DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Historical Change of Policies on Research Facilities and Equipment of South Korea

  • Hwang, ByungSang (National Research Facilities & Equipment Center, KBSI) ;
  • Park, JiYoung (University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2022.08.04
  • Accepted : 2022.08.27
  • Published : 2022.08.31

Abstract

This study analyzed changes in the national research facilities & equipment (RFE) policies historically promoted by the Rho administration (2003~2007), Lee administration (2008~2012), Park administration (2013~2016), and Moon administration (2017~2019) in South Korea. By adding new variables such as policy goals and policy means to a model suggested by Hogwood and Peters (1983), policy change types and their flow could be better classified. Korean RFE policies showed various flows in the policy change types instead of a general flow, which is the order of policy innovation -> policy innovation -> policy succession -> policy succession. This finding indicates that each administration could pursue a higher-level policy change purposively. It is highly required to prepare policy development that devotes to organizing and operating a national council, reflecting in the government's comprehensive plan after evaluating policy effectiveness, improving items needed for the RFE status survey, and unifying the research equipment registration.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to the 11 staff members, including Dr. Euh Duk Jeong, the former director of the National Research Facilities & Equipment Center from the Korea Basic Science Institute, who provided their valuable interviews on this topic. Also, we thank Dr. Jinhyo Joseph Yun of DGIST for useful comments on the draft of this article.

References

  1. Blind, K., Grupp, H., (1999). Interdependencies between the science and technology infrastructure and innovation activities in German regions: empirical findings and policy consequences", Research Policy 28, 451-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00007-4
  2. Caliari, T.; Rapini, M. S.; Chiarini, T., (2020). Research infrastructures in less developed countries: the Brazilian case, Scientometrics 122, 451-475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03245-2
  3. Cho, M. H.; Park, J. W.; Lee, H. J., (2014). Regulation issues for the efficient management of national research facilities and equipment, Hannam Journal of Law & Technology 20(1), 497-530. Institute for Law of Science & Technology, Hannam University. https://doi.org/10.32430/ilst.2014.20.1.497
  4. Chung, C.-K. et al., (2003). Policy Sciences, Pakyoungsa. Korea.
  5. Diercks, G., Larsen, H. and Steward, F., (2019). Transformative innovation policy: Addressing variety in an emerging policy paradigm. Research Policy 48, 880-894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.028
  6. Faber, A., Kemp, R., Van der Veen, G., (2008). Innovation Policy for the Environment in the Netherlands and the EU. Innovation Policy in Europe: Measurement and Strategy: Cheltenham, UK, pp. 171-202.
  7. Hall, Peter. A., (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policy making in Britain. Comparative Politics 25(3), 275-296. https://doi.org/10.2307/422246
  8. Hall, Phoebe, Land, H., Parker, R., Webb, A., (1975). Change, Choice, and Conflict in Social Policy; London: Heinemann Education Books, UK.
  9. Hogwood, B., Peters, B. G., (1983). Policy Dynamics, New York: St. Mar-tin's Press.
  10. Hong, J. K., (2012). Research on the user-oriented service innovation in the research equipment infrastructure, Doctoral Thesis, The Graduate School of Konkuk University. Korea.
  11. Hong, J. K.; Chung, S., (2011). Research on Characteristics Classification of Regional Operation System of the Shared Research Instrument: Exploratory Case Study of Gyeonggi Region, Korea, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society 14(1), 833-859.
  12. Hong, S. G., Lim, Y.C., (2000). Conceptual framework for the direction of improvement in the 21st century national innovation system. Science & Technology Policy 120, Science and Technology Policy Institute.
  13. Howlett M., Ramesh, M., (1998). Policy Subsystem Configurations and Policy Change: Operationalizing the Postpositivist Analysis of the Politics of the Policy Process, Policy Studies Journal 26(3), 466-481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1998.tb01913.x
  14. Hwang, ByungSang., (2005). Influence Factors and Improvements in the Policy Implementation of Research Equipment Joint Utilization, Proceedings of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 350-369. Korea Technology Innovation Society.
  15. Hwang, ByungSang., (2013). Environment and Growth, Yidam Books, Korea.
  16. Irvin, J., B, Martin, D. Griffiths, and R. Gathier, (1997). Equipping Science for the 21th Century, Edward Elgar.
  17. Justman, M., Teubal, M., (1995). Technological Infrastructure Policy (TIP): Creating Capabilities and Building Markets, Research Policy 24(2), 259-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)00765-L
  18. Kang, Keun-Bok et al., (2016). Policy Sciences, Dae Young Company, Korea.
  19. Kim, C. Y. et al., (2019). Policy Suggestions for Korean Research Equipment Industry According to the State of Construction of National Research Facility and Equipment by Country of Manufacture: Focusing on Basic and Analytical Science Field, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society 20(5), 322-333, Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2019.20.5.322
  20. Kim, E.-M., Son, J.-Y., Lee, C.-G., (2018). A Policy Change Management Strategy for Women's Science and Technology to promote and support using Hogwood and Peters' Policy Change Type Framework", Korea Public Administration Quarterly 30(2), 411-436. https://doi.org/10.21888/KPAQ.2018.6.30.2.411
  21. Kim, Inho et al., (2002). A Survey on Research Equipment Needs and its Management Efficiency, Korea Science and Engineering Foundation, Korea.
  22. Kim, Y. J., Kim, Y.C., (2018). A Study on Similarity Calculation Method between Research Infrastructure, KIPS Review 7(12), 469-476. Korea Information Processing Society.
  23. Ko, Soon-Ju. (1997). Environmental Policy Change in Korea: Facts, Contexts, and Characteristics. Doctoral Thesis, Chungnam National University, Korea.
  24. Kruytbosch, C. E., (1997). The Role of Instrumentation in Advancing the Frontiers of Science, Equipping Science for the 21st Century, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
  25. Kwon, G. H., Cha, Y. J., Lee, H. J., (2007). An Evaluation Model for the Major Science Research Facilities and Equipment to Enhance the Competitiveness of the Science and Technology: A Focus on the Test of Reliability and Validity of the Model", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society 10(1), 121-142, Korea Technology Innovation Society.
  26. Kwon, G. H. et al., (2006). An Analysis of Investment Priorities for the Major Science Facilities and Equipment to Enhance the Competitiveness of Science and Technology, Korea Policy Sciences Review 10(1), 101-123.
  27. Lee, C. W. et al., (2003). A Research on Establishment and Operation on Large Research Equipment and Facilities, Ministry of Science and Technology, Korea.
  28. Management Committee of National Science & Technology Committee. (2009). National research facilities & equipment enlargement and management advancement method. 38th Management Committee of National Science & Technology Committee, Korea.
  29. Management Committee of National Science & Technology Committee. (2010). National research facilities and equipment enlargement and management growth promotion method achievements and future plans, 48th Management Committee of National Science & Technology Committee, Korea.
  30. Management Committee of National Science & Technology Council. (2013). National research facilities and equipment management/utilization promotion plan (2013~2017). Issue 5, 1st Management Committee of National Science & Technology Council, Korea.
  31. Management Committee of National Science & Technology Council. (2014) National research facilities and equipment management/utilization promotion enforcement plan. Issue 19, 7th Management Committee of National Science & Technology Council. Korea.
  32. Management Committee of National Science & Technology Council. (2018). National research facilities and equipment management/utilization promotion plan (2018~2022). 33rd Management Committee of National Science & Technology Council. Korea.
  33. Ministry of Planning and Budget. Report on Government-funded research institutes' introduction use of expensive equipment, Korea, (1999).
  34. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning. (2013). National Research Facilities & Equipment Trends 2012, Korea.
  35. Ministry of Science and ICT. (2018). National Research Facilities and Equipment Trends 2017. Korea.
  36. Ministry of Science and ICT. (2019a). National Research Facilities and Equipment Trends 2018. Korea.
  37. Ministry of Science and ICT. (2020a). Standard Guidelines for National RFE Management.
  38. Ministry of Science and ICT. (2020b). Manual for National RFE Management.
  39. National Research Facilities & Equipment Center. (2011). NFEC Work Performance and Plan Report 2010. Korea.
  40. National Research Facilities & Equipment Center. (2012). NFEC Work Performance and Plan Report 2011. Korea.
  41. National Research Facilities & Equipment Center. (2013). NFEC Work Performance and Plan Report 2012. Korea.
  42. National Research Facilities & Equipment Center. (2014). NFEC Work Performance and Plan Report 2013. Korea.
  43. National Research Facilities & Equipment Center. (2015). NFEC Work Performance and Plan Report 2014. Korea.
  44. National Research Facilities & Equipment Center. (2016). NFEC Work Performance and Plan Report 2015. Korea.
  45. National Research Facilities & Equipment Center. (2017). NFEC Work Performance and Plan Report 2016. Korea.
  46. National Research Facilities & Equipment Center. (2018). NFEC Work Performance and Plan Report 2017. Korea.
  47. National Research Facilities & Equipment Center. (2019). NFEC Work Performance and Plan Report 2018. Korea.
  48. National Research Facilities & Equipment Center. (2020). NFEC Work Performance and Plan Report 2019. Korea.
  49. National Science & Technology Committee. (2011). National Research Facilities and Equipment Trends 2010, Korea.
  50. Nelson, R. (ed.), (1993). National Innovation Systems - A Comparative Analysis; Oxford: Oxford University Press: New York, U.
  51. Noh S. C. et al., (2018). Preliminary research for the foundation of the international technology cooperation system for large research facilities, Institute of Science, Technology and Strategy, Korea.
  52. Park, Haeryong. (1990). A Study on Policy Change (II), Korean Public Administration Quarterly 2, 119-130. Korean Association of Governmental Studies.
  53. Pollitt, C., Bouckaert, G., (2009). Continuity and Change in Public Policy and Management. Edward Elgar.
  54. Riggs, W., Hippel, E., (1994). Incentives to Innovate and the Source of Innovation: The Case of Scientific Instruments, Research Policy 23, 459-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)90008-6
  55. Rose, R., (1976). The Dynamics of Public Policy; A Comparative Analysis; London & Beverly Hills, Sage Publications, London, UK.
  56. Schot, J. and Steinmueller, W. E., (2018). Three Frames for Innovation Policy: R&D, Systems of Innovation and Transformative Change, Research Policy 47, 1554-1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
  57. Science & Technology Related Ministerial Conference. (2006). Pan-ministerial research facilities and equipment joint utilization promotion method, Issue 1, 20th Science & technology related ministerial meeting, Korea.
  58. Science & Technology Related Ministerial Conference. (2007). Pan-ministerial research facilities and equipment joint utilization promotion specific promotion method, Issue 3, 24th Science & technology related ministerial meeting. Korea.
  59. Seol, S.S., Kim, I., (2006). Distribution Patterns of Research Equipment in Korea", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society 9(3), 471-495.
  60. Stephan, P. F., Levin S. G., (1992). Striking the Mother Load in Science: The Importance of Age, Place, and Time. Oxford University Press, New York. USA.
  61. Tassey, G., (1991). The Function of Technology Infrastructure in a Competitive Economy, Research Policy 20(4), 345-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(91)90094-7
  62. Tomaskova, H. et al., (2019). The Business Process Model and Notation of Open Innovation: The Process of Developing Medical Instrument, Journal of Open Innovation; Technology, Market, and Complexity 5, 101; doi:10.3390/joitmc5040101.
  63. Yang, Seung Il., (2011). An analysis on the Type about Change of Regional Development Policy: Application of Amended Hogwood and Peters' Theory about the new Administrative Capital City Construction Policy, The Korea Local Administration Review 25(1), 157-187. https://doi.org/10.22783/KRILA.2011.25.1.157
  64. Yang, Seung Il., (2014). Policy Change, Pakyoungsa, Korea.
  65. Yang, Seung Il., (2015). An analysis on the verification of the policy change types stream framework: Focus on the Four-Rivers Refurbishment Project, Korea Public Administration Review 49(2), 507-530. https://doi.org/10.18333/KPAR.49.2.507
  66. Yi, Chan-Goo., (2015). Development of Management System in Research Equipment in Basic Research Program, Journal of Social Science 26(1), 269-296. Institute for Social Science, Chungnam National University. https://doi.org/10.16881/jss.2015.01.26.1.269
  67. Yi, Chan-Goo., (2016). Effective Implementation Strategies for Co-Utilization Policy of Research Equipment: From the Perspective of Bottom-up Approach in Policy Implementation, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society 19(2), 358-394.
  68. Yoon, Donghun., (2018). The policy conflict research of interested parties for the efficient management of research equipment: With focus on the government and the scientist, Cogent Business & Management 5, 1475877. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1475877
  69. You, Kyung Man et al., (2008). Efficient expansion of research facilities and equipment and institutionalization of joint utilization, Korea Basic Science Institute, Korea.
  70. You, Kyung Man et al., (2015). Research on performance management system for joint utilization of research facilities and equipment, Korea Basic Science Institute, Korea.
  71. You, Kyung Man et al., (2019). A study on the Mid to Long Term Planning for the Construction of Large Research Infrastructure. Korea Basic Science Institute, Korea.
  72. Yun, Sujin., (2017). Policy Evaluation of the Large-scale Research Facility by Period: Focusing on PSL-II Accelerator, Journal of Technology Innovation 25(4), 285-311. https://doi.org/10.14386/SIME.2017.25.4.285
  73. Yun, J.J., Liu, Z., (2019). Micro- and Macro-Dynamics of Open Innovation with a Quadruple-Helix Model. Sustainability 11, 3301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123301