Browse > Article

Investigating Student's Understandings of Light Using Dynamic Science Assessment Method  

Lee, Soo-Young (Technical Education Research Centers)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.25, no.1, 2005 , pp. 41-56 More about this Journal
Abstract
Assessing students' knowledge can be a challenging endeavor, as researchers attempt to capture the full complexity and potential development of children's ideas. In this study, the Dynamic Science Assessment (DSA) method (Magnusson, Templin, and Boyle, 1997) was employed to investigate 9-12 year old students' understandings of light, while engaging in multiple tasks with a flashlight with various reflectors and mirrors. The results showed that DSA was effective in providing an opportunity to establish a Zone of Proximal Development, in addition to diagnosing a student's prior understanding. Throughout the interview, a student showed a conceptual model of light as being a solid single entity whose shape can be determined by the shape of the casing of a flashlight. However, as DSA provided phenomena that could not be explained by his unitary model, the student began to re-examine his original conceptual model, and attempted to revise it. This study addressed how Dynamic Science Assessment can help us better understand, not only students' current state of understanding, but also a potential development of understanding in their ZPD. In that sense, this study argues that we should pay more attention to the instructive role of classroom assessment that can promote and support further development of students' deeper understandings.
Keywords
dynamic science assessment; ZPD; light; reflection; conceptual change;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Feher, E., & Rice, K. (1988). Shadows and anti-images: Children's conceptions of light and vision. Science Education, 72(5), 637-649   DOI
2 Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
3 National Center for Educational Statistics (2004). Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/timss
4 Powell, R. R., & Skoog, G. (2000). Middle level integrative curriculum reform: A study of teachers' epistemological theories. Research in Middle Level Education Annual, 23, 1-34   DOI
5 Rice, K., & Feher, E. (1987). Pinholes and images: Children's conceptions of light and vision. Science Education, 71(4), 629-639   DOI
6 Schwab, J. J. (1964). Structure of the disciplines: Meanings and significance. The structure of knowledge and the curriculum. G. W. Ford and L. Pugno. Chicago, Rand McNally & Co.
7 Vygotsky, L. S. (Ed.). (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Edited by Cole, M. John-Steiner, V. and Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
8 Weber, R. (1990). Basic content analysis: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
9 Settlage, J., & Meadows, L. (2002). Standards-based reform and its unintended consequences: Implications for science education within America's urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 114-127   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Firestone, W. A., & Mayerowitz, D. (2000). Rethinking 'high stakes': Lessons from the United States and England and Wales. Teachers College Record, 102, 724-749   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Fetherstonhaugh, T., & Treagust, D. F. (1992). Students' understanding of light and its properties: Teaching to engender conceptual change. Science Education, 76(6), 653-672   DOI
12 Madaus, G. F., & Clarke, M. (2001). The adverse impact of high stakes testing on minority students: Evidence from 100 years of test data. In G. Orfield & M. Kornhaber (Eds), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high stakes testing in public education. New York: The Century Foundation
13 Brickhouse, N. (1994). Children's observations, ideas, and the development of classroom theories and light. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(6), 639-656   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
15 Budoff, M. (1987). Measures for assessing learning potential. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic assessment: An interactive approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 173-195). New York: Guilford
16 Monk, M. (1991). Generic epistemological notes on recent research into children's understanding of light. International Journal of science Education, 13, 255-270   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Palincsar, A. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345-375   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Feuerstein, R. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device: Theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore: University Park Press
19 Shavelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., & Pine, J. (1990). Performance assessment in science. Applied Measurement in Education, 4(4), 347-362
20 Campione, J. C. & Brown, A. L. (1984). Learning ability and transfer propensity as sources of individual differences in intelligence. In P.H. Brooks, R. Sperber, & C. McCauley (Eds.). Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded (pp. 265-293). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawarence Erlbaum
21 Lidz, C. s. (1987). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential. The Guilford Press, New York
22 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2004). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Retrieved from http://www.pisa.oecd.org
23 Smith, M. L. (1991). Put to the test: The effects of external testing on teachers. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 8-11   DOI
24 Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children's ideas. London: Routledge
25 Magnusson, S. J., Templin, M., & Boyle, R. A. (1997). Dynamic science assessment: A new approach for investigating conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(1), 91-142   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
27 Lidz, C. S., and Elliott, J. G. (2000). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications. Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science
28 Haney, W. (2000). The myth of the Texas miracle in education. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(41)
29 Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42   DOI
30 Watts, M. (1985). Student conceptions of light: A case study. Physics Education, 20, 183-7   DOI   ScienceOn
31 McNeil, L., & Valanzuela, A. (2001). The harmful impact of the TAAS system of testing in Texas: Beneath the accountability rhetoric. In G. Orfield, & M. L. Kornhaber (Eds). Raising standards or raising barriers? New York: Century Foundation Press, pp. 127-150
32 Guesne, E. (1985). Light. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children's ideas in science (pp. 11-32). Philadelphia: Open University Press