• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제45권5호
• /
• pp.238-251
• /
• 2021

It is understood that carriers evaluate several features of ports when fixing the T/S port. Those features can be enumerated as Geographic condition of port, Service network with overseas ports, Level of port productivity, Port infrastructure, Port services level, Port Authority's Policy direction mand Cost competitiveness. The objectives of this study are to: 1) determine if those factors could affect the T/S competitiveness of the port; and 2) to evaluate how Busan port conforms to those determinants factors in such extent. According to results of the analysis after surveying National global carrier, Intra-Asia carriers, Global overseas carriers, Terminal operators, and Busan Port Authority known to be highly influential samples, all factors were proven to be factors affecting the T/S competitiveness of the port. Meanwhile, in the analysis through AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) methodology about the order of weight among those factors, Cost competitiveness was answered as the most important factor. On the other hand, in the analysis to find the situation if Busan port conforms to those factors, Busan port was proven to satisfy those conditions to a moderate extent. In the analysis about the order of strength among those factors, Busan port was answered to have the highest strength in the geographic condition. However, it showed the bottom level of strength in the Cost competitiveness which was answered as the most important factor among samples for determining the T/S competitiveness of the port. This indicates that Government and Port Authority of Busan have to concentrate policy capabilities on the improvement of cost competitiveness of Busan port to enhance the T/S competitiveness. In this paper, four policy recommendations are given : Integration of Busan port operation into New port, Combining multiple operators into one or a few, Attracting Global mega carriers as the New port terminal operators, and Continuous Infrastructure expansion.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.19-40
• /
• 2013

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) achieved relatively rapid economic growth over the past decade. Sustainable growth among member states, however, is put into question due to macroeconomic challenges, political risk, and vulnerability to external shocks. Developed countries, in contrast, have turned into less labor-intensive technologies to further expand their economies. In this paper, we review the science, technology, and innovation (STI) policies and statuses of the scientific and technological capabilities of the ASEAN member countries. Empirical results based on STI indicators (R&D spending, publications, patents, and knowledge economy indices) reveal considerable variation between the science and technology (S&T) competence and effectiveness of STI policies of ASEAN members. We have categorized nations into clusters according their situations in their S&T productivity. Under the Korean Innovation Model, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Brunei are classified as being in the institutional-building stage, while Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam in the catch up stage, and Singapore in the post-catch up stage. Finally, policy prescriptions on how to enhance the S&T capabilities of the developing ASEAN countries, based on the South Korea development experience, are presented.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.148-182
• /
• 2022

This study analyzed changes in the national research facilities & equipment (RFE) policies historically promoted by the Rho administration (2003~2007), Lee administration (2008~2012), Park administration (2013~2016), and Moon administration (2017~2019) in South Korea. By adding new variables such as policy goals and policy means to a model suggested by Hogwood and Peters (1983), policy change types and their flow could be better classified. Korean RFE policies showed various flows in the policy change types instead of a general flow, which is the order of policy innovation -> policy innovation -> policy succession -> policy succession. This finding indicates that each administration could pursue a higher-level policy change purposively. It is highly required to prepare policy development that devotes to organizing and operating a national council, reflecting in the government's comprehensive plan after evaluating policy effectiveness, improving items needed for the RFE status survey, and unifying the research equipment registration.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제18권1호
• /
• pp.11-19
• /
• 2015

본 논문은 전 생애주기에 걸쳐 나타나는 우리나라 과학기술인력의 경력이탈 규모와 현황을 추정하는 데 일차적인 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 먼저 과학기술인력의 경력이탈에 대한 조작적 정의를 내리고 이를 분석할 수 있는 기본틀을 크게 인재확보 단계와 활용단계로 구분하여 구축하였다. 이 틀에 입각하여 경력이탈 현황을 진단해 본 결과, 우리나라 과학기술인력의 경력이탈은 주로 활용단계에서 나타나고 양적 이탈보다는 창조경제시대를 이끌어갈 우수 인재의 이탈이라는 질적 이탈 문제가 심각한 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 생산가능인구 감소시대를 맞이할 경우 이러한 질적 이탈 문제는 더욱 심각해질 수 있으므로, 좋은 일자리 확보와 경력개발 경로 구축 등의 정책을 우선적으로 추진할 필요가 있다는 대안을 제시하고 있다.

• 정보처리학회논문지:소프트웨어 및 데이터공학
• /
• 제4권9호
• /
• pp.409-418
• /
• 2015

IoT 환경에서는 정확한 정보의 전달을 위하여 사용자의 상황에 따라 수집된 정보를 추론하여 새로운 정보, 즉 상황 정보를 생성하는 것이 중요하다. 본 논문에서는 IoT 환경에서 센싱 되는 민감한 정보를 보호하기 위해 상황인식을 통한 정보의 접근제어 기법을 제안하고자 한다. 이는 사용자의 상황을 고려하여 접근을 허가하는 접근권한 관리에 중점을 두고 있으며 승인되지 않은 사용자가 네트워크에 저장되어있는 데이터에의 접근 제약(접근제어 정책)을 둔다. 이를 위해 기존에 연구된 CP-ABE 기반의 상황 정보 접근제어 기법에 대해 분석한 후, 상황 정보의 범위에 동적인 상황을 포함시켜, 확장된 다차원 상황 속성(Context Attribute)을 반영하는 접근제어 정책을 제안한다. 본 논문에서는 동적인 상황을 고려한 접근제어 정책을 IoT 센서퓨전 환경에 적합하도록 설계하였다. 따라서 기존의 연구와 비교해 데이터의 다양성 확보 및 정확한 정보의 수집이 가능하고, 기존 상황 속성의 확장이 가능하다는 장점을 갖는다.

• 정보관리연구
• /
• 제36권4호
• /
• pp.199-215
• /
• 2005

과학기술 전문가 커뮤니티로서 가장 성공적인 모델인 '한민족과학기술자네트워크(이하 KOSEN)'를 대상으로 정책 네트워크의 분석방법을 이용하여 네트워크가 갖는 고유의 특성을 유형별로 분석해 보고자 한다. 과학기술 전문인력을 대상으로 하는 KOSEN을 사례로 정책 네트워크 분석을 적용, 지식전문가 네트워크의 유형을 구분해 보았다. KOSEN에 대한 개괄적인 특성분석과 더불어 참여자의 특성에 따라 전문가 그룹 네트워크를 정책공동체의 핵심 및 주변공동체와 이슈 네트워크로 세분화했다. 정책 네트워크의 분석수준과 관련하여 본 연구는 네트워크의 속성을 개인의 행위로 환원시켜서 이해하는 미시적 접근에 초점을 두었다.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2013

As the value and role of intellectual property increases in our knowledge-based economy, countries around the world have exerted various efforts to secure, utilize, and protect their intellectual property. The present study diagnoses the level of IP infrastructure of major OECD countries and analyzes their characteristics and impact. According to the diagnosis, the US, Switzerland, and Germany form a leading group followed by the mid-level countries of Korea, Ireland, Australia, and France, with Spain and Italy in the bottom group. In contrast to Korea's competitiveness in S&T and R&D infrastructures, its competitiveness in IP infrastructure is lower than the OECD average. This is thought to be due to Korea's IP infrastructure being hastily formed under the influence of international pressures rather than having been gradually built up by internal needs. A TFP analysis of the impact of IP infrastructure on economic growth shows IP infrastructure positively influences economic growth. Though this analysis is limited due to inability to secure sufficient data and indicators, it is a useful guide for understanding the nature and key characteristics of IP infrastructure.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.145-163
• /
• 2020

The COVID-19 is a pandemic that affects all facets of our life and will change many patterns in science technology and innovation. A qualitative study was conducted using Focus Group Interview involving ten industry-academia-research experts with the objective of identifying changes in Korea's national innovation system and science & technology policy after the COVID-19. Eight questions were designed, based on the major components of the national innovation system, such as companies, universities, and research institutes, to discuss the changes in the national innovation system and science & technology policy. Also, keyword analysis and cluster analysis were performed using the network analysis program VOSviewer. It is predicted that, in the wake of the COVID-19, Korea's national innovation system will shift to a new paradigm that is more decentralized, responsive, and autonomous. Furthermore, several policy agendas that can turn these changes into positive momentum of change in science & technology policy are presented.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.110-148
• /
• 2016

This study examines the technical level of North Korea's S&T and identifies areas for potential North-South cooperation. First, North Korean media is analyzed for situations and trends from 2010 to 2015. Despite some commendable achievements, North Korean S&T remains lacking in basic science and commercialization potential. Despite an awareness of the importance of international cooperation, North Korea is hampered by international sanctions and their own caution, consequently concentrating their efforts on China. Details of their cooperation reflect their interests and needs to a certain extent, although their collaborations were mainly in the form of meetings and conferences rather than active joint research. To assess the potential areas of cooperation with South Korea, this study also draws on interviews with NGOs and professionals working with North Korea. The country's present situation is analyzed and some practical examples of possible cooperation is suggested. North Korea has the potential to expand its cooperation not only with South Korea but with many other countries. North Korea also promisingly expresses interest in cooperation.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.325-342
• /
• 2019

Gendered innovation in Science, Technology and Innovation, which seeks better science for both men and women by integrating sex and gender analysis, has become an important issue in the entire process of STI, as initiated by the European Commission, Canadian Institutes of Health Research in Canada and the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Korea has also attempted to reflect gendered innovations in Science and Technology as a critical factor in the 3rd and 4th National Plan, followed by the Act on Women Scientists and Engineers (2002). Against this background, the aim of this study is to prioritize the policy instruments regarding gendered innovation in Research and Development. Through the Focus Group Interview (FGI) and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), this study attempts to set the priority among selected criteria, various types of policy instruments, and the applied research development area. As a result, this study shows the preparation of the relevant legal and institutional mechanisms for the full introduction of gendered innovation in S&T, and the importance of various policy instruments for S&T innovation in the fields of planning, budgeting, managing national R&D projects, evaluating and impact assessment, etc., being derived in a systematic way to ensure their effectiveness.