구강회복응용과학지 (Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science)

  • 제36권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-11
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2384-4353(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-4272(eISSN)
대한턱관절교합학회 (Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Polyetherketoneketone의 표면처리 방법에 따른 임시 보철물 제작용 레진과의 결합 강도 비교 연구

Comparative study of surface modification on bond strength of polyetherketoneketone adhesively bonded to resins for temporary restoration

  • 홍문기 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 신수연 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Hong, Mun Gi (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Shin, Soo-Yeon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 투고 : 2019.07.15
  • 심사 : 2020.01.03
  • 발행 : 2020.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 polyetherketoneketone (PEKK)의 표면 처리 방식에 따른 세가지 종류의 임시 보철물 제작용 레진과의 전단결합강도를 비교하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 60개의 PEKK 시편을 110 ㎛의 산화알루미늄 입자(Cobra, Renfert GmbH, Hilzinge, Germany)로 분사 처리하고 시편에 Visio.link (Bredent, Senden, Germany)를 도포하지 않은 군(U)과 도포한 군(P)으로 30개씩 나누었다. 이후 한 변이 3.2 mm인 정사각형의 모양으로 polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), polyethylmethacrylate (PEMA), bis-acryl composite resin을 PEKK에 각각 20개씩 접착하여 총 6개의 군(UM, UE, UC, PM, PE, PC)으로 분류하였다. 완성된 시편은 37℃의 증류수에 24시간 보관하였다. 만능재료시험기의 크로스헤드의 속도를 2 mm/min로 설정하고 전단결합강도를 측정하였다. 각 군간의 전단결합강도 값의 유의차를 확인하기 위하여 일원배치분산분석(one-way ANOVA)과 Tukey HSD test를 시행하였다. 결과:UM, UE군은 UC군과 유의한 전단결합강도의 차이를 나타내었다(P < 0.05). PC군이 UC군보다 높은 전단결합강도를 나타내었다(P < 0.05). 결론: 임상적으로 PEKK에 PMMA와 PEMA를 접착하는 경우에 Visio.link의 적용이 필요하지 않으나, bis-acryl composite resin을 접착하는 경우에는 Visio.link의 적용이 추천된다.

Purpose: The purpose was to compare shear bond strength (SBS) of three types of resin for temporary restoration to polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) depending on surface modification. Materials and Methods: Sixty disks made from PEKK were air-abraded with 110 ㎛ alumina particles (Cobra, Renfert GmbH, Hilzinge, Germany) and thirty specimens were divided into two groups each: PEKK without Visio.link (Bredent, Senden, Germany)(U) and with Visio.link (P). Resins for temporary restoration (polymethylmethacrylate; PMMA, polyethylmethacrylate; PEMA, bis-acryl composite resin) in the shape of a square with one side 3.2 mm were bonded to PEKK twenty respectively and classified into six groups (UM, UE, UC, PM, PE and PC). All specimens were stored in distilled water at 37℃ for 24 hours. SBS of each group was measured at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min in universal testing machine. SBS was compared using one-way ANOVA and a Tukey HSD test (P = 0.05). Results: Group UM and group UE showed a significant difference in SBS with group UC (P < 0.05). Group PC showed a significant increase in SBS than group UC (P < 0.05). Conclusion: It is recommended to apply Visio.link to PEKK for adhering bis-acrylic composite resin, but not for PMMA and PEMA in clinical practice.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 2007;28:4845-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013
  2. Fuhrmann G, Steiner M, Freitag-Wolf S, Kern M. Resin bonding to three types of polyaryletherketones (PAEKs)-durability and influence of surface conditioning. Dent Mater 2014;30:357-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.008
  3. Williams DF, McNamara A, Turner RM. Potential of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and carbon-fibrereinforced PEEK in medical applications. J Mater Sci Lett 1987;6:188-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01728981
  4. Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Beuer F, Roos M, Schmidlin PR. Tensile bond strength of veneering resins to PEEK: impact of different adhesives. Dent Mater J 2013;32:441-8. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-011
  5. Liebermann A, Wimmer T, Schmidlin PR, Scherer H, Loffler P, Roos M, Stawarczyk B. Physicomechanical characterization of polyetheretherketone and current esthetic dental CAD/CAM polymers after aging in different storage media. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:321-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.004
  6. Wimmer T, Huffmann AM, Eichberger M, Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B. Two-body wear rate of PEEK, CAD/CAM resin composite and PMMA: Effect of specimen geometries, antagonist materials and test set-up configuration. Dent Mater 2016;32:e127-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.005
  7. Geringer J, Tatkiewicz W, Rouchouse G. Wear behavior of PAEK, poly (aryl-ether-ketone), under physiological conditions, outlooks for performing these materials in the field of hip prosthesis. Wear 2011;271:2793-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2011.05.034
  8. Bae SY, Park JY, Jeong ID, Kim HY, Kim JH, Kim WC. Three-dimensional analysis of marginal and internal fit of copings fabricated with polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) and zirconia. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61:106-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.07.005
  9. Lee KS, Shin JH, Kim JE, Kim JH, Lee WC, Shin SW, Lee JY. Biomechanical evaluation of a tooth restored with high performance polymer PEKK post-core system: a 3D finite element analysis. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:1373127.
  10. Han KH, Lee JY, Shin SW. Implant- and tooth-supported fixed prostheses using a high-performance polymer (Pekkton) framework. Int J Prosthodont 2016;29:451-4. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4688
  11. Zoidis P, Papathanasiou I. Modified PEEK resinbonded fixed dental prosthesis as an interim restoration after implant placement. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:637-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.024
  12. Tannous F, Steiner M, Shahin R, Kern M. Retentive forces and fatigue resistance of thermoplastic resin clasps. Dent Mater 2012;28:273-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.016
  13. Burns DR, Beck DA, Nelson SK; Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fixed prosthodontic treatment: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:474-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00259-2
  14. Vallittu PK. The effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the fracture resistance of a provisional fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:125-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70204-5
  15. Kim JY, Pfeiffer P, Niedermeier W. Effect of laboratory procedures and thermocycling on the shear bond strength of resin-metal bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:184-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00261-0
  16. Tetelman ED, Babbush CA. A new transitional abutment for immediate aesthetics and function. Implant Dent 2008;17:51-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e318167648c
  17. Wittneben JG, Buser D, Belser UC, Bragger U. Periimplant soft tissue conditioning with provisional restorations in the esthetic zone: the dynamic compression technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013;33:447-55. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1268
  18. Harder S, Kern M. Provisional treatment and soft tissue conditioning before and after implantation for single tooth replacement. Implantologie 2010;18:407-15.
  19. Hallmann L, Mehl A, Sereno N, Hammerle C. The improvement of adhesive properties of PEEK through different pre-treatments. Appl Surf Sci 2012;258:7213-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.04.040
  20. Keul C, Liebermann A, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Sener B, Stawarczyk B. Influence of PEEK surface modification on surface properties and bond strength to veneering resin composites. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:383-92.
  21. Sproesser O, Schmidlin PR, Uhrenbacher J, Eichberger M, Roos M, Stawarczyk B. Work of adhesion between resin composite cements and PEEK as a function of etching duration with sulfuric acid and its correlation with bond strength values. Int J Adhes Adhes 2014;54:184-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.06.006
  22. Sproesser O, Schmidlin PR, Uhrenbacher J, Roos M, Gernet W, Stawarczyk B. Effect of sulfuric acid etching of polyetheretherketone on the shear bond strength to resin cements. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:465-72. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a32806
  23. Stawarczyk B, Thrun H, Eichberger M, Roos M, Edelhoff D, Schweiger J, Schmidlin PR. Effect of different surface pretreatments and adhesives on the load-bearing capacity of veneered 3-unit PEEK FDPs. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:666-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.006
  24. Stawarczyk B, Jordan P, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Eichberger M, Gernet W, Keul C. PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1278-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.014
  25. Stawarczyk B, Bahr N, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Eichberger M, Gernet W, Jahn D, Schmidlin PR. Influence of plasma pretreatment on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:163-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0966-7
  26. Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Beuer F, Roos M, Schmidlin PR. Tensile bond strength of veneering resins to PEEK: impact of different adhesives. Dent Mater J 2013;32:441-8. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-011
  27. Mondragon E, Soderholm KJ. Shear Strength of Dentin and Dentin Bonded Composites. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:227-36.
  28. Oliveira ACC, Oshima HMS, Mota EG, Grossi ML. Influence of chisel width on shear bond strength of composite to enamel. Rev odonto Cienc 2009;24:19-21.
  29. Sinhoreti MA, Consani S, De Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Knowles JC. Influence of loading types on the shear strength of the dentin-resin interface bonding. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001;12:39-44. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1013848901553
  30. Stawarczyk B, Taufall S, Roos M, Schmidlin PR, Lumkemann N. Bonding of composite resins to PEEK: the influence of adhesive systems and airabrasion parameters. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:763-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2151-x
  31. Lumkemann N, Strickstrock M, Eichberger M, Zylla IM, Stawarczyk B. Impact of air-abrasion pressure and adhesive systems on bonding parameters for polyetheretherketone dental restorations. Int J Adhes Adhes 2018;80:30-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.10.002
  32. Kern M, Lehmann F. Influence of surface conditioning on bonding to polyetheretherketon (PEEK). Dent Mater 2012;28:1280-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.09.010
  33. Stawarczyk B, Silla M, Roos M, Eichberger M, Lumkemann N. Bonding Behaviour of Polyetherketoneketone to Methylmethacrylate- and Dimethacrylate-based Polymers. J Adhes Dent 2017;19:331-8.
  34. Silthampitag P, Chaijareenont P, Tattakorn K, Banjongprasert C, Takahashi H, Arksornnukit M. Effect of surface pretreatments on resin composite bonding to PEEK. Dent Mater J 2016;35:668-74. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-349
  35. Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B, Wieland M, Attin T, Hammerle CH, Fischer J. Effect of different surface pre-treatments and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK. Dent Mater 2010;26:553-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.02.003

피인용 문헌

  1. 폴리카보네이트 임시수복재료의 물성 평가 vol.36, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2020.36.3.168