessment of financial data using table of numbers, 2-dimensional column graphs (2D), 3-dimensional column graphs (3D), and mixed reality visualization of true 3-dimensional graphs (MR). The results showed that in assessing the financial status and performance of a firm, Table of numbers and MR took longer than 2D and 3D graphs. The time spent on true 3D graphs using MR technology was about the same as Table of numbers. When compared the assessment scores of the firm's financial status and performance between participants and experts, the difference was the least when participants used 2D graphs. However, MR was seen as being a new way to provide data of greater complexity and was very useful for financial information.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.169-184
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study is to identify the most important factor(s) that contribute(s) to the overall oral proficiency and to examine whether the factor(s) play(s) a different role depending on the proficiency level of learners. Learners were divided into novice group and advanced group and were asked to produce an oral recording of a story based on a comic strip. The recordings were transcribed and graded by three raters. According to the results, the raters attained high inter-rater reliability when assessing advanced learners. However, the reliability level became considerably lower in the assessment of novice learners. The best predictor of oral proficiency among novice learners was sociolinguistic competence and fluency, while grammatical competence and fluency were the strongest predictors for advanced learners. The results suggest the need for a separate assessment tool for different proficiency levels and the need for a different focus in the classroom depending on the learners' proficiency level.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제7권3호
• /
• pp.151-161
• /
• 2003

In this paper, we discuss how to assess students' understanding of concepts during class, after class and in regular exams in the mathematics classes using the handheld graphing technology. We show some methods of assessment that are compatible with the class using the handheld graphing technology. These methods are adjustable to students' learning during class, homework after class or in regular exams. As a feedback of these methods we give students additional opportunity to understand concepts by giving additional concept provoking problems or giving additional help if necessary.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.41-56
• /
• 2005

Assessing students' knowledge can be a challenging endeavor, as researchers attempt to capture the full complexity and potential development of children's ideas. In this study, the Dynamic Science Assessment (DSA) method (Magnusson, Templin, and Boyle, 1997) was employed to investigate 9-12 year old students' understandings of light, while engaging in multiple tasks with a flashlight with various reflectors and mirrors. The results showed that DSA was effective in providing an opportunity to establish a Zone of Proximal Development, in addition to diagnosing a student's prior understanding. Throughout the interview, a student showed a conceptual model of light as being a solid single entity whose shape can be determined by the shape of the casing of a flashlight. However, as DSA provided phenomena that could not be explained by his unitary model, the student began to re-examine his original conceptual model, and attempted to revise it. This study addressed how Dynamic Science Assessment can help us better understand, not only students' current state of understanding, but also a potential development of understanding in their ZPD. In that sense, this study argues that we should pay more attention to the instructive role of classroom assessment that can promote and support further development of students' deeper understandings.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.279-297
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 2015 개정 교육과정으로 과정 중심 평가가 대두됨에 따라 교실에서 과정 중심 평가의 정착 및 운영을 위한 방안을 모색하고자 하였다. 그 방안으로 자기평가를 통한 과정 중심 평가를 제안하였고 이를 적용한 수업이 초등학교 5학년 학생들의 수학 학업 성취도와 정의적 영역에 미치는 영향을 알아보았다. 연구를 위해 동질성이 검증된 5학년 2개 학급을 선정한 후 실험집단에는 자기 평가를 통한 과정 중심 평가를, 비교집단에는 교사 주도의 과정 중심 평가를 적용한 수업을 실시하였다. 그 결과, 자기 평가를 통한 과정 중심 평가를 적용한 수업은 초등학교 5학년 학생들의 수학 학업 성취도를 유의미하게 향상시켰다. 실험집단의 정의적 영역은 유의미하게 변화하지는 않았으나 학생들의 소감문과 면담 자료를 분석한 결과 본 수업을 통해 수학에 대한 흥미와 자신감을 더 갖게 되었음을 알 수 있었다.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.119-139
• /
• 1999

The present study developed teaching-learning activities to improve personal intelligences and to investigate their effectiveness. Significant differences were found in both interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligence. Positive effects appeared in cooperative attitudes, capacity to care for and understand others, and in reflective thinking abilities. The results suggest the importance of a balanced educational curriculum in order to enhance human affective aspects, self-esteem, cooperative classroom climate formation and the moral and character development of students. Consistent and systematic investigation is needed on multiple intelligences theory, development of teaching-learning activities, their longitudinal effects, and a fair assessment instrument.

• 인지과학
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.175-197
• /
• 2019

고차적 사고를 요구하는 글쓰기는 배운 지식을 활용하고 발전시키게 한다. 학습 장면에서 글쓰기를 더 많이 활용하기 위해서는 동료평가를 도입하는 동시에 동료평가의 정확도를 높일 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서는 동료평가의 정확도를 높이는 방안으로, 평가 기준에 대해 학생들끼리 토론하게 하거나 전문가의 평가를 참고하도록 하는 두 방안을 탐색하였다. 대학생 150명을 대상으로 한 실험 결과, 동료평가 후 전문가의 평가를 참고했던 집단이 평가했던 글을 다시 평가할 때는 평가 정확도가 향상되었지만, 새로운 글을 평가할 때는 향상되지 않았다. 반면에, 동료평가 후 평가 기준에 대하여 토론을 진행했던 집단은 평가했던 글을 다시 평가할 때는 평가 정확도가 향상되지 않았지만, 새로운 글을 평가할 때는 향상됨을 발견하였다. 또한 토론 집단의 경우 평가 기준에 대한 토론에서 총 발언 수가 많아질수록 평가 정확도가 높아졌다. 이상의 결과는 평가 기준에 대한 토론에서 적극적이고 자발적인 논의가 활발할수록 이후 동료평가의 정확도가 향상됨을 시사한다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.409-432
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 최근 과정 중심 평가의 중요성과 함께 주목 받고 있는 형성평가의 정착 및 운영을 위한 방안을 모색하고자 하였다. 그 방안의 하나로 설정한 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가가 초등학교 4학년 학생들의 수학 학업 성취도와 수학적 태도에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 본 연구를 진행하기 위해 동질성이 검증된 실험집단과 비교집단을 선정하여 실험집단에는 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가를, 비교집단에는 본인 확인피드백을 통한 형성평가를 실시하였다. 그 결과, 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가는 학생들의 수학 학업 성취도를 향상시키고, 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가는 수학적 태도도 긍정적으로 변화시켰다. 이는 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가가 초등학생들의 수학 학습에 있어서 인지적, 정의적 측면에 유의미한 영향을 미쳤다고 볼 수 있다.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.30-42
• /
• 2005

In this study, we developed an elementary science performance assessment material on STS theme, especially the respiration. The material is constituted with 3 components, which are performance task, students' response format and scoring system, and it also has various objective domains such as applying science knowledge, improving science attitude, using ICT, communicating and reflective thinking. It offers teachers a tool by which they can assess students' abilities on a whole. The task is made with the motivation-evoking content of 'No Smoking'. It is constructed on the activity of writing a letter to his/her father not to smoke. The students' response format is made by problem solving process, and the scoring system is matched with the steps of students' response. The material involves several theoretical backgrounds and the strengths of performance assessment. In addition, due to the detailed students' format and scoring system, it can be used practically in elementary science classroom.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.51-58
• /
• 2014

The main objective of this research lies in estimating how much importance the educators of professional general education and MSC curriculum put on assessment, and, thereafter, take what support should be provided for the efficient assessment of education. The subjects of this research are educators of professional general education and MSC curriculum in the engineering education enrichment program at the 58 universities out of 72 universities where the accreditation for engineering education is implemented. Accordingly questionnaires were distributed to a total of 58 universities among which 136 questionnaires were collected. The data analysis methods, mean and response sample T test, were used in this research. The following conclusions were drawn from the results of this research. First, tile mean of importance and performance in the 'assessment activities' were relatively high. However, in tile assessment, the assessment performance was relatively lower than the assessment importance. Second, the results of the Importance-Performance Matrix in the 'assessment activities' was analyzed by two ways. First, Analyzed with the scale mean, The result means that Keep up the Good Work (KGW) sector included all factors. Second, Analyzed with the actual mean, The result means that KGW sector included 5 factors A, J, B, D, C. Possible Overkill(PO) sector included factors C, I. Low Priority(LP) sector included 4 factors K, E, H, L. Concentrate Here (CH) sector included factor G.