• IE interfaces
• /
• v.23 no.4
• /
• pp.275-285
• /
• 2010

In complex industrial world, many companies make every effort to analyze their competition capability through various performance evaluation tools to cope with rapidly changing business environment. Among evaluation tools the balanced scorecard (BSC), put forward by Kaplan and Norton in 1992, is a strategic performance management tool for measuring whether the smaller-scale operational activities of a company are aligned with its larger-scale objectives in terms of vision and strategy. The BSC tool offers a comparative advantage over others to evaluate the objective achievement of a company by linking its strategic objectives with operational KPI. In this paper, we introduce a case that the BSC performance evaluation system was implemented based on product data management and applied it to the business process. Specially, we shows a implementation procedure to derive discipline-specific topics and key performance metrics.

• Proceedings of the Korea Database Society Conference
• /
• 1999.10a
• /
• pp.289-298
• /
• 1999

최근 조직에 지식경영을 도입해야 할 필요성이 강조되고, 이를 도입하고자 관심을 갖고, 도입 중에 있는 조직들이 점차 증가하고 있다. 그러나 지식경영의 도입은 지속적인 구축과정을 필요로 한다. 또한 이러한 지식경영을 도입하였을 때 과연 조직은 어떠한 성과를 얻을 수 있을까라는 점에 많은 질문을 갖게 된다. 따라서 지식경영을 도입함으로써 조직이 어떻게 변화하며, 궁극적으로 조직의 성과를 어떻게 측정해야 할 것인가는 중요한 사항이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 최근 그 유용성이 강조되는 BSC 관점에서 점진적 지식경영 방법론에 토대를 둔 파일럿 영역단위의 접근에 기반한 산업별 조직의 가치활동의 가중치를 평가해 봄으로써 효과적인 지식경영의 성과측정 방법에 대한 지침 모델을 고찰해 보았다.

• Journal of Information Technology Services
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.35-46
• /
• 2006

In recent years, academic scholars and practitioners have given increasing attention to the importance of strategic performance measurement systems including both financial and non-financial performance metrics. The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is known as integrated performance management framework that helps an enterprise to translate strategic objectives into relevant performance within an organization. While the current literatures and management articles offer BSC design and implementation. there are few reports of detailed validation of using the rationalized sets of CSF (Critical Success Factors) and KPI (Key Performance Indicators) for the Korean construction industry. This paper first propose the perceived sets of CSF/KPI using current literatures and validate with a major construction company's executives and senior managers in Korea. The paper then examines whether the perceived sets of CSF/KPI have co-relationships with the firm performances. The results of the research contribute in heightening of competitiveness of the Korean construction companies in strategic and performance management.

• 한국IT서비스학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.271-278
• /
• 2006

IT 조직의 활동에 대한 성과 평가는 과거 재무적인 평가방법이 주를 이루었으나 최근에는 정보시스템 기능과 활동 주체가 다양해짐에 따라 재무적인 접근방법과 함께 새로운 평가 방법 및 기준에 대한 연구가 진행되고 있다. 특히 균형 성과표 (Balanced Scorecard: BSC) 개념을 IT 활동 평가에 적용한 IT-BSC에 대한 연구도 이루어지고 있다. 그러나 정보시스템과 기업전략과의 관계에 대한 규명이나, 다양한 IT 성과측정지표들간의 연계성을 측정하는 연구는 이루어지고 있지 않은 실정이다. 이에 본 본 연구에서는 IT 조직의 성과평가를 위한 핵심성공요인(CSF)과 핵심성과지표(KPI)를 도출하고, 도출된 지표간의 인과관계를 검증하고자 한다. 본 연구의 결과로 도출된 영역과 지표들은 각 산업영역에서 IT 조직의 성과를 측정할 때 참고하고 적용할 수 있는 효과적인 지침으로 활용될 수 있다는 데에 연구의 의미를 둘 수 있다.

• Korea Journal of Hospital Management
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.103-111
• /
• 2012

• 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2004.10a
• /
• pp.62.1-62.1
• /
• 2004

• Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems
• /
• v.13 no.5
• /
• pp.124-132
• /
• 2008

Most companies in Korea that are implementing six sigma programs evaluate belt's project performance based on their own evaluation systems. Financial performance is a major criterion to evaluate project performance. New project evaluation systems which are based on not only financial performance but also non-financial performance need to be presented for better performance system. The study presents the integration system of balanced scorecard and six sigma project evaluation systems to show balanced view points of performance. Each evaluation index of four view points are presented in the study and could be utilized for alternative project evaluation systems.

• Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems
• /
• v.12 no.5
• /
• pp.163-172
• /
• 2007

ESC has been used as a tool for evaluating overall performance of firms. ESC focuses mainly on building a balanced viewpoint comprising perspectives and their metrics. It is, therefore, difficult to value overall strategic achievements of a company derived by consolidating various perspectives and metrics. Because of the absence of a method for consolidating ESC metrics and computing total score based on these metrics, it is difficult to evaluate whole strategic performance and find core obstacle parts of performance. In this paper, we suggest a method of normalizing a numerical value of metrics with different units, and calculating the total score of ESC metrics. We conduct a case study of evaluating the effectiveness of CRM to illustrate the applicability and feasibility of the suggested method.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.13 no.8
• /
• pp.145-151
• /
• 2015

In this study, we analyze using a structural equation model if an appropriate composite relations among the perspectives(Learning & Growth, Internal Business Process, Customer, Financial perspective) of the balanced scorecard are formed to achieve the ultimate goal in Chinese SMEs. In this study, we find that Learning & Growth perspective is related positively to Financial perspective directly and indirectly via Internal Business Process and also find that for success the careful management is required for Learning & Growth and Internal Business Process perspective. The results of this study will provide information about where the need to emphasis on management to improve the financial performance in Chinese SMEs.

• Journal of Navigation and Port Research
• /
• v.32 no.8
• /
• pp.675-683
• /
• 2008

This paper develops a framework of combining Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and Quality Function Deployment (QFD) using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) and evaluates the performance factors of container terminals using the framework. This study designs a BSC of container terminals and then transforms this into QFD in order to determine the priority of performance factors. This paper provides a modified QFD model and shows a causal relationship among perspectives of BSC to find out critical performance factors of container terminals. This modified QFD model is different from traditional models in that a correlation and relation matrix is presented. This combination of BSC and QFD with AHP and ANP helps to create more realistic and accurate representation of QFD models.