• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제14권11호
• /
• pp.5745-5751
• /
• 2013

본 논문은 monomer에서 결합증진에 많은 역할을 하는 MMA와 TEGDMA의 농도별 표면 처리와 silane coupling agent로 표면 처리한 것이 의치상 레진과 이장재간의 결합력에 미치는 영향에 대해 알아보고자 하였다. 의치상 레진에 MMA와 TEGDMA의 농도별 표면 처리와 silane coupling agent로 표면처리 후 이장재를 주입하여 전단결합강도를 측정하였다. MMA와 TEGDMA의 농도별 표면 처리에 따른 의치상 레진과 이장재간의 전단결합강도에서는 Vertex self curing resin에서 95%, 90%, 80%, Kooliner에서는 95%, 90%에서 유의적으로 높게 나타났다(P<0.05). 또한, silane coupling agent 5%로 표면 처리한 그룹이 Vertex self curing resin과 Kooliner 모두에서 전단결합강도가 유의적으로 높게 나타났다(P<0.05). 따라서 적절한 화학적 표면 처리는 의치상 레진과 이장재간의 결합력 증가에 영향을 미치리라 사료된다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.39-45
• /
• 2010

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to determine differences in shear bond strength to human dentin using immediate dentin sealing (IDS) technique compared to delayed dentin sealing (DDS). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty extracted human molars were divided into 4 groups with 10 teeth each. The control group was light-cured after application of dentin bonding agent ($Excite^{(R)}$ DSC) and cemented with $Variolink^{(R)}$. II resin cement. IDS/SE (immediate dentin sealing, $Clearfil^{TM}$ SE Bond) and IDS/SB (immediate dentin sealing, $Adapter^{TM}$ Single Bond 2) were light-cured after application of dentin bonding agent ($Clearfil^{TM}$ SE Bond and $Adapter^{TM}$ Sing Bond 2, respectively), whereas DDS specimens were not treated with any dentin bonding agent. Specimens were cemented with $Variolink^{(R)}$. II resin cement. Dentin bonding agent ($Excite^{(R)}$. DSC) was left unpolymerized until the application of porcelain restoration. Shear strength was measured using a universal testing machine at a speed of 5 mm/min and evaluated of fracture using an optical microscope. RESULTS. The mean shear bond strengths of control group and IDS/SE group were not statistically different from another at 14.86 and 11.18 MPa. Bond strength of IDS/SE group had a significantly higher mean than DDS group (3.14 MPa) (P < .05). There were no significance in the mean shear bond strength between IDS/SB (4.11 MPa) and DDS group. Evaluation of failure patterns indicates that most failures in the control group and IDS/SE groups were mixed, whereas failures in the DDS were interfacial. CONCLUSION. When preparing teeth for indirect ceramic restoration, IDS with $Clearfil^{TM}$ SE Bond results in improved shear bond strength compared with DDS.

• 대한소아치과학회지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.357-364
• /
• 1996

소아치과 임상에서 자주 사용되는 3 종의 광중합형 GIC의 아말감에 대한 접착능을 평가 할 목적으로 60 개의 아말감 부착시편을 이용하여 중간결합제인 Scotchbond 의 사용여부에 따른 경화된 아말감에 대한 광중합 GIC의 전단결합강도를 측정하고 경계부의 파절양상을 관찰한 결과, 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 아말감에 대한 광중합형 GIC의 전단강도는 Fuji II LC, Vitremer, Vitrebond의 순으로 높게 나타났다 (p<0.05). 2. 중간결합제인 Scotchbond를 사용하지 않은 경우에서 Scotchbond 를 사용한 경우에 비해 전단결합강도가 높게 나타났다(p<0.05). 3. 결합파절면은 Scotchbond를 사용한 경우의 대부분에서 Scotchbond와 아말감의 경계부에서 시편의 탈락이 나타났다. 아말감과 광중합 GIC의 결합을 시도할 경우에는 Scotchbond는 사용하지 않는 것이 바람직할 것으로 사료되었다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.344-351
• /
• 2015

본 논문은 치과에서 많이 사용되고 있는 silane coupling agent로 표면 처리한 의치상 레진과 자가중합 레진 간의 전단 결합력에 미치는 영향에 대해 알아보고자 하였다. 의치상 레진에 silane coupling agent 농도별 표면 처리 후 자가중합레진을 주입하여 전단결합강도를 측정하였다. Silane coupling agent(MPS)의 농도별 표면 처리에 따른 의치상 레진과 자가중합레진 간의 전단결합강도에서는 Vertex self curing resin에서 5%, 7%에서 유의적으로 높게 나타났고(P<0.05), Kooliner에서는 5%에서 유의적으로 가장 높게 나타났다(P<0.05). 따라서 의치상 레진과 자가중합레진 사이에 MPS 5%를 이용한 표면처리가 전단결합강도에 효과적으로 영향을 미치는 것이라 사료된다.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제48권2호
• /
• pp.14.1-14.11
• /
• 2023

Objectives: This study investigated the effect of an aluminum chloride hemostatic agent on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a universal adhesive to dentin. Materials and Methods: Eighty extracted human molars were trimmed at the occlusal dentin surfaces and divided mesiodistally. According to hemostatic agent application, specimens were randomly allocated into control (C) and hemostatic agent (Traxodent; H) groups. Each group was divided into 4 subgroups according to the adhesive system (n = 20): Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SBER), Clearfil SE Bond (CLSE), All-Bond Universal etch-and-rinse mode (ALER), and All-Bond Universal self-etch mode (ALSE). SBS was measured for half of the specimens at 24 hours, and the other half were thermocycled in water baths (group T). Fracture surfaces were examined to determine the failure mode. The SBS was measured, and data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance, the Student's t-test, and the Tukey honestly significant difference test (p = 0.05). Results: No significant differences in SBS were found between groups C and H for any adhesive system at 24 hours. After thermocycling, a statistically significant difference was observed between CT+ALSE and HT+ALSE (p < 0.05). When All-Bond Universal was applied to hemostatic agent-contaminated dentin, the SBS of H+ALSE was significantly lower than that of H+ALER (p < 0.05). The SBER subgroups showed no significant differences in SBS regardless of treatment and thermocycling. Conclusions: When exposed dentin was contaminated by an aluminum chloride hemostatic agent before dentin adhesive treatment, application of All-Bond Universal in etch-and-rinse mode was superior to self-etch mode.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제37권3호
• /
• pp.155-159
• /
• 2012

Objectives: To investigate the effect of dentin moisture degree and air-drying time on dentin-bond strength of two different one-step self-etching adhesive systems. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four human third molars were used for microtensile bond strength testing of G-Bond and Clearfil $S^3$ Bond. The dentin surface was either blot-dried or air-dried before applying these adhesive agents. After application of the adhesive agent, three different air drying times were evaluated: 1, 5, and 10 sec. Composite resin was build up to 4 mm thickness and light cured for 40 sec with 2 separate layers. Then the tooth was sectioned and trimmed to measure the microtensile bond strength using a universal testing machine. The measured bond strengths were analyzed with three-way ANOVA and regression analysis was done (p = 0.05). Results: All three factors, materials, dentin wetness and air drying time, showed significant effect on the microtensile bond strength. Clearfil $S^3$ Bond, dry dentin surface and 10 sec air drying time showed higher bond strength. Conclusions: Within the limitation of this experiment, air drying time after the application of the one-step self-etching adhesive agent was the most significant factor affecting the bond strength, followed by the material difference and dentin moisture before applying the adhesive agent.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.78-87
• /
• 2022

PURPOSE. This study aimed to compare the effect of different surface treatments and luting agent types on the shear bond strength of two ceramics to commercially pure titanium (Cp Ti). MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 160 Cp Ti specimens were divided into 4 subgroups (n = 40) according to surface treatments received (control, 50 ㎛ airborne-particle abrasion, 110 ㎛ airborne-particle abrasion, and tribochemical coating). The cementation surfaces of titanium and all-ceramic specimens were treated with a universal primer. Two cubic all-ceramic discs (lithium disilicate ceramic (LDC) and zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (ZLC)) were cemented to titanium using two types of resin-based luting agents: self-cure and dual-cure (n = 10). After cementation, all specimens were subjected to 5000 cycles of thermal aging. A shear bond strength (SBS) test was conducted, and the failure mode was determined using a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA, and the Tukey-HSD test was used for post hoc comparisons (P < .05). RESULTS. Significant differences were found among the groups based on surface treatment, resin-based luting agent, and ceramic type (P < .05). Among the surface treatments, 50 ㎛ air-abrasion showed the highest SBS, while the control group showed the lowest. SBS was higher for dual-cure resin-based luting agent than self-cure luting agent. ZLC showed better SBS values than LDC. CONCLUSION. The cementation of ZLC with dual-cure resin-based luting agent showed better bonding effectiveness to commercially pure titanium treated with 50 ㎛ airborne-particle abrasion.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.165-173
• /
• 1990

The purpose of this study was to measure the effect of two commercially available composite resin systems and GC dentin cement on the shear bond strength of the etched porcelain to enamel and dentin. The specimens were divided into six groups, and each group was as follows. Group I : etched enamel-dentin/enamel bonding agent-CHOICE-unfilled resin-silane-etched porcelain Group II : etched enamel-Scotchbond 2-Silux-unfilled resin-silane-etched porcelain. Group III : dentin-dentin/enamel bonding agent-CHOICE-unfilled resin-silane-etched porcelain Group IV : dentin-Scotchbond 2-Silux-unfilled resin-silane-etched porcelain Group V : dentin-GC dentin cement-dentin/enamel bonding agent-CHOICE-unfilled resin-silane-etched porcelain Group VI : dentin-GC dentin cement-Scotchbond 2-Silux- unfilled resin-silane-etched porcelain Following polymerization. the specimens were stored in 100% humidity for 24 hours before testing. Shear bond strength was measured with Instron universal testing machine. The results obtained were as follows; 1. The shear bond strength of the etched porcelain to enamel was greater than that of the etched porcelain to dentin. 2. The shear bond strength of Silux-Scotchbond 2 to dentin was greater than that of CHOICE-dentin/enamel bonding agent. 3. There was no significant difference in shear bond strength to dentin between the groups lined with GC dentin cement. 4. The shear bond strength of Silux-Scotchbond 2 to dentin was greater than that of the groups lined with GC dentin cement. 5. There was no significant difference in shear bond strength to dentin between the groups lined with GC dentin cement and the group directly bonded with CHOICE-dentin/enamel bonding agent.

• 대한치과교정학회지
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.583-591
• /
• 1990

If the bond strength is sufficient to resist orthodontic force, orthodontic brackets can be bonded to restorations. Orthodontic brackets were bonded to composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations with no-mix adhesive or glass ionomer cement. The shear bond strength of adhesives bonded to restorations was studied in vitro. Orthodontic brackets were bonded to 10 extracted natural teeth, 40 composite resin restorations and 40 glass ionomer restorations. The surfaces of composite resin restorations were roughened or applied with bonding agent (Scothbond) after surface roughening. The surfaces of glass ionomer cement restorations were conditioned with acid etching or applied with Scotchbond to etched surface. The adhesive was no-mix resin or glass ionomer cement. The shear bond strength was measured. The results were as follows: 1. Orthodontic brackets could be bonded to composite resin restorations effectively as they could be bonded to acid etched enamel with no-mix adhesive. The shear bond strength was sufficient to resist orthodontic force and was not affected by bonding agent greatly. 2. The shear bond strength of no-mix adhesive bonded to acid etched glass ionomer cement restorations was sufficient to resist orthodontic force. However. the fracture risk of glass ionomer cement restorations was increased during debonding. The bonding agent couldn't increase the shear bond strength greatly. 3. The shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement bonded to glass ionomer cement restorations was lower than that of no-mix adhesive. The shear bond strength was sufficient to resist orthodontic force and was greatly decreased by bonding agent. 4. The shear bond strength of glass ionomer cement bonded to composite resin restorations was too low to resist orthodontic force.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제5권4호
• /
• pp.423-427
• /
• 2013

PURPOSE. This study evaluated the bond strength between porcelain denture teeth (Bioblend 43D) and four different polymerized denture resins (Lucitone 199, Palapress, Acron MC, Triad) with and without a bonding agent and after four different types of surface treatment (polished, HF etched, sandblasted, air-abraded). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Central incisor porcelain denture teeth were divided into 32 groups of 5 each. Tensile bond strength (MPa) was determined using a testing machine at crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Mean and standard deviation are listed. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Means were compared by Tukey-Kramer intervals at 0.05 significance level. RESULTS. All surface treatment increased bond strength compared to polished surface and the highest bond strength was found with Palapress resin with etched porcelain surface (8.1 MPa). Bonding agent improved the bond strength of all denture resins to porcelain teeth. Superior bonding was found with Palapress and air-abraded porcelain (39 MPa). CONCLUSION. Resins with different curing methods affect the bond strength of porcelain teeth to denture bases. Superior bonding was found with auto-polymerized resin (Palapress). Application of ceramic primer and bonding agent to porcelain teeth with and without surface treatment will improve the bond strength of all denture resins to porcelain teeth.