DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Prioritization of Policy for Gendered Innovations

  • Hwangbo, Wonju (Dept. of Content Convergence, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Park, Young Il (Dept. of Content Convergence, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Lee, Heisook (Center for Gendered Innovation in Science & Technology Research)
  • 투고 : 2019.10.23
  • 심사 : 2019.11.29
  • 발행 : 2019.12.31

초록

Gendered innovation in Science, Technology and Innovation, which seeks better science for both men and women by integrating sex and gender analysis, has become an important issue in the entire process of STI, as initiated by the European Commission, Canadian Institutes of Health Research in Canada and the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Korea has also attempted to reflect gendered innovations in Science and Technology as a critical factor in the 3rd and 4th National Plan, followed by the Act on Women Scientists and Engineers (2002). Against this background, the aim of this study is to prioritize the policy instruments regarding gendered innovation in Research and Development. Through the Focus Group Interview (FGI) and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), this study attempts to set the priority among selected criteria, various types of policy instruments, and the applied research development area. As a result, this study shows the preparation of the relevant legal and institutional mechanisms for the full introduction of gendered innovation in S&T, and the importance of various policy instruments for S&T innovation in the fields of planning, budgeting, managing national R&D projects, evaluating and impact assessment, etc., being derived in a systematic way to ensure their effectiveness.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ammons, D. (2014) Municipal Benchmarks: Assessing Local Performance and Establishing Community Standards, Routledge.
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2019) Sex and Gender Analysis in Health Research, Available at http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/50833.html
  3. Dunn, W.N. (1994) Public Policy Analyst: An Introduction, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Prentice-Hall.
  4. GAO (United States General Accounting Office) (2010) Drug safety: most drugs withdrawn in recent years had greater health risks for women, Drugs Withdrawn From Market, GAO-01-286R.
  5. Global Research Council (2017) Statement of Principles and Actions Promoting the Equality and Status of Women in Research, Available: May 12, 2018
  6. Horizon (2013) Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013 of The European Parliament and of the Council of 11.
  7. Hwangbo, W.J. (2019) A Study on Technology Assessment Model for New Technologies (in Korean), PhD Dissertation, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  8. Leach, W.D., Pelkey, N.W. and Sabatier, P.A. (2002) Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(4), 645-670. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.10079
  9. National Institute of Health (2016) Policy on Sex as a Biological Variables Article, Available at https://orwh.od.nih.gov /sex-gender/nih-policy-sex-biological-variable
  10. Park, Y.I. (1996) A Study on R&D Planning, Execution, and Evaluation of National R&D Program: HAN Projects Case (in Korean), PhD Dissertation, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Taejon, Korea.
  11. Saaty, R.W. (1987) The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used, Mathematical Modelling, 9(3-5), 165.
  12. Schiebinger, L and Klinge, I. (2013) Gendered Innovations-How Gender Analysis Contributes to Research, Luxembourg, European Commision, European Union
  13. Schiebinger, L., Klinge, I., Paik, H.Y., Sanchez de Madariaga, I., Schraudner, M. and Stefanick, M. (2018) Gendered innovations in science, health & medicine, engineering and environment, Available at http://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/, Accessed on Jan.11, 2018