• 대한치과재료학회지
• /
• 제44권4호
• /
• pp.311-318
• /
• 2017

본 연구의 목적은 2가지 임시 수지 (Bis-acryl resin composite 및 polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA))의 굴곡 강도 및 미세 경도에 대한 경화 순서 및 중합 온도의 영향을 조사하는 것에 있다. 중합은 대기 중 $25^{\circ}C$ (대조) 및 온수 (40, 50, 60, 70 그리고 $80^{\circ}C$)에서 다양한 조건하에 수행되었다. 굴곡 강도 시험은 ISO-4049에 따라 수행되었다. 또한, 누프 경도를 측정 하였다. Bis-acryl resin의 경우, $50^{\circ}C$까지의 온도는 굴곡 강도와 bis-acryl resin composite의 경도를 증가시키지 않았지만 (p> 0.05), 온도가 높을수록 강도가 증가 하였다. PMMA 수지의 경우 굴곡 강도는 최대 $70^{\circ}C$의 온도에서 증가하고 약간 감소합니다. Bis-acryl resin은 PMMA 수지보다 기계적 특성이 더 컸다. 열의 영향은 Bis-acryl resin에서 PMMA 수지보다 더 두드러졌다(p <0.05).

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.1-6
• /
• 2012

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to compare the flexural strength of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and bis-acryl composite resin reinforced with polyethylene and glass fibers. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three groups of rectangular test specimens (n = 15) of each of the two resin/fiber reinforcement were prepared for flexural strength test and unreinforced group served as the control. Specimens were loaded in a universal testing machine until fracture. The mean flexural strengths (MPa) was compared by one way ANOVA test, followed by Scheffe analysis, using a significance level of 0.05. Flexural strength between fiber-reinforced resin groups were compared by independent samples t-test. RESULTS. For control groups, the flexural strength for PMMA (215.53 MPa) was significantly lower than for bis-acryl composite resin (240.09 MPa). Glass fiber reinforcement produced significantly higher flexural strength for both PMMA (267.01 MPa) and bis-acryl composite resin (305.65 MPa), but the polyethylene fibers showed no significant difference (PMMA resin-218.55 MPa and bis-acryl composite resin-241.66 MPa). Among the reinforced groups, silane impregnated glass fibers showed highest flexural strength for bis-acryl composite resin (305.65 MPa). CONCLUSION. Of two fiber reinforcement methods evaluated, glass fiber reinforcement for the PMMA resin and bis-acryl composite resin materials produced highest flexural strength. Clinical implications. On the basis of this in-vitro study, the use of glass and polyethylene fibers may be an effective way to reinforce provisional restorative resins. When esthetics and space are of concern, glass fiber seems to be the most appropriate method for reinforcing provisional restorative resins.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제12권5호
• /
• pp.322-328
• /
• 2020

PURPOSE. This study evaluated the shear bond strength between 3D printed provisional resin and conventional provisional resin depending on type of conventional provisional resin and different surface treatments of 3D printed resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Ninety-six disc-shaped specimens (Ø14 mm × 20 mm thickness) were printed with resin for 3D printing (Nextdent C&B, Vertex-Dental B. V., Soesterberg, Netherlands). After post-processing, the specimens were randomly divided into 8 groups (n=12) according to two types of conventional repair resin (methylmethacrylate and bis-acryl composite) and four different surface treatments: no additional treatment, air abrasion, soaking in methylmethacrylate (MMA) monomer, and soaking in MMA monomer after air abrasion. After surface treatment, each repair resin was bonded in cylindrical shape using a silicone mold. Specimens were stored in 37℃ distilled water for 24 hours. The shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Failure modes were analyzed by scanning electron microscope. Statistical analysis was done using one-way ANOVA test and Kruskal-Wallis test (α=.05). RESULTS. The group repaired with bis-acryl composite without additional surface treatment showed the highest mean shear bond strength. It was significantly higher than all four groups repaired with methylmethacrylate (P<.05). Additional surface treatments, neither mechanical nor chemical, increased the shear bond strength within methylmethacrylate groups and bis-acryl composite groups (P>.05). Failure mode analysis showed that cohesive failure was most frequent in both methylmethacrylate and bis-acryl composite groups. CONCLUSION. Our results suggest that when repairing 3D printed provisional restoration with conventional provisional resin, repair with bis-acryl composite without additional surface treatment is recommended.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.89-96
• /
• 2018

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 비스 아크릴 복합 레진의 수리 시 지연시간, 표면처리, 수리재료가 미치는 영향을 전단 결합강도 비교를 통해 알아보고, 폴리메틸 메타크릴레이트 레진을 이용한 비스 아크릴 복합 레진 수리의 효용성을 평가하고자 하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 총 90개의 비스 아크릴 복합 레진 시편을 제작하였고, 지연시간, 표면처리, 수리재료에 따라 10개씩 9개의 실험군으로 분류하였다. 각각의 시편들은 제작 직후 만능시험기를 사용하여 전단 결합강도를 측정하였고, 통계분석 프로그램(IBM SPSS statistics 20)을 이용하여 분석하였다. 전단 결합강도 측정 후 시편의 파절 단면을 관찰하였다. 결과: 시편 제작 직후, 접착제(bonding agent)를 이용하여 광중합형 유동성 복합 레진을 접착한 실험군에서 가장 높은 전단 결합강도를 보였다($17.54{\pm}3.14MPa$). 결론: 비스 아크릴 복합 레진을 수리할 때 경과시간에 따라 재제작 여부를 고려해야 하며, 효과적인 수리를 위해 사용부위나 목적에 따라 알맞은 재료와 표면처리 방법을 고려하는 것이 바람직할 것이다.

• The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.115-125
• /
• 2024

PURPOSE. The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the fracture resistance, surface hardness, and color stain of 3D printed, CAD-CAM milled, and conventional interim materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 80 specimens were fabricated from auto polymerizing polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), bis-acryl composite resin, CAD-CAM polymethyl methacrylate resin (milled), and 3D printed composite resin (printed) (n = 20). Forty of them were crown-shaped, on which fracture strength test was performed (n = 10). The others were disc-shaped specimens (10 mm × 2 mm) and divided into two groups for surface hardness and color stainability tests before and after thermal cycling in coffee solution (n = 10). Color parameters were measured with a spectrophotometer before and after each storage period, and color differences (CIEDE2000 [DE00]) were calculated. The distribution of variables was measured with the Kolmogorov Smirnov test, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey HSD, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U tests were used in the analysis of quantitative independent data. Paired sample t-test was used in the analysis of dependent quantitative data (P < .05). RESULTS. The highest crown fracture resistance values were determined for the 3D printed composite resin (P < .05), and the lowest were observed in the bis-acryl composite resin (P < .05). Before and after thermal cycling, increase in mean hardness values were observed only in 3D printed composite resin (P < .05) and the highest ΔE₀₀ value were observed in PMMA resin for all materials (P < .05). CONCLUSION. 3D printing and CAD-CAM milled interim materials showed better fracture strength. After the coffee thermal cycle, the highest surface hardness value was again found in 3D printing and CAD-CAM milled interim samples and the color change of the bis-acryl resin-based samples and the additive production technique was higher than the PMMA resin and CAD-CAM milled resin samples.

• 구강회복응용과학지
• /
• 제36권1호
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2020

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 polyetherketoneketone (PEKK)의 표면 처리 방식에 따른 세가지 종류의 임시 보철물 제작용 레진과의 전단결합강도를 비교하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 60개의 PEKK 시편을 110 ㎛의 산화알루미늄 입자(Cobra, Renfert GmbH, Hilzinge, Germany)로 분사 처리하고 시편에 Visio.link (Bredent, Senden, Germany)를 도포하지 않은 군(U)과 도포한 군(P)으로 30개씩 나누었다. 이후 한 변이 3.2 mm인 정사각형의 모양으로 polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), polyethylmethacrylate (PEMA), bis-acryl composite resin을 PEKK에 각각 20개씩 접착하여 총 6개의 군(UM, UE, UC, PM, PE, PC)으로 분류하였다. 완성된 시편은 37℃의 증류수에 24시간 보관하였다. 만능재료시험기의 크로스헤드의 속도를 2 mm/min로 설정하고 전단결합강도를 측정하였다. 각 군간의 전단결합강도 값의 유의차를 확인하기 위하여 일원배치분산분석(one-way ANOVA)과 Tukey HSD test를 시행하였다. 결과:UM, UE군은 UC군과 유의한 전단결합강도의 차이를 나타내었다(P < 0.05). PC군이 UC군보다 높은 전단결합강도를 나타내었다(P < 0.05). 결론: 임상적으로 PEKK에 PMMA와 PEMA를 접착하는 경우에 Visio.link의 적용이 필요하지 않으나, bis-acryl composite resin을 접착하는 경우에는 Visio.link의 적용이 추천된다.