한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집 (Communications of Mathematical Education)

  • 제31권4호
  • /
  • Pages.409-432
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1226-6663(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9935(eISSN)
한국수학교육학회 (Korean Society of Mathematical Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

상호피드백을 통한 형성평가가 수학 학업 성취도 및 수학적 태도에 미치는 영향

Effects of Formative Assessment through Student Interactive Feedback on Mathematics Achievement and Attitude

  • 투고 : 2017.10.11
  • 심사 : 2017.10.30
  • 발행 : 2017.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 최근 과정 중심 평가의 중요성과 함께 주목 받고 있는 형성평가의 정착 및 운영을 위한 방안을 모색하고자 하였다. 그 방안의 하나로 설정한 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가가 초등학교 4학년 학생들의 수학 학업 성취도와 수학적 태도에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 본 연구를 진행하기 위해 동질성이 검증된 실험집단과 비교집단을 선정하여 실험집단에는 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가를, 비교집단에는 본인 확인피드백을 통한 형성평가를 실시하였다. 그 결과, 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가는 학생들의 수학 학업 성취도를 향상시키고, 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가는 수학적 태도도 긍정적으로 변화시켰다. 이는 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가가 초등학생들의 수학 학습에 있어서 인지적, 정의적 측면에 유의미한 영향을 미쳤다고 볼 수 있다.

The purpose of this study is to find out the importance of process - based evaluation and to find a way to set up and operate the formative assessment which is getting attention. As one of the ways, we investigated the effect of formative assessment through student's interactive feedback on mathematics achievement and attitude of fourth grade students in elementary school. In order to conduct the study, two groups of homogeneous grades were selected. In the experimental group, formative assessment was conducted through student's interactive feedback. In comparison group, formative assessment was conducted through self - confirmation feedback. Statistical analysis of the results after the experiment showed that the formative assessment through student's interactive feedback was found to have a positive effect on the improvement of mathematics achievement. In addition, the formative assessment through student's interactive feedback positively changed the mathematics attitude. Therefore, this suggests that applicability of formative assessment through student's interactive feedback in elementary school classroom instruction, as well as implications for follow - up study for effective implementation of formative assessment.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 교육부(2015). 수학과 교육과정 (교육부 고시 제2015-74호 별책 8). 세종: 교육부. (The Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics curriculum. Se Jong: The Ministry of Education.)
  2. 김수진, 김현경, 박지현, 진의남, 이명진, 김지영(2012). 수학, 과학 성취도 추이변화 국제비교 연구-TIMSS 2011 결과보고서. 한국교육과정평가원 연구자료 RRE 2012-4-3. (Kim, S. J., Kim, H. K., Park, J. H., Jin, E. N., Lee, M. J., & Kim, J. Y.(2012). Findings from TIMSS for Korea: TIMSS 2011 international results. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. Research Report RRE 2012-4-3.)
  3. 김성숙, 김희경, 서민희, 성태제(2015). (교수.학습과 하나되는) 형성평가. 서울: 학지사. (Kim, S. S., Kim, H. K., Seo, M. H., & Seong, T. J.(2015). Formative Assessment Associated with Teaching and Learning. Seoul: Hakjisa)
  4. 김진규(2015). 미국 교사의 형성평가 연수 프로그램 사례 분석과 시사점. 교육문화연구, 21(5), 95-114. (Kim, J. K.(2015). American Teachers" Training Program for Formative Assessment: A Case Analysis and Policy Implications. J ournal of Education & Culture , 21(5), 95-114.)
  5. 김미정, 김정환(2007). 자기평가 후 피드백 유형이 쓰기 능력과 쓰기 태도에 미치는 영향. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 7(1), 141-163. (Kim, M. J., & Kim, J. H.(2007). Impact of Feedback Type on Pupils' Writing Ability and Attitude after Performing Self-Evaluation in Classroom Learning Process. The J ournal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 7(1), 141-163.)
  6. 노현종, 손원숙(2015). 교사의 숙제 피드백이 학생의 자기조절학습, 과제가치, 학습태도 및 학업성취도에 미치는 영향. 교육평가연구, 27(3), 879-902. (No, H. J., & Son, W. S.(2015). The Role of Teacher-provided Feedback on Homework in Student Engagement and Academic Achievement. J ournal of Educational Evaluation, 27(3), 879-902.)
  7. 박영석(2009). 연구논문: 초등학교 사회 수업에서 교사의 형성평가 실행에 관한 연구, 시민교육연구, 41(4), 51-79. (Park, Y. S.(2009). A Study on Teacher's Practicing of Formative Assessment in Social studies Classroom of Elementary School, Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 41(4), 51-79.)
  8. 박정(2013). 형성평가의 재등장과 교육 평가적 시사. 교육평가연구, 26(4), 719-738. (Park, J.(2013). Resurgence of formative assessment and the educational implication. J ournal of Educational Evaluation, 26(4), 719-738.)
  9. 박정(2014). 형성평가와 교사교육. 교육평가연구, 27(4), 987-1007. (Park, J.(2014). Formative Assessment and Teacher Education. J ournal of Educational Evaluation, 27(4), 987-1007.)
  10. 서종진(2007). 피드백 방법에 따른 수학 학습의 효과. 한국학교수학회논문집, 10(1), 71-89. (Seo, J. J.(2007). The Effects of Learning Mathematics According to Feedback Method. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 10(1), 71-89.)
  11. 성태제, 임현정(2014). 형성평가의 재인식에 따른 교사와 학교교육의 변화를 위한 제언. 교육평가연구, 27(3), 597-615. (Seong, T. J., & Im, H. J.(2014). Suggestions for Teacher's Perception and Applicable Method Through the New Understanding of Formative Assessment. J ournal of Educational Evaluation, 27(3), 597-615.)
  12. 신성균, 황혜정, 김수진, 성금순(1992). 교육의 본질 추구를 위한 수학 교육 평가 체제 연구(III). 한국교육개발원 연구자료 RM 92-5-2. (Shin, S. K., Hwang, H. J., Kim, S. J., & Sung, K. S.(1992). A Study on Mathematics Education Assessment System for Educational Essential Pursue(III) . Korea Educational Development Institute, Research Material RM 92-5-2.)
  13. 이은자(2009). 교사 첨삭 피드백의 원리와 방법. 작문연구, 9(0), 123-152. (Lee, E. J.(2009). Principles and Methods of Teachers' Written Feedback. Research on Writing, 9(0), 123-152.)
  14. 임태민, 백석윤(2009). 초등수학 수업에서의 피드백 유형 및 학생의 반응. 한국초등교육, 20(1), 37-54. (Lim, T. M., & Paik, S. Y.(2009). Feedback Types and Learner's Responses within Elementary Mathematics Class. The J ournal of Korea Elementary Education, 20(1), 37-54.)
  15. 조성수(2003). 형성평가에서 교정적 피드백 유형이 학업성취도와 학습태도에 미치는 효과. 석사학위논문. 서강대학교. (Cho, S. S.(2003). (The) Effect of Corrective Feedback Types on Academic Achievement and Learning Atittude in Formative Assessment. Master's Dissertation. Sogang University.)
  16. 조영남, 배창식(2001). 집단보상 및 집단구성 방법에 따른 협동학습이 초등 수학과 학업성취에 미치는 효과. 초등교육연구, 14(2), 119-136. (Cho, Y. N., & Bae, C. S.(2001). Effects of the Group Reward and Construction in Cooperative Learning on the Achievement of Math in Elementary School. The J ournal of Elementary Education, 14(2), 119-136.)
  17. 지은림(2010). 교사의 형성평가 피드백 수행 척도 개발 및 타당화. 교육평가연구, 23(1), 79-100. (Chi, E. L.(2010). Developing and validating the scale of teachers' feedback practice for formative assessment. J ournal of Educational Evaluation, 23(1), 79-100.)
  18. 최현숙, 김중복(2015). 물리수업에서 효과적인 형성평가 실천을 위한 방안 탐색. 현장과학교육, 9(3), 152-164. (Choi, H. S., & Kim, J. B.(2015). Exploring Effective Ways to Practice for Formative Assessment in Physics Classes.: Focus on Peer Instruction. School Science Journal, 9(3), 152-164.)
  19. Black, P. J. (1993). Formative and summative assessment by teachers. Studies in Science Education, 12, 49-97.
  20. Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050106
  21. Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00195.x
  22. Brown, H. (2004). language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Language Testings, 25(3), 273.
  23. Cole, P. G., & Chan, L. K. S. (1987). Teaching principles and practice. New York. Prentice-Hall.
  24. Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education: Principles. Policy and Practice, 6(1), 32-42.
  25. Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practice on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438-481. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058004438
  26. Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in Writen Instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 211-232. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047002211
  27. Kahl, S. (2005). Where in the world are formative tests? Right under your nose! Education Week, 25(September) (4), 11.
  28. McMillan, J. H. (2014). Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practices for Effective Standards-Based Instruction(6th. ed.). Pearson.
  29. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne, & M. Scriven(Eds.), Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, 39-83. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  30. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
  31. Stiggins, R. J. (2009). Essential formative assessment competencies for teachers and school leaders. In H. L. Andrade & G, J. Cizek(Eds.), Handbook for formative assessment, New York: Routledge.