• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제37권4호
• /
• pp.440-454
• /
• 2018

This study aims to compare student self-, teacher-, and objective assessments of elementary science-gifted students' scientific creativity. A science-gifted program on the topic of Hydraulic Machine was implemented to 40 fifth-graders in the Science-Gifted Education Center of an education office in Seoul, Korea for four weeks. The products of the students' activities were assessed by three types of 'Student Self-Assesment', 'Teacher-Assesment', and 'Objective Assessment using Formula'. Based on two essential components of creativity, the scientific creativity is divided into two parts of originality and usefulness. Ideas that satisfy both components can be counted as scientifically creative. The main results of this study are as follows: First, the scores of each week and the average of the overall four-week scores on scientific creativity were significantly correlated. Student self-assessment (r=.687), teacher-assessment (r=.715), and objective assessment (r=.724) appeared consistently over instructional periods. Second, the average scores of student self-, objective, and teacher-assessments were 73.15, 35.72, and 26.60, respectively. The result of student self-assessment on scientific creativity tended to be higher than those of formula and teacher. Third, among the three types of assessment on scientific creativity, a strong correlation appeared between teacher- and objective assessment (r=.974), but neither between student self- and objective (r=.161) nor between student self- and teacher- (r=.213). Fourth, the scores on originality component had a positive correlation between teacher- and objective assessment (r=.713). The scores of student self- and teacher-assessments had a significant correlation too (r=.315), but not between student self- and objective assessment (r=.279). Fifth, the scores on usefulness component did not have a significant correlation between student self- and teacher-assessment (r=.155). Sixth, there was no significant difference on scientific creativity between student self- and objective assessment [${\chi}^2$(1, n=40)=1.667, p<.197]. Not between student self- and teacher-assessment either [${\chi}^2$(1, n=40)=1.616, p<.204]. On the contrary, there was a significant difference between teacher- and objective assessment [${\chi}^2$(1, n=40)=32.593, p<.000]. Seventh, the students were categorized into four groups according to the levels of their scores by student self- and teacher-assessment. The result showed that factors influencing student self-assessment are inherent in the personality traits of gifted individuals, such as self-esteem and perfectionism. The findings suggested that there are challenges for the educators to make efforts to construct consistent assessment methods for scientific creativity.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제38권4호
• /
• pp.439-452
• /
• 2019

This study aims to compare self- and peer-assessments of science-gifted elementary students' scientific creativity. A science-gifted program on the Pascal's principle was implemented to 40 fifth-graders in the Science-Gifted Education Center for two weeks. After that, students presented their results from a scientific creativity task using the principle in class. The task was to devise a new and useful tool using the principle, and it included the students' self-assessment about their idea. During presentation, students were asked to assess the works of peers and write down the reasons that they gave the scores they gave. Shortly, student self- and peer-assessments about students' scientific creativity outcomes were compared. Based on two essential components of creativity, ideas that satisfy both originality and usefulness can be counted as scientifically creative. The main results of this study are as follows: First, the average scores of student self- and peer-assessments were 71.5 and 61.9. Second, the standard deviations of student self- and peer-assessments were 14.47 and 5.79. Third, among scientific creativity, originality, usefulness scores, only originality had a significant correlation between student self- and peer-assessment (r=.42). Fourth, the students were categorized into four groups according to the levels of their scores by student self- and peer-assessment. And the frequencies of peer-assessment group had a significant difference at p<0.05 level, according to self-assessment group (Chi Square=4.0000, df=1, p=0.0455). Fifth, through a case study by group, the results suggesting that self-assessment could be affected by the students' self-efficacy and perfectionism and such effect could also influence peer-assessment have been found. The result showed that how the student self- and peer-assessment of scientific creativity are different and what the students' thoughts on the evaluation of scientific creativity are. The findings suggested that there are several things to consider for the educators to make efforts to construct consistent assessment methods for scientific creativity.

• 대한예방한의학회지
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.37-53
• /
• 2022

Objectives : This study analyzed the concordance between student self-assessment and peer-evaluation in a role play using the Clinical Performance Examination (CPX) scenario developed based on Korean medical syndrome differentiation. Methods : The subjects of this study are first-year-students majoring in Korean Medicine. The role play based on clinical case was performed in the class of Korean Medicine Classics. Feedback on clinical skill competency got through student self-assessment and peer-evaluation, and this study was compared and analyzed of result. Results : A simple comparison of the results of self-assessment and peer-evaluation in the evaluation results of clinical skill competency may appear to be consistent. However, it was not statistically significant. It is necessary to enhance the discriminative ability in the evaluation of clinical skill competency. It will be possible to improve a bit by relatively increasing the weight of the scores on the items that students expect to respond differently among the evaluation items. In addition, in order to dramatically improve the systemicity and reliability of the evaluation of clinical skill competency itself, it is necessary to introduce the Introduction to Clinical Traditional Korean Medicine (ICTKM) course. Conclusions : Student's self-assessment and peer-evaluation as feedback on clinical skill competency are suitable for the purpose of education and training. However, the reliability of the evaluation was not statistically significant.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제41권1호
• /
• pp.134-149
• /
• 2022

본 연구의 목적은 초등 과학 지도교사 3인의 학생 평가 전문성을 파악하고, 이를 신장시키기 위한 전략적인 방안을 탐색하는데 있다. 연구는 질적 사례 연구 방법으로 진행되었으며, 자료수집을 위해 자기 인식 체크리스트, 심층 면담을 실시하였다. 자료 분석은 연구자를 포함한 과정 중심 평가 선도 교원 2인과 초등 과학 교육 전문가 2인의 검토와 합의를 거쳤다. 그 결과, 연구 참여자 3인의 학생 평가 전문성 자기 인식 수준은 비교적 높았지만, 공통적으로 결과 환류 영역의 척도 평균이 가장 낮았다. 또한 연구 참여자들의 학생 평가 전문성은 서로 다른 수준과 특징을 보였으며, 학생 평가 전문성에 대한 인식과 실제의 불일치도 일부 발견되었다. 교사의 학생 평가 전문성 신장을 위해서는 전략적인 지원과 교육이 필요하며, 초등 과학 학생 평가 전문성 자기 진단 도구개발이 선행되어야 할 것이다.

• Child Health Nursing Research
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.117-125
• /
• 2016

Purpose: This study was done to examine the effect of direct practice of newborn health assessment on nursing student's clinical competence and self-efficacy and to propose effective strategies for clinical education on newborn care. Methods: Design was a nonequivalent control group quasi-experimental study. The direct practice program was composed of a lecture, demonstration, drill and feedback using a manikin, and repeated direct practice regarding newborn health assessment. Participants were 65 student nurses taking the pediatric nursing practicum in the nursery room at M hospital. The experimental group (n=33) participated in the direct practice program for newborn health assessment and the control group (n=32) received the traditional practice method. Nursing clinical competence was assessed by two nurse investigators and structured questionnaires were used to measure self-efficacy. Results: The experimental group's clinical competence was significantly higher than that of the control group (t=-4.82, p=.000). However no significant difference was found between the two groups for self-efficacy (t=1.264, p=.211). Conclusion: These findings indicate that the direct practice program is effective in improving nursing student's clinical competence, but it was not effective in increasing self-efficacy. Direct practice in various clinical education settings is recommended and longitudinal effects be evaluated.

• 대한화학회지
• /
• 제67권4호
• /
• pp.253-270
• /
• 2023

이 연구는 중학교 과학 수업에서 학생주도평가가 성취정서와 과학개념이해에 미치는 영향에 대해 알아보는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이를 위해 중소도시 소재 중학교 3학년 7학급 중 실험집단으로 선정된 4개 학급은 학생주도평가를 실시하고, 비교 집단(3개 학급)은 교사주도평가를 실시하였다. 학생주도평가는 학습자가 주도적으로 학습 목표 설정과 평가 기준을 개발하여 자기평가와 동료평가를 실시하는 4단계로 구성하였고, 개발한 7개 평가 활동을 수행하였다. 연구 결과, 학생주도평가는 긍정적 성취정서를 향상시키고, 부정적 성취정서를 완화시키는데 효과를 보였으며 중학생의 과학개념이해를 향상시켰다. 학생들은 학습목표 설정에 주도적으로 참여하고, 평가 기준을 개발하여 자기평가와 동료평가를 반복적으로 수행하며 자신의 도달 정도를 파악하고, 학습 과정에서 부족한 점을 보완하는 반복적인 반성적 사고를 거친다. 따라서 학생주도평가는 학습에 대한 책임감을 향상시키고 지속적으로 과학개념이해 정도를 점검할 수 있도록 하여 과학개념이해를 높이는 도구로써 활용될 수 있다.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.279-297
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 2015 개정 교육과정으로 과정 중심 평가가 대두됨에 따라 교실에서 과정 중심 평가의 정착 및 운영을 위한 방안을 모색하고자 하였다. 그 방안으로 자기평가를 통한 과정 중심 평가를 제안하였고 이를 적용한 수업이 초등학교 5학년 학생들의 수학 학업 성취도와 정의적 영역에 미치는 영향을 알아보았다. 연구를 위해 동질성이 검증된 5학년 2개 학급을 선정한 후 실험집단에는 자기 평가를 통한 과정 중심 평가를, 비교집단에는 교사 주도의 과정 중심 평가를 적용한 수업을 실시하였다. 그 결과, 자기 평가를 통한 과정 중심 평가를 적용한 수업은 초등학교 5학년 학생들의 수학 학업 성취도를 유의미하게 향상시켰다. 실험집단의 정의적 영역은 유의미하게 변화하지는 않았으나 학생들의 소감문과 면담 자료를 분석한 결과 본 수업을 통해 수학에 대한 흥미와 자신감을 더 갖게 되었음을 알 수 있었다.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.253-273
• /
• 2007

This study explores issues on how students' variables are related to their educational achievement in English subject. The National Assessment of Educational Achievement (NAEA) is conduced every year to measure educational progress and achievement, and to monitor the quality of education at the national level and appropriateness of the national curriculum. It also serves the purpose to collect background information affecting educational achievement. The background information is gathered by using questionnaires for students, teachers and school administrators. Among the student variables in the national level educational achievement assessment is self-regulated learning, which is composed of self-efficacy, self-control and learning strategy. In the NAEA in 2005 it was found that the features of self-regulated learning were significantly correlated to test scores in English. The findings from the analysis of the trends of the relationships between test scores in English and information on students' self-regulated learning provide implications for the national curriculum as well as for learning and teaching.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.123-133
• /
• 1999

For an appropriate assessment in mathematics, students should play an active role in their learning by becoming aware of what they have learned in mathematics and by being able to assess their attainment of mathematical knowledge. The process of actively examining and monitoring students' own progress in learning and understanding of their mathematical knowledge, process, and attitude is called self-assessment, Researchers in mathematics education have found some important facts about the meta-cognitive process which is related to self-assessment : i. e. meta-cognition progress is composed of being aware of ones' own personal thinking of content knowledge and cognitive process(self-awareness) and engagement in self-evaluation. Tipical method for self-assessment in mathematics developed upon above finding about meta-cognitive progress is describing about students' knowledge and their problem solving strategies. In the beginning of the description in mathematics about themselves, students are required to answer which part they know and which part they don't know. Self-assessment of students' attitudes and dispositions can be just as important as assessment of their specific mathematical abilities. To make the self-assessment method a success, teachers should let students' have confidence and earn their cooperation by let them overcoming fear to be known the their ability to other students. In conclusion, self-assessment encourages students to assume an active role in development of mathematical power. For teachers, student self-assessment activities can provide a prism through which the development of students' mathematical power can be viewed.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.409-432
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 최근 과정 중심 평가의 중요성과 함께 주목 받고 있는 형성평가의 정착 및 운영을 위한 방안을 모색하고자 하였다. 그 방안의 하나로 설정한 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가가 초등학교 4학년 학생들의 수학 학업 성취도와 수학적 태도에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 본 연구를 진행하기 위해 동질성이 검증된 실험집단과 비교집단을 선정하여 실험집단에는 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가를, 비교집단에는 본인 확인피드백을 통한 형성평가를 실시하였다. 그 결과, 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가는 학생들의 수학 학업 성취도를 향상시키고, 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가는 수학적 태도도 긍정적으로 변화시켰다. 이는 학생 상호피드백을 통한 형성평가가 초등학생들의 수학 학습에 있어서 인지적, 정의적 측면에 유의미한 영향을 미쳤다고 볼 수 있다.