• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• v.48 no.5
• /
• pp.524-525
• /
• 2021

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• v.48 no.6
• /
• pp.717-719
• /
• 2021

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• v.49 no.1
• /
• pp.127-129
• /
• 2022

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• v.48 no.1
• /
• pp.145-145
• /
• 2021

• Archives of Obesity and Metabolism
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.49-50
• /
• 2024

• Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.93-109
• /
• 2003

Finding aids have existed from the time when ancient archives appeared, With this long history, they have been used in most of Western archives, and thus, it is one of the most familiar tasks generally performed by archivists. However, ironically, this accustomed concept has not been an academic object to many researchers. Especially, in this electronic age, finding aids are even more complicated in their forms and meanings. This paper intends to address the concept(s) of finding aids as reflected in the archival literature in North America. The paper will attempt to illustrate how the concept of finding aid has evolved both conceptually and practically in archives and archival science and how circumstantial and social elements affect this concept. It Seems that the concept of finding aids has developed from the broad and integrated concept of provenance and pertinence to the narrower and practical sense considering the use by the public. It also turns out that the concept has advanced from a mere technical tool for describing records to an access tool for maximum availability. Not surprisingly, the concept of finding aids have changed as archival science and the profession has advanced and diversified. It is crucial for the archival community to understand changes in the practice and the concept of finding aids that will enable the preparation of higher quality finding aids enabling the optimum use of archives.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.65-75
• /
• 2021

The research aims to suggest descriptive elements for developing archival authority records in university archives through converging archival information descriptive rules with EAC-CFP, data structure standards. To achieve the purpose, the research conducted the following research phases: first, to analyze the main characteristics of record producers according to the features of both functions and organizations of the university. Second, to analyze the descriptive elements by comparing the rules between ISAAR(CPF) and the guidelines of the authority records of NAK and suggest descriptive elements to build archival authority records. Finally, to suggest the finally deducted descriptive elements by matching up with those of EAC-CPF. The significance of the result is to provide both standardized access points to retrieve university records and to search the contextual information of record production in the online environments by converging the data standard structure, EAC-CPF.

• The Korean Journal of Archival Studies
• /
• no.43
• /
• pp.147-177
• /
• 2015

This study presents the research trends of Records and Archives Management in Korea by analyzing the articles of the Records and Archives Management in Korea. For the study, 479 articles from 5 academic journals published between 2004 and 2013 were analyzed. The study employed content analysis and network analysis. As a result, summary of the study is as follows: First, the most frequently used keywords in the area of Korean Archival Studies were 'Record and Archive Management' and 'Archivist'. However 'Electronic Records'. 'Archival Reference Service' and 'Appraisal' have been used the most frequently when these general words have been excluded. Second, most participating institutions in journals, during the given period of the study, were Myongji University, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Chung-Ang University, and Pusan National University. Especially, MyongJi University and Chung-Ang University are core institutions in the Korean Archival Studies community.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• v.40 no.6
• /
• pp.663-665
• /
• 2013

Authors, editors and reviewers, publishers, and subscribers all play their role in scientific journals. These 5 stakeholders are essential to journals. In this paper, firstly, I briefly summarize the role of each journal stakeholder and their respective goals. Secondly, the status of each participant in the Archives of Plastic Surgery is described. Finally, I propose an appropriate role and plan for each of them. Specific roles and responsibilities include the following: subscribers should welcome and submit the critiques of published papers in letters to the editor. Publishers should trust editors and provide them with adequate financial support for ongoing quality improvement of the journal. The editor-in-chief should be given a sufficient period of time-several years-to build up journal quality and train the incoming editor. The editors, including section editors, are also responsible for increasing the author pool. One editor might be designated a 'devil's referee', that is, a kind of devil's advocate with the responsibility of examining the originality of the manuscript, taking a skeptical view of the manuscript, and looking for holes in the methods and results of reported experiments. Authors' responsibilities include submitting manuscripts with scientific integrity and being ready to take responsibility for their articles even long after publication. Finally, reviewers' responsibilities include identifying similar articles not cited. Reviewers are also welcome to write a discussion on the article they review.

• Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.43-68
• /
• 2003

This paper examines the concepts and language that practitioners actually use when talking about authenticity, which is one of the most significant concepts in archives, and explores how they in records and information management currently understand the construct of authenticity in their professional activities. This paper provides brief descriptive statistics drawn from a survey and then analysis related to providing authenticity; the difficulties of judging something authentic; and definitions of authenticity as used and understood in the context of respondents' professional activity. The analysis provides indications of how professionals actually understand and use the concept of authenticity in their professional work depending on the context; and how these professionals react differently to paper records and electronic records. The paper concludes with a discussion of how this preliminary analysis fits within the context of the outcomes of prior electronic records research.