Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of an aluminum chloride hemostatic agent on the dentin shear bond strength of a universal adhesive

  • Sujin Kim (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Wonkwang University, School of Dentistry) ;
  • Yoorina Choi (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Wonkwang University, School of Dentistry) ;
  • Sujung Park (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Wonkwang University, School of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2022.09.21
  • Accepted : 2022.11.20
  • Published : 2023.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated the effect of an aluminum chloride hemostatic agent on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a universal adhesive to dentin. Materials and Methods: Eighty extracted human molars were trimmed at the occlusal dentin surfaces and divided mesiodistally. According to hemostatic agent application, specimens were randomly allocated into control (C) and hemostatic agent (Traxodent; H) groups. Each group was divided into 4 subgroups according to the adhesive system (n = 20): Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SBER), Clearfil SE Bond (CLSE), All-Bond Universal etch-and-rinse mode (ALER), and All-Bond Universal self-etch mode (ALSE). SBS was measured for half of the specimens at 24 hours, and the other half were thermocycled in water baths (group T). Fracture surfaces were examined to determine the failure mode. The SBS was measured, and data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance, the Student's t-test, and the Tukey honestly significant difference test (p = 0.05). Results: No significant differences in SBS were found between groups C and H for any adhesive system at 24 hours. After thermocycling, a statistically significant difference was observed between CT+ALSE and HT+ALSE (p < 0.05). When All-Bond Universal was applied to hemostatic agent-contaminated dentin, the SBS of H+ALSE was significantly lower than that of H+ALER (p < 0.05). The SBER subgroups showed no significant differences in SBS regardless of treatment and thermocycling. Conclusions: When exposed dentin was contaminated by an aluminum chloride hemostatic agent before dentin adhesive treatment, application of All-Bond Universal in etch-and-rinse mode was superior to self-etch mode.

Keywords

References

  1. Yoo HM, Pereira PN. Effect of blood contamination with 1-step self-etching adhesives on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Oper Dent 2006;31:660-665.  https://doi.org/10.2341/05-1279
  2. Yoo HM, Oh TS, Pereira PN. Effect of saliva contamination on the microshear bond strength of one-step self-etching adhesive systems to dentin. Oper Dent 2006;31:127-134.  https://doi.org/10.2341/04-206
  3. de Carvalho Mendonca EC, Vieira SN, Kawaguchi FA, Powers J, Matos AB. Influence of blood contamination on bond strength of a self-etching system. Eur J Dent 2010;4:280-286.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697840
  4. Tarighi P, Khoroushi M. A review on common chemical hemostatic agents in restorative dentistry. Dent Res J 2014;11:423-428. 
  5. Ajami AA, Kahnamoii MA, Kimyai S, Oskoee SS, Pournaghi-Azar F, Bahari M, Firouzmandi M. Effect of three different contamination removal methods on bond strength of a self-etching adhesive to dentin contaminated with an aluminum chloride hemostatic agent. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14:26-33.  https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1264
  6. Kuphasuk W, Harnirattisai C, Senawongse P, Tagami J. Bond strengths of two adhesive systems to dentin contaminated with a hemostatic agent. Oper Dent 2007;32:399-405.  https://doi.org/10.2341/06-121
  7. Land MF, Couri CC, Johnston WM. Smear layer instability caused by hemostatic agents. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:477-482.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90004-9
  8. Chaiyabutr Y, Kois JC. The effect of tooth-preparation cleansing protocol on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to dentin contaminated with a hemostatic agent. Oper Dent 2011;36:18-26.  https://doi.org/10.2341/09-308-LR1
  9. Land MF, Rosenstiel SF, Sandrik JL. Disturbance of the dentinal smear layer by acidic hemostatic agents. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:4-7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90207-0
  10. Shadman N, Farzin Ebrahimi S, Mollaie N. Sealing of adhesive systems in ferric sulfate-contaminated dentinal margins in class V composite resin restorations. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospect 2016;10:17-22.  https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2016.003
  11. Sharafeddin F, Farhadpour H. Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Total- and Self-etching Adhesive Systems after Application of Chlorhexidine to Dentin Contaminated with a Hemostatic Agent. J Dent (Shiraz) 2015;16:175-181. 
  12. Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ, Jekki R, Won J. Gingival displacement for impression making in fixed prosthodontics: contemporary principles, materials, and techniques. Dent Clin North Am 2014;58:45-68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2013.09.002
  13. Adamis Z, Williams RB; International Programme on Chemical Safety. Environmental Health Criteria 231. Bentonite, kaolin and selected clay minerals. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. 
  14. Kheirabadi BS, Mace JE, Terrazas IB, Fedyk CG, Estep JS, Dubick MA, Blackbourne LH. Safety evaluation of new hemostatic agents, smectite granules, and kaolin-coated gauze in a vascular injury wound model in swine. J Trauma 2010;68:269-278.  https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c97ef1
  15. Pourshahrestani S, Zeimaran E, Djordjevic I, Kadri NA, Towler MR. Inorganic hemostats: the state-of-the-art and recent advances. Mater Sci Eng C 2016;58:1255-1268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.09.008
  16. Harnirattisai C, Kuphasuk W, Senawongse P, Tagami J. Bond strengths of resin cements to astringent-contaminated dentin. Oper Dent 2009;34:415-422.  https://doi.org/10.2341/08-107
  17. Tuncer D, Basaran S, Halacoglu DM, Yamanel K, Celik C, Arhun N. Effect of haemostatic agent application on the shear bond strength of contemporary/multi-mode adhesive systems. Oral Health Dent Manag 2014;13:103-106. 
  18. Chaiyabutr Y, Kois JC. The effects of tooth preparation cleansing protocols on the bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cement to contaminated dentin. Oper Dent 2008;33:556-563.  https://doi.org/10.2341/07-141
  19. Acar O, Erkut S, Ozcelik TB, Ozdemir E, Akcil M. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality. J Prosthet Dent 2014;111:388-394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.009
  20. Ayo-Yusuf OA, Driessen CH, Botha AJ. SEM-EDX study of prepared human dentine surfaces exposed to gingival retraction fluids. J Dent 2005;33:731-739.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.02.002
  21. Hook M, Christoffersen J, Christoffersen MR, Leonardsen ES, Rassing MR, Rostrup E. Effects of aluminum (III) and fluoride on the demineralization of bovine enamel: a longitudinal microradiographic study. Scand J Dent Res 1994;102:198-201.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1994.tb01179.x
  22. Bernades KO, Hilgert LA, Ribeiro AP, Garcia FC, Pereira PN. The influence of hemostatic agents on dentin and enamel surfaces and dental bonding: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2014;145:1120-1128.  https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.2014.84
  23. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89-99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00037-2
  24. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 2004;83:454-458.  https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300604
  25. Tay FR, King NM, Chan KM, Pashley DH. How can nanoleakage occur in self-etching adhesive systems that demineralize and infiltrate simultaneously? J Adhes Dent 2002;4:255-269. 
  26. Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Okihara T, Matsumoto T, Minagi S, Osaka A, Van Landuyt K, Van Meerbeek B. HEMA inhibits interfacial nano-layering of the functional monomer MDP. J Dent Res 2012;91:1060-1065.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512460396
  27. Makishi P, Andre CB, Ayres A, Martins AL, Giannini M. Effect of storage time on bond strength and nanoleakage expression of universal adhesives bonded to dentin and etched enamel. Oper Dent 2016;41:305-317.  https://doi.org/10.2341/15-163-L